[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[btell]

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

[1713519166]

1713519166

[1713519166]

1713519166

[1713519166]

1713519166

[synechist]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

I think you'd be mistaken in assuming that a community is an individual. :-)

You'd also be mistaken in assuming that XC is a company.

Finally you'd be mistaken in assuming that the community disagrees with me about treating others with respect.

Kindly be respectful, or leave.

[KimmyF]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

Wow, cool down guy, double check who you are talking to & look around, come back tomorrow & chill before you awaken the kraken

[qawzsx]

A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?

Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

STFU already you idiotic moron...

[cryptoholic11]

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

[qawzsx]

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

Except the devs of DRK are a fucking bunch of scamers, who tried to scam the community at first...So stop comparing this coin with a shity pump&dump coin, developed by some greedy fucks...
Now they are so legit because they said something like... "ok, we had this fucking 50% instamine, but well, we destroyed it cause you noticed it...so we are good now..."

You are tracking DRK & XC for a long time? dude, its a 6 months old coin vs a 2 months old coin, lets talk in 3 months, and compare this coin with DRK after 3 months...

"So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS"....

Dude, you're a senile one...why the fuck are you even in crypto? Seems like you have no fucking idea...

[CryptoGretzky]

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

The reason why there is low volume is because everyone value their XC and is actually holding the coins in their wallet staking.  

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!wallets

There is a total of only 19.66% of the coins at Mintpal, Bittrex and Cryptsy.

That just shows that the supplies of free floating coins is super low.   People are actually securing the network by staking.

Going back to PoW is the DUMBEST idea EVER for a coin with such low float.  Luckily you are just a troll and not the dev of XC.   All of your posts are nothing but drivel and useless FUD....

[synechist]

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.

[battbot]

im a troll

You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.

Let's not quote the troll.  Over 50% of DRK's coins were mined in a couple days.

[rockstahh]

XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?

You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

Except the devs of DRK are a fucking bunch of scamers, who tried to scam the community at first...So stop comparing this coin with a shity pump&dump coin, developed by some greedy fucks...
Now they are so legit because they said something like... "ok, we had this fucking 50% instamine, but well, we destroyed it cause you noticed it...so we are good now..."

You are tracking DRK & XC for a long time? dude, its a 6 months old coin vs a 2 months old coin, lets talk in 3 months, and compare this coin with DRK after 3 months...

"So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS"....

Dude, you're a senile one...why the fuck are you even in crypto? Seems like you have no fucking idea...

Wallet Nerd, lay off the pcp!

[BrewCrewFan]

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.

If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.

[dragnar]

im a troll

You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.

Let's not quote the troll.  Over 50% of DRK's coins were mined in a couple days.

it was insta mined in the first hours ( adding up to over 40% sins release )

wen u controll so mutch of the supply its easy to control the price ( just dry the market out )

any one els here noticed that wen DRK moved up a shit ton *( and every one bought DRK )
that a lot of btc that was in altcoins left the market ? wonder where those btc have gone to  

and thats why there aint a lot of btc in the alt market atm * it was drained out by xxxxx )

someting i warned peeps about some time ago ( and predicted ) and i was right on the money

[_evolution_]

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

Any concrete arguments against my opinion, mouthful Mr. Bean?

[Teka]

Lets keep the arguments constructive and outside of personal attacks.

[braxx]

evolution added to my ignore list

suggest you all do the same

[KimmyF]

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

Any concrete arguments against my opinion, mouthful Mr. Bean?

i for one do not question or contest your opinion. Just the way you express it is enough for me not to listen.
Talk with some maner & respect for the opinion of others, then i will listen to what you have to say
 

[synechist]

Fortunately it's now clear what sort of person _evolution_ is, and we need not bother to engage further.

But more importantly, I'd say that we shouldn't engage in the way that he does.

He's offensive; let's be respectful, even to him. Otherwise we just let him win.


The last thing I want is his way of treating others infecting my behaviour or my conversations.

[synechist]

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

Any concrete arguments against my opinion, mouthful Mr. Bean?

i for one do not question or contest your opinion. Just the way you express it is enough for me not to listen.
Talk with some maner & respect for the opinion of others, then i will listen to what you have to say
 

+1. Beautifully said.

[cryptoholic11]

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

Any concrete arguments against my opinion, mouthful Mr. Bean?

You shouldnt call anybody 'mouthful' before evaluating yourself first. Do you realize the amount of bullshit that is spewing out of your mouth right now? Calling people mother fuckers, redhead rednecks, disrespecting the community manager for no reason, repeating the same shit over and over, etc. Dude if you dont like XC, gtfo and find another coin. But you're obviously a troll and either knows it or you're just a miserable retard living in moms basement and find this amusing. Either way stfu already. Troll. And everybody here seems to be against how youre conducting yourself. So either grow up and have some respect or gtfo. Otherwise you're not part of any community, you dolt. Troll.

EDIT then again im probably helping to feed the troll. Youve been ignored.

[ssmc2]

evolution added to my ignore list

suggest you all do the same

Done