|
Bl4ckw00d
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:32:49 PM |
|
+1 That's a winner right there.
|
|
|
|
bardacuda
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:33:11 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it?
|
The future will rely on AI. SingularityNET lets anyone create, monetize, and use AI at scale. From the creators of Sophia the Robot.
|
|
|
Thrash
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:36:04 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design.
|
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:37:14 PM |
|
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
|
heartastack
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:39:24 PM |
|
Someone should put a watermark radar detector in the background
|
|
|
|
roede94105
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:41:01 PM |
|
Any news on the testnet block explorer?
|
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:41:07 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue.
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:42:47 PM |
|
To help improve staking, I've split up the balance in the premine wallet as thetime to age for coins maybe too large and the net weight goes up and down. I would guess it should even itself over time, as more coins split and stake. It is much better for the coin to get a lot of small blocks instead of large ones.
XHciahhy7rgusYeSqi359TdJNUvT4S2QKc XGgekbiLd5HAnv2iLrA7iZeNrWnDGJ8hbS XS4QLi6VpQQo79HLkoFBj5YZkn6p6TuLKG
ATCSECURE
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:43:47 PM |
|
I'd like to see what it would look like if the two arches were brought out to the left and right a bit so that they do not overlap in the center. You would have a larger earth and I think it would still look good. And less like the chambers logo.
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
bardacuda
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:44:17 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. I would agree but this has more than just 'characteristics' of that other logo. It's a lawsuit and FUDstorm waiting to happen if it became the official XC logo.
|
The future will rely on AI. SingularityNET lets anyone create, monetize, and use AI at scale. From the creators of Sophia the Robot.
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:44:54 PM |
|
To help improve staking, I've split up the balance in the premine wallet as thetime to age for coins maybe too large and the net weight goes up and down. I would guess it should even itself over time, as more coins split and stake. It is much better for the coin to get a lot of small blocks instead of large ones.
XHciahhy7rgusYeSqi359TdJNUvT4S2QKc XGgekbiLd5HAnv2iLrA7iZeNrWnDGJ8hbS XS4QLi6VpQQo79HLkoFBj5YZkn6p6TuLKG
ATCSECURE
Thanks for the update and explanation!
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:45:47 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. I would agree but this has more than just 'characteristics' of that other logo. It's a lawsuit and FUDstorm waiting to happen if it became the official XC logo. I agree that we need to avoid FUD and suits. That's why I suggested non-overlapping arches. Edit: And maybe get rid of the slash in the bottom of the C?
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
Thrash
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:46:58 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. I would agree but this has more than just 'characteristics' of that other logo. It's a lawsuit and FUDstorm waiting to happen if it became the official XC logo. +1
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:47:55 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. I would agree but this has more than just 'characteristics' of that other logo. It's a lawsuit and FUDstorm waiting to happen if it became the official XC logo. I agree that we need to avoid FUD and suits. That's why I suggested non-overlapping arches. What do you think of my logo I submitted a couple of days ago?: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=627225.msg7020109#msg7020109
|
|
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:49:31 PM |
|
The superimposed globe with orbiting badassness looks nice.
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
wobbzz
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:51:19 PM |
|
This is ripped off from the xavier chambers logo that was posted earlier though. Did anyone get permission to use it? We cannot use a logo that is lifted from an existing one if we want to be taken seriously. We need a fresh, unique and 100% ours logo. It is extremely important to not base the XC logo on an existing design. I would argue that it's not wrong to implement characteristics of other designs into a new design as the new logo poster has done. Lots of people produce products with similar designs. (Look at cars/trucks/vans...) I'd say as long as a certain percentage has changed then it shouldn't be an issue. I would agree but this has more than just 'characteristics' of that other logo. It's a lawsuit and FUDstorm waiting to happen if it became the official XC logo. I agree that we need to avoid FUD and suits. That's why I suggested non-overlapping arches. What do you think of my logo I submitted a couple of days ago?: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=627225.msg7020109#msg7020109I like the arch separation but the circle makes it look like the x-men logo. Scrap the circle, superimpose the earth and orbits, black background, $profit.
|
z2z me @ zs18642322h0h7hzjknejehavx0srwmungl8uj0t3vsxd7jwzr2kdhrcj38setn7ujd500fqn99y52
|
|
|
nanoprobe
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
Traveling in subspace
|
|
May 31, 2014, 05:52:02 PM |
|
Can someone offer some sound advice to a fellow XC brethren?
Should I buy a gpu that hashes around 4 MHS X11 or an asic 1.5 Mhs scrypt miner? Both are about the same price.
Thank you for any input on this
i guess the Advantage of an asic is the less power consumption (even less than running your gpu with x11 algo) right? you Need to create an excelfile to calculate the power consumption, helps to decide. on the other Hand your gpu has a warranty and can be replaced quite fast (when gridseed showed up there were only couple months warranty and replacing them means shipping them worldwide) and a gpu has a value even if the whole cryptocoin Thing dies tomorrow. hope that helps. i would buy the gpu. http://www.gawminers.com/store/The Fury 1 MH/S+ ASIC SCRYPT MINER (Week Three) 5 Reviews $149.95 @ 40 watts Overstock.com Gigabyte GV-N75TOC-2GI... 2.8 MHS to 3.0 MHs X11 @ 40 watts $167.99 Quantity: 1 Send exactly 0.26979194 BTC (plus miner fee) to: 1Mo7abeTr3YpcjL2fnZdYkfEfNwvbBj85m Both places take BTC as payment One other thing to consider is that the 750Ti will only do about 300kh/s on regular scrypt so for the same money the asic will do 4x more.
|
You'll never know what you're living for until you know what you're willing to die for. Never look back, something might be gaining on you.
|
|
|
|