Unmoderated XC thread

[CryptoGretzky]

chaeplin's point is that the user is depositing i XC into a new unspent output, which is not moved. Then sometime later but not excessively far in the future i pops out at some other address. He says that this is a link and is correct. The dev wants a physical path to follow when there isn't technically one, yet there is still a path. You just have some patience and some scripting experience.

That is what I gathered, anyway.

Didn't Chaeplin just send those amounts to both addresses after ATC revealed them?

Yup.

Chaeplin couldn't solve ATC'c challenges.

I mean... ya after both sender and receiver's address has been revealed... then he go and make some fake transactions and now he says it's linked..

[benthach]

all these challenge craps is just nonsense when you don't get the solid answer or question. do real challenge and put answer somewhere with TIME STAMP, perhaps youtube video then reveal the video/answer at specific time. if no video or answer with time stamp this mean the code still crackable and if the answer/video reveal then chance the answer is wrong. I never see real solid challenge or answer, all i see is craps throwing arounds. if you have confidence with your coding please do real challenge, upload answer somewhere with time stamp with reputative sites, like youtube or flickr etc..

[chaeplin]

Active spamming.

Code:

user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./who.py 28617
* ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx
	* ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb
		tx: 7	percent 95		value 2.2
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1
				*===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}'

user@sv2:~/x11coin> x11coind sendmany 123 '{"XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb": 0.0001, "XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC":0.0001}'
0a50c8b4408aec0b6acdae11dbd9d88ce4b67092a55cf634ff3cde9d48089784

[chaeplin]

ref:

ver. XCv0.9.1.41x11-coin-1.0

sendfrommixer "1" XH2xAiXB2H6tXSraubgfxWHKRUJR8rWdHm 0.1

Its my mintpal deposit adress and that is working i have now 0.09999 at my mintpal deposit.
I have searched a direct link to this transaction but i cant find one with my user perspective.
Xnode has been paid for but its not mine i'm curious to know what is the xnode that has been paid for this transaction.

Nice work ATCsecure !

!!

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?95279.htm

Code:

Hash	a57d4def3d08fe7753a77f8ac05b7a757105d72dcf0f33dd6aafd910a51a0ed0
Blockheight	28315 (142 confirmations)
Date/Time	 2014-06-11 03:16:37
Total Output	16.372583 XC
Fee	0.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index	Previous output	Address	Amount
0	40f01abd6d11...:0	XHaUgNe5rZ6Avf7bwXGBCWdxD5nCxqAxVo	16.382583 XC
Outputs
Index	Redeemed in	Address	Amount
0	Not yet redeemed	XWtcrjseXhMBDBvGPfwXq3SVKhdv7qiLcG	16.310359 XC
1	Not yet redeemed	XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG	0.062224 XC

-->
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93622.htm

Code:

Hash	40f01abd6d11e15a0d722c1419a31358d7b399d5e9a4f3d742959122462a03d6
Blockheight	27754 (703 confirmations)
Date/Time	 2014-06-09 19:43:38
Total Output	16.45 XC
Fee	0.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index	Previous output	Address	Amount
0	afe2802947d5...:1	XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R	16.46 XC
Outputs
Index	Redeemed in	Address	Amount
0	a57d4def3d08...	XHaUgNe5rZ6Avf7bwXGBCWdxD5nCxqAxVo	16.382583 XC
1	Not yet redeemed	XHx9XtGvaN5kbzfjpEqgSy4pjw6aU6vjae	0.067417 XC

-->
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?93120.htm

Code:

Hash	afe2802947d5737695fd90c6fab5061fdb2a75fd8fe2bbf2be34b74f0925d093
Blockheight	27557 (900 confirmations)
Date/Time	 2014-06-09 10:10:06
Total Output	32.928647 XC
Proof of Stake + Fees	0.028647 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index	Previous output	Address	Amount
0	9ff63a3e7c94...:1	XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R	32.9 XC
Outputs
Index	Redeemed in	Address	Amount
0	40f01abd6d11...	XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R	16.46 XC
1	44f76163aca2...	XEuKHQieqYF2xJQ73m92GsY6nkiRjToE9R	16.468647 XC

Block 28315 to 28320

Code:

* ====> Working block height 28315 has 12 tx
	* ====> Searchng XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 0.1
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28320 : diff : 5
				*===> XH2xAiXB2H6tXSraubgfxWHKRUJR8rWdHm 0.09999 link is : XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

LINK : http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?95679.htm BLOCK 28460

Code:

Details for Transaction
Hash	9026a3920f2f91983f448b5d5789e1413ec7fc77d2eb74da3c9a951d16228332
Blockheight	28460 (431 confirmations)
Date/Time	 2014-06-11 12:11:23
Total Output	6.048076 XC
Fee	2,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index	Previous output	Address	Amount
0	fc32a52d05e8...:1	XCYKD4UDBAwdSePgW7tfNyBtxLXQzQ2y8p	0.001429 XC
1	05b2f027a8e0...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
2	45f0ca0cdc8c...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
3	d7f735ddc6f6...:1	XKLGYgnbnhTNmA25y97MMy3JnULoME6DhA	0.002811 XC
4	4c539a33adb3...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
5	ee8c8637ef6a...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
6	3dd4c6f4142d...:2	XSjLtzrRRquusicuUfFMvFbkBJzYe5mHEk	0.003 XC
7	0a17a0ab48af...:0	XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG	0.003 XC
8	8c5e2b1532af...:1	XRV24U9rqSj2zexsj9vHTEyagGAHzyssGh	3.0 XC
9	b8758cba5977...:1	XRV24U9rqSj2zexsj9vHTEyagGAHzyssGh	3.0 XC
10	936f1b732a43...:1	XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG	0.037776 XC
Outputs
Index	Redeemed in	Address	Amount
0	7534a7809955...	XJptWzwxrgEC1WLhZ4r1LnEPQPZiWm7Hn9	0.010001 XC
1	Not yet redeemed	XBPMEncv8HzCqvjxdF6SbbfpvB4pTC24Da	6.038075 XC

[chaeplin]

Chaeplin,

New test.

https://evaltech-my.sharepoint.com/personal/allen_eval-tech_com/_layouts/15/guestaccess.aspx?guestaccesstoken=FUJ7tBTUM8R3KMU2hAwba293Jah2leGT2%2bkg%2fp%2fdFX0%3d&docid=1b12fbf2d34bd495aa8d86071dfff2742

zipped file.
PW protected.
MD5 included

"sendfrommixer" MAIN XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.2

---FROMADDRESS??

FYI:

Code:

* ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx
	* ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb
		tx: 7	percent 95		value 2.2
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1
				*===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28617.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96074.htm

Code:

Details for Transaction
Hash	3680e4bd53607ff677eb94fd0b15f17cdf21f6c8e89a0b5b573c5a2ee13cfdb5
Blockheight	28617 (34 confirmations)
Date/Time	 2014-06-11 16:03:57
Total Output	21.49996 XC
Fee	1,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index	Previous output	Address	Amount
0	762a501de829...:0	XQaYnWevqYVfg7j75qr2YR38R3xbb5xjyw	21.49997 XC
Outputs
Index	Redeemed in	Address	Amount
0	4eba6dee5d2a...	XCfsrU7KGy6hzCmfvF47FjC2Mj56tqxR9d	21.484411 XC
1	dd438f2fbd86...	XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb	0.015549 XC

http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/block.dws?28618.htm
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96083.htm

Code:

Hash	1cd9a9bdc8cadc55de21d1dc640aa35bd0bc631f52d54e373b49c1b4ac3a42ed
Blockheight	28618 (33 confirmations)
Date/Time	 2014-06-11 16:04:47
Total Output	2.210008 XC
Fee	4,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index	Previous output	Address	Amount
0	2e4b75ef5a19...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
1	cd32a1861879...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
2	3ce0db590e12...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
3	02db662529db...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
4	447508bf02da...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
5	2d78dc9f56f4...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
6	11c03ded1646...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
7	621e30ceab64...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
8	94fdca2ed122...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
9	8b9b2670d7fe...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
10	9e0042d13a8c...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
11	3bf012c2084a...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
12	88d3f916833b...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
13	d3c04cd03e84...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
14	c2f94d8a07f7...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
15	6bf82a41a9ea...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
16	41a3ee9ac44a...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
17	5e4064a65a3b...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
18	3dd4c6f4142d...:1	XXh8LXMKYXiZ8dJMs57cBSZ93tDZddSoF7	0.003 XC
19	0a17a0ab48af...:2	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.003 XC
20	2ef543f876d2...:1	XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2	0.100593 XC
21	a5e213619ea1...:1	XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN	0.003 XC
22	c933acb99fd0...:1	XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2	0.003 XC
23	339cf1265d09...:1	XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN	2.094095 XC
24	b83aee2ba80c...:2	XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2	0.003 XC
Outputs
Index	Redeemed in	Address	Amount
0	Not yet redeemed	XU9zPC349F4QVJmcn96d1S86bA9TwiyR7q	0.010018 XC
1	Not yet redeemed	XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNuBITTREX	2.19999 XC

Code:

* ====> Working block height 28617 has 10 tx
	* ====> Searchng XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb
		tx: 7	percent 95		value 2.2
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28618 : diff : 1
				*===> XV49MnmtTirtZSQ2jtgisvNhNr6DduzCNu 2.19999 link is : XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb <----> XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC

LINK : http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96160.htm  BLOCK 28645
         http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?96187.htm  BLOCK 28653

Code:

Details for Transaction
Hash	dd438f2fbd86db8daf7b20e32d2306de9963ad68b380208f861633a8d789a070
Blockheight	28645 (246 confirmations)
Date/Time	 2014-06-11 17:06:04
Total Output	2.20999 XC
Fee	4,E-5.0 XC

 
Inputs / Outputs
Raw Transaction
Inputs
Index	Previous output	Address	Amount
0	383d04dd517a...:1	XFY3XchgfA16dFv9pFVDTpCGg2q7TWUNtC	0.00002 XC
1	d1f8ecf3a75b...:1	XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2	0.049407 XC
2	f596e0666f37...:1	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	0.003 XC
3	551e9a19e1d1...:0	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	0.003 XC
4	4940a1bd5720...:1	XTiH1AgxVoFYLuLamAzRLGbvoAYyxhZJV1	0.847077 XC
5	9cffaed1ea71...:1	XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb	0.147548 XC
6	ab4b6d07d446...:1	XFx7u2jjP2TSQA34m6wJRugivcsJPG9yHN	1.129429 XC
7	27d341cb53c2...:0	XSroWK3bng8awEdZs5eZXUqXgyn4RPr7cG	0.003 XC
8	72a8d9397092...:2	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	0.003 XC
9	b83aee2ba80c...:1	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	0.003 XC
10	16139b9176aa...:2	XYjDp5K1XTHn5ajiVxtaKw7CoL9CzRZKM2	0.003 XC
11	0d227a1fcf00...:2	XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa	0.003 XC
12	3680e4bd5360...:1	XPpRHV6hWFDnQvNhu7WaRy6h6KfGkmx9Hb	0.015549 XC
Outputs
Index	Redeemed in	Address	Amount
0	5802869372cc...	XDDiNN2xbNbAnCZGe56sEjEt7w9JThRnoA	0.01 XC
1	Not yet redeemed	XHAscCkHdvAkXpCUCrggGasKeoVivs1izo	2.19999 XC

[chaeplin]

Ref:

Dev read this.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7259577#msg7259577

You have to fix something.

no, those transactions were set after I revealed the address details

in attempt to FUD the system

**edit**

the only thing I see is that you searched a block for any value that equals 2.2

Links are appear.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7261379#msg7261379
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.msg7261411#msg7261411

Should be fixed.

[mav137]

its funny how you keep switching threads when the arguments you give are made senseless by the dev, you just start over here..

Either way, it's not relevant anymore, V2 of XC will have even better full anonymity. Don't waste your time on downtalking something that is continuously being improved.

There will be a big bounty in 2 week when V2 is finished, and hopefully we attract some serious people that have a critical and constructive look at the technology

[chaeplin]

its funny how you keep switching threads when the arguments you give are made senseless by the dev, you just start over here..

Either way, it's not relevant anymore, V2 of XC will have even better full anonymity. Don't waste your time on downtalking something that is continuously being improved.

There will be a big bounty in 2 week when V2 is finished, and hopefully we attract some serious people that have a critical and constructive look at the technology

Never improved

[chaeplin]

Ref:

Mixer Test using v1.42


http://cryptexplorer.com/tx/7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f#o0

Code:

Hash7337f03cc1d0b726d1fb8b0b9e66bc6cc796853379b75d7dd193e6d5e9c33c4f
Appeared inX11Coin 28533 (2014-06-11 13:25:09)
Number of inputs2 (Jump to inputs)
Total in10
Number of outputs1 (Jump to outputs)
Total out9.99999
Size345 bytes
Fee0.00001
Raw transaction

Inputs

Index	Previous output	Amount	From address	ScriptSig
0	235b7cba7a...:1	8.329413	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	73:3046...e501 33:03f5...9f33
1	2b46b1f30d...:1	1.670587	XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb	72:3045...3501 33:03f5...9f33
Outputs

Index	Redeemed at input	Amount	To address	ScriptPubKey
0	Not yet redeemed	9.99999	XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D	DUP HASH160 20:788b...2bb6 EQUALVERIFY CHECKSIG

* block : 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D : 9.99999



* Search through pattern

Code:

user@sv2:~/x11coin> ./run.py 28500 28590
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XTiH1AgxVoFYLuLamAzRLGbvoAYyxhZJV1
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached
* ====> Working block height 28527 has 8 tx
	* ====> Searchng XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
		tx: 2	percent 94		value 0.006
			*===> block reached

* ====> Working block height 28531 has 4 tx
	* ====> Searchng XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 10.0
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28533 : diff : 2
				*===> XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D 9.99999 link is : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa <----> XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb

* ====> Working block height 28587 has 5 tx
	* ====> Searchng XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2
		tx: 2	percent 100		value 0.15
			*===> block reached
			*===> Searchng 28590 : diff : 3
				*===> XE3dFcdQ6aH81J6viKraZwauMk9zcP4Ehz 0.14999 link is : XUZvnU6MrxH49AVaSKwsXJMsyPoicrP6g2 <----> XMDDFuadQFGas9Zn8nTMVFFGz9hUc7Jteo

Possible candidate in 28531

Code:

Hash7315a0968d1aa71e01031583446625bde7189bee1642d3c85737a537d7480778
Previous Blockc2ef588b1680c5498151345eacc4a3c363d77d802aff45674a597c3bdbfac00f
Next Block7e5eeaeecda5745b32be824e5da54a9a95b5b350126a216bf5499c0f6e5fa2c9
Height28531
Version4
Transaction Merkle Roote9c293aa46b5f2bc684349e6b4accbbb196f36b04742e26d2df53811a2a9fdfd
Time1402492966 (2014-06-11 13:22:46)
Difficulty0.000 (Bits: 1e047c41)
Cumulative Difficulty11 973 042.889
Nonce0
Transactions4
Value out2070.657277
Transaction Fees-1.62137
Average Coin Age9.27782 days
Coin-days Destroyed17767.243184
Cumulative Coin-days Destroyed62.9868%

Transactions

Transaction	Fee	Size (kB)	From (amount)	To (amount)
c6d0da399b...	0	0.077	Generation: 1.62137 + -1.62137 total fees	Unknown: 0
dcd8718986...	-1.62139	0.258	XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 1993.671236
Unknown: 0
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.64
XXrbb5c4JFJTTXwSPJeVXpT1g6Htd4isH6: 997.652626
2c3d8fcfa4...	0.00001	0.229	XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R: 40.99999
XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 6.635299
633fe22002...	0.00001	0.23	XGn7mdvRKy6LYYdejMYsxx8mCocdyuSXmf: 34.364681
XZ2zsBE5oqTciM5bkWtPajqqjQKHNv8Cip: 30.99997
XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa: 3.364701

* multiple tx pattern to same destination


* address never used before 28531
* input value matched.



from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa.


* coin flow :
BLOCK 28531
from address XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R to mixer XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa
-->
BLOCK 28533
* from mixer XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb to XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D

: SENDER : XLS1oGFeJQ7qjhcVYYg6cXaQ5vfGNBA72R
: MIXER INPUT : XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa / never used before
: MIXER OUTPUT : XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb
: PAYEE : XNLdJtLQKnmi7PSUknoPoPRDjnmJnb3y8D


If outputs of address XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa and XNECF1CtdkF2DjuVxcCr8VJEdKiH9ByDMb are
spent as an input for a transaction, Mixer identified.
Link from wallet B to wallet C is identified


As XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa is nerver used before, check XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa's tx.


http://cryptexplorer.com/address/XQdBjeQtH1JGrkd2MWcXbtsRVeKHWZbnqa

Code:

Transaction	Block	Approx. Time	Amount	Balance	Currency
2c3d8fcfa4...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	6.635299	6.635299	XC
633fe22002...	28531	2014-06-11 13:22:46	3.364701	10	XC
0d227a1fcf...	28540	2014-06-11 13:39:49	0.003	10.003	XC
07957c70d0...	28555	2014-06-11 14:03:57	0.001	10.004	XC
dd438f2fbd...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.003)	10.001	XC
fe5ad7f573...	28645	2014-06-11 17:06:04	(0.001)	10	XC
36e6e4f1bb...	28646	2014-06-11 17:08:27	(3.364701)	6.635299	XC
d24770a89a...	28653	2014-06-11 17:20:52	(6.635299)	0	XC
8e708043fa...	28847	2014-06-11 22:52:01	0.0001	0.0001	XC

Block 28645 has hard link.

http://cryptexplorer.com/block/4255ac4c5e93fa1769f58312d76338779229424538357dc4cf00a07fc1aafb74








* Hard Link is real.

[adhitthana]

I wanted to do a comparison between DRK and XC, and I invite input from anyone.
It seems that DRK has an advantage in that it preceded XC and gained a significant following before XC appeared. However after that I'm not sure how it is better.

1. DRK relies on Masternodes.    With XC each wallet can act as a node.  Better for XC?

2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin)      XC has a mixer that is also encrypted?  Better for XC?

3. Both coins have talented developers, but XC 's developer has important business experience too, which may help in gaining widespread adoption...?

4. It is claimed that XC is building an entire platform ? Is DRK doing this or seeing it as important?

5. The name Darkcoin is very different in it's connotations to XC 11 coin. Will Darkcoins name possibly impede it's progress?

6. DRK presently trades much bigger volume and is on at least one bigger important exchange

7. XC is a lot cheaper.

I welcome discussion and am happy to be proved wrong if I have got any facts wrong

[stealth923]

2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin)      XC has a mixer that is also encrypted?  Better for XC?

Did you not read the post above yours - XC mixer is flawed - hard link is proven

[illodin]

1. DRK relies on Masternodes.    With XC each wallet can act as a node.  Better for XC?

Every bitcoin clone relies on dedicated nodes.

[phosphorush]

2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin)      XC has a mixer that is also encrypted?  Better for XC?

Did you not read the post above yours - XC mixer is flawed - hard link is proven

did someone get the 100 XC then? who? where?

[AlexGR]

I wanted to do a comparison between DRK and XC, and I invite input from anyone.
It seems that DRK has an advantage in that it preceded XC and gained a significant following before XC appeared. However after that I'm not sure how it is better.

1. DRK relies on Masternodes.    With XC each wallet can act as a node.  Better for XC?

DRK "relies" on masternodes, XC "relies" on xnodes... Branding differences. Given that most people open their wallet to transact and then close it, or have their PC off, dedicated hardware is better for network reliability. However there is nothing preventing one from running a masternode on their laptop.

2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin)      XC has a mixer that is also encrypted?  Better for XC?

DRK has encrypted transactions as a planned feature since January.

3. Both coins have talented developers, but XC 's developer has important business experience too, which may help in gaining widespread adoption...?

Adoption for cryptocurrencies in general is problematic. It will take years - and I'm not talking about 2-3-5-10 merchants accepting DRK or XC. We are talking about tens of thousands of merchants doing so. The attention span of most people in cryptoland is too short for waiting so long.

4. It is claimed that XC is building an entire platform ? Is DRK doing this or seeing it as important?

The potential to provide network services that are paid for them, is a DRK concept. The difference being that XC is a PoS coin and as such cannot pay with block generation, so it'll have to do it with fees.

5. The name Darkcoin is very different in it's connotations to XC 11 coin. Will Darkcoins name possibly impede it's progress?

People said that since the beginning... It's working great so far and the global media love it for portraying it as the darker brother of bitcoin or something. I think the name is a definite hit.

6. DRK presently trades much bigger volume and is on at least one bigger important exchange

7. XC is a lot cheaper.

Tends to happen with all market leaders.

[adhitthana]

2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin)      XC has a mixer that is also encrypted?  Better for XC?

Did you not read the post above yours - XC mixer is flawed - hard link is proven

I know Chaeplin has lamented that he wishes his English was better (but hey he probably speaks more languages than myself).. So it's not clear to me what was proven.
But since you believe it has been proven can you explain it to us.

Remembering Albert Einsteins words.   "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."

[adhitthana]

Thank you AlexGR

[jaft16]

2. DRK has a mixer (coinjoin)      XC has a mixer that is also encrypted?  Better for XC?

Did you not read the post above yours - XC mixer is flawed - hard link is proven

I know Chaeplin has lamented that he wishes his English was better (but hey he probably speaks more languages than myself).. So it's not clear to me what was proven.
But since you believe it has been proven can you explain it to us.

Remembering Albert Einsteins words.   "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough."

I'm starting to like you now. Hehe

[adhitthana]

Tends to happen with all market leaders.

Toyota is the world's largest car manufacturer today, yet they didn't start till the 1930's.
But maybe the tautology was tongue in cheek

[phosphorush]

DRK has encrypted transactions as a planned feature since January.

Yeah, and now it's June, great progress there... DRK also promised anonymity and then said that it would never be 100% anon

[AlexGR]

DRK has encrypted transactions as a planned feature since January.

Yeah, and now it's June, great progress there... DRK also promised anonymity and then said that it would never be 100% anon

You got it backwards.

The plan for DRK was to provide privacy / moderate anonymity but pressure escalated to improve anonymity around March after some discussions between Evan and Anonymint and that's what is being done the last few months (DarkSend was changed to increase anonymity and it will get further increases).

As promised, here is our vision and future plans for XCoin!

http://xcoin.co/XCoinVision.pdf

TL;DR: We're building XCoin into a moderately-anonymous network, where the transactions are sent encrypted and only able to be read the party who is receiving the funds. Blocks will be published via CoinJoin as to ensure some amount of anonymity. This is being built in such a way to compete with the other top alt-coins and maybe even Bitcoin.  

Btw, full of win that statement with competing with other top alt-coins or even Bitcoin...

As for the encryption, network encryption is the easy part. Getting the mechanics to work on the Bitcoin protocol is the hard stuff.