Four people voted for this proposal? Fucking morons.
well it is after all just a hypothetical debate. its not like the results would actually do any real world change/prevention. so its not a real world decision people need to make. just a question of opinion, thus some dont see the point in voting
IMO the debate is real. This is something that could actually be done.
It would be very much against the principles behind bitcoin but from a technological standpoint it would be possible
obviously its against the whole ethos of bitcoin, .. but the 'debate' what is it achieving.. has this topic even asked people to flashmob pools to never attempt such a task that would break bitcoin.
has this topic asked for any solutions that lock miners out of tweaking the code, by having more node consensus preventing transactions from being ignored
and your own words "something that could actually be done"... what is this "something" you propose that would be the solution..
all i see is a debate of a few people saying in laymans "lets stick it to the man" and the majority saying "stick one man, ruin it for millions"
Poll
