[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[evtrmm]

thanks for all who joined my stumble session on teamviewer.  
normally I use Lync, so had to get it figured out.

now.  here is the transaction from my end.

Code:


{
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401481973,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "2d7609d9135573b85a0b41995b525fbca9fdddf4a057a0dad2a864f982a04b38",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901 0205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6",
"hex" : "48304502206ea28eca5bb401f2a89a663b8de34ad1e2d12c64f5f17b46b7fc1e8c29ff95a0022100babd5f8559f292ec108ab63bae59f5b45048419a5c9697439822260ff4c7b2c901210205637581c3fd965632ede8f095ef13c5c2866bbf3b98224e436a5616678a63c6"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 176.96700500,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914fc61c52af3a6ceaecdd786dc568969d91d157e4f88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"n4XRhazk87c3atB7hKcFCq2BHaHowFQZ4m"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 5.86236100,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 1acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f5935 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a9141acb169d410d546b34d8198507f42273753f593588ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000,
"confirmations" : 4,
"blockhash" : "00000705cfdc2212d1ef4e49a241a4b6f7a54c458ffa182b3a75ba3bc1d922e8",
"blockindex" : 2,
"blocktime" : 1401482018,
"txid" : "54015432e52f518b09c78d5ddd073cb32bfa5c0d0e9ba781d6dae42359355f71",
"time" : 1401481973,
"timereceived" : 1401481973,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "[color=yellow]main",
"address" : "mhxd9sDeotkkgoshn31tiCxW7Nhvosuv2j",[/color]
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -5.86236100,
"fee" : -0.00001000
}
]
}

As you can see the address associated here with main does not match the address you saw on the session which was mmGYnBPXoypuc7GGpSd5QSW29SgLB1Xa85
the address sent to was msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow  Which again does not show up in the tx

Once again, we all know this is not a final product. This was a test to show progress and the progress is evident.  

Oh yeah, the people on my session also got to see transactions being passed first hand.

One more thing.  note that the addresses for "main" at the end of the code are not the same even though it is the same account

Code:

msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow



15:58:49

Welcome to the X11Coin RPC console.
Use up and down arrows to navigate history, and Ctrl-L to clear screen.
Type help for an overview of available commands.


16:04:26

"sendfrommixer" main msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow 57.0


16:04:26




16:09:04

"sendfrommixer" main msJQeu3mJZDZM3nRZBddHhR3J3DGMzryow 2.0


16:09:04




16:10:49

"gettransaction" 92a7e218f7df0e4eba5c346e66e12fd1aa66ab7abe490ce03694cf89b42fc92d


16:10:49

{
"txid" : "92a7e218f7df0e4eba5c346e66e12fd1aa66ab7abe490ce03694cf89b42fc92d",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1401484165,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"txid" : "c9bfdd9b227786d4d3f4e8a494459396df0a857ff6913c1b1fb25b3f8b5da724",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "304502203cf87e7fe55d491294de4e1fb010858e9b697c365158aef9c135ba72788b4564022100f2553300963ef6cc49ed8fcfe18cb2cbba31b0f1e03ca9f7852b2f7db465863401 03eb0c1e3965f3fdb5bb12be8463623f0ccd1badacaefc3eb165896d8b8fb5e5bd",
"hex" : "48304502203cf87e7fe55d491294de4e1fb010858e9b697c365158aef9c135ba72788b4564022100f2553300963ef6cc49ed8fcfe18cb2cbba31b0f1e03ca9f7852b2f7db4658634012103eb0c1e3965f3fdb5bb12be8463623f0ccd1badacaefc3eb165896d8b8fb5e5bd"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
},
{
"txid" : "f1928df7ff419674f9d136f124a49dded9a036bd5b71b123126d8d5bbe91a22c",
"vout" : 0,
"scriptSig" : {
"asm" : "3045022100965cd149a3d9ad3d469be3f0a149d28823127dd086b94303bbb05494ff04d4420220283c6a6f74105e5022c0f7fde66ff10e3141f10056c6529050e23d4175803e7e01 02dc374c7c7fcd5aaf98c55ff731bf3ea818f9fb4d781b177f4674bd57ba5419b8",
"hex" : "483045022100965cd149a3d9ad3d469be3f0a149d28823127dd086b94303bbb05494ff04d4420220283c6a6f74105e5022c0f7fde66ff10e3141f10056c6529050e23d4175803e7e012102dc374c7c7fcd5aaf98c55ff731bf3ea818f9fb4d781b177f4674bd57ba5419b8"
},
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.69638200,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 909967cc22d95941fb217d52e7d85e0f04f03dd6 OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914909967cc22d95941fb217d52e7d85e0f04f03dd688ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mthXNUYbqWBJz91zi1hUiDW4c3CgXDvtVK"
]
}
},
{
"value" : 1.17177200,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "OP_DUP OP_HASH160 d4f1a567afe556b8e1f83fc70d2d918fd9c7e3ae OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG",
"hex" : "76a914d4f1a567afe556b8e1f83fc70d2d918fd9c7e3ae88ac",
"reqSigs" : 1,
"type" : "pubkeyhash",
"addresses" : [
"mzvu2b5Ya4GtFum9vCyvu4MAvLEgnJSsCW"
]
}
}
],
"amount" : -1.17177200,
"fee" : -0.00002000,
"confirmations" : 1,
"blockhash" : "000003ba4410e9be27dee00053af64fb971642465b8f0f725a254fadd8dd21e5",
"blockindex" : 3,
"blocktime" : 1401484217,
"txid" : "92a7e218f7df0e4eba5c346e66e12fd1aa66ab7abe490ce03694cf89b42fc92d",
"time" : 1401484165,
"timereceived" : 1401484165,
"comment" : "",
"message" : "",
"details" : [
{
"account" : "main",
"address" : "mzvu2b5Ya4GtFum9vCyvu4MAvLEgnJSsCW",
"category" : "send",
"amount" : -1.17177200,
"fee" : -0.00002000
}
]
}

[AlexGR]

but never mentions how the accusations was false and even members of their own community lambasted the person for putting it out there to begin with.

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-duel-xc-demise-mcdogecoin/

I hold both XC and DRK (XC reduced by a massive %) after seeing the code copy in the DRK thread. I bought XCs at 0.00007 and sold at >0.004+.

Nobody considered this as "false accussations" because, well... It's code available on github. It's either there, or it isn't. And it was there (=true story, not "accussations"). It's not someone making stuff out of their mind.

Twitter is a different issue and it shouldn't be handled that way, in that we agree.

My assessment so far is that the anonymity* proposed is flawed. I am neither a legendary coder or a cryptographer, I simply have been on the anonymity market for something like 3-4 months and I'm starting to understand it better.

I believe the coder can contribute something to cryptoland in terms of new techniques of encrypted communication but not in the anonymity department. I simply don't see something superior to DarkSend right now or with the prospect of becoming such. A wallet/node getting money and then sending money by remote trigger/action? This is not good even as a proof of concept.

* Defined as private for all intents and purposes, but not NSA-proof. NSA-proofing is a whole different game, perhaps 2015+ for some coin of the anon market.

AlexGR... Evan needed help from AnonMint. (hope i spelled it correctly). Dan will probably get contributions from the community as well. I choose to wait and see. Rome and DRK for that matter wasn't built in a day.

Indeed it wasn't.

Evan is working on it for months and he had to scrap his work and go through alternative ways because some of the first implementations had drawbacks or design limitations / flaws. Is the current implementation perfect? Far from it, otherwise it wouldn't need anonymity upgrades in upcoming versions.

As far as I know Anonymint contributed through constructive feedback but he prefers ring signatures.

Dan will need as much help as he can get to make it work but the crowd's expectation is simply unrealistic in term of instant gratification / market explosion to ...0.05. If price goes over fundamentals, the pressure to deliver is immense and the price swings are excessive. A bumpy ride so to speak.

[CryptoClub]

If it matters, the dev is who he says he is, I checked and I am sure. Felt a little like a friendly stalker matching everything up, but, I am very paranoid after all the BS with some coins. He is legit, so, don't worry about that. I am also quite confident he can pull it off.

Anyway, great dev, great coin. Should do quite well over time.

[cyberhacker]

Indeed it wasn't.

Evan is working on it for months and he had to scrap his work and go through alternative ways because some of the first implementations had drawbacks or design limitations / flaws. Is the current implementation perfect? Far from it, otherwise it wouldn't need anonymity upgrades in upcoming versions.

As far as I know Anonymint contributed through constructive feedback but he prefers ring signatures.

Dan will need as much help as he can get to make it work but the crowd's expectation is simply unrealistic in term of instant gratification / market explosion to ...0.05. If price goes over fundamentals, the pressure to deliver is immense and the price swings are excessive. A bumpy ride so to speak.

Sir, you made a great U-Turn.

congratulations.

[evtrmm]

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

[JesstersDead]

but never mentions how the accusations was false and even members of their own community lambasted the person for putting it out there to begin with.

http://www.coindesk.com/darkcoin-duel-xc-demise-mcdogecoin/

I hold both XC and DRK (XC reduced by a massive %) after seeing the code copy in the DRK thread. I bought XCs at 0.00007 and sold at >0.004+.

Nobody considered this as "false accussations" because, well... It's code available on github. It's either there, or it isn't. And it was there (=true story, not "accussations"). It's not someone making stuff out of their mind.

Twitter is a different issue and it shouldn't be handled that way, in that we agree.

My assessment so far is that the anonymity* proposed is flawed. I am neither a legendary coder or a cryptographer, I simply have been on the anonymity market for something like 3-4 months and I'm starting to understand it better.

I believe the coder can contribute something to cryptoland in terms of new techniques of encrypted communication but not in the anonymity department. I simply don't see something superior to DarkSend right now or with the prospect of becoming such. A wallet/node getting money and then sending money by remote trigger/action? This is not good even as a proof of concept.

* Defined as private for all intents and purposes, but not NSA-proof. NSA-proofing is a whole different game, perhaps 2015+ for some coin of the anon market.

AlexGR... Evan needed help from AnonMint. (hope i spelled it correctly). Dan will probably get contributions from the community as well. I choose to wait and see. Rome and DRK for that matter wasn't built in a day.

Indeed it wasn't.

Evan is working on it for months and he had to scrap his work and go through alternative ways because some of the first implementations had drawbacks or design limitations / flaws. Is the current implementation perfect? Far from it, otherwise it wouldn't need anonymity upgrades in upcoming versions.

As far as I know Anonymint contributed through constructive feedback but he prefers ring signatures.

Dan will need as much help as he can get to make it work but the crowd's expectation is simply unrealistic in term of instant gratification / market explosion to ...0.05. If price goes over fundamentals, the pressure to deliver is immense and the price swings are excessive. A bumpy ride so to speak.

This I agree with. I am in XC pretty deep in regards to my "alt" coin holdings as I have traded primarily BTC since last year.. But I would much prefer things being thought out, help being requested when needed, etc. I personally am in no hurry for any major price increase. Increased price = increased pressure on the dev, and I would rather there be no shortcuts taken.

That being said, and as an old school programmer myself(maybe not as old school as Dan), I have no doubt things can come to fruition. Stay on track, don't be bothered with todays price, and do the proper work. That is all I ask, thus far it is what I have seen done, and is why I am still holding my XC.

[Teka]

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

Watching.....

[Randy Marsh]

has anyone received payment from the multipool?

i mine on http://www.cryptoalts.com/ and I have received payments

Hello, I own 85Mh and would like mined XC is the possibility of payment in XC?

[Slaxt]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTgnZAFuNU&feature=youtu.be

[JesstersDead]

has anyone received payment from the multipool?

i mine on http://www.cryptoalts.com/ and I have received payments

Hello, I own 85Mh and would like mined XC is the possibility of payment in XC?

cryptoalts.com

[ballzdeep]

has anyone received payment from the multipool?

i mine on http://www.cryptoalts.com/ and I have received payments

Hello, I own 85Mh and would like mined XC is the possibility of payment in XC?

I mine there since POW stop and got pay

[evtrmm]

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.




One more time.

sorry its so long, but I had a hard time concentrating with 3 little ones running around the house.

[Skatebird]

Wow this dev is awesome !!! Did more in one week that others in 3 months, so glad i invested at beginning !!! Continue like that, ill need to give you part of im profits !!

[cryptico]

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.




One more time.

sorry its so long, but I had a hard time concentrating with 3 little ones running around the house.

that is not so much time at all! you are the men! 10 XC will be sent to you now

[Randy Marsh]

has anyone received payment from the multipool?

i mine on http://www.cryptoalts.com/ and I have received payments

Hello, I own 85Mh and would like mined XC is the possibility of payment in XC?

I mine there since POW stop and got pay

thank you, I am also a holder of xc, I want mined xc for me, not for sale

[trix222]

has anyone received payment from the multipool?

i mine on http://www.cryptoalts.com/ and I have received payments

Hello, I own 85Mh and would like mined XC is the possibility of payment in XC?

cryptoalts.com

Hey just a question ,i just put my XC address as worker name and im good to go ?

[milkyway]

has anyone received payment from the multipool?

i mine on http://www.cryptoalts.com/ and I have received payments

Hello, I own 85Mh and would like mined XC is the possibility of payment in XC?

cryptoalts.com

Hey just a question ,i just put my XC address as worker name and im good to go ?

Yes

[Pizpie]

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

Watching.....

OMG! It works.

[evtrmm]

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

Watching.....

OMG! It works.

So much for "random screen shots" or whatever they were saying.  LOL.
I am more than willing to demo again if needed, and perhaps make a more in depth video

[Grifftech]

PROOF.
http://youtu.be/_uTgnZAFuNU

hopefully this explains enough.

Well done sir!!!