Bitcoin Forum
December 10, 2019, 11:20:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 [933] 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 ... 1640 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos  (Read 1481794 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
oblox
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1018


View Profile
July 30, 2014, 11:52:16 PM
 #18641

Cryptoland is a strange world. Don't get it.  After Dan's code and review, Keycoin up almost 200% and XC almost 15%.  Huh? Also volume has skyrocketed on Keycoin? XC is still superior in so many ways.  I guess patience is a virtue as they say.

I feel more secure with my money in XC than bitcoin at the mo. keycoin being 200% up could soon be 200% down. look on coinmarketcap, all the coins have been up and down XC has been steady... slight rise though over all...

perhaps i'm deluded but were onto a winner here!

You can't be down more than 200% unless you are margined. Up, certainly.
1575976832
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575976832

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575976832
Reply with quote  #2

1575976832
Report to moderator
1575976832
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575976832

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575976832
Reply with quote  #2

1575976832
Report to moderator
1575976832
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575976832

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575976832
Reply with quote  #2

1575976832
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1575976832
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575976832

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575976832
Reply with quote  #2

1575976832
Report to moderator
1575976832
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575976832

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575976832
Reply with quote  #2

1575976832
Report to moderator
1575976832
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575976832

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575976832
Reply with quote  #2

1575976832
Report to moderator
CryptoGretzky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 30, 2014, 11:52:49 PM
 #18642

Cryptoland is a strange world. Don't get it.  After Dan's code and review, Keycoin up almost 200% and XC almost 15%.  Huh? Also volume has skyrocketed on Keycoin? XC is still superior in so many ways.  I guess patience is a virtue as they say.

I feel more secure with my money in XC than bitcoin at the mo. keycoin being 200% up could soon be 200% down. look on coinmarketcap, all the coins have been up and down XC has been steady... slight rise though over all...

perhaps i'm deluded but were onto a winner here!

The great thing is.  After knowing that Dan gave it a good review... I made like 4x profit from my investment in Key.  So now... I have more btc to get more XC. Smiley

fair play man, i wish i knew that Dan was gonna give this review and i woulda done the same! but i think my point still stands... u recon keycoin is gonna stay up??

Don't know, any coins besides XC is just a number game to get more btc to get more XC.   The pop from yesterday feel "to me" is unsustainable.   Will it be at the end?  Don't know myself, but I just have to take profits in case it crash back down.  

qawzsx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

NOT FUD! FACTS!


View Profile
July 30, 2014, 11:57:14 PM
 #18643

Now that's a freaking healthy increase in value...not some 200% / day
 
G-Bert
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 30, 2014, 11:58:33 PM
 #18644

Now that's a freaking healthy increase in value...not some 200% / day
 

booo yaaa!! 16!

XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv
public key  fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
tazmania
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 30, 2014, 11:59:17 PM
 #18645

Can some day traders and sellers move to bittrex. Not looking to use Mintpal till the take over happens.

G-Bert
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 12:15:24 AM
 #18646

im begging ya...guys.. what exchange? just left bittrex for mintpal.

XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv
public key  fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
flashbit
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 505



View Profile
July 31, 2014, 12:17:39 AM
 #18647

MACD for 1 day just crossed over into the green after over 2 weeks in the red. Very good sign folks.
knowbrainar
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 12:27:30 AM
 #18648

So now keycoin is up to 200k (200%) after a code review??? lol, crypto is a strange world indeed.
ssmc2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 1035


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 12:33:07 AM
 #18649

So now keycoin is up to 200k (200%) after a code review??? lol, crypto is a strange world indeed.

When the dust settles, this will only be a good thing for XC.  Cool
Driv3n
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 12:55:31 AM
 #18650

MACD for 1 day just crossed over into the green after over 2 weeks in the red. Very good sign folks.

It's about time... I dont really check the price much these days but it is good to see some decent volume and an increase today.

Also the announcement today was great, I cant wait for the pr campaigns on finished rev 2 and rev 2.5.
pbremen01
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 01:22:41 AM
 #18651

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?
policymaker
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210
Merit: 100

Crypto Currency Supporter


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 01:34:38 AM
 #18652

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

ofc we r going to have to w8 on an official response from the team, but even if we neglect the fact the same dude states in his OP that "The purpose of this program is to demonstrate that the anonymity of KeyCoin and similar coins may be broken. This is not production-ready code that covers all possible cases" , XC is so far ahead in rev/tech terms that I wouldn't hold my breath.

Not to mention XC is not mirrored directly anywhere in there. If id take a guess, its probably another FUD to trigger the keycoin dump. Again, nothing personal against keycoin, just taking a wild guess.

XCurrency Price Speculation Topic
Coin Control Basic guide                                                                XChat address/private/instant/absolute: XSKu1fpwvRcAekfK91qVHi51Tgz4ckoA91
XChat public key: zcfx74j4fFK9hW7rQniTvLyDyXd9SyRCrncP9vdukbVT
mecc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 01:53:27 AM
 #18653

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

Quote
This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?
pbremen01
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 02:00:59 AM
 #18654

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

Quote
This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?

It doesn't mean that it has to be sender's wallet. Any wallet will suffice. It seems that the program is using RPC API to get info about transactions.

_evolution_
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 140
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 03:30:46 AM
 #18655

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

Quote
This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?

It doesn't mean that it has to be sender's wallet. Any wallet will suffice. It seems that the program is using RPC API to get info about transactions.

Stop the blatant FUD. That's the whole "algorithm" of the moron who is trying to influence the market price:
Quote
               foreach (Vout vout in vouts)
                {
                    // addresses sometimes don't exists in vout JSON returned from client, we just ignore this case
                    if (vout.address != null)
                    {
                        if (coinsReceived.ContainsKey(vout.address))
                        {
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = coinsReceived[vout.address] + vout.amount;
                        }
                        else
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = vout.amount;
                    }
 
                }
 
                foreach (string addr in coinsReceived.Keys)
                {
                    decimal c = coinsReceived[addr];
                    if (c >= receivedAmount && c <= receivedAmount + 0.0003M)
                    {
                        return addr;
                    }
                }
As anyone can see, there is absolutely no logic, it's just a piece of shit, probably copy & paste from some M$ost department...
shfc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 05:09:28 AM
 #18656

nice dev.
 Grin
synechist
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000


To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market


View Profile WWW
July 31, 2014, 08:32:44 AM
 #18657

This reddit post contains reference to "XC":

http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2c6pax/program_that_deanonymizes_anonymous_keycoin/

Opinions? Does this mean that the first revision of XC also had similar flaw?

Quote
This program requires complete access to your wallet.

If the "flaw" requires full control of the wallet, then wtf is the point?

It doesn't mean that it has to be sender's wallet. Any wallet will suffice. It seems that the program is using RPC API to get info about transactions.

Stop the blatant FUD. That's the whole "algorithm" of the moron who is trying to influence the market price:
Quote
               foreach (Vout vout in vouts)
                {
                    // addresses sometimes don't exists in vout JSON returned from client, we just ignore this case
                    if (vout.address != null)
                    {
                        if (coinsReceived.ContainsKey(vout.address))
                        {
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = coinsReceived[vout.address] + vout.amount;
                        }
                        else
                            coinsReceived[vout.address] = vout.amount;
                    }
 
                }
 
                foreach (string addr in coinsReceived.Keys)
                {
                    decimal c = coinsReceived[addr];
                    if (c >= receivedAmount && c <= receivedAmount + 0.0003M)
                    {
                        return addr;
                    }
                }
As anyone can see, there is absolutely no logic, it's just a piece of shit, probably copy & paste from some M$ost department...


Yes, I can't see how this will have any effect on XC. Multipath obscures the amount sent and so using block height is no way to identify the sender.




Co-Founder, the Blocknet
reebokasss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 08:41:39 AM
 #18658

nice buy wall at 153 Smiley it seems that we are going up slowly but steady Smiley

For security, your account has been locked. Email acctcomp15@theymos.e4ward.com
CryptoGretzky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 250



View Profile
July 31, 2014, 08:46:24 AM
 #18659

nice buy wall at 153 Smiley it seems that we are going up slowly but steady Smiley

Wo.. 35 btc.   Guess someone got sick of waiting to get their buy order filled when no one with large amount of XC is selling.  Grin

smoothie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1018


LEALANA Monero Physical Silver Coins


View Profile
July 31, 2014, 09:51:41 AM
 #18660

125,000 XC premine?

That is quite a hefty premine if you ask me.

2.27% of all coins to exist in the form of a premine.

Sorry gonna pass on this one.

███████████████████████████████████████

            ,╓p@@███████@╗╖,           
        ,p████████████████████N,       
      d█████████████████████████b     
    d██████████████████████████████æ   
  ,████²█████████████████████████████, 
 ,█████  ╙████████████████████╨  █████y
 ██████    `████████████████`    ██████
║██████       Ñ███████████`      ███████
███████         ╩██████Ñ         ███████
███████    ▐▄     ²██╩     a▌    ███████
╢██████    ▐▓█▄          ▄█▓▌    ███████
 ██████    ▐▓▓▓▓▌,     ▄█▓▓▓▌    ██████─
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓█,,▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
           ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓─  
     ²▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓╩    
        ▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀       
           ²▀▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀`          
                   ²²²                 
███████████████████████████████████████

. ★☆ WWW.LEALANA.COM        My PGP fingerprint is A764D833.                  History of Monero development Visualization ★☆ .
LEALANA  PHYSICAL MONERO COINS 999 FINE SILVER.
 
Pages: « 1 ... 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 [933] 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 ... 1640 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!