[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[Zarmung]

blocknet was a catastrophe for xc as anyone can see
give me back my money !

I see this apologist of DRK in each thread which connected with Blocknet.
M8 all who are able to think already out of DRK, this coin is the past.
Now is the time for global networks like BlockNet, SuperNet
Get lost!

[mav137]

Yes, please expand the blocknet thread ban on mchammer to this threat. I'm here for constructive feedback and announcements on the XC project.

For hammer: please man, if you invested badly, don't blame others.

[cryptohunter]

Is the XC multipool ever coming back online?

it's all gone a little quiet in here

[sugarboy321]

Yes, please expand the blocknet thread ban on mchammer to this threat. I'm here for constructive feedback and announcements on the XC project.

For hammer: please man, if you invested badly, don't blame others.

I think we are being to nice.

Mchammer is a pumper and dumper, does not care about the tech or the coin. Just cares about lining his pockets. Hes a parasite/vulture.
Look at his posting history you will find I am right.

[McHammer]

FAME  
ofc i am interested in the tech
blocknet was not convincing

[LD2164]

FAME  
ofc i am interested in the tech
blocknet was not convincing

Blocknet still is convincing
You are still a troll
This FUD was not convincing

[mr_random]

Why don't more of you guys post at xctalk.com? 

It's quiet over there but it's FUD free. More importantly it's one of the easiest and best ways ANYONE can support XC, by building the community.

We want to be like NXT, Bitshares, Maidsafe, Dogecoin etc that don't RELY upon bitcointalk and have busy communities outside of this forum. That is a v good thing to aim for. When new investors search, do we want them coming to troll city bitcointalk or do we want them going to xctalk.com? We want the latter. And that will only happen if we post there. 

[mr_random]

We should have a locked topic in the announcements section that is strictly for technical announcements, new wallets, app testing releases, partnerships, PR etc. That will give a quick overview to newcomers how active the development and PR is.

We should also have an unlocked topic which is strictly moderated. After the ridiculous amount of FUD and dummy accounts being used to smear Dan, XC and Block this should be a no-brainer. People can (and have!) created unofficial discussion topics for XC which are unmoderated (and guess who flock to those, the trolls).

What I suggest shouldn't be a problem. See peercoin:

Announcement topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=101820.0
Locked topic only for updates: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=114994.0

Note - I have read little of the recent posts above me.

this looks good and shouldn't be deleted.
just open a new thread here in ann section with a coordinated account plus one update thread in the general section. if they allow it for peercoin we should be good.

Suits me.

I'm also open to the idea of community-created threads in the main Altcoins section. They can facilitate broader discussion and allow other people to discover XC (even if they're full of FUD).

Was a problem implementing this?

I also made a topic on the xctalk forum, I don't know if you've checked it - essentially I suggest that download links for wallet releases and app releases only get posted on the xctalk forum to boost activity there. Could be a rubbish idea, but so far two members gave positive replies.

I also made an earlier topic on xctalk about changing the structure of the xctalk forum so the front page is more like the maidsafe.org one and simply lists the newest topics. This hides the clutter and cuts straight to the active conversations. Quite a few people seemed to agree with me but again, no reply from anyone on the XC team. I do appreciate it may be a pain in the arse to change things around after the work has been put in to make it how it is. I guess my point is, to me it seems unnecessary to have so many forums and subforums when it's mostly a ghost town...

[McHammer]

FAME  
ofc i am interested in the tech
blocknet was not convincing

Blocknet still is convincing
You are still a troll
This FUD was not convincing

im not a 100% troll
blocknet is crap
a big part of the fud was convincing

claim vs claim

[UnicornFarts]

Can someone link me to the detailed expense sheet of the XC premine expenditures Dan & team promised a few weeks ago?

[MKAxe11]

@McHammer

99% of what you writer her is OT.
Post it somewhere else - this thread is about XC, not blocknet.

[reebokasss]

and can we know when we will get the news? not exactly, but approximately? in one week or later? because its very sad to see XC at these prices and that volume (2btc in 24h in bittrex )

[synechist]

Can someone link me to the detailed expense sheet of the XC premine expenditures Dan & team promised a few weeks ago?

Get lost rdnkjdi.

[MKAxe11]

@UnicornFarts

going through your post history, I don't see much reasoning why you would invest in XC.  instead a lot of comments that could be considered FUD (or at least uncertainty and doubt).
so i consider you are not invested in XC at all. except your one of the stupidest investors in the crypto world (an there's a lot of stupid crypto investors around not knowing the slightest thing about trading/investing), who buts money into something you don't believe in or trust.

but I give you the benefit of the doubt and say your not invested in XC, then stop lurking around here and also stop demanding stuff from the our dev - he has better things to do, really - and I can't remember anyone from the team saying "we promise to give you more details about ..." but give me a link if I missed it.

[ib88]

Can someone link me to the detailed expense sheet of the XC premine expenditures Dan & team promised a few weeks ago?

Get lost rdnkjdi.

+1

Unicornfarts, McHammer, Revelation and the rest of the trolls should be banned from this thread. I'm all for constructive criticism but their posts have only one aim in mind - to spread fud.

[biskyb33]

originally, it was the maturity level that drew me to the cryptocurrency community in general, and obviously it just keeps evolving, which is why i stay ....awk!! 

[flashbit]

Can someone link me to the detailed expense sheet of the XC premine expenditures Dan & team promised a few weeks ago?

Get lost rdnkjdi.

Arlyn, why can't you ban them? If you can't, what about Teka?

[ib88]

@UnicornFarts

going through your post history, I don't see much reasoning why you would invest in XC.  instead a lot of comments that could be considered FUD (or at least uncertainty and doubt).
so i consider you are not invested in XC at all. except your one of the stupidest investors in the crypto world (an there's a lot of stupid crypto investors around not knowing the slightest thing about trading/investing), who buts money into something you don't believe in or trust.

but I give you the benefit of the doubt and say your not invested in XC, then stop lurking around here and also stop demanding stuff from the our dev - he has better things to do, really - and I can't remember anyone from the team saying "we promise to give you more details about ..." but give me a link if I missed it.

There is absolutely no point in wasting XC team's time by demanding accounts of expenses. Anybody who has remotely followed this thread will know it all went into development, hence the remarkable rate of development up until rev 2. ffs Dan has even invested his own funds in progressing XC's development.

The premine address has been available to the public at all times. Anyone who had concerns or questions regarding expenses had every opportunity to inquire throughout the project - why all these "concerns" now? Because of trolls trying to fuel a non-existent fire. A list detailing expenses doesn't prove anything now anyhow. I, myself, could come up with a list of what xc went where - it proves nothing!

The premine was also only 125k - the average price of XC has probably been about 50 cents so that's approx $62,500 in total funds over 5/6 months (give or take). That is a shoestring budget at best so the team should be commended on getting XC into the position it is now. Looking forward to seeing what XC accomplishes over the coming weeks and months.

[synechist]

Get lost rdnkjdi.

Arlyn, why can't you ban them? If you can't, what about Teka?

Teka will have to ban him - if he chooses to.

This is one of the reasons why we'll be starting a new thread - so that one of us isn't permanently tied to a computer.

[MKAxe11]

@McHammer

99% of what you writer her is OT.
Post it somewhere else - this thread is about XC, not blocknet.

have you fagotten blocknet is in the xc roadmap as a thing adding value to xc ?  
this was supposed to be the big next thing ...

fuck you cheerleaders who only want to hear good words  "ban him whine whine"
if you are so convinced by the tech
my "fud" shouldnt be a problem for you
i assume you whiners just want to get out

I didn't use the word ban, I told you to post block related stuff somewhere else.
I know it's related and I'm happy the ITO was successful, but it's going to take a while (couple of month at least) until this will be integrated with the XC wallet application, so for the time being it's way to early too talk about blocknet here. (except some major milestones in development in blocknet)

so please, have this discussion somewhere else.