Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3

[Claymore]

v 9.0 have many mistake below..

buf: {"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"job","params":

And I still did not get any logs from you...
This text is not error.

[Claymore]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

[wayla]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

9.1 no linux version?

[Ptah]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

Thx works fine on my 5970 510+h/s Cat 13.12

[Claymore]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

9.1 no linux version?

I'm working on it, will be available next week.

[bitwolf]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

Thx works fine on my 5970 510+h/s Cat 13.12

I am sorry to disappoint but the problem is fixed at only 10%.  I have about 10 cores from 58** serie and only 1 and sometimes 2 cores dont make problems.   And the problem is not in the cards or in the rigs. Everything is on stock settings and otherwise working just fine.  But with v9 and v9.1 (i cant remember what happens with v8) it still gives a lot of server responce errors.  The funny part is that they are all pool dependent. Least errors I get with cryptoescrow at 5000 diff.    I use 14.6 diff RCs.   Should I update the driver to 14.9?  Which drivers did u test with?

P.S. With all my other AMD cards I have absolutely no problems and I am very happy with the hash increase. 3 of the rings are mixed 5850 cards with R9 serie cards.  R9 cards work super.  But when it comes to accepting the share from the 5850 card -  the usual server responce error appears and it says the this share is with too low difficulty... 

[Claymore]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

Thx works fine on my 5970 510+h/s Cat 13.12

I am sorry to disappoint but the problem is fixed at only 10%.  I have about 10 cores from 58** serie and only 1 and sometimes 2 cores dont make problems.   And the problem is not in the cards or in the rigs. Everything is on stock settings and otherwise working just fine.  But with v9 and v9.1 (i cant remember what happens with v8) it still gives a lot of server responce errors.  The funny part is that they are all pool dependent. Least errors I get with cryptoescrow at 5000 diff.    I use 14.6 diff RCs.   Should I update the driver to 14.9?  Which drivers did u test with?

P.S. With all my other AMD cards I have absolutely no problems and I am very happy with the hash increase. 3 of the rings are mixed 5850 cards with R9 serie cards.  R9 cards work super.  But when it comes to accepting the share from the 5850 card -  the usual server responce error appears and it says the this share is with too low difficulty... 

Make sure that you use "-a 3" for old cards like 6xxx and 5xxx. If it does not help, PM me the log file.

[omnik]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

GBT R9 270 (non X) - 418 h/s each.
14.7 driver, 1020/1400... Elpida.
-a 1 (auto-selected).

Power Color R9 280X - 559 h/s each.
14.7 driver, 1060/1500... Hynix.
-a 4 (auto-selected).

Power Color R9 270x - 446 h/s each.
14.7 driver, 1100/1425... Elpida.
-a 1 (auto-selected).

Good work! I hope it will report at the pool as it supposed to. This was usualy issue with your miner.

Any comparison in power consumption vs 6.1, 8.0 and 9.0?

BR

[infofront]

Can we expect to see an updated linux miner?

[Claymore]

Can we expect to see an updated linux miner?

I already answered this question. On this page

[ZXSpectrum]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

9.1 gets flagged as malware in google chrome, have you added some dlls which could cause this?

[Chicken76]

Claymore, have you tested it on the new R9 285? Does it work? If it does, what kind of hashrates can we expect?

[anatolikostis]

7970
@1080/1500
hc 832
-a 4
591h/s

290(hynix)
@1050/1375
hc 1280
-a 4
818h/s

290x(elpida)
@1050/1375
hc 1376
-a 4
840h/s

[onetwentyfive]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

9.1 gets flagged as malware in google chrome, have you added some dlls which could cause this?

In Chrome go to 'Settings' and under 'Privacy' uncheck the 'Enable phishing and malware prevention' box, that will let you download it. Just don't forget to re-check the box when you're done.

[Claymore]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

9.1 gets flagged as malware in google chrome, have you added some dlls which could cause this?

I tried it and confirmed that Chrome does not want to download all versions, even v7. It's really paranoid filter, I have no idea why it decided to block files. I remember it worked in past...

[Claymore]

Claymore, have you tested it on the new R9 285? Does it work? If it does, what kind of hashrates can we expect?

I don't have 285 card here, but miner must support it. I don't know about hashrate for now.

[V@n@dis]

what's the current best hash per watt card? Mining with 280x right now and thinking of getting a few more cards.

also, do I need to uppgrade to 9.1 if everything seems to work with 9.0?

[Rabinovitch]

v9.1 is available:

Thaaanx! 

[anatolikostis]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

Best "-a" and "-h" values are set automatically for ...290

correct auto "-h" value for 290 is 1280.  

[Claymore]

v9.1 is available:

- Improved pool-related routines: less disconnects, more hashrate on some pools.
- Fixed issue with some old 6xxx/5xxx cards ("lowDifficultShare" error).

Best "-a" and "-h" values are set automatically for ...290

correct auto "-h" value for 290 is 1280.  

You are correct, 1152 shows 690h/s, 1280 shows 700h/s (Elpida), my mistake, I'll fix it in next update, thanks for pointing it out.