Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2017, 01:11:13 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [2014 - 05 - 21] HARVARD ECONOMICS PROFESSOR MAKES THE CASE FOR BITCOIN  (Read 1985 times)
bitcool
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1441

Live and enjoy experiments


View Profile
June 07, 2014, 08:54:36 PM
 #21

I've read his argument several times,
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/kenneth-rogoff-examines-two-ways-to-beat-the-zero-bound-on-nominal-interest-rates

It seems he wants to do away with paper money, and replace it with digital currency that GOVERNMENT has absolute control... isn't that the polar opposite of bitcoin?
1510967473
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510967473

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510967473
Reply with quote  #2

1510967473
Report to moderator
Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1510967473
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510967473

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510967473
Reply with quote  #2

1510967473
Report to moderator
bryant.coleman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610



View Profile
June 08, 2014, 11:05:14 AM
 #22

It seems he wants to do away with paper money, and replace it with digital currency that GOVERNMENT has absolute control... isn't that the polar opposite of bitcoin?

That means that he is not exactly supporting Bitcoin, but only to some of the aspects of the digital currency. Right now, that is a good start. Even government controlled digital currency can give some boost to Bitcoin.

         ▄███████████████▄
       ▄██▀             ▀██▄
    ▄▄██▀                 ▀██▄▄
█████▀▀       ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄    ▀▀█████
██          ▄▀ ▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▄▀█▄▄      ██
▐█▌       ▄▀ ▄▀ ▄▄▄▀▀▀▄▀▀▀███   ▐█▌
 ██      ▄▀▄▀▄▀▀▄▄▄▀▀▀▀▀█ ▄█▀   ██
 ▐█▌    █▄▀▄▀▄█▀▀▀ ▀█▀ ▄▀▄▀█   ▐█▌
  ██    █▄▀▄▀▄▄█▀ ▄▀ ▄▀▄▀▄▀█   ██
  ▐█▌ ▀▄█████▀▄▄▀▀▄▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀█  ▐█▌
   ██▌▀████▀██▄▄▀▀▄▄▀▄▀▄▀▄█▀ ▐██
    ██▌▀█▀▀█▄▀▀▄▀▀▄▄▀▄█▄▄█▀ ▐██
     ██▌ ▀  ▀███▄▄▄█████▀  ▐██
      ██▄      ▀▀▀▀▀      ▄██
       ▀██▄             ▄██▀
         ▀██▄         ▄██▀
           ▀██▄     ▄██▀
             ▀███▄███▀
               ▀███▀
.DeepOnion.
★ ★ ★ ★ ★  .❱❱❱ JOIN AIRDROP NOW!.
TOR INTEGRATED & SECURED
★  Your Anonymity Guaranteed
★  Your Assets Secured by TOR
★  Guard Your Privacy!
|Bitcointalk
Reddit
Telegram
|                        ▄▄▀▄▄▀▄▄▀▄▀▀
                    ▄▄██▀█▀▄▀▀▀
                  ▄██▄█▄██▀
                ▄██████▀
              ▄██████▀
  ▄█▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██████▀
██████▀▀▀▀▀██████▀
 ▀█████  ▄███████
  ████████████▀██
  ██▀███████▀  ██
  ██ ▀████▀    ██
  ██   ▀▀      ██
  ▀█████████████▀
BitDreams
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 501



View Profile
June 08, 2014, 08:00:10 PM
 #23

I've read his argument several times,
https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/kenneth-rogoff-examines-two-ways-to-beat-the-zero-bound-on-nominal-interest-rates

It seems he wants to do away with paper money, and replace it with digital currency that GOVERNMENT has absolute control... isn't that the polar opposite of bitcoin?

What is most interesting to me is that academia are even talking about adopting it. To me, that's an important first step. Many of them will get it wrong of course, but after watching how MIT handled introduction to Bitcoin I'm not worried at all - 'here's your wallet, go create stuff.' I don't care if they get it wrong, Bitcoin (and the network) will eventually set them right.

Because Bitcoin protocol can be adopted to so many things, we should expect all manner of power brokers believing they need to or even can 'control' its usage. If I had to pick one thing that wrongful thinking economists need to figure out it is the power of the decentralized trust network effect - I don't think they comprehend what it means to the seat of power. To me, these economists are like people assembling a bridge out of popsicle sticks, debating how traffic will flow and what tolls they will charge while Bitcoin simply doesn't care as it it too busy moving boulders and pouring concrete.

If the greatest feature of Bitcoin is building trust where trust never existed before, we should welcome any and all debate between untrusted parties and hash it out on the blockchain. Even if they think they can control Bitcoin, welcome their efforts. The moment any of those controls become abusive to the greater number of users that blockchain will cease to exist and another will sprout up to take its place.

I agree 100% with Andreas Antonopoulos, the cat is out of the bag. Consider many of the uninformed modern economists as little children who we've given toy hammers and we let them play with the concept until they suddenly realize that economies and everything they knew about them are about to be redefined. This is World Changing thinking, out with the old rules and in with the new rules - it's just going to take a little time.

As far as a totally paperless/coinless currency that is dependent 100% upon electricity, I believe the Professor is wrong as there will always be coins, commerce can't stop simply because the power went out. There's always a handshake or a promise. Iif pressed I imagine a local script could be created based on the blockchain - one can manually create a transaction (on paper) if they wish:

http://www.righto.com/2014/02/bitcoins-hard-way-using-raw-bitcoin.html <- This is what the good Professor may some day be teaching.

okthen
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490


View Profile
June 08, 2014, 10:06:10 PM
 #24

It seems he wants to do away with paper money, and replace it with digital currency that GOVERNMENT has absolute control... isn't that the polar opposite of bitcoin?

That means that he is not exactly supporting Bitcoin, but only to some of the aspects of the digital currency. Right now, that is a good start. Even government controlled digital currency can give some boost to Bitcoin.

I'm not sure it is good, this is what the government will want to do, so everyone should be alert and against it now.
Anyway, no publicity is bad publicity Smiley
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!