dida
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
SoNiC BooM
|
 |
May 29, 2014, 10:43:08 PM |
|
It's really interesting to watch someone constantly trying to bring the price down, selling coins at much lower price then buying price  It is gonna skyrocketed soon..just watch it will be epic ....  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
studio1one
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:44:20 PM |
|
If you want to get a second opinion of evaluating the code from a very well respected dev, then you should invite rat4 (Blackcoin dev) to take a look at it.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
I have sent him a PM with a bounty, it's up to him to accept it. https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/472145998882828288Good move, well done man. |
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:44:37 PM |
|
It's really interesting to watch someone constantly trying to bring the price down, selling coins at much lower price then buying price They are trying to hold a balloon underwater. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
greyskies
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:45:21 PM |
|
If you want to get a second opinion of evaluating the code from a very well respected dev, then you should invite rat4 (Blackcoin dev) to take a look at it.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
I have sent him a PM with a bounty, it's up to him to accept it. https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/472145998882828288rat4 is a very respected dev. |
|
|
|
|
|
Relaxedsense
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:45:41 PM |
|
Teka, thanks for putting up with all the non-sense. I don't know how you do it, and not lose your cool. Good work.
XC to the moon!
+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:46:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEECoinfan
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:46:32 PM |
|
All it takes to witness the professionalism and expertise of the "peer reviewer" of the code is to take a glance on his main page and read a few paragraphs. http://cryptopump.info/If that's a trusted and respectable source that can do such judgments as declaring anything secure then I am madonna. I won't even mention the article and conclusion of the review, because that has to be the vaguest thing I have read in a long time. With a premine IPO one could at least expect that those funds get spent properly. Guess not. There was no IPO, and the premine was declared from the beginning. When I joined the Premine was worth about a bitcoin. For all the work and cost associated with launching a coin, if there was no community interest then the Dev would have lost more (Opportunity cost) as he could easily make more money with his time working then the time he has spent on the forms responding to peoples questions and concerns. Would you expect somebody to do work for free? Shouldn't you be happy that the dev has incentive to continue to create a better and better coin (Makes his premine worth more) No incentive coins are either not original or dumped as soon as they hit the exchange. Also most of the people saying the code wasn't right were offered the opportunity to review it and turned it down because guess what....They admitted they don't understand it! |
|
|
|
|
mfqrs3
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:46:39 PM |
|
It's really interesting to watch someone constantly trying to bring the price down, selling coins at much lower price then buying price It is gonna skyrocketed soon..just watch it will be epic .... Yes I know, as soon as whales fill their stomach, and their gasses get out off the ass  price will fly away in the sky |
|
|
|
|
|
ReRunRod
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:46:53 PM |
|
Thank you Keep up the great work chief! |
|
|
|
|
|
mindfox
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:47:07 PM |
|
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
|
|
|
|
|
Grifftech
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:47:25 PM |
|
The DRK fanboys won't be happy soon, I really think DRK is about to come off and XC is about to rise... Could get interesting...
this is the reply to your last message but I dont see it anymore in thread and my previous reply either "dude cut it out already I have 17000 coins and I was concerned about this review thing and actually still am this is something can change my life compleatly or burn all my savings so Yes I am concerned read my first fuking post in here I arrived just today just for this community and this coin. so please do not offend me anymore " I would like to know why they were both deleted I strongly believe in this coin but this is scaring me Well dumb of you to use your savings, trading anything is like gambling. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:47:33 PM |
|
If you want to get a second opinion of evaluating the code from a very well respected dev, then you should invite rat4 (Blackcoin dev) to take a look at it.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
I have sent him a PM with a bounty, it's up to him to accept it. https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/472145998882828288Good move, well done man. +1 thank you Teka |
|
|
|
nzminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:47:56 PM |
|
If you want to get a second opinion of evaluating the code from a very well respected dev, then you should invite rat4 (Blackcoin dev) to take a look at it.
Not sure if he has time, but worth asking him.
I have sent him a PM with a bounty, it's up to him to accept it. https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/472145998882828288rat4 is a very respected dev. lol and when he looks at it and finds its unique, the price will triple instantly! |
NEM, THE SECURE, SCALABLE BLOCKCHAIN [NEM.IO] [T.ME/NEMRED]
|
|
|
|
Teka (OP)
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:49:15 PM |
|
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
IMPORTANT! |
|
|
|
|
|
megges
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:50:04 PM |
|
Dear dev, it would be great if you could use git like its used for, i believe you should know how git works!
Its impossible to analyze your code if we havent any history of the code and where it comes from ...
(for the users who wouldn't know for what a git repository is - wikipedia: Every Git working directory is a full-fledged repository with complete history and full version tracking capabilities, not dependent on network access or a central server.)
ps: that would also help in the claims of codebase, and it would be fair to the orginal code developers!
Thanks
|
tip me!  XtSrWch1U3BsTBFBHj7acTTzxFo1fy5BMa |
|
|
PmcUnited
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:50:19 PM |
|
My coins need to grow up quickly if only i could feed them some Big bud
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brilliantrocket
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:50:23 PM |
|
You guys are totally missing the point. I don't care whether the current XC code is original or not. Writing a centralized mixer is so easy that the Fedoracoin guys did it. The point is the difference in difficulty between coding a centralized mixing service and coding a decentralized mixing service is enormous. Being able to do the former is NOT evidence that one can do the latter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mfqrs3
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:50:54 PM |
|
It's really interesting to watch someone constantly trying to bring the price down, selling coins at much lower price then buying price They are trying to hold a balloon underwater. Yes, it's too obvious that it's funny |
|
|
|
|
|
powersup
|
|
May 29, 2014, 10:51:49 PM |
|
Hello.
I was invited to check the implementation of XC compared to FedoraCoin's codebase in order to find possible similarities between them.
First of all, I visited FedoraCoin's repository and checked the specific file mentioned (mixerann.cpp and the header file).
Then, I was invited to Developer's station with a Teamviewer session and saw the code that implements the specific feature.
The code is in no way similar between the two coins.
But, I believe that one must trusts his own eyes (and compiler). Just download the source code from FedoraCoin and create a working wallet that has all the features of XC enabled. That would prove whether the claim is correct or false.
Now, I do not know who claimed that Fedora and XC share the same codebase. If someone claims that some principles are the same, then I'm afraid that someone hasn't heard of Bitcoin and the blockchain concept (or the transaction concept, or the pubkey->wallet address concept, or... the list goes on forever).
IMPORTANT! +1 Darkcoin community receiving blow after blow, a review by rat4 would be a K.O. And can I point out, once again ATCsecure has delivered what he promised |
|
|
|
|
|
