Bitcoin Forum
March 28, 2024, 03:53:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 [1764] 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 ... 1993 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NEM (XEM) Official Thread - 100% New Code - Easy To Use APIs  (Read 2983951 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Alohaboy?!
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 506



View Profile
January 25, 2018, 08:45:17 PM
 #35261

Dear NEMbers, we are working on a big wallet relaunch and need your help.

Please fill out this survey: https://goo.gl/forms/T8ZukL2DNJpCOdRF2

Thanks in advance Smiley


a NanoWallet relaunch? 

yes Smiley
1711641221
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711641221

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711641221
Reply with quote  #2

1711641221
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711641221
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711641221

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711641221
Reply with quote  #2

1711641221
Report to moderator
1711641221
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711641221

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711641221
Reply with quote  #2

1711641221
Report to moderator
1711641221
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711641221

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711641221
Reply with quote  #2

1711641221
Report to moderator
Tehfiend
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 491
Merit: 514



View Profile
January 25, 2018, 11:01:49 PM
 #35262


B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-


C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s  Cheesy Roll Eyes

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.
ruletheworld
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1045


View Profile WWW
January 26, 2018, 12:10:27 AM
 #35263


B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-


C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s  Cheesy Roll Eyes

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.

If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?

These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.
Tehfiend
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 491
Merit: 514



View Profile
January 26, 2018, 01:03:08 AM
 #35264

If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?

These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.

The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3008


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 01:04:51 AM
 #35265

The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets to that audience regardless of what we think.

I have not seen one positive reception to their ratings. There's been nothing but universal flabbergastiness. There no doubt is the desire for something thorough and credible. This is not it and credible ratings would be much, much uglier than these ones.
ruletheworld
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1045


View Profile WWW
January 26, 2018, 01:17:44 AM
 #35266

If you think this is the case, you have no understanding of how Wall Street sell side research works. Any guess how they make money? Who is paying them for the research? What's the firm's history in ratings (hint: very ugly)?

These ratings have absolutely nothing to do with either technology or as investment potential. They have everything to do with the firm's, and their clients' current crypto holdings.

The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.


This is again not true. The "people" you're talking about aren't investors. No one with money who knows what they are doing ever pay any attention to these ratings. The worst thing you can do is to make your investment decisions based on these types of sell-side research. That's called dumb money on the street.
Tehfiend
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 491
Merit: 514



View Profile
January 26, 2018, 02:16:18 AM
 #35267

I have not seen one positive reception to their ratings. There's been nothing but universal flabbergastiness. There no doubt is the desire for something thorough and credible. This is not it and credible ratings would be much, much uglier than these ones.

You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.


The fact is that people do pay for their research so even though you and I don't care, others do in fact value their ratings. This is meaningful as it gives credence to crypto assets for that audience regardless of what we think.


This is again not true. The "people" you're talking about aren't investors. No one with money who knows what they are doing ever pay any attention to these ratings. The worst thing you can do is to make your investment decisions based on these types of sell-side research. That's called dumb money on the street.

Not sure how you can be so confident on what is true or not in regards to how these ratings effect every single person out there haha. Wish I was omnipotent like you ;-). Don't confuse opinion for fact...

You're thinking only of crypto enthusiasts or wall street investors. I'm talking about the people that have ignored Bitcoin because it was a scam or ponzi scheme. They aren't going to invest based on these ratings. The fact that they even researched and rated them might make them take a second look. I have a friend that stayed away for years until he heard about the futures contracts. He didn't purchase any but the fact that they existed made him reconsider his understanding and he started asking me for more info which led to me selling him $3300 worth of XEM. These ratings could have the same effect.

Re: "dumb money", you don't think there's already a ton of it in these markets? You don't think these headlines could bring in more?
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2590
Merit: 3008


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 02:21:52 AM
 #35268

You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.

I'm not bereft because of these ratings. They're blatant shite. Point me towards someone who is taking them seriously.

The overall concept is sound and potentially helpful. The execution of this particular iteration is a steaming piss take.
nemwanderer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 230
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 02:41:02 AM
 #35269

You're only seeing the reaction from the crypto world and most people don't understand that a C rating is not bad and BTC didn't get an A because they just never give out A's. There's a ton of other people out there who had dismissed Bitcoin early on as a ponzi scam who might take a second look after seeing these ratings.

I'm not bereft because of these ratings. They're blatant shite. Point me towards someone who is taking them seriously.

The overall concept is sound and potentially helpful. The execution of this particular iteration is a steaming piss take.

Yeah feels like the market is shrugging these off. Maybe some reaction in price but nothing earth shattering.

Moving on...feels like cryptos are basing after the recent bludgeoning. What will be the catalyst for another gap higher in NEM (if any)?
LemonAndFriesOne
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 05:11:13 AM
 #35270


B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-


C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s  Cheesy Roll Eyes

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.

You mean the way they gave AAA ratings to subprime mortgages right before the great USA recession of 2008?  Roll Eyes

Again, meaningless ratings from people who barely understand Bitcoin but want to manipulate the markets.
CryptoNeed
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 137


Nope.


View Profile WWW
January 26, 2018, 05:21:36 AM
 #35271


B Grade - ETH and EOS.
B- Grade - ADA, NEO and Steem.
C+ Grade - ARK, BTC, BTS, GBYTE, DASH, DCR, IOC, LTC and NEM.
I would presume that on their next rating schedule some of the C+ could potentially get a B-


C Grade - AEON, ASCH , BLK, BLOCK, BURST, BCN, XCP, DOGE, ETC, KMD, LSK, MNR, NAV, NBL, NXS, NXT, PPC, PIVX, QTUM, XRB and XRP.
C- Grade - BCH, CLOAK, DGB, XDN, ETN, FTC, NMC, RDD, SKY, UBQ, VIA, XWC and ZEN.
D+ Grade - AUR, BTG, EMC2, GAME, NLG, MEC, ETP and PURA.
D Grade - EXP, GUP, NVC, POT, QUARK, RISE and SALUS.

These ratings are meaningless, they are coming from dinosaurs who wish we could go back to the roaring 1950s  Cheesy Roll Eyes

They are not meaningless at all. By giving these ratings, they are making crypto assets more legit and mainstream. These ratings are not based on the merits of the technology but their potentials as investments and they NEVER give out A's. A rating of C is not bad like in school grades and actually indicates to hold that investment.

You mean the way they gave AAA ratings to subprime mortgages right before the great USA recession of 2008?  Roll Eyes

Again, meaningless ratings from people who barely understand Bitcoin but want to manipulate the markets.


+1

Not more than an already established rating company which does not want to miss the  crypto train ... 
Reading their crypto rating is like watching videos from all the new experts on Youtube ...  Roll Eyes

Great minds discuss ideas,
average minds discuss events,
small minds discuss people. (Eleanor Roosevelt)
moli1
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 118



View Profile
January 26, 2018, 06:38:09 AM
 #35272

NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline.
This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days.
If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks.
We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages.
A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.
MoneyJ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 504


GoMeat - Digitalizing Meat Stores - ICO


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 07:07:02 AM
 #35273

Hoping that the price would be stable . NEM platform would be in full swing and should dapps adapt its platform , this would drive developers swoop down and use it.

█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
████▀▀ ▄▄▄ ▀▀████▀ ▄▄▄▄ ▀████
███▀ ███████▄ ██ ▄██████▄ ███
███ ████▀▀▀▀▀  ▀█████████████
███▄ ███████▀ █▄ ▀██████▀▀███
████▄ ▀▀▀▀▀ ▄████▄ ▀▀▀▀ ▄████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████
.GoMeat.  300+ STORES ALREADY ONBOARD
 THE FIRST PROJECT OF ITS KIND

ONLY 160K TOKENS REMAINING
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
█████████████████▀▀  ███████
█████████████▀▀      ███████
█████████▀▀   ▄▄     ███████
█████▀▀    ▄█▀▀     ████████
█████████ █▀        ████████
█████████ █ ▄███▄   ████████
██████████████████▄▄████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████
Alohaboy?!
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1050
Merit: 506



View Profile
January 26, 2018, 07:25:41 AM
Merited by moli1 (1)
 #35274

NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline.
This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days.
If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks.
We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages.
A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.

You never know what the market brings, but in the long run nem never disappoints  Wink
gobbi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 429
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 08:04:48 AM
 #35275

NEM has held on to the $0.86 levels for the past few days, but the bulls are unable to push prices above the down trendline.
This is likely to lead to another attempt to break down of $0.86 within a couple of days.
If the bears succeed, a fall to the Jan. 16 lows of $0.55134 is likely. The 20-day EMA has turned down and is likely to complete a bearish crossover if the support breaks.
We don’t find any bullish setups on the XEM/$$$ pair with price trading below the trendline and both the moving averages.
A change in trend will be signaled once it rallies above $1.21.

You never know what the market brings, but in the long run nem never disappoints  Wink

You are right, Iam checking nem for few years and it´s always been in top 10 coins, now what we are seeing, every day new coins try to overtake nem and other good projects, but on long term nem will always be there.
tuvok007
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 08:48:15 AM
 #35276

Nice healthy correction on polo in the last thirdy minutes,11 percent drop. Should I get in now or will it go few more sats lower? Fuck me,I"m gettin in on this dip.
cybercash
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 101



View Profile
January 26, 2018, 09:29:59 AM
 #35277

Nice healthy correction on polo in the last thirdy minutes,11 percent drop. Should I get in now or will it go few more sats lower? Fuck me,I"m gettin in on this dip.

Looking not good

https://twitter.com/Coin_and_Peace/status/956800783936204800

cybercash - bathing in cybercurrencies
fragout
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1279
Merit: 1018


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 09:39:27 AM
 #35278

Nice healthy correction on polo in the last thirdy minutes,11 percent drop. Should I get in now or will it go few more sats lower? Fuck me,I"m gettin in on this dip.

Looking not good

https://twitter.com/Coin_and_Peace/status/956800783936204800

There always seems to be a hack that pops up at the worst possible time. Is this the cause of the btc drop too ? $600 million is headline news unfortunately if it is true
KloNEM
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 11


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 09:41:03 AM
 #35279

Nice healthy correction on polo in the last thirdy minutes,11 percent drop. Should I get in now or will it go few more sats lower? Fuck me,I"m gettin in on this dip.

Looking not good

https://twitter.com/Coin_and_Peace/status/956800783936204800

I read this article before a short while :

https://cointelegraph.com/news/japan-coincheck-exchange-freezes-all-withdrawals-as-up-to-723-mln-leaves-its-wallet

It does make a sense together with the "hack info". And yeah, this is really not good (at least for further volume and prices of NEM), even if that hack (if it was a hack) is very probably exchange mistake, not some NEM serious design flaw...
Thylemo
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 26, 2018, 09:53:23 AM
 #35280

So because of a Ripple Movement out of their Wallet they disable NEM Withdrawl?

Can someone explain the relation between Ripple and NEM in this case?  Huh Cheesy

Edit: Ok, is should read till the end. 600mil worth of Nem.  Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 [1764] 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 ... 1993 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!