|
jebus911
|
 |
June 21, 2014, 11:02:27 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
jdebunt
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:05:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jebus911
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:06:36 AM |
|
A question Scambust, when you're proven wrong, will you apologize? I see you're too much of a pussy to use your main BCT account so I'm going to assume you're going to be just like all of the rest of the trolls and just disappear in shame when you are.
|
|
|
|
|
scambust
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:08:41 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO |
|
|
|
|
jebus911
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:10:58 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
scambust
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:17:11 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". |
|
|
|
|
jebus911
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:19:23 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you |
|
|
|
|
scambust
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:26:12 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. I bet no one will ever answer this. |
|
|
|
|
Crypto_Enthusiast
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:26:13 AM |
|
With a username like 'scambust' - he has obviously created this account to do one thing, what a sad, sad life this person must live.
My sympathies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jebus911
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:28:32 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose. |
|
|
|
|
scambust
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:32:57 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose. Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions! |
|
|
|
|
jebus911
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:33:51 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose. Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions! "People are too lazy to do research. The answers are out there." |
|
|
|
|
scambust
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1007
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:40:35 AM |
|
Hey guys,
Few quick questions,
Is this the first coin to implement tor?
Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?
What are its current issues?
Thanks,
"Is this the first coin to implement tor?" No, there was one before it, but it turned out to be a scamcoin "Is the anon working? IE is this currently the most anon coin?" Depends on what you mean by anon. The idea that mixing makes things anon is absurd. Its actually not a feasible goal to be fully anon. What you can do is put so many roadblocks up that data collection becomes so expensive that its not cost effective to do it on a mass scale. There will be anon features added such as drk has, but what the first goal of this coin was was to fix http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/ < that issue, which the TOR routing does. Things will be built on that, but this is the first fairly launched coin to rout the network through Tor. "What are its current issues?" Trolls? I don't know that I would say there are any issues, there are just continuing developments and there will continue to be. And for the record, the code has been audited by a trusted member of the community. Listen to Jebus911, so he can sell you his coins later on. If your gonna develop a coin, why copy code from a scamcoin? So your argument is that because one coin was a scamcoin, every other coin derived from it is a scamcoin. Did you take any logic classes in school? Were you dropped in the head as child? First off, if you are copying a code, acknowledge the original dev's work and not label it as a scam. Second, if you're gonna innovate on the fork code, do so but do not pass off an EXACT replica as your own. It's not working at the moment, will Razorcoin's devs ask Neutrinocoin's devs for help? LMAO How about this. 10,000$ bet that its not a scam. You game? , no need to resort to bets, name-calling or use your so-called Twitter "fame". I'm giving you an opportunity to make a public statement that this is a scam. You seem very sure. Why would you not view this as free money? Are you a coward? Just a troll? How about 5,000$ if 10 is too rich for you Just answer this: Why did Bryce called Neutrino a scam and then copied its code, call it his own and then launched his own coin? Why not work with the Neutrino Devs instead? Why is there no difference between the two codes at this moment? Why isn't Razorcoin showing any anonymity tests to prove it's working? Be mature and just answer the above. You've proven my point. You are a coward who is calling something a scam without facts you are sure of to back it up. Go away troll, you lose. Talking to yourself? Just answer the damm questions! "People are too lazy to do research. The answers are out there." There you go...  |
|
|
|
|
smackii
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:42:23 AM |
|
We need more FUD  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wolffish
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:54:16 AM |
|
We need more FUD Yes, bring it on! Price is still too high, so more FUD please!! |
|
|
|
|
|
Safty
|
|
June 21, 2014, 11:56:25 AM |
|
Is Anon via Tor already implemented or a future plan?
|
|
|
|
|
Jubes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2014, 12:08:07 PM |
|
Is Anon via Tor already implemented or a future plan?
already up since day one |
|
|
|
|
|
McHammer
|
|
June 21, 2014, 12:48:11 PM |
|
a love these fud dips imo everything is fine this is FAR better then neutrino! they dont even have an ann thread  |
altcoincasinogulagshoppingshow FUD is good, look @altcoin prices ...
pls fud me hard via pm
id appriciate that.
|
|
|
|
