Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 06:35:22 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Same card, one mines slower than the other?  (Read 1589 times)
bobbobobbo (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 06:30:37 AM
 #1

2x 7950. Sapphire 4Ls. Installed the latest CGminer and enabled amd overdrive.

1100/1500 clock set, +20 powertune

cgminer.exe --scrypt -o http:xxxx -u username -p password --worksize 256 --thread-concurrency 24000 --vectors 1 --shaders 1792 --intensity 20 -g 1 --lookup-gap 2


I'm getting 515k/hash - 57c and 603k/hash - 75c.

 Shocked Shocked They're the same card.... 1 other had mentioned it's just slightly defective and will largely show at max usage... ugh.
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715366122
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715366122

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715366122
Reply with quote  #2

1715366122
Report to moderator
brucemangy
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 164
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 27, 2013, 07:14:33 AM
 #2

one of your card is busy rendering the desktop.

try linux ^^ ?
bobbobobbo (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 08:47:51 AM
 #3

one of your card is busy rendering the desktop.

try linux ^^ ?

I have no monitors plugged in except for a tiny 7" usb monitor.... so don't think that's it?

I will try xubuntu tomorrow.

Anything else anyone can think of? Perhaps my settings are all weird? This is so strange.
BBQKorv
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 27, 2013, 09:27:57 AM
 #4

If you have recently plugged some cards on and off, reinstalling drivers could help. I have one 7970 underperforming slightly (715khs vs. 730khs) in one of my rigs, it has unpowered riser and I suspect that being the reason. Already swapped to card with another one but no difference. I'll try powered riser on it some day.
mccminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 12:55:50 PM
 #5

Did you mean to post your readings in Kh/s, or did you mean Mh/s?  The reason I ask is because a difference of 88 Kh/s is not all that much when you convert it to Mh/s. 

For example, the difference in your cards expressed in Mh/s would look like this:  700.000 Mh/s vs  700.088 Mh/s
ebildude123
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 100


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 02:35:45 PM
 #6

Did you mean to post your readings in Kh/s, or did you mean Mh/s?  The reason I ask is because a difference of 88 Kh/s is not all that much when you convert it to Mh/s. 

For example, the difference in your cards expressed in Mh/s would look like this:  700.000 Mh/s vs  700.088 Mh/s
It's KH/s, he's doing litecoin mining. This difference in speed actually does make a difference.
mccminer
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 88
Merit: 10


View Profile
April 27, 2013, 04:09:34 PM
 #7

My apologies.  I didn't see the '--scrypt' entry in the config line when I originally looked at the post.  Embarrassed
 
bobbobobbo (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 49
Merit: 0


View Profile
April 30, 2013, 12:14:11 AM
Last edit: April 30, 2013, 02:51:14 AM by bobbobobbo
 #8

Opened up GPUz. I get Asic qualities of 60% and 67%. One major oddity is that one of the cards reports 1050/1450 while as the other reports 1100/1500. I have them set in AMD Overdrive, I thought it applied to both cards..

Perhaps I will set it through CGminer, will that override overdrive's settings?


edit:: set CGminer to control GPU clock speeds. All is now well. Thank you all.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!