Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2024, 11:08:37 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
Author Topic: ROCKMINER ASIC miner official thread  (Read 199705 times)
la7eralus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 06:06:06 AM
Last edit: July 09, 2014, 06:44:02 AM by la7eralus
 #481

How much does the rocket miner rocket box cost in USD, i did not understand 990 mBTC on the website

I'm actually currently selling an RK-BOX for $600 USD - which does not include SH, or 1 BTC - which does include SH.  This is about $100+ less than the average on most websites.

Here's a link to the official listing: http://www.ebay.com/itm/171381497720?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
somatic
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 06:59:00 AM
 #482

What alternatives to cgminer are there for the R-Box? I mine other sha256 currencies, and the new versions of cgminer (the ones that support the R-Box) are Bitcoin only.

BFGminer works with the R-Box, but is buggy. It doesn't go over 32GH/s and there seems to be more hardware error with it, too. Sometimes it dies for no apparent reason, and there is some voodoo involved in even getting it to start.

What other options are there? I prefer command line miners, because my mining server is a really low-horsepower laptop. (That's why I love it, it uses very little power, but I can't run lots of graphical doodas while I'm mining.)
longwutx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 07:43:32 AM
 #483

Results better with CGMiner:

cgminer version 4.3.3 - Started: [2014-07-08 20:18:49]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):420.6G (1m):431.9G (5m):281.0G (15m):127.3G (avg):436.0Gh/s
A:48639  R:0  HW:183  WU:6129.6/m  Freq:290MHz
Connected to stratum.bitsolo.net diff 4.1K with stratum as user 18ujkgMxgHfcu
Block: 37caa434...  Diff:16.8G  Started: [20:18:49]  Best share: 5.12M
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[]SB management []ool management []ettings []isplay options []uit
0: RMU 0       :                   | 108.3G / 107.6Gh/s WU:1522.9/m| T:44C
1: RMU 1       :                   | 99.98G / 107.3Gh/s WU:1513.6/m| T:44C
2: RMU 2       :                   | 112.6G / 107.7Gh/s WU:1505.1/m| T:42C
3: RMU 3       :                   | 80.42G / 78.76Gh/s WU:1100.3/m| T:42C
4: RMU 4       :                   | 38.30G / 35.51Gh/s WU: 496.3/m| T:40C  (R-Box)

Looks like RMU3 is a bum-blade, really disappointing.

This is running with the only command line option --rmu-freq 290. When I set it to 300, CGMiner says the frequency is 270.

With Antec Bronze power supply, this is pulling 445W at the wall.



 RK-Box overlock command is "--rmu-auto 350".It is default setting.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4312
Merit: 1649


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 07:46:21 AM
 #484

What alternatives to cgminer are there for the R-Box? I mine other sha256 currencies, and the new versions of cgminer (the ones that support the R-Box) are Bitcoin only.
We only support mining bitcoin, but cgminer can't really tell apart an altcoin mining sha256 from mining bitcoin so there really is nothing stopping you using it.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
la7eralus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 05:49:20 PM
 #485

Has anyone managed to get their RK-BOX working with p2pool? It seems to submit too many bad shares too quickly addenda up causing CGMiner to crash and the PI to reboot.  Works fine on normal pools, and the problem seems to solely lie with using P2Pool.  Does the RK-BOX require a stratum server for P2Pool? I was under the assuming CGMiner supported stratum out of the box.  If there's something I'm missing here, please fill me in as I'm currently running a node that I can't use.
Phosphorous
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 07:37:53 PM
 #486

I'm really struggling. I thought I was using version cgminer 4.3.3 and at least I was getting it to work.

I thought upgrading cgminer would help. Unfortunately, I over-wrote my old directory and can't retrieve it to go back.

I have 1 RK-Box and 1 R-Box connected to my computer via USB.

When I use the latest CGMiner (4.4.1), the RK-Box blades perform like the R-Box... all around 35GH instead of 100+. This is running without any command line options. Am I missing anything?

Also, it seems the formatting of the ASIC-README.txt file included with CGMiner has changed. I can no longer read it with Notepad. I must use Wordpad. It was much better with the previous formatting.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4312
Merit: 1649


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 07:41:38 PM
 #487

When I use the latest CGMiner (4.4.1), the RK-Box blades perform like the R-Box... all around 35GH instead of 100+. This is running without any command line options. Am I missing anything?

Also, it seems the formatting of the ASIC-README.txt file included with CGMiner has changed. I can no longer read it with Notepad. I must use Wordpad. It was much better with the previous formatting.
There's no rk-box support in mainline cgminer (yet) so you're just getting the r-box driver trying to mine on it.

Formatting should be compatible with notepad. I'll check to see if my scripts are no longer converting the asic readme to windows format.

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
Phosphorous
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 07:52:55 PM
 #488

When I use the latest CGMiner (4.4.1), the RK-Box blades perform like the R-Box... all around 35GH instead of 100+. This is running without any command line options. Am I missing anything?

Also, it seems the formatting of the ASIC-README.txt file included with CGMiner has changed. I can no longer read it with Notepad. I must use Wordpad. It was much better with the previous formatting.
There's no rk-box support in mainline cgminer (yet) so you're just getting the r-box driver trying to mine on it.

Formatting should be compatible with notepad. I'll check to see if my scripts are no longer converting the asic readme to windows format.
OK, thanks for letting me know. But somehow it was working... as you can see from my screen-copies.
la7eralus
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 10:17:28 PM
 #489

When I use the latest CGMiner (4.4.1), the RK-Box blades perform like the R-Box... all around 35GH instead of 100+. This is running without any command line options. Am I missing anything?

Also, it seems the formatting of the ASIC-README.txt file included with CGMiner has changed. I can no longer read it with Notepad. I must use Wordpad. It was much better with the previous formatting.
There's no rk-box support in mainline cgminer (yet) so you're just getting the r-box driver trying to mine on it.

Formatting should be compatible with notepad. I'll check to see if my scripts are no longer converting the asic readme to windows format.

Is it possible to get the RK-BOX successfully working with P2Pool and CGMiner?  Or at all?

Billbags
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250

Brainwashed this way


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 10:33:13 PM
Last edit: July 10, 2014, 02:44:48 AM by Billbags
 #490

Rocket Boxes been mining for 24 hrs now. I'm having same ghs/watts as setup video. Seems real stable with pi image. I'm gonna replace fans tonight because of noise level. I'll post once I find a quite fan solution. By the way these fans suck air through miner, they do not push.

Update: I installed a manual fan control on my RK-Boxes that is working well to dramatically reduce the fan noise and still keep the blades cool. Highly reccomended if the Rocket Boxes are in your house. I just lowered fan speed and monitored during the hotest times of the day to get right setting for quiet cooling. Here is the link of the ones I'm using:
 http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B004LL8KF6?cache=8dd22ea26140667f1737f48c0bd46cbe&pi=SX200_QL40&qid=1404945076&sr=8-1#ref=mp_s_a_1_1

Note: plastic guide on the end of the fan controller wires must be shaved down to fit on the miner. I used a knife, takes about 5 seconds, works well.

Listen: meat beat manifesto ~ Edge of no control (pt.1)
Read:"He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past." ~ George Orwell
Think: http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-dawn-of-trustworthy-computing.html
Phosphorous
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 556
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 10:58:04 PM
 #491

Billbags, I am going to do that tonight. Are there any details about the wiring? I don't remember what the wiring for my fan controller looks like.
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 11:14:00 PM
 #492

Guys you're going to love the R3-Box. Its such a step up and has an inbuilt Pi and USB hub.


sushi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100

ASIC Myth Buster


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 11:17:47 PM
 #493

Can't wait to play with one of these!!!



Guys you're going to love the R3-Box. Its such a step up and has an inbuilt Pi and USB hub.



>>> PM me for New ASIC Miner's Info.  We will go check it out <<<
FEEL GENEROUS TODAY?  ==> 1AHNusc3BQA2QJCokySAQ1Qtymr1ZyAG6P
ManeBjorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004



View Profile
July 09, 2014, 11:36:18 PM
 #494

Now that is a serious step in the right direction.
Looks like good air flow and not a tentacle monster of cables.
How is the noise level?


Guys you're going to love the R3-Box. Its such a step up and has an inbuilt Pi and USB hub.



TrekRider
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 09, 2014, 11:42:30 PM
 #495

Who gives a shit what they look like?!  Maybe they should address the 10%+ rejects!!!
dogie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185


dogiecoin.com


View Profile WWW
July 09, 2014, 11:57:25 PM
 #496

Now that is a serious step in the right direction.
Looks like good air flow and not a tentacle monster of cables.
How is the noise level?

Guys you're going to love the R3-Box. Its such a step up and has an inbuilt Pi and USB hub.

Oh don't worry, its a tentacle monster allright, but all the cables are internal. The only external you have is one ethernet and 4 PCI-Es which are all close together. If you've got one of those server PSUs you can almost put it 'in' the miner as well.

Noise levels are like an S1 when it ramps up a bit, but its totally overcooled. The chips closer to the fan are reporting 8-12C over ambient, those further away 22C over ambient. I've suggested putting a $5 fan on the other end and using software to lower the original fan down. Its a proper 4 pin fan so we have full control.

bobsag3
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500

Owner, Minersource.net


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 12:02:11 AM
 #497

Now that is a serious step in the right direction.
Looks like good air flow and not a tentacle monster of cables.
How is the noise level?

Guys you're going to love the R3-Box. Its such a step up and has an inbuilt Pi and USB hub.

Oh don't worry, its a tentacle monster allright, but all the cables are internal. The only external you have is one ethernet and 4 PCI-Es which are all close together. If you've got one of those server PSUs you can almost put it 'in' the miner as well.

Noise levels are like an S1 when it ramps up a bit, but its totally overcooled. The chips closer to the fan are reporting 8-12C over ambient, those further away 22C over ambient. I've suggested putting a $5 fan on the other end and using software to lower the original fan down. Its a proper 4 pin fan so we have full control.

If the heatsinks had been put together instead of seperated they would have seen a much less air loss. Pretty bad on all the units we have
geoffrey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0



View Profile
July 10, 2014, 12:05:52 AM
 #498

I think they should first work on those 10%+ rejects we all are dealing with,
it's nice to see a better unit, but it still has these rejects as seen on the pics....
klondike_bar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005

ASIC Wannabe


View Profile
July 10, 2014, 12:46:25 AM
 #499

I think they should first work on those 10%+ rejects we all are dealing with,
it's nice to see a better unit, but it still has these rejects as seen on the pics....

agreed. its unfair to advertise unit such as the rk-box to be running 450-480GH when the actual accepted hashrate is only 390-425GH considering the 9-13% reject rates ive seen

24" PCI-E cables with 16AWG wires and stripped ends - great for server PSU mods, best prices https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563461
No longer a wannabe - now an ASIC owner!
ManeBjorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004



View Profile
July 10, 2014, 12:48:33 AM
 #500

Very cool.  That is good to know.
I have plenty of those fans lying around.

Now that is a serious step in the right direction.
Looks like good air flow and not a tentacle monster of cables.
How is the noise level?

Guys you're going to love the R3-Box. Its such a step up and has an inbuilt Pi and USB hub.

Oh don't worry, its a tentacle monster allright, but all the cables are internal. The only external you have is one ethernet and 4 PCI-Es which are all close together. If you've got one of those server PSUs you can almost put it 'in' the miner as well.

Noise levels are like an S1 when it ramps up a bit, but its totally overcooled. The chips closer to the fan are reporting 8-12C over ambient, those further away 22C over ambient. I've suggested putting a $5 fan on the other end and using software to lower the original fan down. Its a proper 4 pin fan so we have full control.

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!