Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v11.3

[sir4o]

1250@960-980mV

Thanks. Managed to increase even to 1300@1025mV. This has increased the wattage with 20% and the hashrate with 6% (900 h/s). Again, compared to sgminer, this miner is currently superior

[Bakhtra]

1250@960-980mV

Thanks. Managed to increase even to 1300@1025mV. This has increased the wattage with 20% and the hashrate with 6% (900 h/s). Again, compared to sgminer, this miner is currently superior

If electricity cheap i think no problem, but you see wattage increase 20% but you only gain 6%, how thats good?

[rascabily]

Have anyone a sample config for nanopool with 480 4gb? Thanks!

[sir4o]

1250@960-980mV

Thanks. Managed to increase even to 1300@1025mV. This has increased the wattage with 20% and the hashrate with 6% (900 h/s). Again, compared to sgminer, this miner is currently superior

If electricity cheap i think no problem, but you see wattage increase 20% but you only gain 6%, how thats good?

Because I'm still profiting man. Calculated the extra electricity and the extra hash only through whattomine and it shows I'm on +++

[Call_Me_Bambi]

1250@960-980mV

Thanks. Managed to increase even to 1300@1025mV. This has increased the wattage with 20% and the hashrate with 6% (900 h/s). Again, compared to sgminer, this miner is currently superior

If electricity cheap i think no problem, but you see wattage increase 20% but you only gain 6%, how thats good?

Because I'm still profiting man. Calculated the extra electricity and the extra hash only through whattomine and it shows I'm on +++

On my 5 card setup I find no difference in hashrate between Sgminer & Claymore, but Claymore does take a little more power.
Sgminer no more than 770 Watts and Claymore 790 Watts - jumping occasionally to 800 Watts.

[Eisenkopf89]

Have anyone a sample config for nicehash? Thanks!

NsGpuCNMiner.exe -xpool stratum+ssl://cryptonight.eu.nicehash.com:33355 -xwal btc-addr.rig1 -xpsw x -h 928 -dmem 1 -cclock 1167 -cvddc 875 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 875

btc-addr - is yours nicehash btc address
rig - is your rig name ( if you use it )
This is setup for 4GB vram card , if you have 8GB you can change -h 928 to -h 1800-1900 , just test it to find thah best fits to you , "-cclock 1167 -cvddc 875 -mclock 2000 -mvddc 875" - this is core and memory speed and voltage , edit it to fits for you or just delete it if you use other program to overclock/undervolt.

Thanks! I hope now it will work fine.

[tytanick]

Hi Calymore,
Do you have any ETA on version for linux ?
My users are waiting for Your release and many other part of the word
Thx for you well done job in all miners !

[adaseb]

Anyone have any configs for the AMD Tahiti's? (7950/ 7970/ 280x)?

Seems that the speed is identical to the older Claymore version.

And profitability seems identical between ZEC and XMR. However XMR might pull less power.

[UnclWish]

Anyone have any configs for the AMD Tahiti's? (7950/ 7970/ 280x)?

Seems that the speed is identical to the older Claymore version.

And profitability seems identical between ZEC and XMR. However XMR might pull less power.

Just try to add an -dmem 1 option. It can increese speed.

[adaseb]

Anyone have any configs for the AMD Tahiti's? (7950/ 7970/ 280x)?

Seems that the speed is identical to the older Claymore version.

And profitability seems identical between ZEC and XMR. However XMR might pull less power.

Just try to add an -dmem 1 option. It can increese speed.

I did, doesn't do much. Exact same speed as Version 9.7

Using drivers 15.12

[garytheasshole]

Anyone have any configs for the AMD Tahiti's? (7950/ 7970/ 280x)?

Seems that the speed is identical to the older Claymore version.

And profitability seems identical between ZEC and XMR. However XMR might pull less power.

Just try to add an -dmem 1 option. It can increese speed.

I did, doesn't do much. Exact same speed as Version 9.7

Using drivers 15.12

Same here on my 7990s

[JuanHungLo]

Has anyone successfully installed and used Claymore 10.2 for XMR with these drivers in Win 7-64 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2068446.0 with 4x Vega 56?  Or is Win 10 64 and Aug 28th Blockchain drivers essential?

[notbatman]

v10.0 BETA:

- now miner uses the latest framework which is used for dual and zec miners. Therefore several new options are available.
- new assembler GPU kernels are used.
- added "-dmem" options that can improve performance in many cases. Note that twice more GPU memory is used in this mode.
- some old options were removed, some were renamed, please read Readme for detailed information and samples.
- reduced devfee, it's 1% now if you use secure SSL/TLS connection, 1.5% for unsecure connection.
- devfee mining is executed every hour, similar to dual and zec miners.
- a lot of minor improvements.

PS. Linux version will be available in a day.

After two weeks of waiting patiently...

Hi Calymore,
Do you have any ETA on version for linux ?
My users are waiting for Your release and many other part of the word
Thx for you well done job in all miners !

Pretty sure he said he's discontinuing it due to loss of the source or something.

Seriously? 

[sir4o]

Has anyone successfully installed and used Claymore 10.2 for XMR with these drivers in Win 7-64 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2068446.0 with 4x Vega 56?  Or is Win 10 64 and Aug 28th Blockchain drivers essential?

For XMR, I don't think the blockchain drivers help your hash speed.
Check you motherboard bios settings, that's usually the problem with mining.

I think they do help as the new Claymore version was optimized for these drivers. I'm using the blockchain drivers and at least for me switching from 9.7 has brought 15% improvement while reducing the wattage.

[nowaltcoin]

@claymore go ahead !!

really fine work with version 10.2 !

Please in 10.3 support for my old HD7790 (bonaire)

and for all the other complaining about the new miner:

after some hours testing:

due to the tipps and hints i found here i'd like to share my results and settings:

Mining XMR at Nanopool

Rig one:

Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
AMD-Driver 15.300.1025.1001
SGMiner-GM 5.5.5-8

2 * R9 270 2G (sapphire)  ri:340 ws:4 gt:2     345 H/s each
1 * HD 7850 2G (XFX) ri:256 ws:4 gt:2     320 H/s
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rig total 1010 H/s
---- with Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v10.2    ------------------------- Rig total 1230 H/s
--------------- minus 15 % incorrect shares ------------------------------------------ minus 185 H/s
---- with Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v10.2    -------------------------- Rig total 1045 H/s

Rig two:

Windows 7  Ultimate 64 bit
AMD-Driver 15.300.1025.0
SGMiner-GM 5.5.5-8

4 * HD 7850 2G  ( HIS ICEQ X) ri:256 ws:4 gt:2     330 H/s each
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rig total 1320 H/s
---- with Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v10.2    -------------------------- Rig total 1625 H/s
--------------- minus 25 % incorrect shares ------------------------------------------ minus 400 H/s
---- with Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v10.2    -------------------------- Rig total 1225 H/s

Rig three:

Windows 8.1 Pro 64 bit
AMD-Driver 21.19.155.257 (6 GPU-Patch)
SGMiner-GM 5.5.5-8

6 * HD 7790 1G (HIS/ASUS/XFX) ri:192 ws:4 gt:2     204 H/s each
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rig total 1230 H/s
---- with Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v9.7        ------------------------- Rig total 1200 H/s


---------------------> All rigs : 3560 H/s
---------------------> Power at the wall: 1240 watt
----with 10.2-------> All rigs : 4050 H/s
-------minus-------> minus : 585 H/s
---------=---------> All rigs : 3465 H/s
--------------------> Power at the wall: 1215 watt

Have a nice day

[Vann]

Rig two:

Windows 7 Home Ultimate 64 bit
AMD-Driver 15.300.1025.0
SGMiner-GM 5.5.5-8

4 * HD 7850 2G  ( HIS ICEQ X) ri:256 ws:4 gt:2     330 H/s each
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rig total 1320 H/s
---- with Claymore's CryptoNote AMD GPU Miner v10.2    -------------------------- Rig total 1625 H/s

My Powercolor HD 7850 2GB card does 520 H/s with the Claymore v9.7 miner. With the v10.2, the best I could do was 515 H/s. I switched back to the v9.7 miner, but unfortunately it has problems reading the fan speed and temperature with the blockchain drivers and it sometimes hangs Windows while trying to restart the miner.

16:13:38:853   1bdc   WATCHDOG: GPU memory error, you need to restart miner
16:13:38:853   1bdc   Failed to get OverdriveN capabilities
16:13:39:869   1bdc   Restarting OK, exit...

[UnclWish]

@nowaltcoin, your sgminer-gm settings wrong and your speeds for your cards are too low.
On 270X 4Gb on Claymore 9.7 I have 495-500 h/s, sgminer 515-520. Claymore 10.2 with dmem 1 gives 530 h/s but too many incorrect shares. Without dmem 1 10.2 gives only 485-490 h/s.
On 280X(7870) on Claymore 9.7 I have 695 h/s, sgminer-gm - 675 h/s.

Try on 270/370 and other analog cards with sgminer xintensity 460 worksize 8 gputhreads 2.

[Call_Me_Bambi]

Has anyone successfully installed and used Claymore 10.2 for XMR with these drivers in Win 7-64 https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2068446.0 with 4x Vega 56?  Or is Win 10 64 and Aug 28th Blockchain drivers essential?

For XMR, I don't think the blockchain drivers help your hash speed.
Check you motherboard bios settings, that's usually the problem with mining.

I think they do help as the new Claymore version was optimized for these drivers. I'm using the blockchain drivers and at least for me switching from 9.7 has brought 15% improvement while reducing the wattage.

I have to add a "Me to" here as I was mining XMR on the 17.7.1 AMD drivers and whan I changed to the Blockchain drivers there was a noticable increase in hashrate. This is on a Windows 10 pro x64 machine.

[Dodonpa]

Claymore - Possible bug.

With 10.2 Beta I am getting incorrect shares on my two Gigabyte 270 OC (Pitcairn) (non X)

I'm using the stock settings (-h 512) on non-overclocked cards.  9.7 did/does not give incorrect shares.

For me, this miner, for the old cards type 7850(1,2gb), 270(x), 280(x) is totally unusable, unfortunately. 15-30% less hash from clay9.7 version and too manny low diff share.

I spend 40 hours of my life trying to install it properly  that at least I get at least the same hash rate, but , it's not worth it. 7850 with 1 GB of memory and 7950 remain on clay9.7, the rest on kachur miner

My two 270s get 422 and 456h/s respectively when I engage the overclock settings.  No other miner provides me with anything near that.   

I have the same gigabyte cards.

9.7 provides me with better hashrates.  860h/s between my two 270 versus 840h/s with 10.2.   I'm not running blockchain drivers though on this particular computer, I use this workstation for photo/video editing and I don't know how much the blockchain drivers will affect performance for that.

xfx and msi 270x,  claymore 10.2 show me a lot this message:

GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.

i ran a test for the msi with everything in stock -h 512 and get this results:

15:46:07:999   10a4   GPU #0: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 20 compute units
15:46:07:999   10a4   GPU #0 recognized as Radeon 270/270X
15:46:07:999   10a4   card 0, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 160
15:46:07:999   10a4   0 m = 2
15:46:08:421   10a4   GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 512, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 1075MB)


16:13:16:690   12a8   GPU #0: Pitcairn
16:13:16:690   12a8   XMR - Total Speed: 449 H/s, Total Shares: 115, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:26
16:13:16:690   12a8   XMR: GPU0 449 H/s
16:13:16:690   12a8   Incorrect XMR shares: GPU0 16
16:13:16:690   12a8   1 minute average XMR total speed: 446 H/s

with -dmem 1 the miner drop the hashs 376 Hash/s

with the v9.7 the hash with -a 4 was 445 H/s - 461 hash/sol max

i still going to check options for this two r9 270x, if anyone like share any results for this card

[infojunkiePHD]

Claymore - Possible bug.

With 10.2 Beta I am getting incorrect shares on my two Gigabyte 270 OC (Pitcairn) (non X)

I'm using the stock settings (-h 512) on non-overclocked cards.  9.7 did/does not give incorrect shares.

For me, this miner, for the old cards type 7850(1,2gb), 270(x), 280(x) is totally unusable, unfortunately. 15-30% less hash from clay9.7 version and too manny low diff share.

I spend 40 hours of my life trying to install it properly  that at least I get at least the same hash rate, but , it's not worth it. 7850 with 1 GB of memory and 7950 remain on clay9.7, the rest on kachur miner

My two 270s get 422 and 456h/s respectively when I engage the overclock settings.  No other miner provides me with anything near that.   

I have the same gigabyte cards.

9.7 provides me with better hashrates.  860h/s between my two 270 versus 840h/s with 10.2.   I'm not running blockchain drivers though on this particular computer, I use this workstation for photo/video editing and I don't know how much the blockchain drivers will affect performance for that.

xfx and msi 270x,  claymore 10.2 show me a lot this message:

GPU0 found incorrect share. If you see this message often, make sure you that you did not overclock it too much, also try to reduce "-h" value.

i ran a test for the msi with everything in stock -h 512 and get this results:

15:46:07:999   10a4   GPU #0: Pitcairn, 2048 MB available, 20 compute units
15:46:07:999   10a4   GPU #0 recognized as Radeon 270/270X
15:46:07:999   10a4   card 0, m1 2048, m2 1791 w 160
15:46:07:999   10a4   0 m = 2
15:46:08:421   10a4   GPU #0 algorithm ASM, -h 512, -dmem 0 (Memory used: 1075MB)


16:13:16:690   12a8   GPU #0: Pitcairn
16:13:16:690   12a8   XMR - Total Speed: 449 H/s, Total Shares: 115, Rejected: 0, Time: 00:26
16:13:16:690   12a8   XMR: GPU0 449 H/s
16:13:16:690   12a8   Incorrect XMR shares: GPU0 16
16:13:16:690   12a8   1 minute average XMR total speed: 446 H/s

with -dmem 1 the miner drop the hashs 376 Hash/s

with the v9.7 the hash with -a 4 was 445 H/s - 461 hash/sol max

i still going to check options for this two r9 270x, if anyone like share any results for this card

I switched back to using 9.7. While I got a 2% increase in hashrate, it was pointless because I had an incorrect share rate of 12-15%, no matter if overclocked or not.  I'm just waiting patiently for 10.3/11.  Though it would be nice if Claymore reduced the rate in 9.7 to be in line with 10.2.