Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 01:49:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 78 percent of Bitcoin currency stashed under digital mattress, study finds  (Read 2321 times)
Quantus (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 883
Merit: 1005



View Profile
October 20, 2012, 10:36:24 AM
 #1

 Lips sealed
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/10/78-percent-of-bitcoin-currency-stashed-under-digital-mattress-study-finds/
Is this report accurate and how mite this affect price swings?

And why would some one try to hide owner ship of an account like they one that showed up in the report.


(I am a 1MB block supporter who thinks all users should be using Full-Node clients)
Avoid the XT shills, they only want to destroy bitcoin, their hubris and greed will destroy us.
Know your adversary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKorP55Aqvg
1714312176
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714312176

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714312176
Reply with quote  #2

1714312176
Report to moderator
1714312176
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714312176

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714312176
Reply with quote  #2

1714312176
Report to moderator
1714312176
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714312176

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714312176
Reply with quote  #2

1714312176
Report to moderator
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714312176
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714312176

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714312176
Reply with quote  #2

1714312176
Report to moderator
hazek
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


View Profile
October 20, 2012, 10:48:40 AM
 #2

No, it's not accurate because it's based on a flawed premise that coins not moving for a long time are owned by a small minority ignoring that this small minority might just be cold storage of a service and a custodian for many many clients and their balances deposited with that service.

My personality type: INTJ - please forgive my weaknesses (Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times, tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, tend to believe I'm always right)

If however you enjoyed my post: 15j781DjuJeVsZgYbDVt2NZsGrWKRWFHpp
BlackHeartFund
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 20, 2012, 12:52:02 PM
 #3

might just be cold storage of a service and a custodian for many many clients and their balances deposited with that service.

btcsl?
Saturn7
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 20, 2012, 01:28:23 PM
 #4

On the other hand if everybody just kept moving their coins to different addresses everyday that would show an artificial movement of money.

First there was Fire, then Electricity, and now Bitcoins Wink
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 1001


RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME


View Profile
October 20, 2012, 01:33:22 PM
 #5

Does it also discount "lost" coins? Of which if I remember, there are about 2 million.

more or less retired.
Saturn7
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 20, 2012, 01:41:05 PM
 #6

Does it also discount "lost" coins? Of which if I remember, there are about 2 million.

They did not say so i'm assuming it does not.

First there was Fire, then Electricity, and now Bitcoins Wink
Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1003



View Profile WWW
October 20, 2012, 02:15:06 PM
 #7

Does it also discount "lost" coins? Of which if I remember, there are about 2 million.

From what I read they are counting lost coins as 'stashed' or 'horded' as well.  Considering that the lost and 'stashed' coins add up to nearly half, that means that the other half is generally in use.  Basically the report draws some pretty flawed conclusions from good data.

Etlase2
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 20, 2012, 02:22:18 PM
 #8

Where is this concrete data on lost coins?

Littleshop
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1003



View Profile WWW
October 20, 2012, 04:24:42 PM
 #9

Where is this concrete data on lost coins?

There will never be concrete data on lost coins.  It is a guess.  Even when someone says they lost coins we do not know that to be true.  Every single bitcoin ever created could move again, it is just very unlikely. 

There are many people who created coins and forgot about them and in the end lost the wallets.  There are others who lost coins due to mistakes such as wiping drives or cloud knowledge failures. 


jgarzik
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1091


View Profile
October 20, 2012, 06:28:58 PM
 #10

This thread duplicates this thread (discussion of paper) and this thread (discussion of Ars article).

Jeff Garzik, Bloq CEO, former bitcoin core dev team; opinions are my own.
Visit bloq.com / metronome.io
Donations / tip jar: 1BrufViLKnSWtuWGkryPsKsxonV2NQ7Tcj
hazek
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1078
Merit: 1002


View Profile
October 20, 2012, 06:39:18 PM
 #11

This thread duplicates this thread (discussion of paper) and this thread (discussion of Ars article).


And with that, I'm locking it.

My personality type: INTJ - please forgive my weaknesses (Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times, tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, tend to believe I'm always right)

If however you enjoyed my post: 15j781DjuJeVsZgYbDVt2NZsGrWKRWFHpp
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!