vokain
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
 |
June 01, 2014, 05:53:01 AM |
|
I still don't quite understand why running 3 or 7 threads on a 4 core, 8 thread CPU results in more hashes than running 1,2,4,5,6, or 8 threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QuadraQ
|
|
June 01, 2014, 09:47:17 AM |
|
I was trying to send a donation for your work, but I guess I need payment ID.
You don't need a payment ID. The .NET Windows GUI Wallet I'm using for Monero begs to differ. It won't let me send anything without a payment ID. Probably a bug in the GUI. |
|
|
|
|
Captain-Karacho
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
June 01, 2014, 09:50:47 AM |
|
I can confirm +20% with my FX 4300 and +30% with my I7 2600k. Thanks a lot Wolf0, good job!  |
|
|
|
|
rommie7
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 01, 2014, 05:47:45 PM |
|
Thanks for the awesome work.
I'm trying to donate a couple of MRO but i'm getting "Invalid Send Address" when using the address in the first post and the payment id.
|
|
|
|
|
|
phzi
|
|
June 01, 2014, 06:16:54 PM |
|
Great performance running 3 threads on an i7 2600. Pulling ~180H/s. More threads hurts performance, so less threads definitely does seem like more here.
2 threads has the same performance as 8 threads, and 3 threads definitely pushes the most hashrate. Interestingly, 3 threads uses only 40% CPU... must be hitting some cache limits or something.
(Windows rig this one - most of my machines run linux, but have Core2Duos without AES-NI).
|
|
|
|
|
drmavis
Member
Offline
Activity: 69
Merit: 10
|
|
June 01, 2014, 06:35:07 PM |
|
Hi,
Really great work on this. Would it be possible for you to add another crypto algorithm? I would love it if DCrypt could be added for Slimcoin mining. There is a fork of cpuminer called slimminer (that I can't get to compile on Windows) and it would be amazing if it could get integrated in this optimized cpuminer-multi. Will definitely donate.
Mike
|
|
|
|
|
|
hero18688
|
|
June 01, 2014, 10:35:35 PM |
|
Is Boolberry supported？ Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #Lw7H68vv8KEGiNiH |
|
|
|
|
deadmanwalking
|
|
June 02, 2014, 04:03:51 AM |
|
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care  grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks |
\
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
June 02, 2014, 06:08:33 AM |
|
Is there a reason why you didn't edit out the furry images?
I had been up for four days straight reading and writing code - at that point I just didn't care grateful for your pioneering work wolfie! my mining pool hashrate reflects my hashrate on a 4770k as much faster. Consistently 200H/s+ instead of often lingering in the 100s How much does 200H\s net you in a day? Thanks maybe a monero if I'm lucky |
|
|
|
|
obobob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2014, 08:30:24 AM |
|
I'm using GCC 4.7.2 and LD 2.23 compiled.
when I make , I got a error:
gcc: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
who can help me ?
thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
obobob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2014, 08:41:57 AM |
|
Recommends upgrading to ?
|
|
|
|
|
obobob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:45:53 AM |
|
many thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
cryptos
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
June 02, 2014, 09:50:33 AM |
|
How do you control number of threads or optimize this, has made my pc unusable
minerd -a cryptonight -o stratum+tcp://mine.moneropool.com:3333 -p x -u [YourMoneroAddress]
I just followed above.
EDIT found it... --help hahah
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ed4252
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:14:33 AM |
|
so are there any 32 bit options??
|
|
|
|
|
ajiekceu4
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 06:48:34 AM |
|
so are there any 32 bit options??
No. I mean, I could do it, but... there's no point. You'd be mining so slowly you'd be losing coins On my work i have 400+ pc with 32 bit windows 7. I can mine on all this machine with low priority and free electricity 24\7  . So 32 bit version would be great for me. I can donate 0.2 BTC for this. Sorry for my English. |
|
|
|
|
|
tersagun
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:17:19 AM |
|
I still keep getting the same error on this version (I had this on prior cpuminer versions as well)
After a random while (5 minutes, 2 hours), I start getting the following error and it doesn't fix unless I restart the minerd. What could be the cause?
I'm mining at Minergate BTW.
[2014-06-03 14:09:17] accepted: 2/2 (100.00%), 146.87 H/s at diff 444 (yay!!!)
[2014-06-03 14:09:21] thread 3: 119 hashes, 17.18 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] json_rpc2.0 error: Slightly stale share
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:23] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:24] thread 2: 222 hashes, 16.28 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:25] thread 0: 80 hashes, 12.42 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:27] thread 1: 154 hashes, 20.35 H/s
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[2014-06-03 14:09:34] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] json_rpc2.0 error: Unknown job id
[2014-06-03 14:09:46] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
|
|
|
|
|
|
ajeef
|
|
June 03, 2014, 11:31:18 AM |
|
  4 threads easy get shares |
|
|
|
|
vokain
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1834
Merit: 1019
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:09:01 PM |
|
4 threads easy get shares what's your cpu? |
|
|
|
|
|
tersagun
|
|
June 03, 2014, 12:59:22 PM |
|
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
|
|
|
|
|
beavis4ever
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2014, 02:26:56 PM |
|
BTW I do not think the hashrate represents "real value", at least on my i5.
My hashrate on the minerd goes between 80-220 h/s. Minergate shows 50 hash/s on average
A 20% more powerful PC using 4 simpleminers result in 100 h/s on Minergate.
He found 124 shares where I've found a whopping 57. More then double the gain using simpleminer. how can I trust the hashrate shown in the minerd?
The shares are most likely being submitted at a higher difficulty, which should have more value to the pool. |
|
|
|
|
|
