Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3

[Msobh]

Anyone here complain about fees should find another miner . end of story .

[ZenFr]

Hi, Claymore.
Is there a nVidia version in project (for Ubuntu users) ?
If not, can you write in the title "... for AMD" : each time, i forgot than nVidia is not supported :-).

You have add the "AMD" mention in the title : thank you Claymore for this precision ;-).

I have no AMD GPUs, but if one day you want make a nVidia Cryptonote version ;-).

[TeCe]

... I do not understand why many write "thank you for the work," "it will not be easy" and that kind of crap ...  

If we use the program from mr. Claymore  and do not specify the "-nofee 1" option, we become mr. Claymore's clients and pay him a 2% fee (ex. SSL conn...etc).
I think Mr. Claymore should tell us "thank you" ...? Right?  

I, as an active mr. Claymor's client, have a number of questions for mr. Claymore:
1. How to verify the reliability of 2% of your rewards? Real indicators are 10% or even 15%. The information is taken from the number of allocated shares on the pool and the indicators of the miner.
2. Why when I specify the option "-nofee 1" does your program report that some optimizations are disabled? And how does disabling optimizations relate to your reward? Why?
3. How does the "-h" parameter affect performance? Your measurements, recomendations?
4.  Comments on the following message when your program is running:
cannot find block data:
{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":null,"error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}}
cannot convert blob data
How does this affect performance? Is the action accepted?
5. Will there be comments to the comparisons of the performance of your miner and  other's?

Yes, we have to thank him for is great work. With his miner I get a 10% higher hashrate on some cards. Donating him 2% gives me still 8% more profit. You don't have to use his miner! Just be a dick, take the stak miner source code, remove the fees and compile it yourself.
As already explained, it's not 2% of the shares, it's 2% of your mining time. Take a stopwatch and measure the time, the miner uses for dev-fees and the time it's mining for you.

...be a dick?
Excuse me, I did not go on insults ...

At the expense of time or shares ... think about it - 2% of the time gives a reduction of shares at 10..15% ... funny you.

The questions are clearly not for you.
Questions on the merits.

[Jackkyy]

if a results good - no problem for this 2% fee
but last results on Claymore is poor from other minning soft

[Claymore]

... I do not understand why many write "thank you for the work," "it will not be easy" and that kind of crap ...  

If we use the program from mr. Claymore  and do not specify the "-nofee 1" option, we become mr. Claymore's clients and pay him a 2% fee (ex. SSL conn...etc).
I think Mr. Claymore should tell us "thank you" ...? Right?  

I, as an active mr. Claymor's client, have a number of questions for mr. Claymore:
1. How to verify the reliability of 2% of your rewards? Real indicators are 10% or even 15%. The information is taken from the number of allocated shares on the pool and the indicators of the miner.
2. Why when I specify the option "-nofee 1" does your program report that some optimizations are disabled? And how does disabling optimizations relate to your reward? Why?
3. How does the "-h" parameter affect performance? Your measurements, recomendations?
4.  Comments on the following message when your program is running:
cannot find block data:
{"id":4,"jsonrpc":"2.0","result":null,"error":{"code":-1,"message":"Lowdifficultyshare"}}
cannot convert blob data
How does this affect performance? Is the action accepted?
5. Will there be comments to the comparisons of the performance of your miner and  other's?

Yes, we have to thank him for is great work. With his miner I get a 10% higher hashrate on some cards. Donating him 2% gives me still 8% more profit. You don't have to use his miner! Just be a dick, take the stak miner source code, remove the fees and compile it yourself.
As already explained, it's not 2% of the shares, it's 2% of your mining time. Take a stopwatch and measure the time, the miner uses for dev-fees and the time it's mining for you.

...be a dick?
Excuse me, I did not go on insults ...

At the expense of time or shares ... think about it - 2% of the time gives a reduction of shares at 10..15% ... funny you.

The questions are clearly not for you.
Questions on the merits.

Your questions are not new, all of them.

1. It's a very good idea to read FAQ in the first post of this thread. If you really think that I take 10-15% of your hashrate - don't use my miners. If you want to share this "news" here: show some proofs at least, the miner writes detailed log file and you can examine it if you have some basic knowledge about pool mining.
2. Because my miner is not free. If you want me to lose 100% earnings from you, I want you to lose a few percents of your earnings too. You always can use open-source miners if you think that you will earn more or if they are more convenient for you.
3. Miner selects best "-h" value automatically. If you think that you can find better value, you can try to do it.
4. The reason depends on pool, may be it was stale share, or GPU found solution incorrectly, you can find more details in the log file. You lost this share anyway.
5. I don't understand why you wait these comparisons from me, you should do it yourself to find the best miner for you.

[Claymore]

Finally I have fixed the bug with Vega.
New version will be available within 24 hours.
Also I will reduce devfee and it will be executed once an hour, similar to dual and zec miners.

[garytheasshole]

Finally I have fixed the bug with Vega.
New version will be available within 24 hours.
Also I will reduce devfee and it will be executed once an hour, similar to dual and zec miners.

Linux will get an update as well? Or holding back on it for now?

[Claymore]

Finally I have fixed the bug with Vega.
New version will be available within 24 hours.
Also I will reduce devfee and it will be executed once an hour, similar to dual and zec miners.

Linux will get an update as well? Or holding back on it for now?

Yes I will release Linux version too. Though Vega won't work in Linux, currently I don't support ROCm drivers.

[Msobh]

Finally I have fixed the bug with Vega.
New version will be available within 24 hours.
Also I will reduce devfee and it will be executed once an hour, similar to dual and zec miners.

@Claymore Nice   . is there any chance to dual mine XMR with other coin ?.. Thanks for your developing efforts

[Claymore]

Finally I have fixed the bug with Vega.
New version will be available within 24 hours.
Also I will reduce devfee and it will be executed once an hour, similar to dual and zec miners.

@Claymore Nice   . is there any chance to dual mine XMR with other coin ?.. Thanks for your developing efforts

Yes it is possible technically, but requires some efforts to implement it properly.

[rednoW]

Finally I have fixed the bug with Vega.
New version will be available within 24 hours.
Also I will reduce devfee and it will be executed once an hour, similar to dual and zec miners.

Linux will get an update as well? Or holding back on it for now?

Yes I will release Linux version too. Though Vega won't work in Linux, currently I don't support ROCm drivers.

What is the expected speed for Vega? Can't wait )))

[Claymore]

Finally I have fixed the bug with Vega.
New version will be available within 24 hours.
Also I will reduce devfee and it will be executed once an hour, similar to dual and zec miners.

Linux will get an update as well? Or holding back on it for now?

Yes I will release Linux version too. Though Vega won't work in Linux, currently I don't support ROCm drivers.

What is the expected speed for Vega? Can't wait )))

It's just a bit faster than sgminer in my tests, may be you will get different results. The problem of this PoW is in GPU memory, so all tricks don't help much.

[Jackkyy]

My prediction is 1600 hs for vega64 dual minning 

[rednoW]

What is the expected speed for Vega? Can't wait )))

It's just a bit faster than sgminer in my tests, my be you will get different results. The problem of this PoW is in GPU memory, so all tricks don't help much.

To get full Vega speed you need HBCC enabled and 2 or more threads with total memory usage ascending to the upper limit.
Will hope your miner let us configure threads and intensities. We need do break 2kh/s wall ))

[Claymore]

What is the expected speed for Vega? Can't wait )))

It's just a bit faster than sgminer in my tests, my be you will get different results. The problem of this PoW is in GPU memory, so all tricks don't help much.

To get full Vega speed you need HBCC enabled and 2 or more threads with total memory usage ascending to the upper limit.
Will hope your miner let us configure threads and intensities. We need do break 2kh/s wall ))

I use different approach, so I get best speed in a single thread, two threads have same speed.
I did not try HBCC yet since I test everything on blockchain drivers and I don't see any dialogs with settings at all.

[ytkingo]

Hey claymore lets tell us whats the speed for vega 56 and 64

[Claymore]

Hey claymore lets tell us whats the speed for vega 56 and 64

I don't OC GPUs and use stock bios, don't enable HBCC, etc, so I get low speeds. For example, I see 1140H/s for stock Vega64.

[rednoW]

Hey claymore lets tell us whats the speed for vega 56 and 64

I don't OC GPUs and use stock bios, don't enable HBCC, etc, so I get low speeds. For example, I see 1140H/s for stock Vega64.

That's bad. You'll see 2-thread gain with HBCC only ((( HBCC can be enabled easy with blockchain drivers. But if you have Frontier - that is a problem ))

For HBCC enabled with Vega56 or Vega64 be sure you have enough virtual memory, make clean uninstall of drivers (I used amd utiity), install blockchain drivers again, you will see HBCC slider in Gaming section

[matuson]

I use hashing for RX 540. I dispersed them. It works stable at speed 29680 Mh/s Ethereum + 874.961 Mh/s Decred in the mode of dual mining. I do not know a lot or not but this is my stats. I can't say that in dual mode mining greatly increases the income but 20% plus.

[garytheasshole]

I use hashing for RX 540. I dispersed them. It works stable at speed 29680 Mh/s Ethereum + 874.961 Mh/s Decred in the mode of dual mining. I do not know a lot or not but this is my stats. I can't say that in dual mode mining greatly increases the income but 20% plus.

Wrong thread