provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:45:04 PM |
|
still works. let's do something good for community. Send Emails guys, more exchanges can prevent multipool's big dump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
chedigital
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
WOW SUCH COIN
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:45:10 PM |
|
Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.
And these parts of the source code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident. We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped. We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!
|
GPG Key ID: 80307E1A
|
|
|
doch
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:45:54 PM |
|
if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin
I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea: My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.
|
|
|
|
jakiman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:46:02 PM |
|
we need a official response from dev and someone reliable, until then im out
dev is offline now, he may solve this problem when he online. he may too tired to release the Anon Wallet. If the dev is in Asia, it's still early morning there. (6:40am) He released the anon wallet before going to sleep AFAICS. He'll soon wake up to this exciting thread I assume.
|
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:46:11 PM |
|
Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later. Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet. Dark coin Current total supply is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$ XC coin Current total supply is 5.5 Million, the Price is 130K Satoshi/0.84$ Vericoin Current total supply is 26 Million, the Price is 15K Satoshi/0.1$ Supercoin Current total supply is 10 Million, the Price is 3K? /0.018$??? personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin so the reasonable Supercoin price at least hit 15K*2.6=37.5K Satoshi if we compared with XC coin, the reasonable price will hit 60K Satoshi.now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi. so what are we waiting for???. +1 thank you for your support!
|
|
|
|
|
Mrjitter
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:49:05 PM |
|
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoinToday at 08:20:32 PM Reply with quote #1 Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: Quote - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000. And these parts of the source code: Code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. POLONIEX are retarded , its obvious and clear. should have waited several confirmations of expert developers before to launch the FUD News
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:50:11 PM |
|
if super coin is a scam so is cinni coin and silk coin
I'm gonna repeat this again so people don't get the wrong idea: My post was not meant to imply that Silkcoin and Cinni are also scams. There's zero reason to believe SC or Cinni are scams, I was just pointing out that other, more trusted coins have the same MAX_MONEY "issue" that SUPER does.sense of humor. lol now POLO are frustrated with all complaints. they are totally in a big mess.
|
|
|
|
Abinito
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:50:25 PM |
|
Here is a Simple a analysis on Supercoin reasonable price after Anon wallet release Until now, only Dark coin and XC coin has some Anon features Darkcoin has a worked mixer but also some problem with their master node XC coin has a test net mixer and do not worked Anon wallet yet, they will have a version2.0 two weeks later. Vericoin do not have a Anon wallet, they only have a development plan Supercoin has a Anon wallet on testnet. Dark coin Current total supply is 4.3 Million, the Price is 1.7 Million Satoshi/11$ XC coin Current total supply is 5.5 Million, the Price is 130K Satoshi/0.84$ Vericoin Current total supply is 26 Million, the Price is 15K Satoshi/0.1$ Supercoin Current total supply is 10 Million, the Price is 3K? /0.018$??? personally i think we have done much work on Anon features than Vericoin now the Current Supercoin price is only 3K Satoshi. so what are we waiting for???. +1 thank you for your support! Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes
classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry
|
Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:50:55 PM |
|
This gets better and better.
|
|
|
|
supercoindev
Member
Offline
Activity: 213
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:51:05 PM |
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus
|
|
|
|
Abinito
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:51:14 PM |
|
Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoinToday at 08:20:32 PM Reply with quote #1 Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: Quote - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions. - Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000. And these parts of the source code: Code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0) Code: static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN; static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN; MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped.We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin.
|
Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
|
|
|
Abinito
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:52:14 PM |
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes
classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ?
yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry
|
Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
|
|
|
maryvale
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:54:55 PM |
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus Yes, and also you can set the upper limit to be 10000000000000000000 trillion, but only generate 15 millions, is there a problem there? someone is completely idiot. If you want to know how many coins will be generated, look at the functions generating them, not the limit. Idiot!
|
|
|
|
bitrap
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:55:29 PM |
|
Seriously, Abinito is spamming the same comments over and over again.
|
|
|
|
chedigital
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
WOW SUCH COIN
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:56:10 PM |
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus +1 Better then TV. We'll at least we learned what exchanges are able to read and vet code.
|
GPG Key ID: 80307E1A
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:56:49 PM |
|
Seriously, Abinito is spamming the same comments over and over again.
JUST IGNORE this moron
|
|
|
|
originalchilli
|
|
June 14, 2014, 10:59:40 PM |
|
already bounced back up to 4000 on bittrex, grabbed me some cheap super, thanks!
|
FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER - @originalchilli
|
|
|
provenceday
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 14, 2014, 11:00:55 PM |
|
Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old?
The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions:
- GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor()
These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke!
|
|
|
|
Abinito
|
|
June 14, 2014, 11:01:07 PM |
|
lmao, this is a complete joke, if this is done by poloniex tech staff, I feel really sorry to them Here is a reply from a forum member (timerland) to that accusation: Is this an amateur or a 10-years-old? The max coin limits the maximum coin, but does it mean the maximum coin will be generated?? Not at all. The generated coin depends on the formula in 3functions: - GetProofOfWorkReward() - GetProofOfStakeReward() and - GetProofOfWorkBonusRewardFactor() These functions define how many coins will be generated. Moreover, even the system generates more coins than the MAX_MONEY defined above, there will be no problem at all, go look at the code. If Poloniex tech staff is that dumb, I feel very sorry for them, it is a joke! This member stated the fact. These 3 functions determined how many coins will be generated. The MAX_MONEY is largely irrelavent. All it does (and the dAmount), is to check each transaction if this limit exceeded. I can't believe this, it's like a circus +1 Better then TV. We'll at least we learned what exchanges are able to read and vet code. Re: Why Poloniex Has Rejected SuperCoin Today at 10:22:21 PM Reply with quote #84 Quote from: doch on Today at 10:12:32 PM Quote from: Spoetnik on Today at 10:10:28 PM diversion tactics won't work guys Roll Eyes classic.. YOU get caught so you attempt to discredit the guy that caught you. Oh internet your so creative ahahha Do you guys think you just invented the cover up technique or something ? yeah.. bam.... puuuuuhleeeeze lol I'm not affiliated with SUPER in any way and have never bought or mined SUPER, I just thought people should know how completely and utterly wrong Poloniex is here. but he's not.. what you just said is not true. for one thing the exchange can pick and choose what ever coins they want to add.. they are not obligated to add any of them. so how can he be wrong on that point ? and on the other major point.. what he said is verified .. i checked it myself and he is 100% dead on about it. It's been explained.. so i have no choice but to believe you and others are lying and playing games now to cover up the truth. And the truth is he found a contradiction that looks fishy. And that IS the truth. if i have to choose one or the other to believe i believe Poloniex staff not the anon cloner.. and i can tell you all i too have no Super coins etc and if i did i would still say the same thing anyway.. truth is truth . Suck it up.. for the good of our scene please lol Quit being lying manipulative game playing scammers invested scam coins defending them.. you make ALL of us look bad Angry
|
Conscia mens recti, famae mendacia ridet.
|
|
|
|