Bitcoin Forum
May 08, 2024, 08:15:25 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Why The SEC Delay Over Crowdfunding Rules is Stifling Bitcoin Innovation  (Read 651 times)
freee101 (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 13, 2014, 04:11:26 PM
 #1

Brian Klein is a partner at the Los Angeles-based litigation boutique Baker Marquart LLP, the chair of the Bitcoin Foundation’s legal advocacy committee (although he is not writing here on behalf of the foundation), and a former US federal prosecutor. This article was co-authored alongside Molly White, a partner at McGuireWoods LLP in Los Angeles and a former SEC enforcement attorney.

Crowdfunding has undoubtedly become an important way for emerging and innovative companies to raise money. Look no further than Soylent (the high-profile and controversial food replacement product), which raised millions through crowdfunding.
Not surprisingly, entrepreneurs are developing bitcoin-powered companies and applications that could revolutionize both the crowdfunding field and the cryptocurrency space.
With the assistance of the bitcoin protocol, a company that wants to crowdfund can potentially avoid using current and perhaps more costly third-parties like Kickstarter and Indiegogo.
Examples of bitcoin crowdfunding platforms that are in development include Mike Hearn’s Lighthouse app and Joel Dietz’s Swarm (which describes itself as ‘the Facebook of crowdfunding’).
Unfortunately, crowdfunding’s (and thus bitcoin’s) ability to reach its full potential is stalled, for the time being. This is because the SEC has not yet issued rules that would allow crowdfunding as a way to sell equities in a company (ie: stock).
The background
In April 2012, Congress enacted the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (or JOBS Act), legislation meant to make it easier for small businesses to raise money. One way that Congress sought to do that was to allow companies to use crowdfunding to raise up to $1 million in a 12-month period.
However, because Congress believed crowdfunding could increase the possibility of investment fraud, it put in place some significant limitations. Those measures include limiting the amount of money that an investor can invest – up to $2,000 or 5% of the investor’s annual income (whichever is greater) – as well as requiring companies to crowdfund through an intermediary and to make certain disclosures to potential investors.
Congress also directed the SEC to issue rules to implement fraud protection.
Crowdfunding through an intermediary means working with either a registered broker-dealer or a funding portal registered with the SEC. For a crowdfunding website to qualify as a funding portal and sell equities, that website will have to be a member of FINRA, be registered with the SEC, and be subject to SEC examinations. As for the disclosure requirements, they will be substantial.
In October 2013, the SEC proposed rules to govern the offer and sale of securities through crowdfunding. If those rules are enacted (as is expected), a company will have to disclose:
The identity and business experience of its directors, officers, and anyone who holds more than 20% of the company’s shares
The nature of the business
The risk factors in making the investment
Any related-party transactions between the company and directors, officers, or family members
Information about any other exempt offerings in past three years
How it will use the funds that it raises
Financial information about the company
The amount and the terms of outstanding debt
Information about the number, type and price of securities offered
The target amount the company would like to raise and the deadline for reaching the target
Adverse consequences
It is now June 2014. When Congress enacted the JOBS Act in April 2012, it gave the SEC 270 days – until January 2013 – to adopt its rules. With that date now long past, and with the passage of eight months since the SEC proposal, one can only hope that the rules will be finalized by the end of this summer.
In the meantime, offering securities in a crowdfunding campaign, regardless of the country of origin, may and likely does violate SEC regulations, among other potential problems. Failing to wait for the SEC to finish its rule making risks an SEC investigation and significant adverse consequences, potentially even criminal consequences.
The SEC needs to enact the crowdfunding rules as soon as possible. Doing so will help everyone, including bitcoin enterprises that are developing crowdfunding applications, or that are hoping to tap into crowdfunding for raising money. Innovation should not have to wait any longer.
Crowdfunding image via Shutterstock
From: CoinDesk
| http://www.3-coin.com/2014-06-13/2947/
1715199325
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715199325

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715199325
Reply with quote  #2

1715199325
Report to moderator
1715199325
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715199325

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715199325
Reply with quote  #2

1715199325
Report to moderator
The forum was founded in 2009 by Satoshi and Sirius. It replaced a SourceForge forum.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
June 13, 2014, 04:51:27 PM
 #2

Lack of rules does not stifle innovation, waiting for governments to catch up to technology is what stifles innovation.

Government corporations are a thing of the past. Welcome to the future.

First seastead company actually selling sea homes: Ocean Builders https://ocean.builders  Of course we accept bitcoin.
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
June 14, 2014, 05:26:55 AM
 #3

I got as far as...
Look no further than Soylent (the high-profile and controversial food replacement product), which raised millions through crowdfunding.
...and couldn't really read any farther. Soylent? A food product company?

Anyone with a campaign ad in their signature -- for an organization with which they are not otherwise affiliated -- is automatically deducted credibility points.

I've been convicted of heresy. Convicted by a mere known extortionist. Read my Trust for details.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!