|
atcsecure
|
 |
June 14, 2014, 05:18:32 PM |
|
WTF is that? as I said, POST THE address's |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
minerjav
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:19:03 PM
Last edit: June 14, 2014, 05:48:44 PM by minerjav |
|
I'm a layman so this all goes over my head, but in the American court of law we have a thing called "Reasonable Doubt", and from what I gather is there is absolutely no flaw in the XC design that would allow someone to be caught, indicted and convicted on anything based on the evidence shown. Chaeplin's method just seems to be the equivalent of throwing darts at a wall and getting giddy when he hits it right, while this may be technically correct, in the REAL WORLD this is not enough to send anyone up the river, if my understanding is incorrect let me know.
As the suggested reading shows, Most of the time in real life you only need a lightly test (like the DNA), to elevate it to something higher (like an "American court" as you mention) if the importance of the case require it. At that level, you can order a more exhaustive search with better tools and technology. For most users, proof that he is not my father is enough, For most fathers, proof that he is not my son is enough. (the big business for commercial products around the world and "over the counter") Edited for clarification. |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:21:19 PM |
|
I'm willing to offer 1 btc for anybody who can find the senders address for the transaction done yesterday
XXcJEFKxziaH8trY6DruHx9ap39rnDJbK7 - Receivers Address
in order to claim the bounty you need to include the proof and it needs to be "beyond a reasonable doubt"
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
PUMPBANDIT
Member
 Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:25:01 PM |
|
The heat is on!
This is the funniest sht eva!
|
|
|
|
|
fourdegrees11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:26:40 PM |
|
SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.
Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!
Can you deny this ? Is not single entity ? This is your a Xnode address. So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up.. As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there... chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left... This. He continuously blows off what ATCsecure says and then posts the same garbage. How is this helping? |
|
|
|
|
|
pookielax31
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:27:00 PM |
|
ATC.... are we gonna see a Rev 1.5 wallet release today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:29:09 PM |
|
ATC.... are we gonna see a Rev 1.5 wallet release today?
Most likely tomorrow night |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
jasinlee
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:36:45 PM |
|
Chaplin, be honest, you cannot produce the results you have tricked people into thinking you are capable of delivering. The reason you are having so much trouble explaining the satoshi spam is because you think you have access to the wallets total balance? Or you think by sending coins to that address it adds the address to the blockchain on some level you somehow created a hard link? Do you even understand the logical fails here?
This is like you are saying: Yes officer, little 9 year old Suzie sold me the crack. And the cop looks at you like you are a nutcase because he clearly saw crackhead A hand crackhead B said crack. (Chain of custody.) Then Chaplin says, "Yes, yes, I know the crackheads gave me the crack, but then I threw some on Suzie....so now she is involved too and she gave me crack now since I gave her some." To which the cop responds by putting you in a straight jacket.
|
|
|
|
n00bnoxious
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Bitnation Development Team Member
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:39:30 PM |
|
This is like you are saying: Yes officer, little 9 year old Suzie sold me the crack. And the cop looks at you like you are a nutcase because he clearly saw crackhead A hand crackhead B said crack. (Chain of custody.) Then Chaplin says, "Yes, yes, I know the crackheads gave me the crack, but then I threw some on Suzie....so now she is involved too and she gave me crack now since I gave her some." To which the cop responds by putting you in a straight jacket.
+9000 Internets, dude. |
|
|
|
|
|
phosphorush
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:40:32 PM |
|
First I thought Chaeplin was just FUD, then I thought he was actually helping, however now I'm back at my initial position. Post something clear or get lost  |
Your account locked, please contact support.
|
|
|
|
flashbit
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:42:59 PM |
|
Lol not a good sign - the 6 hr bitcoinwisdom chart is showing the dragon now spewing fire. The chart is mad. Who knows where this will go now.
|
|
|
|
|
ethereal73
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:43:53 PM |
|
WTF is that? as I said, POST THE address's Sorry Cheaplin, i will back you up when people are starting attacks on a personal level. i will NOT back you up a technical way, the question is easy, provide the senders addresss. What i see are a view links to a view topics, thats not what is asked for. just post the senders address, no links, nothing, plain and simple the senders address. |
|
|
|
|
|
flashbit
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:49:03 PM |
|
WTF is that? as I said, POST THE address's Sorry Cheaplin, i will back you up when people are starting attacks on a personal level. i will NOT back you up a technical way, the question is easy, provide the senders addresss. What i see are a view links to a view topics, thats not what is asked for. just post the senders address, no links, nothing, plain and simple the senders address. I think Cheaplin's silence is telling. Nothing more to add. |
|
|
|
|
mr_random
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:51:49 PM |
|
SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.
Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!
Can you deny this ? Is not single entity ? This is your a Xnode address. So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up.. As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there... chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left... Chaeplin is actually a very sneaky and cunning individual. He posts irrelevant shit and acts like he doesn't understand. But he knows exactly wtf he is doing. Why the fuck he keeps harping back to old versions of XC is beyond me. He's a FUDster with technical knowledge - the worst kind, because only a handful of regular posters understand the protocol well enough to challenge him. Atcsecure has posted the challenge for the newest version of XC. By all means anyone is invited to try and crack it. |
|
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:54:04 PM |
|
SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.
Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!
Can you deny this ? Is not single entity ? This is your a Xnode address. So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up.. As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there... chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left... This. He continuously blows off what ATCsecure says and then posts the same garbage. How is this helping? ^ this. anyone complimenting chaeplin needs to see all his repeat spams in both DRK and XC Uncensored threads of issues that have already been properly answered by atcsecure. Chaeplin is not trying to help XC but trying to spread FUD. That much is clear. |
|
|
|
|
ethereal73
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:56:47 PM |
|
WTF is that? as I said, POST THE address's Sorry Cheaplin, i will back you up when people are starting attacks on a personal level. i will NOT back you up a technical way, the question is easy, provide the senders addresss. What i see are a view links to a view topics, thats not what is asked for. just post the senders address, no links, nothing, plain and simple the senders address. I think Cheaplin's silence is telling. Nothing more to add. As far as i can see, ATCSecure has provided a great job here. And it looks like Chaeplin can't figure out the address. Chaeplin has actually 3 choices. 1. Post the address, and only the address. 2. Ask for more time to investigate, and i think ATCSecure will provide a day more without a problem. 3. Or admit he can't find the Address. (silence is also admitting) Just my 2 XCents |
|
|
|
|
|
BrewCrewFan
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:57:04 PM |
|
SO Chaeplin couldn't prove any thing so he tries to stir up the debate with non-trivial information.
Lets ALL BE CLEAR - PRODUCE THE ORIGINAL SENDERS ADDRESS or STFU!!!!!
Can you deny this ? Is not single entity ? This is your a Xnode address. So that was REV1 code, we are now REV1.5, I posted the transaction details yesterday for testing... get with the program I dont get all the chaeplin compliments, the guy is clearly not capable of proving anything and just wants to stir things up.. As for his apparent lack of grasp for the English language, I suggest a few of you read his posts on the DRK thread, he seems to have very few problems there... chaeplin you cannot work out the sender address, just admit it and stop losing whatever credibility you may have left... Chaeplin is actually a very sneaky and cunning individual. He posts irrelevant shit and acts like he doesn't understand. But he knows exactly wtf he is doing. Why the fuck he keeps harping back to old versions of XC is beyond me. He's a FUDster with technical knowledge - the worst kind, because only a handful of regular posters understand the protocol well enough to challenge him. Atcsecure has posted the challenge for the newest version of XC. By all means anyone is invited to try and crack it. Winner winner of the steak dinner. |
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 14, 2014, 05:58:11 PM |
|
the bounty is out there for anybody to claim... 1 BTC
|
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
jasinlee
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:01:44 PM |
|
I have dealt with contractors from India just like this, take a job they cannot finish or even understand. Turn in code that makes no sense and is no where close to the guidelines set forth. Then getting mad when you tell them the work isnt correct and you will not pay them for it.
|
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:02:03 PM |
|
the bounty is out there for anybody to claim... 1 BTC
+1 When is REV 1.5 releasing to public? |
|
|
|
|
|
