Bitcoin Forum
November 18, 2017, 03:22:23 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] ◢◣ BurnerCoin x13 PoW+PoS ◢◣ Android Game available on play store!  (Read 121929 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
gorgo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 04:59:23 PM
 #1181

They are not outside the blockchain..

Its like taking your wallet.dat and emailing it to someone else.

They open it, and have access to the coins located on the blockchain as they were before.

The coins are on the blockchain, but they never move.

that would require you to already have the exact amount of coins you want to send in a wallet address
1510975343
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510975343

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510975343
Reply with quote  #2

1510975343
Report to moderator
1510975343
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510975343

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510975343
Reply with quote  #2

1510975343
Report to moderator
1510975343
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510975343

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510975343
Reply with quote  #2

1510975343
Report to moderator
Coinlancer is Disrupting the Freelance marketplace!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1510975343
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510975343

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510975343
Reply with quote  #2

1510975343
Report to moderator
1510975343
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510975343

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510975343
Reply with quote  #2

1510975343
Report to moderator
1510975343
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510975343

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1510975343
Reply with quote  #2

1510975343
Report to moderator
BTCNeverSleeps
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 05:07:12 PM
 #1182

I am sorry but either this explanation of burner connect is bogus
or it is a really bad idea in many ways

1. The Blockchain is always involved in a transaction (if you know how cryptocurrencies work you might understand why)
2. this does not add any kind of anonimity
3. it requires you to trust the sender since he created the wallet address and could be keeping the priv. key to tranfer the coins somewhere else before you have a chance to do so
4. why not just create the wallet on the receiver side. Would be more secure (no priv. key over the wire, even if its ssl encrypted) and trustless (burnerconnect seems here like a complicated way to achieve a simple thing)



You and everyone else are making assumptions. The dev has not gone into details and gave a simple explanation.


1. The Blockchain is always involved in a transaction (if you know how cryptocurrencies work you might understand why)

If the client is sending the wallet.dat or something similar, technically it is avoiding the blockchain. If I create a wallet and put 50 burnercoins in it, and then I email you that wallet, there is no trace of me sending you that 50 burnercoins in the blockchain.

2. this does not add any kind of anonimity
That depends on what he is doing before he sends the file.

3. it requires you to trust the sender since he created the wallet address and could be keeping the priv. key to tranfer the coins somewhere else before you have a chance to do so
That is if the users has access to that information. Maybe the dev is encrypting the file.

4. why not just create the wallet on the receiver side. Would be more secure (no priv. key over the wire, even if its ssl encrypted) and trustless (burnerconnect seems here like a complicated way to achieve a simple thing)

Think about your solution, that wouldn't work.


 
Joe Budden
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 210

JO€¥ B⃦udd$


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 05:18:44 PM
 #1183

Who will be first polo or mintpal? 

rlm42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 237


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 05:26:12 PM
 #1184

Who will be first polo or mintpal? 

Both should collaborate and add at same time lol  Grin
gorgo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 05:27:09 PM
 #1185


You and everyone else are making assumptions. The dev has not gone into details and gave a simple explanation.


1. The Blockchain is always involved in a transaction (if you know how cryptocurrencies work you might understand why)

If the client is sending the wallet.dat or something similar, technically it is avoiding the blockchain. If I create a wallet and put 50 burnercoins in it, and then I email you that wallet, there is no trace of me sending you that 50 burnercoins in the blockchain.

Call it put 50 burnercoins in it if you like
fact is that happens on the blockchain


2. this does not add any kind of anonimity
That depends on what he is doing before he sends the file.

no it does not it is just a simple transaction

3. it requires you to trust the sender since he created the wallet address and could be keeping the priv. key to tranfer the coins somewhere else before you have a chance to do so
That is if the users has access to that information. Maybe the dev is encrypting the file.

it only requires a modified client to copy the file somewhere else before its encrypted

4. why not just create the wallet on the receiver side. Would be more secure (no priv. key over the wire, even if its ssl encrypted) and trustless (burnerconnect seems here like a complicated way to achieve a simple thing)

Think about your solution, that wouldn't work.

it would since you already have a direct connection he could just hand over the public key


 
mikesrevenge
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 05:31:07 PM
 #1186

They are not outside the blockchain..

Its like taking your wallet.dat and emailing it to someone else.

They open it, and have access to the coins located on the blockchain as they were before.

The coins are on the blockchain, but they never move.

that would require you to already have the exact amount of coins you want to send in a wallet address
I'm sure it will be streamlined and simplified for the end users.  My explanation was as generic as I could explain it based on my understanding of the dev's post.
gorgo
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 05:38:37 PM
 #1187

They are not outside the blockchain..

Its like taking your wallet.dat and emailing it to someone else.

They open it, and have access to the coins located on the blockchain as they were before.

The coins are on the blockchain, but they never move.

that would require you to already have the exact amount of coins you want to send in a wallet address
I'm sure it will be streamlined and simplified for the end users.  My explanation was as generic as I could explain it based on my understanding of the dev's post.

The point is that you will need the blockchain to create a new wallet with the amount of coins you want to send
BTCNeverSleeps
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 05:50:17 PM
 #1188

The point is that you will need the blockchain to create a new wallet with the amount of coins you want to send

Yea I agree. The Blockchain has to be invovled in some way. But I think the dev meant when sending the coins to the receiver you are avoiding the blockchain. He did not go into details with what happens before the coins/wallet is sent.
BurnerCoin
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 06:34:22 PM
 #1189

Hey everyone
This has created a lot of attention and I'm getting bombarded with messages right now.

The BurnerConnect announcement only gives a brief outline of how the technology will work, we will give you more in depth details in the next few days, but right now we're really busy with the beta testing and improving the technology.

Thanks
Slingmoonshot
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 06:36:06 PM
 #1190

Just received an email that I can beta test BurnerConnect soon.  I'm traveling for work but will advise once I get the link/instructions and can get to a PC.  

mrdennis86
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 09:15:32 PM
 #1191

Really greate job Dev!


All my XST coins are stolen Sad feel free to donate some XST to RzPMCaQxjxCNCyw2eiYsLqU2MWe45vFfLU I really appreciate that!
BTCNeverSleeps
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 25, 2014, 10:27:46 PM
 #1192

Poloniex is adding SummerCoin v2 today. That means Burner is next in line to be added! We have to keep voting to keep our position in line: https://www.poloniex.com/voting

We are at the final stretch, lets keep the voting up  Grin
cindereynolds
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 12:43:50 AM
 #1193

I sense a pump.

Id say I smell a pump, but that just wouldn't be the right thing to say.


ʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔ PND bamboo muncher ʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔʕ•͡ᴥ•ʔ
                        PPtd7diYFaKzY11iqVV1xoy6MLLY6mg7Kq
Slingmoonshot
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 12:57:10 AM
 #1194

LOL to above pic

but yeah, Burner extremely undervalued considering clean code, TOR, Google play game, low coin count, auto enthusiast relevance, developing BurnerConnect, and most importantly, an active and credible DEV.  Screw all that innovation talk, fun and real world usage is what matters.  In two weeks mind you.  

It's like some kids expect a time machine to be unveiled or something or money to fall out of the sky.  
BTCNeverSleeps
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 01:11:21 AM
 #1195

BTCNeverSleeps
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:30:54 AM
 #1196

Whoa! The buy pressure is building up! Shocked I will buy a bit more before I can't anymore at this price.  Grin
magaura
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 990



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:39:36 AM
 #1197

Whoa! The buy pressure is building up! Shocked I will buy a bit more before I can't anymore at this price.  Grin

Yeah! Wee all do that...belivers... Smiley

zhonghao110
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224

goog


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 10:16:18 AM
 #1198

Voting  at   POLO   is   first. Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
BurnerCoin
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 10:52:44 AM
 #1199

Yes we are now first on the voting table Cheesy
But don't stop voting as we need to maintain that leader spot !

https://www.poloniex.com/voting
https://www.mintpal.com/voting#BURN
zhonghao110
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224

goog


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:55:08 AM
 #1200

Yes we are now first on the voting table Cheesy
But don't stop voting as we need to maintain that leader spot !

https://www.poloniex.com/voting
https://www.mintpal.com/voting#BURN





+1+1+1+1+1

Developers, awesome
Pages: « 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 [60] 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!