Bitcoin Forum
October 19, 2019, 06:14:33 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 [842] 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 ... 1640 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1481785 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 09:12:19 PM
 #16821



A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?


Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1571508873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571508873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571508873
Reply with quote  #2

1571508873
Report to moderator
1571508873
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571508873

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571508873
Reply with quote  #2

1571508873
Report to moderator
BrewCrewFan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 501



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:14:48 PM
 #16822

just as a test i put 26 xc from cryptsy to my osx wallet. took me 2 minutes and 28 seconds. WAUW! but my walley says; not minting because you dont have mature coins, what does this mean? thx

You need to wait for a certain number of confirmations of the payment on the network before your coins are mature.

I can't remember how many, or how long this takes. Anyone here know?

and what does mature and minting mean? thx for your awnser

mature means how many ticks later a coin will "mature"... some need 50, others much higher or lower... all depends on the coin. Until the set number is reached the coins that were transferred are not "mature".

Minting is the process whereby new coins are created in XC. 3.33% more coins are created each year. They're created in the wallets of users who leave their wallets running so that they can "stake".

Once coins are created, it's still possible that a different wallet will process transactions in such a way as to leave out the coins you've just earned; this record of the blockchain will compete against yours as different nodes accept either your or the other wallet's version. Whichever version gets the majority wins out and all the nodes have to accept it. For this reason you can't spend coins for a while - until it's certain that your coins are well established in the blockchain.

is it true that the more coins i have in my wallet, the more chance i have of earning coins?
Not really. I think there is an opt number which I believe is around 50 to 500 per wallet is best. Much of mining is random too.... some times you might get it in hours, or some cases wait a few weeks before you stack hits.

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.
SqMe5ceYfdcGsRyVpgvpYb6bRLS9j8omvB

XChat : Addy : XYuZESQpeMtZ2wit8nVVnXKGytfiaTBCo6 PubKey : eteshLzeq8Bh54BRjGSunMTc6Ytxtk7HYaSmDYMQn61z
_evolution_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:19:39 PM
 #16823



A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?


Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.
btell
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 119
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:20:54 PM
 #16824


XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?


You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.

synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 09:23:07 PM
 #16825



A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?


Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

I think you'd be mistaken in assuming that a community is an individual. :-)

You'd also be mistaken in assuming that XC is a company.

Finally you'd be mistaken in assuming that the community disagrees with me about treating others with respect.

Kindly be respectful, or leave.


Co-Founder, the Blocknet
KimmyF
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:24:02 PM
 #16826



A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?


Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.
Wow, cool down guy, double check who you are talking to & look around, come back tomorrow & chill before you awaken the kraken

qawzsx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:27:04 PM
 #16827



A little odd reaction... You ask respectfully?! You are in the position and obligation to answer respectfully, not to ask. I don't give a fuck about your PR strategies and so on corporation bullshits. That's not the idea of Satoshi Nakamoto in the first place. So please be more respectful.

UPDATE: I don't give a fuck about your investors also, that's not my problem, Mr. fucking Micros$ft-brainfuck. It seems to me that people like you will fuck up this technology, not the community.

What??

Should I translate in Albanian? Where are you from?


Kindly engage with respect for other people or wander off elsewhere. This is not how the XC community treats people.

Sorry, you are not the XC community. I am. You are part of a company - stop playing mother Teresa.

STFU already you idiotic moron...
cryptoholic11
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:27:53 PM
 #16828

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

qawzsx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:34:26 PM
 #16829


XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?


You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.



Except the devs of DRK are a fucking bunch of scamers, who tried to scam the community at first...So stop comparing this coin with a shity pump&dump coin, developed by some greedy fucks...
Now they are so legit because they said something like... "ok, we had this fucking 50% instamine, but well, we destroyed it cause you noticed it...so we are good now..."

You are tracking DRK & XC for a long time? dude, its a 6 months old coin vs a 2 months old coin, lets talk in 3 months, and compare this coin with DRK after 3 months...

"So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS"....

Dude, you're a senile one...why the fuck are you even in crypto? Seems like you have no fucking idea...

CryptoGretzky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:35:53 PM
 #16830


XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?


You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.



The reason why there is low volume is because everyone value their XC and is actually holding the coins in their wallet staking.  

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/#!wallets

There is a total of only 19.66% of the coins at Mintpal, Bittrex and Cryptsy.

That just shows that the supplies of free floating coins is super low.   People are actually securing the network by staking.

Going back to PoW is the DUMBEST idea EVER for a coin with such low float.  Luckily you are just a troll and not the dev of XC.   All of your posts are nothing but drivel and useless FUD....

synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 09:39:57 PM
 #16831

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.




You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.


Co-Founder, the Blocknet
battbot
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:43:09 PM
 #16832

im a troll



You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.



Let's not quote the troll.  Over 50% of DRK's coins were mined in a couple days.

XCurrency www.xc-official.com #xcofficial
XChat: XFCe4ue7yCeSvn22gisLXdfd9HhdVfr5uJ / 28VjdNMZMyF6UiHRqkSCi63UikfcdHXj8nRzhkb9GmHip
rockstahh
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:43:52 PM
 #16833


XC price is normal, but 24h exchange volumes are decreasing again. Anxiety...

Poloniex volumes DRK/XC = 7.516/2.568, mintpal volumes DRK/XC = 684.069/59.180.

Can you explain why people trust in DRK more? Indeed Evan Duffield has opened the sources?! Nor he has hypnotic abilities to make people zombies?


You can't evaluate a coin based on one 24h period.  That is idiotic.  If this were the case, then you would have to conclude just 1 day ago that XC > DRK, because 1 day ago XC had a higher 24h volume than DRK.  So, according to your method, you now have two antithetical reports to reconcile within a period of 48 hours.

Your method is seriously flawed.  And the reason DRK volume has risen to overtake XC's in the last 24 hours is unquestionably because they just released news on RC4.

I am tracking for DRK & XC for a long time. Yes, there are few time intervals in history, where XC > DRK by 24h volume, but MOST of rest time (I estimate 80-90%), DRK > XC by volume.

Today, the volume difference just became drammatic. My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.



Except the devs of DRK are a fucking bunch of scamers, who tried to scam the community at first...So stop comparing this coin with a shity pump&dump coin, developed by some greedy fucks...
Now they are so legit because they said something like... "ok, we had this fucking 50% instamine, but well, we destroyed it cause you noticed it...so we are good now..."

You are tracking DRK & XC for a long time? dude, its a 6 months old coin vs a 2 months old coin, lets talk in 3 months, and compare this coin with DRK after 3 months...

"So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS"....

Dude, you're a senile one...why the fuck are you even in crypto? Seems like you have no fucking idea...



Wallet Nerd, lay off the pcp!

1MKvsb5ULZrJqX9UjBpgESvfn5ftSg85qH
BrewCrewFan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 501



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:45:41 PM
 #16834

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.




You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.



If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.
SqMe5ceYfdcGsRyVpgvpYb6bRLS9j8omvB

XChat : Addy : XYuZESQpeMtZ2wit8nVVnXKGytfiaTBCo6 PubKey : eteshLzeq8Bh54BRjGSunMTc6Ytxtk7HYaSmDYMQn61z
dragnar
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:50:25 PM
 #16835

im a troll



You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.



Let's not quote the troll.  Over 50% of DRK's coins were mined in a couple days.

it was insta mined in the first hours ( adding up to over 40% sins release )

wen u controll so mutch of the supply its easy to control the price ( just dry the market out )

any one els here noticed that wen DRK moved up a shit ton *( and every one bought DRK )
that a lot of btc that was in altcoins left the market ? wonder where those btc have gone to  Wink

and thats why there aint a lot of btc in the alt market atm * it was drained out by xxxxx )

someting i warned peeps about some time ago ( and predicted ) and i was right on the money Tongue

lol no ty
_evolution_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:56:06 PM
 #16836

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

Any concrete arguments against my opinion, mouthful Mr. Bean?
Teka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:57:10 PM
 #16837

Lets keep the arguments constructive and outside of personal attacks.
braxx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:58:06 PM
 #16838

evolution added to my ignore list

suggest you all do the same
KimmyF
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 17, 2014, 09:58:25 PM
 #16839

@evolution, if youre really part of the community,  you wouldnt be talking like a 14year old muppet tough guy behind a computer screen. Why dont you be a little more constructive instead of condescending and disrespectful.

Any concrete arguments against my opinion, mouthful Mr. Bean?
i for one do not question or contest your opinion. Just the way you express it is enough for me not to listen.
Talk with some maner & respect for the opinion of others, then i will listen to what you have to say
 
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
July 17, 2014, 10:01:01 PM
 #16840

Fortunately it's now clear what sort of person _evolution_ is, and we need not bother to engage further.

But more importantly, I'd say that we shouldn't engage in the way that he does.

He's offensive; let's be respectful, even to him. Otherwise we just let him win.


The last thing I want is his way of treating others infecting my behaviour or my conversations.





Co-Founder, the Blocknet
Pages: « 1 ... 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 [842] 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 ... 1640 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!