Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2024, 01:36:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 1627 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1484224 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:27:52 PM
 #1461

I'll bounty out 200 XC to make the block explorer.
thewarners777
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:28:01 PM
 #1462

has anyone received payment from the multipool?

i mine on http://www.cryptoalts.com/ and I have received payments
qqryq
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:29:13 PM
 #1463

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

it's you

There might be a reason for it:
Quote
There has been controversy lately regarding the true origins of XC. You can see clearly at this page after you login and press 'Show ratings'. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=249302 that the XC coin "developer", atcecure has paid loljosh 0.7 BTC.

atcsecure 0: -0 / +0(0) 2014-05-09 0.70000000 Very trustworthy and put in the extra effort as needed.. very fast service and highly recommended

Loljosh is a person who offers custom made alt-coins for BTC. You can see loljosh's thread where he offers his services at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.0
Loljosh started offering a PoS and X11 custom made alt-coin on 9th of May: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.msg6625004#msg6625004 which has the exact same features as XC.
9th may was also the very same day the X11Coin launched and the payment was made to Loljosh from atcecure. The date of the launch can be looked up in the original thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.0
To this moment the X11Coin "developer" is very vague about the transaction and hasn't even explained what was the payment for. We can only assume it was a payment for the creation of X11Coin since it's Loljosh expertise field. The evidence above is a strong indication that this is the case

Since we have developer's attention it would be nice to have it addressed since it hasn't been.
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:29:32 PM
 #1464

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

=>

This release does not have the multi-path paradigm code which will prevent that.  This is only a test release

What part of multi-path paradigm code don't you get?
subG
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:31:11 PM
 #1465

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

it's you

Are you guys all brainwashed?  Man, sometimes you need to open your eyes and face reality.   Shocked   All this deleting posts and avoiding questions/issues.  Does the "C" is XC stand for CULT?  
Propulsion
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


The Buck Stops Here.


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:31:37 PM
 #1466

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

it's you

There might be a reason for it:
Quote
There has been controversy lately regarding the true origins of XC. You can see clearly at this page after you login and press 'Show ratings'. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=249302 that the XC coin "developer", atcecure has paid loljosh 0.7 BTC.

atcsecure 0: -0 / +0(0) 2014-05-09 0.70000000 Very trustworthy and put in the extra effort as needed.. very fast service and highly recommended

Loljosh is a person who offers custom made alt-coins for BTC. You can see loljosh's thread where he offers his services at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.0
Loljosh started offering a PoS and X11 custom made alt-coin on 9th of May: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.msg6625004#msg6625004 which has the exact same features as XC.
9th may was also the very same day the X11Coin launched and the payment was made to Loljosh from atcecure. The date of the launch can be looked up in the original thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.0
To this moment the X11Coin "developer" is very vague about the transaction and hasn't even explained what was the payment for. We can only assume it was a payment for the creation of X11Coin since it's Loljosh expertise field. The evidence above is a strong indication that this is the case

Since we have developer's attention it would be nice to have it addressed since it hasn't been.

Who originally said this though? Your quote doesn't have an author.
CryptoGretzky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:32:21 PM
 #1467

ATCSECURE has even offered a bounty to someone who could provide a testnet blockexplorer to answer back the constructive criticism. This is the last step towards the launching of this project, someone please do it.

Maybe he can just make it himself. He's a 20 year veteran software developer right? I'm sure he can do it.

That's exactly what I was thinking.  Is it really that hard?  If it is, then lol to everything else.

Right, do you see CEO of a company go sweep the floor?  Ya, how hard can sweeping be...

coine_smithe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:33:02 PM
 #1468

ATCSECURE has even offered a bounty to someone who could provide a testnet blockexplorer to answer back the constructive criticism. This is the last step towards the launching of this project, someone please do it.

Maybe he can just make it himself. He's a 20 year veteran software developer right? I'm sure he can do it.

such sarcasm makes you very low. man

Sarcasm? I was serious. Do you doubt the dev?
I have seen you in the DRK topic bashing us. Plz just go away. If we are really such a threat to you, diversify your investments.

I don't baghold any alts. I only day trade.
anonymousxx1503
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:33:09 PM
 #1469


If that's the case, then this coin is not anonymous at all.

from page one, day one: Anonymous Transactions: In Development

what is everyone's problem jumping down the dev's throat at every turn?

yowzers....

Honestly some of the hate you are getting is from xc holders who don't want to toyed with and the rest is from some darkcoin holders.

And I understand them, here you have a pre alpha anonymity release with no proof of it working apart from sketchy screenshots. And people are saying it's way better than darksend already  (which actually works right now), and they actually have no idea how it works. Burden of proof is on xc, not dark.

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
whazzledazzle
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:34:51 PM
 #1470

I'll bounty out 200 XC to make the block explorer.

I will add 200 XC to this bounty.
qqryq
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:35:27 PM
 #1471

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

it's you

There might be a reason for it:
Quote
There has been controversy lately regarding the true origins of XC. You can see clearly at this page after you login and press 'Show ratings'. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=249302 that the XC coin "developer", atcecure has paid loljosh 0.7 BTC.

atcsecure 0: -0 / +0(0) 2014-05-09 0.70000000 Very trustworthy and put in the extra effort as needed.. very fast service and highly recommended

Loljosh is a person who offers custom made alt-coins for BTC. You can see loljosh's thread where he offers his services at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.0
Loljosh started offering a PoS and X11 custom made alt-coin on 9th of May: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.msg6625004#msg6625004 which has the exact same features as XC.
9th may was also the very same day the X11Coin launched and the payment was made to Loljosh from atcecure. The date of the launch can be looked up in the original thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.0
To this moment the X11Coin "developer" is very vague about the transaction and hasn't even explained what was the payment for. We can only assume it was a payment for the creation of X11Coin since it's Loljosh expertise field. The evidence above is a strong indication that this is the case

Since we have developer's attention it would be nice to have it addressed since it hasn't been.

Who originally said this though? Your quote doesn't have an author.

Sorry, link didn't get included for some reason. I found it on reddit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26uf4g/dev_update_290514/
TsuyokuNaritai
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 500



View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:35:44 PM
 #1472

!target <price> - Tells you how much BTC is needed to move the market + or -.
!target xc <price>

greyskies
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 186
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:38:00 PM
 #1473

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

it's you

There might be a reason for it:
Quote
There has been controversy lately regarding the true origins of XC. You can see clearly at this page after you login and press 'Show ratings'. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=249302 that the XC coin "developer", atcecure has paid loljosh 0.7 BTC.

atcsecure 0: -0 / +0(0) 2014-05-09 0.70000000 Very trustworthy and put in the extra effort as needed.. very fast service and highly recommended

Loljosh is a person who offers custom made alt-coins for BTC. You can see loljosh's thread where he offers his services at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.0
Loljosh started offering a PoS and X11 custom made alt-coin on 9th of May: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.msg6625004#msg6625004 which has the exact same features as XC.
9th may was also the very same day the X11Coin launched and the payment was made to Loljosh from atcecure. The date of the launch can be looked up in the original thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.0
To this moment the X11Coin "developer" is very vague about the transaction and hasn't even explained what was the payment for. We can only assume it was a payment for the creation of X11Coin since it's Loljosh expertise field. The evidence above is a strong indication that this is the case

Since we have developer's attention it would be nice to have it addressed since it hasn't been.

Who originally said this though? Your quote doesn't have an author.

Sorry, link didn't get included for some reason. I found it on reddit:

http://www.reddit.com/r/XCofficialreddit/comments/26uf4g/dev_update_290514/

Dev has already addressed this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.msg7034609#msg7034609
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:38:33 PM
 #1474

just finish the teamviewer. i think it works. so i am holding tight my xc.
dida
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000


SoNiC BooM


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:38:46 PM
 #1475

Darkcoin got banned on btc-e   Grin
the_game1224
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:40:16 PM
 #1476

Quote

Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI?  Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?


the receiver can not see the original wallet address

BIG Shout Out to evtrmm for hosting the teamviewer!  I can confirm running the gettransaction command with the Transaction ID DOES NOT show the origin address.  So that post saying all he was doing was "replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI" was completely FALSE.
Grifftech
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:40:24 PM
 #1477

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....
you moron, lol it is "scapegoat" and that is not the correct usage of the term. Hurry catch that "escape goat"!!
tat123
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 261
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
May 30, 2014, 08:41:34 PM
 #1478

teamviewer was interesting. AlexGR... did you participate?
Grifftech
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:41:45 PM
 #1479

Is it just me or does the dev's responses do not sound technical at all. Seems like his escape goat reply is "this is only a test release"  Not sure if he can get it done.  This post will be deleted in 5,4,3,2....

it's you

There might be a reason for it:
Quote
There has been controversy lately regarding the true origins of XC. You can see clearly at this page after you login and press 'Show ratings'. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=249302 that the XC coin "developer", atcecure has paid loljosh 0.7 BTC.

atcsecure 0: -0 / +0(0) 2014-05-09 0.70000000 Very trustworthy and put in the extra effort as needed.. very fast service and highly recommended

Loljosh is a person who offers custom made alt-coins for BTC. You can see loljosh's thread where he offers his services at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.0
Loljosh started offering a PoS and X11 custom made alt-coin on 9th of May: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=466908.msg6625004#msg6625004 which has the exact same features as XC.
9th may was also the very same day the X11Coin launched and the payment was made to Loljosh from atcecure. The date of the launch can be looked up in the original thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=600706.0
To this moment the X11Coin "developer" is very vague about the transaction and hasn't even explained what was the payment for. We can only assume it was a payment for the creation of X11Coin since it's Loljosh expertise field. The evidence above is a strong indication that this is the case

Since we have developer's attention it would be nice to have it addressed since it hasn't been.

He addressed that pages back and said he has not had loljosh involved in this.
cyberhacker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000



View Profile
May 30, 2014, 08:42:34 PM
 #1480

Quote

Thank you for your answer.
So you are saying this test release is only anonymous if you use the GUI?  Running a simple command reveals the origin wallet address if you know the transaction id?


the receiver can not see the original wallet address

BIG Shout Out to evtrmm for hosting the teamviewer!  I can confirm running the gettransaction command with the Transaction ID DOES NOT show the origin address.  So that post saying all he was doing was "replacing the sent from text field as 'unknown' in the GUI" was completely FALSE.

i also take part in the teamview. everything is going well. so what are they trolling about?

seriously i have no idea what they are talking about.
Pages: « 1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 [74] 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 ... 1627 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!