Bitcoin Forum
December 14, 2017, 03:49:37 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: discouraging institutional investors by being anonymous?  (Read 568 times)
coinsolidation
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294

Bitmark Developer


View Profile WWW
June 27, 2014, 12:03:21 AM
 #1


Being anonymous obviously doesn't help the developers of shitcoins and clones, however does the anonymity factor detract from the work of hard working developers who are making valuable contributions to the community?

Put another way, do institutional investors (within the context of supporting projects or buying aged PoW coins, not IPO/scams/PoS-premines), become deterred if the lead developer of a project is anonymous?

I wonder just how much of a bearing a developers identity has on a project.

Bitmark (reputation+money) : Bitmark v0.9.4 (release)
1513223377
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513223377

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513223377
Reply with quote  #2

1513223377
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513223377
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513223377

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513223377
Reply with quote  #2

1513223377
Report to moderator
1513223377
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513223377

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513223377
Reply with quote  #2

1513223377
Report to moderator
TaunSew
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 12:08:04 AM
 #2

If developer identity mattered then Mastercoin or another copywright coin like Maidsafe would be #1 crypto right now..

As well anonymity seems to be a requirement.  I keep hearing rumor that Ethereum may never launch due to Canadian laws on crowd funding and securities.

There ain't no Revolution like a NEMolution.  The only solution is Bitcoin's dissolution! NEM!
nutildah
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


Destroyer of Buffets


View Profile
June 27, 2014, 12:42:06 AM
 #3


Being anonymous obviously doesn't help the developers of shitcoins and clones,

Sure it does. It makes it easier for them to get away with successfully launching their next shitcoin.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!