rongphuongnam
Newbie

Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 10:33:35 AM |
|
When miner runs long-term, hash reduce...Restart hash increase again.
|
|
|
|
|
rongphuongnam
Newbie

Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 11:05:21 AM |
|
Wolf0 congrats, people says your miner is faster than Claymore!
Meh, it is in some cases, but only a bit. If I wanted to have a contest, I wouldn't hand the competitor my entry, duh.  Are you share your miner version? My public one is on Github! Or in SGMiner-GM. Hey wolf, thank you for all your work. Have you done any testing with the vega frontier? Any clue of optimal settings? 4 threads possible/better? Since xmr-stak-amd is just a new miner shell plus my GPU code ripped off, I guess the stats for it are identical. Your work is very good. It gets hightest hash.
|
|
|
|
|
T1Pimp
Newbie

Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 01:11:50 PM |
|
When miner runs long-term, hash reduce...Restart hash increase again.
I've noticed this as well. And it's not simply restarting the miner; I run mine with -r 240 so it should be restarting every 4 hours or GPU fail (I've not confirmed if this is happening in the logs yet FWIW). I got up this morning and hash rate had dropped and didn't come back until I rebooted. Bounced my machine and blamo... right back up to the 5130-5140 range.
|
|
|
|
|
YonhPal
Newbie

Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 03:36:42 PM |
|
Does Miners Works with Nvidia's Card ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 04:26:40 PM |
|
There is something wrong with 10.2 and Pitcairns. On my 270X 4Gb with -dmem 1 and stock frequences 1070/1400 speed 515 h/s and about 50-75% incorrect shares. No rejects. Without -dmem 1 option card even with overclocking gives only 485 h/s maximum. I didn't check for incorrect shares. On 9.7 with overclock i recieve 595 h/s and no rejects. Returning to 9.7 for now. Only 1 plus of 10.2 - it more power effective and card cooler and quieter. Hope that Claymore fix this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFI2013
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 04:37:46 PM |
|
I cant get my 470 8gb running good at default h there at 310 if I set -h higher the card hashes lower the best I could get is -h 900 at 500-600 hashes which is horrible on gatelessgate I get 700-800 hashes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ursul0
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 06:10:46 PM |
|
this feels like pre-alpha version. on a mixed rig of 470&370 running stable XMR for days it just refuses to work(very low hash and GPU hangs) on default miner settings, no matter the frequencies/voltages. (using 16.11.4 drivers) not yet usable for now...
|
|
|
|
|
j2lcg2
Newbie

Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 03, 2017, 11:57:30 PM |
|
Hello,
This are my results whit 7 card rig ( 5xRX580+2xRX470 all bios moded )
With 9.7 Total H/S was 4690
With 10.2 Total H/S is 4790
Had to increase virtual memory to 52000MB to fix error dk2a
So, is that ok?
Also with 9.7 i had no temperatures and fan speeds with 10.2 now that is working.
|
|
|
|
|
Coin_Miner1
Newbie

Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 02:56:10 AM |
|
getting poor performance (best 3500 h/s after running for 10 mins) and sometimes GPU hangs. Config default / No overclock. C: Drive = 20,000mb paging file / D: Drive = 100,000mb paging file 4GB Ram / Intel Celeron 2 core GPU.
9.7 I get 5600 h/s no overclock 6000 h/s with overclock
Snip from 10.2 log
22:47:47:282 1a34 driver 10.0.2442.8 22:47:47:286 1a34 AMD Cards available: 8
22:47:50:287 1a34 GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB) 22:47:50:664 1a34 GPU #1 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB) 22:47:51:022 1a34 GPU #2 algorithm ASM, -h 900, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 3780MB) 22:47:51:379 1a34 GPU #3 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB) 22:47:51:741 1a34 GPU #4 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB) 22:47:52:106 1a34 GPU #5 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB) 22:47:52:504 1a34 GPU #6 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB) 22:47:52:888 1a34 GPU #7 algorithm ASM, -h 1800, -dmem 1 (Memory used: 7560MB) 22:47:52:892 1a34 Total cards: 8
|
|
|
|
|
stonebr
Newbie

Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 04:58:44 AM |
|
Tested Claymore v10.2 on 8 rx 580 8 GB. Got the same hash rate 830-850 h/s per card as with sgminer-5.5.5. Will stay with sgminer-5.5.5 until see significant improvement in Claymore's miner
|
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary

Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 06:40:24 AM |
|
Tested Claymore v10.2 on 8 rx 580 8 GB. Got the same hash rate 830-850 h/s per card as with sgminer-5.5.5. Will stay with sgminer-5.5.5 until see significant improvement in Claymore's miner
Yes, I moved back to my xmr-stak-amd with polaris 8gb cards. Little bit more pool-side hash (but I can be wrong). Using Claymore's 10.2 with hawaii and polaris 4gb cards only.
|
|
|
|
|
coinfoundry
Full Member
 

Activity: 292
Merit: 100
Miningcore
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 10:47:45 AM |
|
Tested Claymore v10.2 on 8 rx 580 8 GB. Got the same hash rate 830-850 h/s per card as with sgminer-5.5.5. Will stay with sgminer-5.5.5 until see significant improvement in Claymore's miner
That mirrors my own observations. Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
tuni
Newbie

Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 10:50:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NewbieMiner17
Newbie

Activity: 46
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 01:28:21 PM |
|
You are killing noobs with your wrong environment vars setting in bat file ))) GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 What should or shouldn't be there then?
|
|
|
|
|
wingman1487
Newbie

Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 01:56:12 PM |
|
You are killing noobs with your wrong environment vars setting in bat file ))) GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 What should or shouldn't be there then? setx needs to be added to the front of each line. setx GPU_FORCE_64BIT_PTR 1 setx GPU_MAX_HEAP_SIZE 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_SINGLE_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
|
|
|
|
|
l1xx
Member


Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 02:30:02 PM |
|
this version is still with only 1 thread per vega , right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
UnclWish
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 02:46:35 PM |
|
There is something wrong with 10.2 and Pitcairns. On my 270X 4Gb with -dmem 1 and stock frequences 1070/1400 speed 515 h/s and about 50-75% incorrect shares. No rejects. Without -dmem 1 option card even with overclocking gives only 485 h/s maximum. I didn't check for incorrect shares. On 9.7 with overclock i recieve 595 h/s and no rejects. Returning to 9.7 for now. Only 1 plus of 10.2 - it more power effective and card cooler and quieter. Hope that Claymore fix this problem.
Claymore, made something with Pitcairn problem. Can you reduce devfee on 9.7 and add an -dmem 1 option?
|
|
|
|
|
nutsnax
Newbie

Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 05:45:21 PM |
|
Please add Aeon support! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
yuslav
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 06:34:55 PM |
|
Good miner 
|
I'm an idiot. I believe in Bitcoin!
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
 |
October 04, 2017, 07:39:25 PM |
|
Hey claymore lets tell us whats the speed for vega 56 and 64
I don't OC GPUs and use stock bios, don't enable HBCC, etc, so I get low speeds. For example, I see 1140H/s for stock Vega64. That's bad. You'll see 2-thread gain with HBCC only ((( HBCC can be enabled easy with blockchain drivers. But if you have Frontier - that is a problem )) For HBCC enabled with Vega56 or Vega64 be sure you have enough virtual memory, make clean uninstall of drivers (I used amd utiity), install blockchain drivers again, you will see HBCC slider in Gaming section Hmm, Vega56 shows about 1400H/s in stock. So it seems Vega56 is faster than Vega64 for my PoW implementation. I really need more time to find the reason, so I will release new version in several hours and then will spend more time for Vega. Claymore, how did you get Vega56 to 1400H/s? No matter what I try I can't get above 1 KH/s
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
|