|
baigreen
|
 |
June 27, 2014, 11:46:20 PM |
|
Set up shinycoind and now waiting for it to sync.
Still block 992. Too fucking slow... EDIT: stopped it. If anyone has info about a problem, please share. sync is slow... maybe cost 1 hour~~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
becker
|
|
June 27, 2014, 11:46:55 PM |
|
This thing will lock up your computer even if gen is set to 0. WTF. Shittiest shit coin ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
sandor111
|
|
June 28, 2014, 01:16:19 AM
Last edit: June 28, 2014, 01:46:46 AM by sandor111 |
|
I have a solution that will allow you to run multiple wallets (the more, the slower the overall syncing), while still using 15 GB RAM in total.
OR - run a wallet from machine that has LESS than 15 GB RAM, provided that you have access to a remote machine with >= 15GB RAM.
More info will follow soon.
|
|
|
|
xlcus
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1009
|
|
June 28, 2014, 07:16:00 AM |
|
Cost in BTC to mine 1 SHCI hereby go through the procedure of calculating the cost in BTC to mine 1 SHC. For the example I will use the difficulty at block 2198 : 0.00003015 The example also assumes that 5 r3.2xlarge EC2 spot instances are used for mining, each one costing $0.0641/hr. It is assumed that each instance runs shinyminer with 3 ramhogthreads, producing a total of about 38hashes/min. 5 instances cost: 5 x $0.0641/hr = $0.3205/hr 5 instances produce a total hash rate: 5 x 38hashes/min = 190 hashes/min Time to generate one valid block with 5 instances: Number of hashes the instances should solve to generate 1 valid block: Difficulty x 2^32 = 0.00003015 x 4294967296 = 129493.2639744hashes/block Time to generate 1 valid block on the 5 instances: 129493.2639744hashes/block / 190 hashes/min = 681.54min/block = 11.36hr/block Cost per valid block: 11.36hr/block x $0.3205/hr = $3.64 Current reward per block is 400 SHC. Cost per 1 SHC: $3.64 / 400SHC = 0,0091 $/SHC Assuming the current USD/BTC exchange rate of 608, the cost of 1 SHC in BTC should be: 1 SHC = $0,0091 / 608 = 0.00001497 BTC ~ 1500 sat PS1: Again corrections are welcome. Mining 1 SHC on physical boxes at home would probably cost less. PS2: This should not be considered a price for trading the coin. It is the cost at miner level at the time of writing. 1 SHC will cost you more/less to buy depending on supply and demand.  Nice estimation. I'd like to buy 10,000 SHC at the price of 3000 sat. I will pay 0.3btc for 10,000 SHC. |
|
|
|
|
Aricoin_Mike
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
June 28, 2014, 07:23:11 AM |
|
I hope this coin gets to one good exchange asap.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Skarfur
|
|
June 28, 2014, 10:58:08 AM |
|
Cost in BTC to mine 1 SHCI hereby go through the procedure of calculating the cost in BTC to mine 1 SHC. For the example I will use the difficulty at block 2198 : 0.00003015 The example also assumes that 5 r3.2xlarge EC2 spot instances are used for mining, each one costing $0.0641/hr. It is assumed that each instance runs shinyminer with 3 ramhogthreads, producing a total of about 38hashes/min. 5 instances cost: 5 x $0.0641/hr = $0.3205/hr 5 instances produce a total hash rate: 5 x 38hashes/min = 190 hashes/min Time to generate one valid block with 5 instances: Number of hashes the instances should solve to generate 1 valid block: Difficulty x 2^32 = 0.00003015 x 4294967296 = 129493.2639744hashes/block Time to generate 1 valid block on the 5 instances: 129493.2639744hashes/block / 190 hashes/min = 681.54min/block = 11.36hr/block Cost per valid block: 11.36hr/block x $0.3205/hr = $3.64 Current reward per block is 400 SHC. Cost per 1 SHC: $3.64 / 400SHC = 0,0091 $/SHC Assuming the current USD/BTC exchange rate of 608, the cost of 1 SHC in BTC should be: 1 SHC = $0,0091 / 608 = 0.00001497 BTC ~ 1500 sat PS1: Again corrections are welcome. Mining 1 SHC on physical boxes at home would probably cost less. PS2: This should not be considered a price for trading the coin. It is the cost at miner level at the time of writing. 1 SHC will cost you more/less to buy depending on supply and demand. Nice work. Good to have some kind of comparison. |
|
|
|
|
|
sandor111
|
|
June 28, 2014, 04:42:21 PM |
|
There is someone with crazy amount of hashing power mining at the pool : http://106.3.225.46/workersThis individual hashes at 140 H/s and rising, I'm going to have to increase the global difficulty so the pool can keep up. |
|
|
|
|
sandor111
|
|
June 28, 2014, 04:50:13 PM |
|
It's insane really, I have never seen such power.
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 28, 2014, 04:50:48 PM |
|
It's insane really, I have never seen such power.
250 amazon instances, no big deal.. |
|
|
|
|
|
sandor111
|
|
June 28, 2014, 04:52:13 PM |
|
It's insane really, I have never seen such power.
250 amazon instances, no big deal.. Oh ok, those are Amazon IPs indeed, is it you? |
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 28, 2014, 04:53:23 PM |
|
It's insane really, I have never seen such power.
250 amazon instances, no big deal.. Oh ok, those are Amazon IPs indeed, is it you? No only idiots mine with amazon  I'd say around 500 instances, $30/h. Lets see how long he sticks for |
|
|
|
|
|
sandor111
|
|
June 28, 2014, 04:58:48 PM |
|
It's insane really, I have never seen such power.
250 amazon instances, no big deal.. Oh ok, those are Amazon IPs indeed, is it you? No only idiots mine with amazon I'd say around 500 instances, $30/h. Lets see how long he sticks for Aaand he left.  |
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 28, 2014, 05:16:44 PM |
|
The problem is amazon has a limit on the number of spot instances. He has either raised those limits or has enough money to spend.
I know a few people with no limits on spot instances. Only restriction - available hardware |
|
|
|
|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 28, 2014, 05:21:21 PM |
|
can someone help me
i cant open the qt
error loading blkindex.dat
what can i do
|
|
|
|
|
|
Youghoor
|
|
June 28, 2014, 05:22:19 PM |
|
can someone help me
i cant open the qt
error loading blkindex.dat
what can i do
delete everything except wallet in you appdata folder and try again. |
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 28, 2014, 05:23:44 PM |
|
can someone help me
i cant open the qt
error loading blkindex.dat
what can i do
delete everything except wallet in you appdata folder and try again. That is not going to work mor..! Read the OP, you need to use the conf file from first post! |
|
|
|
|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 28, 2014, 05:27:27 PM |
|
ok thanks it works i had this before but i delete everything except the addnodes..that was the problem
but i dot get any connection in the wallet..it wont sync
|
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 28, 2014, 06:04:14 PM |
|
Difficulty 0.00004569 Amazon guy must be solomining |
|
|
|
|
primer-
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 28, 2014, 06:19:36 PM |
|
I have a solution that will allow you to run multiple wallets (the more, the slower the overall syncing), while still using 15 GB RAM in total.
OR - run a wallet from machine that has LESS than 15 GB RAM, provided that you have access to a remote machine with >= 15GB RAM.
More info will follow soon.
Any progress about that? What about SSD disk space as virtual ram for syncing ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Skarfur
|
|
June 28, 2014, 06:48:59 PM |
|
I have a solution that will allow you to run multiple wallets (the more, the slower the overall syncing), while still using 15 GB RAM in total.
OR - run a wallet from machine that has LESS than 15 GB RAM, provided that you have access to a remote machine with >= 15GB RAM.
More info will follow soon.
Any progress about that? What about SSD disk space as virtual ram for syncing ? Sounds like a good idea, but the dev should comment on that to be sure. Actually would be good to get any comment at all from the dev. He hasn't posted for 5 days now. |
|
|
|
|
|
