Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 09:45:28 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: BitCoin Coming to an End?  (Read 2205 times)
jhfire (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 26, 2011, 07:02:41 AM
 #1

Will BitCoin ever come to a complete stop? I mean, if more and more people find out, start mining, and join pools. Wouldn't BitCoin have inflation? Does BitCoin ever "start over" or get rid of BTC to stop inflation? I'm just wondering, cause it says that it increases the level of mining, but what if you got 1 million computers that you have access to and stick a couple of minors on them? Wouldn't that actually increase inflation? In my point of view, BitCoin seems as if it has one flaw. Who ever has the most computers or better hardware gets the most BitCoins.

Just wondering Roll Eyes.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714859128
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714859128

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714859128
Reply with quote  #2

1714859128
Report to moderator
fpgaminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 517



View Profile WWW
April 26, 2011, 07:15:05 AM
 #2

Please read:
How are new Bitcoins created?

Specifically:

Quote
The reward for solving a block is automatically adjusted so that in the first 4 years of the Bitcoin network, 10,500,000 BTC will be created. The amount is halved each 4 years, so it will be 5,250,000 over years 4-8, 2,625,000 over years 8-12 and so on. Thus the total number of coins will approach 21,000,000 BTC over time.

And to answer your other question:
Quote
Who ever has the most computers or better hardware gets the most BitCoins.
Sure; if you had 90% of the money in the world, you could buy up 90% of the computing power and get 90% of the Bitcoins. So ... you'd have the same proportion of Bitcoins as you do real world money. Seems reasonable.

Computers cost money, so having the most power computers equates roughly to having the most money. So, why shouldn't those who invest heavily in mining reap a proportional reward?

And having the most Bitcoins doesn't help you. The value of those Bitcoins is dictated by those willing to accept them, not by the person with the most Bitcoins.

BitterTea
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 26, 2011, 07:22:49 AM
 #3

The Bitcoin p2p network recalculates the difficulty of the block finding problem after every 2016 blocks. Based on the time it took the last 2016 blocks, it will modify the difficulty (up to +/4x), so that the next 2016 blocks will be found in 2 weeks. This causes a pretty constant 6 blocks found/hour, regardless of the computing power of the network. There will never be more than 21 million Bitcoin (2,100,000,000,000,000 individual base units or Satoshis).

It is true that monetary inflation is happening (it has to come from somewhere), but it is not centrally controlled, and it is known in advance. The problem with fiat currency inflation is its unpredictable nature, and the privilege of those who are able to acquire new money before it has devalued the old money.
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5194
Merit: 12972


View Profile
April 27, 2011, 03:01:29 AM
 #4

Off-topic discussion about repeat questions split.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!