|
BitcoinSanDiego
|
 |
October 16, 2015, 11:23:56 PM |
|
BitcoinSandiego,
I see what you are saying as to integrating more of these concepts into another tier of the network, this is what trust keys are beginning, which will be held to their own rules. Essentially my problem with master nodes is that they are established by a holding of the asset, which is beneficial to those that can afford, but I like using the concept of time is more valuable in trust than monetary influence, which is why I'm building the next tier with trust keys. I am planning on giving special trust based rules to miners as well to award the miners that work on the blockchain more consistently than others.
Masternodes can enable some additional features such as validate certain transactions instantly, or perform additional network relay function... Or is this already essentially what trust keys will enable staking nodes to do so as to equal the playing field for all node operators (not just rich ones)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Conqueror
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
|
|
October 18, 2015, 06:58:35 AM |
|
I am part of that group and its even more dead than here. Why don't you address our concerns here? |
|
|
|
|
CryptoClub
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
cryptocollectorsclub.com
|
|
October 18, 2015, 08:30:29 AM |
|
5% really? How could this not screw up with emission model?? Count with me, buy 1M niro, stake 100 years: 1000000 1050000 1102500 1157625 1215506,25 1276281,56 1340095,64 1407100,42 1477455,44 1551328,22 1628894,63 1710339,36 1795856,33 1885649,14 1979931,6 2078928,18 2182874,59 2292018,32 2406619,23 2526950,2 2653297,71 2785962,59 2925260,72 3071523,76 3225099,94 3386354,94 3555672,69 3733456,32 3920129,14 4116135,6 4321942,38 4538039,49 4764941,47 5003188,54 5253347,97 5516015,37 5791816,14 6081406,94 6385477,29 6704751,15 7039988,71 7391988,15 7761587,56 8149666,93 8557150,28 8985007,79 9434258,18 9905971,09 10401269,65 10921333,13 11467399,79 12040769,78 12642808,26 13274948,68 13938696,11 14635630,92 15367412,46 16135783,09 16942572,24 17789700,85 18679185,89 19613145,19 20593802,45 21623492,57 22704667,2 23839900,56 25031895,59 26283490,37 27597664,88 28977548,13 30426425,54 31947746,81 33545134,15 35222390,86 36983510,4 38832685,92 40774320,22 42813036,23 44953688,04 47201372,44 49561441,07 52039513,12 54641488,78 57373563,22 60242241,38 63254353,44 66417071,12 69737924,67 73224820,91 76886061,95 80730365,05 84766883,3 89005227,47 93455488,84 98128263,28 103034676,45 108186410,27 113595730,78 119275517,32 125239293,19 131501257,85Surprise! Somebody who maintain the wallet after 100 years have 131M coins !  After 16y on 5% you double from 1M to 2M. 16 Years is a very long time, and worrying about 100 years out? I think anything 5% and under annually should be fine. If there is also some POW, maybe lower it slightly. The balance is to have enough incentive to bother staking, but not so much that it grows out of control quickly. Doubling in 16 years isn't growing out of control quickly. Once it gets around 10% then it starts to get out of control too quickly IMHO. |
...
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
|
October 18, 2015, 03:07:25 PM |
|
I am part of that group and its even more dead than here. Why don't you address our concerns here? At the time of his posting, it was like a live chat. |
|
|
|
|
pdogg147
|
|
October 18, 2015, 03:50:18 PM |
|
I am part of that group and its even more dead than here. Why don't you address our concerns here? At the time of his posting, it was like a live chat. Exactly. Some people are more easily reachable on Facebook and to be honest, I don't think here is always the best place for discussion personally. We have a Slack Channel that we will be opening up shortly to the Community and folks who want to be more deeply involved with advancing Nexus. |
|
|
|
|
Namsbreh
|
|
October 18, 2015, 06:44:22 PM |
|
I don't do facebook and have no intention of ever signing up for an account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
AliMan
|
|
October 18, 2015, 09:54:52 PM |
|
I don't do facebook and have no intention of ever signing up for an account.
You don't always have to like something, to be a part of something. |
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
October 19, 2015, 02:42:55 AM |
|
I don't do facebook and have no intention of ever signing up for an account.
I also want nothing to do with facebook. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
macorcina
|
|
October 19, 2015, 06:50:45 AM |
|
I don't do facebook and have no intention of ever signing up for an account.
I also want nothing to do with facebook. Yes, I am glad it's still exist people with brain . |
|
|
|
|
|
pdogg147
|
|
October 19, 2015, 09:13:28 AM |
|
I don't do facebook and have no intention of ever signing up for an account.
I also want nothing to do with facebook. Yes, I am glad it's still exist people with brain . To each their own. Facebook is used by LOTS of people and will continue to be one of the avenues of Community interaction. I got my introduction into cryptos via Facebook as did many other folks. Some people like Reddit too. I don't care for it. I like Slack. Others do not. Some Development Teams do not use bitcointalk at all. |
|
|
|
|
macorcina
|
|
October 19, 2015, 11:41:53 AM |
|
I don't do facebook and have no intention of ever signing up for an account.
I also want nothing to do with facebook. Yes, I am glad it's still exist people with brain . To each their own. Facebook is used by LOTS of people and will continue to be one of the avenues of Community interaction. I got my introduction into cryptos via Facebook as did many other folks. Some people like Reddit too. I don't care for it. I like Slack. Others do not. Some Development Teams do not use bitcointalk at all. Yes. |
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinSanDiego
|
|
October 19, 2015, 04:05:19 PM |
|
I don't care about whether or not people use Facebook. I care about Nexus being open-sourced to bring in more developer interest and NIRO brought to more exchanges in order to bring more people into the community.
Open sourcing code and opening a BTC/NIRO market on Poloniex should be marketing priorities
|
|
|
|
|
|
Namsbreh
|
|
October 19, 2015, 06:54:01 PM |
|
Open sourcing code and opening a BTC/NIRO market on Poloniex should be marketing priorities
Agreed. |
|
|
|
|
|
macorcina
|
|
October 19, 2015, 08:04:04 PM |
|
Open sourcing code and opening a BTC/NIRO market on Poloniex should be marketing priorities
Agreed. Agreed. ++ ------------------------- The top two coins (with images) by Total Votes are added every Saturday morning around 10am. Time Now: Tuesday 05:54:37 Please VOTE , http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/vote/whats happen with Viz. company registration ? few months ago i suggest Viz to make company share with niro. Like AMBER coin https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=944408.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinSanDiego
|
|
October 19, 2015, 08:13:01 PM |
|
Open sourcing code and opening a BTC/NIRO market on Poloniex should be marketing priorities
Agreed. Agreed. ++ The top two coins (with images) by Total Votes are added every Saturday morning around 10am. Time Now: Tuesday 05:54:37 Please VOTE , http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/vote/My experience is that voting is not a useful way to get a cryptocurrency added to exchange but we should vote nonetheless! Developer/community relationships with exchanges is the real way to get coin added. The Niro marketing team should start by conversing with Busoni, OldManKidd, and others over at Poloniex. I do believe neither Poloniex or Cryptsy will add a closed-source cryptocurrency however - the first thing they ask for is the Github repository to review code. |
|
|
|
|
|
macorcina
|
|
October 19, 2015, 10:25:20 PM |
|
Open sourcing code and opening a BTC/NIRO market on Poloniex should be marketing priorities
Agreed. Agreed. ++ The top two coins (with images) by Total Votes are added every Saturday morning around 10am. Time Now: Tuesday 05:54:37 Please VOTE , http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/vote/My experience is that voting is not a useful way to get a cryptocurrency added to exchange but we should vote nonetheless! Developer/community relationships with exchanges is the real way to get coin added. The Niro marketing team should start by conversing with Busoni, OldManKidd, and others over at Poloniex. I do believe neither Poloniex or Cryptsy will add a closed-source cryptocurrency however - the first thing they ask for is the Github repository to review code. If you just look , before type, you will notice this. and for nitro is good to mention everywhere. |
|
|
|
|
Videlicet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1058
Creator of Nexus http://nexus.io
|
|
October 20, 2015, 04:09:48 AM |
|
Agreed about open sourcing, that's why I am working towards clone proofing for now until we can get more visibility. Facebook is a useful tool if you know how to use the tool correctly, as I see it, don't post anything you don't want the NSA or world powers to know. You can use it to feed them what you want them to see of you, and gain a profile based on what you want them to see rather than being under the profile of "this person has no facebook, hmmm".
There is already a github repository that I have up and can add github users to access it since it is currently private. Working towards a open source solution is definitely a top priority right now as I have considered the opinions of community members, and agree, driving me to find a way to make it happen with minimal risk associated.
Thank You,
Viz.
|
[ Nexus] Created by Viz. [ Videlicet] : "videre licet - it may be seen; evidently; clearly" |
|
|
|
macorcina
|
|
October 20, 2015, 05:46:12 AM
Last edit: October 20, 2015, 05:56:18 AM by macorcina |
|
Mainstream trash it's excellent for marketing.
For that is useful.
What you think if restaurant chefs arrange meeting in burger king,
to discuss about cooking ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stenull
|
|
October 20, 2015, 06:03:07 AM |
|
Agreed about open sourcing, that's why I am working towards clone proofing for now until we can get more visibility. Facebook is a useful tool if you know how to use the tool correctly, as I see it, don't post anything you don't want the NSA or world powers to know. You can use it to feed them what you want them to see of you, and gain a profile based on what you want them to see rather than being under the profile of "this person has no facebook, hmmm".
There is already a github repository that I have up and can add github users to access it since it is currently private. Working towards a open source solution is definitely a top priority right now as I have considered the opinions of community members, and agree, driving me to find a way to make it happen with minimal risk associated.
Thank You,
Viz.
For me i couldn't care less if it's open or closed source. You have a good record and a code review and that's good enough for me to trust what you'r doing.  Spend time to focus on important stuff instead and open source when the timing is better. |
Change...is in the air.
You know why
|
|
|
|
