lemonandfriesonetwo
Member
 Offline
Activity: 652
Merit: 11
|
 |
February 19, 2020, 04:58:06 AM |
|
ProximaX is starting to look better than NEM at this point. Maybe that's why some ex-NEM members have moved over to ProximaX.   |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jelin1984
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1004
|
|
February 19, 2020, 11:18:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
gimre
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 866
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 19, 2020, 04:46:20 PM |
|
200 million xem silver funds snapshot
FUD, those will not be touched. There's also no entity that would deal with silver coins, so they probably will get burned. Also, as Lon put it ages ago: "Note: The execution of the silver coin project is not guaranteed and will only proceed providing that XEM market cap and liquidity are sufficient to cover the expenses with the allocated stakes. " |
|
|
|
Wittmann1987
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2020, 06:40:52 PM |
|
has the auction already been launched? |
|
|
|
|
|
jkoil
|
|
February 19, 2020, 09:31:47 PM
Last edit: February 20, 2020, 10:17:55 AM by jkoil |
|
200 million xem silver funds snapshot
FUD, those will not be touched. There's also no entity that would deal with silver coins, so they probably will get burned. Also, as Lon put it ages ago: "Note: The execution of the silver coin project is not guaranteed and will only proceed providing that XEM market cap and liquidity are sufficient to cover the expenses with the allocated stakes. " Burn? Why? The silver coins were meant to be shared *). If forgetting the debates about the existence of the Funds versus "all the XEMs to the stake holders", then the case of silver coins was quite straightforward: they belonged to all, when Funds were for special purposes. Edit: *) if no coins, then the XEMs instead are shared |
|
|
|
|
schnötzel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1041
Bitcoin is a bit**
|
|
February 20, 2020, 10:04:27 AM |
|
I don´t care about the silver coins, but i want the XEM from the silverfund!
|
|
|
|
|
|
gsxrl3oi
|
|
February 22, 2020, 02:21:39 AM |
|
I don´t care about the silver coins, but i want the XEM from the silverfund!
Exactly what we meant, silver coin funds should be just distributed to the original stakeholders in XEM. |
|
|
|
|
gimre
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 866
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 27, 2020, 01:41:58 PM |
|
Burn?
Why?
The silver coins were meant to be shared *).
Edit: *) if no coins, then the XEMs instead are shared
Rhetorical question: what is she difference between burning and re-distribution? (tip: what is the outcome of both actions?) |
|
|
|
lemonandfriesonetwo
Member
Offline
Activity: 652
Merit: 11
|
|
February 27, 2020, 04:13:09 PM |
|
Looks like ProximaX will be a major competitor to the now delayed for 1500 time "Catapult or Symbol or ..."
A lot of disillusioned NEM users are starting to appear in ProximaX community.
|
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3008
Welt Am Draht
|
|
February 27, 2020, 04:25:36 PM |
|
A lot of disillusioned NEM users are starting to appear in ProximaX community.
Jolly good. Off you pop. Burn?
Why?
The silver coins were meant to be shared *).
Edit: *) if no coins, then the XEMs instead are shared
Rhetorical question: what is she difference between burning and re-distribution? (tip: what is the outcome of both actions?) I couldn't care less either way, but sending the original amounts to the original private keys is as good as burning in most cases, and will shut the other people up. |
|
|
|
|
|
jkoil
|
|
February 27, 2020, 05:56:33 PM |
|
Burn?
Why?
The silver coins were meant to be shared *).
Edit: *) if no coins, then the XEMs instead are shared
Rhetorical question: what is she difference between burning and re-distribution? (tip: what is the outcome of both actions?) Is it sure what will be the outcome? Have there been similar cases with other coins? Basically, I would like to see that the agreed plans should be followed. Changes may be uncontrolled or shady. Generally, I do not understand or accept concepts like 'burn' or 'inflation', in crypto coins. They seem to be some kind of manipulation. Not sure who will benefit from those... |
|
|
|
|
KimNg
Member
Offline
Activity: 169
Merit: 10
|
|
February 28, 2020, 02:30:55 PM
Last edit: March 01, 2020, 04:16:10 PM by KimNg |
|
Finally, got a node running.  Here is the "Running a XYM Testnet Node Without Tears" method. 1. Goto https://www.allnodes.com/invite/9jdf3d2. Click Host node -> Symbol Testnet. 3. Select a city. 4. That's it. In 10 minutes your new node is synced, easy peasy. The service is $10/month. They said later NEM will be a payment option. |
|
|
|
satb
Member
Offline
Activity: 202
Merit: 30
forum.nem.io
|
|
February 28, 2020, 03:28:55 PM |
|
Looks like ProximaX will be a major competitor to the now delayed for 1500 time "Catapult or Symbol or ..."
A lot of disillusioned NEM users are starting to appear in ProximaX community.
If you're investing long term, XPX isn't in a better position. It has just a few exchanges available, and very low volume. and has dropped to an all time low. There's probably some "private sale" investors who got to buy them cheap before launch, who might be p**ed right now. |
|
|
|
yescoins
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
February 29, 2020, 10:20:30 AM |
|
XPX has no investment value, LON is a loser
|
|
|
|
|
lemonandfriesonetwo
Member
Offline
Activity: 652
Merit: 11
|
|
March 06, 2020, 05:04:23 PM |
|
Look likes ProximaX base is getting bigger everyday.
If you compare ProximaX wallet with NEM, it really looks like the better updated version of NEM.
Almost as if ProximaX is the real "catapult". ProximaX is basically NEM 2.0 and improved.
More people join ProximaX everyday.
ProximaX's community will keep growing with more ex NEM-bers moving to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
jkoil
|
|
March 07, 2020, 07:36:42 PM |
|
Look likes ProximaX base is getting bigger everyday.
If you compare ProximaX wallet with NEM, it really looks like the better updated version of NEM.
Almost as if ProximaX is the real "catapult". ProximaX is basically NEM 2.0 and improved.
More people join ProximaX everyday.
ProximaX's community will keep growing with more ex NEM-bers moving to it.
real "catapult"? FUD? until otherwise proven... On what your opinion is now based; what features are better updated in Proximax than in Catapult? |
|
|
|
|
SymbolHodler
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 1
|
|
March 08, 2020, 03:04:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
lemonandfriesonetwo
Member
Offline
Activity: 652
Merit: 11
|
|
March 08, 2020, 05:28:59 PM |
|
Running ProximaX nodes is better and much easier. Look into ProximaX. It's the real Catapult, Lon took the Catapult code and turned it into ProximaX. It's a really nice wallet and much more streamlined than NEM. ProximaX welcomes all the disillusioned NEM users who lost their gains because of the greedy NEM Foundation. This is your second chance, don't miss out  |
|
|
|
|
SymbolHodler
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 1
|
|
March 09, 2020, 05:45:08 AM |
|
Running ProximaX nodes is better and much easier. Look into ProximaX. It's the real Catapult, Lon took the Catapult code and turned it into ProximaX. It's a really nice wallet and much more streamlined than NEM. ProximaX welcomes all the disillusioned NEM users who lost their gains because of the greedy NEM Foundation. This is your second chance, don't miss out Thank you, but I'm not interested in ProximaX, I'm Symbol supporter. |
|
|
|
|
|
