Bitcoin Forum
October 18, 2019, 10:26:23 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 [844] 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 ... 1640 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1481785 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
SushiChef
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:05:27 AM
 #16861

ID a known troll


Just read from page 689 onwards.. We already know Wink
1571437583
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571437583

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571437583
Reply with quote  #2

1571437583
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1571437583
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571437583

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571437583
Reply with quote  #2

1571437583
Report to moderator
1571437583
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571437583

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571437583
Reply with quote  #2

1571437583
Report to moderator
1571437583
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1571437583

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1571437583
Reply with quote  #2

1571437583
Report to moderator
pookielax31
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:19:16 AM
 #16862

watch out for pookielax31.... Just ventured into the cloak thread and he was disrespecting someone who was going to buy XC. I wouldn't believe a word coming out of this guys mouth and he surely does not hold any XC. Put him on your ignore list because he will be back soon to spout more BS.


I love how you say i dont hold XC yet if you check the forums i was in XC before the original big rise and fall.. Hahaha so ignorant you are
pookielax31
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:20:59 AM
 #16863

and wasnt harassing some1 going to buy XC it was arbteddo or what ever his name is saying DUMP it for XC and i told him to GTFO... grow some skin
cryptoholic11
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:23:55 AM
 #16864

and wasnt harassing some1 going to buy XC it was arbteddo or what ever his name is saying DUMP it for XC and i told him to GTFO... grow some skin

dude relax, he wasnt saying dump cloak for XC. He said that he dumped his cloak for xc because he doesnt see it going any higher, but wished the cloak holders good luck and hope it actually rises.

shakesbear
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 551
Merit: 10

Global Business Lending


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:40:59 AM
 #16865

watch out for pookielax31.... Just ventured into the cloak thread and he was disrespecting someone who was going to buy XC. I wouldn't believe a word coming out of this guys mouth and he surely does not hold any XC. Put him on your ignore list because he will be back soon to spout more BS.


I love how you say i dont hold XC yet if you check the forums i was in XC before the original big rise and fall.. Hahaha so ignorant you are

So you saying you got the OG status in this gang ?

I'm just wondering how many OGs are still around ?

If you have been here since the beginning, put your hands up dawgs !!!

Obviously Dan aka Atcsecure is the gang leader

XC is a rap. We about to go gangsta in this crypto b#$@$tch !!

flashbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 505



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:43:59 AM
 #16866

Crap haven't seen volume this low is some time. At least its heading in the right direction. Likely calm before the storm. Looking forward to the new roadmap this weekend.  Exciting times coming boys!
flashbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 505



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:48:49 AM
 #16867

Synechist - can you comment on any work the new teams members recently announced are focusing their efforts on currently?
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2014, 12:52:23 AM
 #16868

Synechist - can you comment on any work the new teams members recently announced are focusing their efforts on currently?

Christian: C++ work on the core code; not sure exactly what though.

Rob: working on strategy for social marketing, media buys, etc. as well as copy-editing releases and shaping the conversation around how the brand and public image will evolve.

Foundation members: ongoing work on the ATM thing.

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
Driv3n
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:53:17 AM
 #16869

Crap haven't seen volume this low is some time. At least its heading in the right direction. Likely calm before the storm. Looking forward to the new roadmap this weekend.  Exciting times coming boys!

I think a lot has to do with ppl pulling their XC off of Mintpal, but I agree exciting times are ahead.
CryptoGretzky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:55:12 AM
 #16870

watch out for pookielax31.... Just ventured into the cloak thread and he was disrespecting someone who was going to buy XC. I wouldn't believe a word coming out of this guys mouth and he surely does not hold any XC. Put him on your ignore list because he will be back soon to spout more BS.


pookie is the biggest weasel you can find on the net.   He says whatever he says based on whatever benefits him the most at the time of posting.  He's basically a Cloak mole now just here advertising Cloak whenever he wants because he holds more Cloak at this time.

PowderMonkey
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 105
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 12:55:28 AM
 #16871

Crap haven't seen volume this low is some time. At least its heading in the right direction. Likely calm before the storm. Looking forward to the new roadmap this weekend.  Exciting times coming boys!


I've been giving this a fair amount of thought lately, and I would say that one of the biggest reasons for the decrease in volume recently is that there are very few people willing to sell at these "accumulation" prices.  The biggest 3 exchanges right now hold less than 20% of total supply from what someone posted earlier.  That means that over 80% of the coins are held by people believing XC will have some sort of long term value.  If I'm right with this thought process, then once the volume dries up due to the overwhelming majority of people being unwilling to sell, there's only one way for this ship to go.  Exciting times ahead I think.



synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
July 18, 2014, 12:58:18 AM
 #16872

Crap haven't seen volume this low is some time. At least its heading in the right direction. Likely calm before the storm. Looking forward to the new roadmap this weekend.  Exciting times coming boys!


I've been giving this a fair amount of thought lately, and I would say that one of the biggest reasons for the decrease in volume recently is that there are very few people willing to sell at these "accumulation" prices.  The biggest 3 exchanges right now hold less than 20% of total supply from what someone posted earlier.  That means that over 80% of the coins are held by people believing XC will have some sort of long term value.  If I'm right with this thought process, then once the volume dries up due to the overwhelming majority of people being unwilling to sell, there's only one way for this ship to go.  Exciting times ahead I think.




+1. I'm certainly holding. And I'm certainly not keeping coins on the internet!

Co-Founder, the Blocknet
therightmintality
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:04:28 AM
 #16873

@ demgains So is seems to me that you have something against other people buying illegal substances using XC, but you are perfectly fine if they only use it for tax evasion, bribes and other illegal financial shit....maybe not but at least that's what I understand.

Here is what I think:

The most important feature of XCurrency is privacy there is no doubt about this and getting it done is surely the number 1 priority.
Second priority is, at least in my mind, creating an environment that would enable spending XCurrency. I understand that introducing xc on the currency cards and ATMs will make it possible to spend it anywhere or exchange it for fiat, but people can do this just as well with bitcoin. For XC there needs to be a different application, specific for anon coins, like an online market.

By market I refer to a completely decentralized online market that would use xc. For such a market to have success a true anon coin is necessary and xc is perfect for that. Otherwise there are little applications that would absolutely require the use of an anon coin. I mean using it to sponsor political parties is great but still...not enough. Also what point is there to keep the records of a online company private (using xc) if the actual business can not be conducted also in a private way (using a decentralized anon market based on xc).

I consider cloak coin as the most important competitor. They are currently working on implementing a decentralized anon feature that might work out just as well as Dan's implementation. If they do achieve this then I belive in a very short time xc will be losing its advantage because cloak will also have their Onemarket service, maybe you have read their whitepaper.

I feel that in the future most commerce will move on the online medium and next logical step after getting rid of financial  middlemen, and thus liberating money (as bitcoin and all the other cryptocurrencies have done), is eliminating the ecommerce middlemen (like ebay, amazon and many others).

There is a great deal of bitcoin being transactioned on the dark markets. Those users will most definitely migrate over to the first good implementation of a decentralized market as they are aware that their weak spot is the fact that the markets they transact on are centralized.

Now don't get me wrong, I do not advertise the sale of drugs, child porn, weapons and what not. All of these issues can be resolved through peer reviews or other methods. But the fact still stands: there is a need for such a free market open to anyone and sooner or later someone will make it happen. I only wish that XC will be the one.

So in conclusion I belive that developing such a application should be first priority after anonymity problem is fully done.

Who's the developer's of Cloak?  Can I look up their bios or find them on Linkdin?  I wasn't able to find them on the Cloak site?
almond
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 387
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:17:01 AM
 #16874

Who's the developer's of Cloak?  Can I look up their bios or find them on Linkdin?  I wasn't able to find them on the Cloak site?

Their whitepaper says the developer's name is "Z"  I think Costa Gavras made a movie about him.........
.........If that's the same "Z"

Freedom of the press is guaranteed only to those who own one
SushiChef
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:20:15 AM
 #16875

 Grin
therightmintality
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:22:10 AM
 #16876

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.




You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.



If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.

+1,  If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution...  Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed.  Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...  
JakeThePanda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:23:46 AM
 #16877

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.




You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.



If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.

+1,  If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution...  Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed.  Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...  

Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.
BrewCrewFan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 501



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:23:53 AM
 #16878

Crap haven't seen volume this low is some time. At least its heading in the right direction. Likely calm before the storm. Looking forward to the new roadmap this weekend.  Exciting times coming boys!


I've been giving this a fair amount of thought lately, and I would say that one of the biggest reasons for the decrease in volume recently is that there are very few people willing to sell at these "accumulation" prices.  The biggest 3 exchanges right now hold less than 20% of total supply from what someone posted earlier.  That means that over 80% of the coins are held by people believing XC will have some sort of long term value.  If I'm right with this thought process, then once the volume dries up due to the overwhelming majority of people being unwilling to sell, there's only one way for this ship to go.  Exciting times ahead I think.




Biggest transaction tick was for 8 BTC in the last 24 hours, and that was a BUY and not a sell...

This should also make people pause and think that most likely most people who bought in the 80-90K range still are not dumping even at these prices... I did this and to be honest, I wont sell one XC until it at LEAST hits .015 if not more.

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.
SqMe5ceYfdcGsRyVpgvpYb6bRLS9j8omvB

XChat : Addy : XYuZESQpeMtZ2wit8nVVnXKGytfiaTBCo6 PubKey : eteshLzeq8Bh54BRjGSunMTc6Ytxtk7HYaSmDYMQn61z
BrewCrewFan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 501



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:26:08 AM
 #16879

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.




You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.



If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.

+1,  If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution...  Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed.  Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...  

Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.

Yes but that is such a small amount that it does not matter much at all in the over all picture. I bought into the coin more knowing that its not going to be farmed mined raped and dumped. To me PoS is the most stable out of it all. Also, if I understand it right, PoS does not make coins, but more or less takes the coins accumilated from transaction fees over the network and that is where the new coins come from... but not new per say... am I right? I am not 100% on that thinking right there lol.

Free SIGNs giving everyday. Be part, do not miss!.
SqMe5ceYfdcGsRyVpgvpYb6bRLS9j8omvB

XChat : Addy : XYuZESQpeMtZ2wit8nVVnXKGytfiaTBCo6 PubKey : eteshLzeq8Bh54BRjGSunMTc6Ytxtk7HYaSmDYMQn61z
JakeThePanda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 18, 2014, 01:31:43 AM
 #16880

My opinion, among many parity features of XC vs. DRK there is one, 'instamine' that intrinsic to XC, and not intrinsic to DRK. People's psychology does not accept unjust feature such as 'instamine'. You may contradict with 'stake' feature. But to stake coins, one need buy them first, buying is not so psychologically comfortable, as minig on the equipment you already possess.

So I call on Dan to return the mining feature, and let XC be PoW coin again, at least 50% PoW, 50% PoS.




You forget that, for investors, one of the central features of XC is that its money supply is not being continually diluted by mining.

So no, we're not bringing back mining.



If there was even a hint of something like that I would dump my thousands in a heartbeat....and it would not only be me either. The coin price be under 80K in short order.

+1,  If you want to read why this is a horrible idea, click on my username and read my post about dilution...  Mining coins until 2050 is an ill fated strategy and will not succeed.  Take any investible asset and continue to add shares to the mix the price will eventually be walking up the down escalator...  

Well, PoS also adds coins to the mix.

Yes but that is such a small amount that it does not matter much at all in the over all picture. I bought into the coin more knowing that its not going to be farmed mined raped and dumped. To me PoS is the most stable out of it all. Also, if I understand it right, PoS does not make coins, but more or less takes the coins accumilated from transaction fees over the network and that is where the new coins come from... but not new per say... am I right? I am not 100% on that thinking right there lol.

I'm pretty sure they are newly minted coins.
Pages: « 1 ... 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 [844] 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 ... 1640 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!