Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns [Last update: 14-Apr-24]

[InvoKing]

Following on with Decoded, an update should also be made in the OP.

There are plenty of new signature campaigns that have not yet been added to this list.

These are:
-Snip-

Limited time campaigns from 1 to 8 weeks... I think these ICO signature campaigns should have a separate topic or a table or a section inside the current table for it!
In a separate comment about other signature campaigns which could not pay the users if they didn't reach X amount... Better to permanently ban/tag them (and all the users behind it), it is just a professional scam attempt!!!

4 from these 6 six campaigns have escrowed funds by campaign manager, so payments is guaranteed. In this case, there are no diference from all usual signature campaigns. I don't think that separate thread is neccessary.
And why to ban/thag them? If you call it as scam attempt, just don't invest in these ICOs. Maybe next time you will ask to ban signature campaigns of gambling websites, because people loosing money in gambling?

I said about other signature campaigns not those listed.
Some signature campaigns ask you to wear their signature +/- their avatar for X time then in case they didn't collect X amount they will not pay anyone!
This is ridiculous and scammy behaviour. Ofc I blame the users that joined this scam which isn't different than the shit posted in bitcointalk investors' scam board...

[1713492473]

1713492473

[1713492473]

1713492473

[2bfree]

I tried to get into one of these just to see how they work but no one would let me in. I really don't care because it's less then $100 Euro a month I make more then that a day trading coins not sure why so many people fight for these things for such low payments??

[LTU_btc]

Following on with Decoded, an update should also be made in the OP.

There are plenty of new signature campaigns that have not yet been added to this list.

These are:
-Snip-

Limited time campaigns from 1 to 8 weeks... I think these ICO signature campaigns should have a separate topic or a table or a section inside the current table for it!
In a separate comment about other signature campaigns which could not pay the users if they didn't reach X amount... Better to permanently ban/tag them (and all the users behind it), it is just a professional scam attempt!!!

4 from these 6 six campaigns have escrowed funds by campaign manager, so payments is guaranteed. In this case, there are no diference from all usual signature campaigns. I don't think that separate thread is neccessary.
And why to ban/thag them? If you call it as scam attempt, just don't invest in these ICOs. Maybe next time you will ask to ban signature campaigns of gambling websites, because people loosing money in gambling?

I said about other signature campaigns not those listed.
Some signature campaigns ask you to wear their signature +/- their avatar for X time then in case they didn't collect X amount they will not pay anyone!
This is ridiculous and scammy behaviour. Ofc I blame the users that joined this scam which isn't different than the shit posted in bitcointalk investors' scam board...

Such ICO campaigns without guaranteed payments aren't listed on this thread anymore:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.msg22314205#msg22314205

[InvoKing]

Such ICO campaigns without guaranteed payments aren't listed on this thread anymore:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.msg22314205#msg22314205

That's what should happens, i think i will ask to fight it in the meta board 

[Coiner_]

@Fatanut, Narbonne is done:

Unfortunately The Narbonne team has decided to end the signature campaign.I will be counting posts later today and payments will roll out maximum by tomorrow.

Following on with Decoded, an update should also be made in the OP.

There are plenty of new signature campaigns that have not yet been added to this list.

These are:
-Snip-

Limited time campaigns from 1 to 8 weeks... I think these ICO signature campaigns should have a separate topic or a table or a section inside the current table for it!
In a separate comment about other signature campaigns which could not pay the users if they didn't reach X amount... Better to permanently ban/tag them (and all the users behind it), it is just a professional scam attempt!!!

[-- snip --]

I said about other signature campaigns not those listed.
Some signature campaigns ask you to wear their signature +/- their avatar for X time then in case they didn't collect X amount they will not pay anyone!
This is ridiculous and scammy behaviour. Ofc I blame the users that joined this scam which isn't different than the shit posted in bitcointalk investors' scam board...

No, it's not. Repeating "it's scammy behaviour" does not make it one.

Such ICO campaigns without guaranteed payments aren't listed on this thread anymore:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=615953.msg22314205#msg22314205

That's what should happens, i think i will ask to fight it in the meta board  

LOL! Good luck with that.

I tried to get into one of these just to see how they work but no one would let me in. I really don't care because it's less then $100 Euro a month I make more then that a day trading coins not sure why so many people fight for these things for such low payments??

You clearly do care if you put out time to apply and after being rejected (repeatedly?), still bothered to complain here.

[Fatanut]

Following on with Decoded, an update should also be made in the OP.

There are plenty of new signature campaigns that have not yet been added to this list.

These are:

~Snip~

If you guys would just scroll a little, you wouldn't have to link them here because they are already in the latest update.

Plus, some of the campaigns in the services have no guarantee of payment or a "Join at your own risk" campaign. We don't list them here anymore.

[PX-Z]

Coinpayments.net Signature Campaign manage by Lauda is open https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2222129.0

Lets see if how many user will try to enroll this campaign since lauda is the manager lol

[InvoKing]

Coinpayments.net Signature Campaign manage by Lauda is open https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2222129.0

Lets see if how many user will try to enroll this campaign since lauda is the manager lol

I used to be in bitmixer signature campaign like many others participants, no one will get kicked if he isn't spamming. For me, I can't make regularly more than 5-10 posts per week (don't have time)

[InvoKing]

New campaign - btckings -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2223497.0

Members: 0.002 BTC per week
Full members: 0.005 BTC
Senior members: 0.010 BTC
Legendary/Hero: 0.015 BTC

30 min posts

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boosteroid

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2225498.0
Full Members: 0.007 BTC
Senior Members: 0.0125 BTC
Hero/Legendary Members: 0.0225 BTC

30 min posts

[TheQuin]

The BTCKings campaign has some restrictions on withdrawing payments:

PAYMENTS :  
Payments are made directly to your BTCKings.com Poker account  and will be available for withdrawal after  "50 Bonus points" are made, once you recieve your weekly payment an screenshot of your current bonus points should be sent to me for verification purposes.

NOTE : A player should contribute 600 chips to the rake to collect 50 bonus points.
                                                                                    

I'm not sure exactly what even means but, if I'm right, it doesn't look like you can withdraw without gambling your earnings.

[unyil]

The BTCKings campaign has some restrictions on withdrawing payments:

PAYMENTS :  
Payments are made directly to your BTCKings.com Poker account  and will be available for withdrawal after  "50 Bonus points" are made, once you recieve your weekly payment an screenshot of your current bonus points should be sent to me for verification purposes.

NOTE : A player should contribute 600 chips to the rake to collect 50 bonus points.
                                                                                    

I'm not sure exactly what even means but, if I'm right, it doesn't look like you can withdraw without gambling your earnings.

Yes it looks strange to have to collect points to be able to withdraw.

To my knowledge bitsler has no rules to gamble first to be able to withdraw.

 

[mozillaspez]

New campaign - btckings -
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2223497.0

Members: 0.002 BTC per week
Full members: 0.005 BTC
Senior members: 0.010 BTC
Legendary/Hero: 0.015 BTC

30 min posts

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Boosteroid

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2225498.0
Full Members: 0.007 BTC
Senior Members: 0.0125 BTC
Hero/Legendary Members: 0.0225 BTC

30 min posts

No one gets kicked any way from any company until he/she start spamming. I am also do campaign regularly and in my company I have been working since last 4 years and I’m still here and see myself there in future too. And 5-10 posts is not a bad number that is the number of posts I write daily.

[panjul07]

The BTCKings campaign has some restrictions on withdrawing payments:

PAYMENTS :  
Payments are made directly to your BTCKings.com Poker account  and will be available for withdrawal after  "50 Bonus points" are made, once you recieve your weekly payment an screenshot of your current bonus points should be sent to me for verification purposes.

NOTE : A player should contribute 600 chips to the rake to collect 50 bonus points.
                                                                                    

I'm not sure exactly what even means but, if I'm right, it doesn't look like you can withdraw without gambling your earnings.

Yes you're right, participants are forced to play on the ring games to collect the bonus points. Indeed it is not an easy task to do, a participant can even lose all his signature earning but failed to collect enough bonus points. Afaik this rule is being made to make the site looks more active, but I dont think it is good for the participants.

[InvoKing]

The BTCKings campaign has some restrictions on withdrawing payments:

PAYMENTS :  
Payments are made directly to your BTCKings.com Poker account  and will be available for withdrawal after  "50 Bonus points" are made, once you recieve your weekly payment an screenshot of your current bonus points should be sent to me for verification purposes.

NOTE : A player should contribute 600 chips to the rake to collect 50 bonus points.
                                                                                    

I'm not sure exactly what even means but, if I'm right, it doesn't look like you can withdraw without gambling your earnings.

Yes you're right, participants are forced to play on the ring games to collect the bonus points. Indeed it is not an easy task to do, a participant can even lose all his signature earning but failed to collect enough bonus points. Afaik this rule is being made to make the site looks more active, but I dont think it is good for the participants.

@ fatanut / Mitchell
Better to remove btckings from the list if they are forcing users to gamble their earning before withdrawing it...

-snip-

No one gets kicked any way from any company until he/she start spamming. I am also do campaign regularly and in my company I have been working since last 4 years and I’m still here and see myself there in future too. And 5-10 posts is not a bad number that is the number of posts I write daily.

Your campaign just started yesterday afaik. Stop spamming!

[STT]

"
I'm not sure exactly what even means but, if I'm right, it doesn't look like you can withdraw without gambling your earnings."

This is standard revenue turnover requirements for many gambling companies.   The monies free but only after you win it back from us, so the campaign is not paying cash its giving an opportunity at free tickets.    I dont know about now but I've seen old campaigns by bet sites that would do this on top of payment not instead of !   So its more then a little cheeky and any payment should be listed as zero plus the free gambling.   Maybe thats ok by some people especially if they take lower ranks

[zoomzoom]

Please remove earnfreecoin campaign, thanks.

[TheQuin]

"
I'm not sure exactly what even means but, if I'm right, it doesn't look like you can withdraw without gambling your earnings."

This is standard revenue turnover requirements for many gambling companies.   The monies free but only after you win it back from us, so the campaign is not paying cash its giving an opportunity at free tickets.    I dont know about now but I've seen old campaigns by bet sites that would do this on top of payment not instead of !   So its more then a little cheeky and any payment should be listed as zero plus the free gambling.   Maybe thats ok by some people especially if they take lower ranks

Here are your wages but you have to spend them with us. That's not employment that's serfdom.

[PX-Z]

The BTCKings campaign has some restrictions on withdrawing payments:

PAYMENTS :  
Payments are made directly to your BTCKings.com Poker account  and will be available for withdrawal after  "50 Bonus points" are made, once you recieve your weekly payment an screenshot of your current bonus points should be sent to me for verification purposes.

NOTE : A player should contribute 600 chips to the rake to collect 50 bonus points.
                                                                                    

I'm not sure exactly what even means but, if I'm right, it doesn't look like you can withdraw without gambling your earnings.

Yes you're right, participants are forced to play on the ring games to collect the bonus points. Indeed it is not an easy task to do, a participant can even lose all his signature earning but failed to collect enough bonus points. Afaik this rule is being made to make the site looks more active, but I dont think it is good for the participants.

This discussion should not be here. This is not the right place to discuss this topic.

But to reply this if that's true then it might be unfair to the participants of the campaign that's why people keep ignoring the campaign and they get less participants IMO.

[Mitchell]

I've returned from my vacation and updated the OP. Thanks Fatanut!

[Moht]

Daily Update: https://paste.ee/p/4yngj

Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns

|     Advertisement     |

Advertised sites, items, etc are not endorsed and may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
This spot is available. Advertise here

The following abbreviations will be used for campaigns (where applicable):

Campaigns:
Active	||	Currently active
PNYC	||	Payment not yet confirmed
FLUX	||	Campaign in flux between closed and accepting
CFNP	||	Closed for new participants
Term:				Ranks:
p/d	||	post/daily		L	||	Legendary Member
p/w	||	post/weekly		H	||	Hero Member
p/m	||	post/monthly		S	||	Senior Member
f/w	||	fixed/weekly		F	||	Full Member
f/m	||	fixed/monthly		M	||	Member
				J	||	Junior
				N	||	Newbie

All Bitcoin Signature Campaigns

Active

|

Campaign

|

Term

|

L

|

H

|

S

|

F

|

M

|

J

|

N

|

Min

|

Max

|

Escrow

|

|

777Coin

|

p/w

|

.0003

|

.0003

|

.00022

|

.000135

|

.0001

|

.00004

|

x

|

15/w

|

60/w

|

Y/N

|

|

Bitvest

|

p/w

|

.0003

|

.0003

|

.00022

|

.000135

|

.0001

|

.00004

|

x

|

15/w

|

60/w

|

Y/N

|

|

Coinroll

|

p/w

|

**

|

**

|

**

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

N

|

|

Crypterium

|

f/w

|

.025

|

.025

|

.0125

|

.007

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

|

Enjin Coin

|

p/w

|

.0008

|

.0007

|

.0006

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

10/w

|

30/w

|

N

|

|

Ice Rock

|

f/w

|

.03

|

.03

|

.02

|

.01

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

|

Graft

|

f/w

|

.012

|

.012

|

.01

|

.004

|

.0015

|

x

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

NitrogenSports

|

p/w

|

.0003

|

.00025

|

.0002

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

10/w

|

20/w

|

Y/N

|

|

Synapse

|

f/w

|

.03

|

.03

|

.02

|

.01

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

vDice

|

f/m

|

.04

|

.04

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

80/m

|

x

|

N

|

PNYC

|

Campaign

|

Term

|

L

|

H

|

S

|

F

|

M

|

J

|

N

|

Min

|

Max

|

Escrow

|

|

Boosteroid

|

f/w

|

.0225

|

.0225

|

.0125

|

.007

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

Coinpayments

|

f/w

|

.0225

|

.0225

|

.015

|

.008

|

.004

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

|

Cryptopay

|

f/w

|

.025

|

.025

|

.015

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

MoneyRebel

|

f/w

|

.0225

|

.0225

|

.015

|

.0075

|

.004

|

x

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

|

OneHash

|

p/2w

|

.0008

|

.0008

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/2w

|

x

|

N

|

|

PrivCoin

|

f/w

|

.02

|

.02

|

.01

|

.0035

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

FLUX

|

Campaign

|

Term

|

L

|

H

|

S

|

F

|

M

|

J

|

N

|

Min

|

Max

|

Escrow

|

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

CFNP

|

Campaign

|

Term

|

L

|

H

|

S

|

F

|

M

|

J

|

N

|

Min

|

Max

|

Escrow

|

|

Betcoin*

|

f/m

|

.045

|

.04

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

N

|

|

BitBlender

|

f/w

|

.027

|

.025

|

.022

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

|

BitDice

|

f/w

|

.0275

|

.0275

|

.0175

|

.0125

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

BitMix.Biz

|

p/w

|

.0007

|

.0007

|

.0006

|

.0004

|

.0003

|

.0002

|

x

|

1/3d

|

35/w

|

N

|

|

BitMixCoin

|

f/w

|

.025

|

.02

|

.015

|

.0075

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

|

Bitsler

|

p/w

|

.001125

|

.00105

|

.001

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

1/w

|

30/w

|

N

|

|

ChipMixer

|

p/w

|

.00075

|

.00075

|

.00075

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

50/w

|

Y/N

|

|

Crypto-Games

|

f/w

|

.0235

|

.0235

|

.016

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

Crypto-News

|

f/w

|

.0235

|

.0235

|

.016

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

Electroneum

|

f/w

|

.02

|

.02

|

.013

|

.008

|

.004

|

.002

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

Y

|

|

FortuneJack

|

f/w

|

.04

|

.04

|

.04

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

30/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

GoGoOption

|

p/w

|

.00005

|

.00005

|

.00004

|

.00003

|

.00002

|

x

|

x

|

10/w

|

35/w

|

N

|

|

Javvy

|

f/w

|

.025

|

.025

|

.0125

|

.007

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

Y/N

|

|

Jibrel

|

f/w

|

.0225

|

.0225

|

.015

|

.0075

|

.004

|

.002

|

x

|

25/w

|

x

|

N

|

|

NexChange

|

f/m

|

$100

|

$80

|

$40

|

$20

|

$10

|

$5

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

N

|

|

PayBis

|

f/m

|

$70

|

$70

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

N

|

|

YoBit.net

|

p/d

|

.0003

|

.0003

|

.0003

|

.0002

|

.00013

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

20/d

|

N

|

|

YOLOdice

|

p/w

|

.0007

|

.0007

|

.0005

|

.0003

|

.0001

|

x

|

x

|

x

|

40/w

|

N

|

* means that the campaign is currently having some trouble. Joining is not recommend.
* means that the campaign counts the post per period (e.g. weekly, monthly) but they will pay the total earnings at a specific date. You have to visit their thread to find out more about it.
** means that there are some special conditions. Please see the campaigns thread for more information.

Yes/No explanationIf a campaign has Yes/No as escrow status, it means that the person holding the funds also manages the campaign. This is a conflict of interest, but shouldn't be a big problem if the person doing escrow is trusted.


Changelog:

Code:

07-Oct-17: Removed CarTaxi, Moved Ice Rock, Added Money Rebel
06-Oct-17: Removed BTCKings, Removed CoinPro.fit, Moved Crypterium, Removed EarnFreeCoin, Moved Graft, Moved Javvy, Moved Jibrel, Added Cryptopay
03-Oct-17: Moved Synapse, Moved Jibrel, Moved ChipMixer, Added BTCKings, Added Boosteroid
02-Oct-17: Updated & Moved NitrogenSports, Added Coinpayments, Added Graft
01-Oct-17: Updated Enjin Coin, Removed Narbonne, Moved PayBis, Moved Ice Rock, Removed Notary, Moved ChipMixer
30-Sept-17: Removed Confido, Removed MindPass, Moved & Updated Synapse, Removed Sebeum, Moved ChipMixer, Removed BlockV, Removed BTCBet.cc, Removed Doc.AI, Removed LookRev, Removed SENSE, Added BitMix.Biz, Added Ice Rock Mining, Added PrivCoin, Added Crypterium, Added CoinPro.fit, Added Javvy
27-Sept-17: Moved BitMixCoin, Added OneHash, Added MindPass
26-Sept-17: Moved GoGoOption, Moved BitMixCoin, Added BTCBet.cc
24-Sept-17: Moved Narbonne, Updated & Moved CarTaxi, Moved ChipMixer, Added Synapse
23-Sept-17: Removed Affinity Mining, Added BLOCKv

This is the guide i've been looking for!

Thanks for all the time put into this!