Bitcoin Forum
June 11, 2026, 12:58:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 [235] 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 ... 325 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3  (Read 2145113 times)
rongphuongnam
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 10:33:35 AM
 #4681

When miner runs long-term, hash reduce...Restart hash increase again.
rongphuongnam
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 11:05:21 AM
 #4682

Wolf0 congrats, people says your miner is faster than Claymore!

Meh, it is in some cases, but only a bit. If I wanted to have a contest, I wouldn't hand the competitor my entry, duh. Tongue
Are you share your miner version?

My public one is on Github! Or in SGMiner-GM.

Hey wolf, thank you for all your work.  Have you done any testing with the vega frontier?  Any clue of optimal settings?  4 threads possible/better?

Since xmr-stak-amd is just a new miner shell plus my GPU code ripped off, I guess the stats for it are identical.

Your work is very good. It gets hightest hash.
T1Pimp
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 01:11:50 PM
 #4683

When miner runs long-term, hash reduce...Restart hash increase again.

I've noticed this as well. And it's not simply restarting the miner; I run mine with -r 240 so it should be restarting every 4 hours or GPU fail (I've not confirmed if this is happening in the logs yet FWIW). I got up this morning and hash rate had dropped and didn't come back until I rebooted. Bounced my machine and blamo... right back up to the 5130-5140 range.
YonhPal
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 03:36:42 PM
 #4684

Does Miners Works with Nvidia's Card ?
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 04:26:40 PM
 #4685

There is something wrong with 10.2 and Pitcairns.
On my 270X 4Gb with -dmem 1 and stock frequences 1070/1400 speed 515 h/s and about 50-75% incorrect shares. No rejects. Without -dmem 1 option card even with overclocking gives only 485 h/s maximum. I didn't check for incorrect shares.
On 9.7 with overclock i recieve 595 h/s and no rejects. Returning to 9.7 for now. Only 1 plus of 10.2 - it more power effective and card cooler and quieter.
Hope that Claymore fix this problem.
FFI2013
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 906
Merit: 507


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 04:37:46 PM
 #4686

I cant get my 470 8gb running good at default h there at 310 if I set -h higher the card hashes lower the best I could get is -h 900 at 500-600 hashes which is horrible on gatelessgate I get 700-800 hashes 
Ursul0
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 857
Merit: 262


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 06:10:46 PM
 #4687

this feels like pre-alpha version.
on a mixed rig of 470&370 running stable XMR for days it just refuses to work(very low hash and GPU hangs) on default miner settings, no matter the frequencies/voltages. (using 16.11.4 drivers)
not yet usable for now...
j2lcg2
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 03, 2017, 11:57:30 PM
 #4688

Hello,

This are my results whit 7 card rig ( 5xRX580+2xRX470 all bios moded )

With 9.7 
 Total H/S was 4690

With 10.2
 Total H/S is 4790

Had to increase virtual memory to 52000MB to fix error dk2a

So, is that ok?


Also with 9.7 i had no temperatures and fan speeds with 10.2 now that is working.



Coin_Miner1
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 02:56:10 AM
 #4689

getting poor performance (best 3500 h/s after running for 10 mins) and sometimes GPU hangs. Config default / No overclock.
C: Drive = 20,000mb paging file / D: Drive = 100,000mb paging file
4GB Ram / Intel Celeron 2 core GPU.



9.7 I get 5600 h/s no overclock 6000 h/s with overclock



Snip from 10.2 log


22:47:47:282   1a34   driver 10.0.2442.8
22:47:47:286   1a34   AMD Cards available: 8

22:47:50:287   1a34   GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB)
22:47:50:664   1a34   GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB)
22:47:51:022   1a34   GPU #2 algorithm ASM, -h 900, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3780MB)
22:47:51:379   1a34   GPU #3 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB)
22:47:51:741   1a34   GPU #4 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB)
22:47:52:106   1a34   GPU #5 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB)
22:47:52:504   1a34   GPU #6 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB)
22:47:52:888   1a34   GPU #7 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB)
22:47:52:892   1a34   Total cards: 8
stonebr
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 04:58:44 AM
 #4690

Tested Claymore v10.2 on 8 rx 580 8 GB. Got the same hash rate 830-850 h/s per card as with sgminer-5.5.5. Will stay with sgminer-5.5.5 until see significant improvement in Claymore's miner
rednoW
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 06:40:24 AM
 #4691

Tested Claymore v10.2 on 8 rx 580 8 GB. Got the same hash rate 830-850 h/s per card as with sgminer-5.5.5. Will stay with sgminer-5.5.5 until see significant improvement in Claymore's miner
Yes, I moved back to my xmr-stak-amd with polaris 8gb cards. Little bit more pool-side hash (but I can be wrong).
Using Claymore's 10.2 with hawaii and polaris 4gb cards only.
coinfoundry
Full Member
***
Offline

Activity: 292
Merit: 100


Miningcore


View Profile WWW
October 04, 2017, 10:47:45 AM
 #4692

Tested Claymore v10.2 on 8 rx 580 8 GB. Got the same hash rate 830-850 h/s per card as with sgminer-5.5.5. Will stay with sgminer-5.5.5 until see significant improvement in Claymore's miner

That mirrors my own observations. Thanks for sharing.

Miningcore.pro - Stress-Free, Reliable Crypto Mining. Period.
tuni
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 10:50:27 AM
 #4693

What wrong with my MSI Afterbuner ?
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7Bc6ZeuUtjgV0V2V3ZmUml6cWM/view?usp=sharing
NewbieMiner17
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 46
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 01:28:21 PM
 #4694


You are killing noobs with your wrong environment vars setting in bat file )))
Quote
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

What should or shouldn't be there then? Smiley
wingman1487
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 01:56:12 PM
 #4695


You are killing noobs with your wrong environment vars setting in bat file )))
Quote
GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

What should or shouldn't be there then? Smiley

setx needs to be added to the front of each line.

setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1
setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
l1xx
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 02:30:02 PM
 #4696

this version is still with only 1 thread per vega  , right?
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 02:46:35 PM
 #4697

There is something wrong with 10.2 and Pitcairns.
On my 270X 4Gb with -dmem 1 and stock frequences 1070/1400 speed 515 h/s and about 50-75% incorrect shares. No rejects. Without -dmem 1 option card even with overclocking gives only 485 h/s maximum. I didn't check for incorrect shares.
On 9.7 with overclock i recieve 595 h/s and no rejects. Returning to 9.7 for now. Only 1 plus of 10.2 - it more power effective and card cooler and quieter.
Hope that Claymore fix this problem.
Claymore, made something with Pitcairn problem. Can you reduce devfee on 9.7 and add an -dmem 1 option?
nutsnax
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 05:45:21 PM
 #4698

Please add Aeon support! Thanks!
yuslav
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
October 04, 2017, 06:34:55 PM
 #4699

Good miner  Grin

I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
JuanHungLo
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 935
Merit: 1001


I don't always drink...


View Profile
October 04, 2017, 07:39:25 PM
 #4700

Hey claymore lets tell us whats the speed for vega 56 and 64

I don't OC GPUs and use stock bios, don't enable HBCC, etc, so I get low speeds. For example, I see 1140H/s for stock Vega64.
That's bad. You'll see 2-thread gain with HBCC only ((( HBCC can be enabled easy with blockchain drivers. But if you have Frontier - that is a problem ))

For HBCC enabled with Vega56 or Vega64 be sure you have enough virtual memory, make clean uninstall of drivers (I used amd utiity), install blockchain drivers again, you will see HBCC slider in Gaming section

Hmm, Vega56 shows about 1400H/s in stock. So it seems Vega56 is faster than Vega64 for my PoW implementation. I really need more time to find the reason, so I will release new version in several hours and then will spend more time for Vega.

Claymore, how did you get Vega56 to 1400H/s?  No matter what I try I can't get above 1 KH/s

Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
Pages: « 1 ... 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 [235] 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 ... 325 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!