|
Qazo
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 11:03:45 AM |
|
pffff even at 9.5 i still get "lowdifficulty" share error ,
rx 480 samsung 1120/1850
did you add -a 4 -h 0 to your batch file ? Can you show me full exempel on this dude? I don't get it where to put it? Btw i have 2x rx470 xfx 4gig 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig. in fodler you have pool batch file, right click and edit my code NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8005 -u yourwallet -p x -a 4 -h 1024 With -a 4 I have same speed but also I got 20W lower consumption from wall which is also nice
|
|
|
|
|
gaah
Newbie

Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 11:08:00 AM |
|
pffff even at 9.5 i still get "lowdifficulty" share error ,
rx 480 samsung 1120/1850
did you add -a 4 -h 0 to your batch file ? Can you show me full exempel on this dude? I don't get it where to put it? Btw i have 2x rx470 xfx 4gig 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig. in fodler you have pool batch file, right click and edit my code NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8005 -u yourwallet -p x -a 4 -h 1024 With -a 4 I have same speed but also I got 20W lower consumption from wall which is also nice Thx! Works great big up!
|
|
|
|
|
lummujaj
Member


Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 11:09:45 AM |
|
Yes it's planned in upcoming release. Unfortunately, I had to postpone it a bit because I decided to release an update for XMR miner firstly (it will be released in 1-2 days).
ETA for the new XMR miner? Any speedups? No speedup for now because I have to add many features from my other miners (config.txt, allpools, etc). New version will be released in several hours. how about lowdifficulty share error some are getting ? when rx 480 goes more than 720 h/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ursul0
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 11:23:31 AM |
|
btc pro r2, proper setup: 1150-1180 core 1950-2000 mem at 900-918mv  same settings for 480 produce 750-760
|
|
|
|
|
derselben
Newbie

Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 11:24:53 AM |
|
Hi everyone! Who have Sapphire RX-480 nitro+ 4 gb (Elpida), what is the max speed for this card?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ursul0
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 11:27:52 AM |
|
ZEC is still better at this point
and how did you reach this conclusion?
|
|
|
|
|
|
tiamatt
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 11:57:18 AM |
|
Hi everyone! Who have Sapphire RX-480 nitro+ 4 gb (Elpida), what is the max speed for this card?
740-750 for me
|
|
|
|
|
derselben
Newbie

Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 12:50:36 PM |
|
Hi everyone! Who have Sapphire RX-480 nitro+ 4 gb (Elpida), what is the max speed for this card?
740-750 for me What is your clocks and voltage? Did you mode your bios?
|
|
|
|
|
lummujaj
Member


Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 03:22:12 PM |
|
pffff even at 9.5 i still get "lowdifficulty" share error ,
rx 480 samsung 1120/1850
did you add -a 4 -h 0 to your batch file ? Can you show me full exempel on this dude? I don't get it where to put it? Btw i have 2x rx470 xfx 4gig 1x rx 480 nitro 8gig. in fodler you have pool batch file, right click and edit my code NsGpuCNMiner.exe -o stratum+tcp://xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com:8005 -u yourwallet -p x -a 4 -h 1024 With -a 4 I have same speed but also I got 20W lower consumption from wall which is also nice i still have the error ... my cards do from 720-735
|
|
|
|
|
enrique3uro
Newbie

Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 03:26:53 PM |
|
Whats up guys.
What card do you recommend me?
I am interested in mining ETH, XMR, ZEC ...
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
lummujaj
Member


Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 03:28:01 PM |
|
16:12:42:997 1244 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Low difficulty share"}}
16:12:42:997 1244 parse packet: 76 16:12:42:997 1244 Error in server response : {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}} 16:12:43:012 1244 buf was cleared 16:12:43:028 1244 Stratum - connecting to 'xmr-eu.dwarfpool.com' <188.165.34.183> port 8005 16:12:43:043 e70 GPU 2: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1389 ms, hashrate = 737 h/s 16:12:43:075 1244 Stratum - Connected 16:12:43:137 1244 got 303 bytes 16:12:43:137 1244 buf: {"id":1,"jsonrpc":"2.0","error":null,"result":{"id":"353713814029470","job":{"blob":"0305a2a0b4c3052fbbfd61b76dac28ea7b1c2c37deedf02d8b56519a5ebf7c2b7e6986f09499730 0000000f598a896f601b68487a070c5bd4893a3834e723ac87a0dcc80a207f020be590806","job_id":"963475246937014","target":"b88d0600"},"status":"OK"}}
16:12:43:137 1244 parse packet: 303 16:12:43:137 1244 new buf size: 0 16:12:43:153 1244 Pool Diff 10000 16:12:43:168 1244 df has same pool, skip 16:12:43:278 e70 Round 16:12:43:606 176c Job changed, drop current round 16:12:43:606 176c Round 16:12:43:669 1774 Job changed, drop current round 16:12:43:684 100 Job changed, drop current round 16:12:43:684 100 Round 16:12:43:762 660 Job changed, drop current round 16:12:43:762 660 Round 16:12:45:059 480 GPU 0: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1407 ms, hashrate = 727 h/s 16:12:45:075 480 Round 16:12:45:106 1774 GPU 1: HashCnt = 1024, time = 1394 ms, hashrate = 734 h/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 05:32:34 PM |
|
Whats up guys.
What card do you recommend me?
I am interested in mining ETH, XMR, ZEC ...
Thank you.
For ETH & XMR, rx 470's are probably the consensus winner... they hash slightly slower than 480s but consume less power and cost less, so the ratios are the best, at least for most people/systems. For ZEC, it's a bit more confusing since older cards seem to get more hashes on it (but probably also suck a lot of power). Check out the ZEC thread for better recommendations on that. As for 470's, I prefer the MSI 4GB Gaming. Super quiet, easy to mod the bios, look great and run pretty cool. Many people in this forum love that GPU so check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
Trimegistus
Legendary

Activity: 1563
Merit: 1027
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 05:32:51 PM |
|
Anyone managed to connect to dwarf using a Kraken address? Their support answered me stating this feature was available starting from yesterday but so far I haven't been able to connect. 
|
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 05:41:11 PM |
|
ZEC is still better at this point
and how did you reach this conclusion? ZEC is only most profitable for older cards... I guess 390s, 290s, etc. But for 470/480s, ETH & XMR have been more profitable than ZEC for quite a while now. Simply plug your system stats into this site and you will see it. ZEC has made a surge in profitability over the past few hours mainly due to lower difficulty but it is still clearly below the other 2, at least for the 470/480 crowd. http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency
|
|
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 06:16:35 PM |
|
ZEC is only most profitable for older cards... I guess 390s, 290s, etc. But for 470/480s, ETH & XMR have been more profitable than ZEC for quite a while now. Simply plug your system stats into this site and you will see it. ZEC has made a surge in profitability over the past few hours mainly due to lower difficulty but it is still clearly below the other 2, at least for the 470/480 crowd.
Absolutely right! But I like more http://whattomine.comAnd in my pool https://minergate.com calculator https://minergate.com/calculator , too right!
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
|
GabryRox
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 06:37:04 PM |
|
ZEC is only most profitable for older cards... I guess 390s, 290s, etc. But for 470/480s, ETH & XMR have been more profitable than ZEC for quite a while now. Simply plug your system stats into this site and you will see it. ZEC has made a surge in profitability over the past few hours mainly due to lower difficulty but it is still clearly below the other 2, at least for the 470/480 crowd.
Absolutely right! But I like more http://whattomine.comAnd in my pool https://minergate.com calculator https://minergate.com/calculator , too right! Yeah, I've checked that site as well but it does not seem to be as reliable as coinwarez. The 2 big issues I have seen is that I is usually WAY off on ETH difficulty (a spot check now of the 2 sites at the exact same time has CW with 92.6 and WTM at 85.4), which really skews profitability. Every time I've checked, CW has been right and WTM has been wrong, so there must be something wrong with how they are pulling ETH diff. Also, the $ values that WTM uses also usually seem to be off by some degree. Based on these 2 factors, seems to me that CW is much more reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
siagirl
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 06:37:26 PM |
|
Hi I have AMD video cards on windows 64. Does anybody have worked settings for Claymore's CryptoNote GPU Miner v9.6 or another working miner for Monero. Thank you in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
pehoko
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 06:44:30 PM |
|
Why linux version loads 100% cpu?
|
|
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 06:45:49 PM Last edit: January 04, 2017, 07:09:00 PM by yuslav |
|
Yeah, I've checked that site as well but it does not seem to be as reliable as coinwarez. The 2 big issues I have seen is that I is usually WAY off on ETH difficulty (a spot check now of the 2 sites at the exact same time has CW with 92.6 and WTM at 85.4), which really skews profitability. Every time I've checked, CW has been right and WTM has been wrong, so there must be something wrong with how they are pulling ETH diff. Also, the $ values that WTM uses also usually seem to be off by some degree. Based on these 2 factors, seems to me that CW is much more reliable.
maybe you're right. Hi I have AMD video cards on windows 64. Does anybody have worked settings for Claymore's CryptoNote GPU Miner v9.6 or another working miner for Monero. Thank you in advance.
then sign up https://minergate.comand then download the finished bat file for Claymore's CryptoNote GPU Miner v9. 6 after registration. here it is very easy! https://minergate.com/altminers/claymore-gpu
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
|
Hurtman
|
 |
January 04, 2017, 07:08:41 PM |
|
When there is a new version? 
|
|
|
|
|
|