a.i.a
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
 |
November 23, 2014, 06:00:59 PM |
|
If i am not mistaken besides deephash algo it doesn't bring anything new.
we have a good technical implementation here, and the continued development, we will see |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
November 23, 2014, 10:39:12 PM
Last edit: November 24, 2014, 01:29:50 AM by Goldshredder |
|
I've had to restart the wallet a couple of times per day (for solo mining), for about the last three days. It loses sync and just sits there saying "0 hours behind..." for ages. Meanwhile the miner buggers off on it's own fork. Not good for mining.
Is this related to the coming update or it's testing??
|
|
|
|
|
|
marada
|
|
November 25, 2014, 10:07:42 PM |
|
I've had to restart the wallet a couple of times per day (for solo mining), for about the last three days. It loses sync and just sits there saying "0 hours behind..." for ages. Meanwhile the miner buggers off on it's own fork. Not good for mining.
Is this related to the coming update or it's testing??
Hi, My wallet keeps synced and everything seems to be ok. Anyone else having that issue? |
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
November 25, 2014, 11:29:34 PM |
|
I've had to restart the wallet a couple of times per day (for solo mining), for about the last three days. It loses sync and just sits there saying "0 hours behind..." for ages. Meanwhile the miner buggers off on it's own fork. Not good for mining.
Is this related to the coming update or it's testing??
Hi, My wallet keeps synced and everything seems to be ok. Anyone else having that issue? Thanks, it seems fine now for the past day, so perhaps it was only a temporary issue. |
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
November 29, 2014, 12:48:15 AM
Last edit: November 29, 2014, 01:36:42 AM by Goldshredder |
|
Hmm still happening every day, restarting at least once. The following image shows what it looks like. Wallet sits at "0 hours behind" (yet still connected to the network) and meanwhile the miner drops to very low diff and starts finding lots of it's own blocks (the blocks are not confirmed of course). The wallet randomly decides to sync properly at a later time (or I discover the fault, and restart the wallet and miner manually), at which time the false blocks are subtracted from the Immature balance, and proper mining resumes, until the next occurrence. Any ideas devs? or is this issue an unexplainable one unique to me only? I've been mining DCN for months with zero issue until the last week or two. Wondering if it's coincidence that you guys are supposedly testing new funcs that "sit over top of the existing network" at that same time.  |
|
|
|
|
|
marada
|
|
November 29, 2014, 08:23:39 AM |
|
It seems to be OS related issue as I have never experienced that with Deepcoin linux wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
November 29, 2014, 11:42:21 PM |
|
Ah well, we'll see if anything comes of it. The dev isn't paid to support users so I don't expect any technical response. That's one of the shortcomings here.
On another note, I guess the "rich list" is defunct and non-operational. My wallet made it's way into the top 100 ages ago and doesn't appear on the list. If this "rich list" is truly not working, then reference to it should be removed from the first post. As it is misleading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
marada
|
|
November 30, 2014, 03:26:38 PM
Last edit: November 30, 2014, 04:02:52 PM by marada |
|
Ah well, we'll see if anything comes of it. The dev isn't paid to support users so I don't expect any technical response. That's one of the shortcomings here.
On another note, I guess the "rich list" is defunct and non-operational. My wallet made it's way into the top 100 ages ago and doesn't appear on the list. If this "rich list" is truly not working, then reference to it should be removed from the first post. As it is misleading.
Please mind that if you were mining solo each block reward has different DCN address. |
|
|
|
|
|
bushstar
|
|
November 30, 2014, 07:15:24 PM |
|
Ah well, we'll see if anything comes of it. The dev isn't paid to support users so I don't expect any technical response. That's one of the shortcomings here.
On another note, I guess the "rich list" is defunct and non-operational. My wallet made it's way into the top 100 ages ago and doesn't appear on the list. If this "rich list" is truly not working, then reference to it should be removed from the first post. As it is misleading.
 The DNS seeders, which are used by the client when it starts to look up other nodes on the network, were set to support the new test clients. They were set to no longer maintain a list of current clients which could have caused your connectivity problems. The seeders have now been set to fully support current clients again. Please let me know if your problem is resolved. |
|
|
|
Deepcoinbiz (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
November 30, 2014, 09:07:05 PM |
|
On another note, I guess the "rich list" is defunct and non-operational. My wallet made it's way into the top 100 ages ago and doesn't appear on the list. If this "rich list" is truly not working, then reference to it should be removed from the first post. As it is misleading.
Rich list was removed |
|
|
|
|
|
BossBee
|
|
December 02, 2014, 05:42:14 AM |
|
Whats the ETA on the anon?
|
|
|
|
|
Goldshredder
|
|
December 02, 2014, 10:25:57 AM |
|
The DNS seeders, which are used by the client when it starts to look up other nodes on the network, were set to support the new test clients. They were set to no longer maintain a list of current clients which could have caused your connectivity problems. The seeders have now been set to fully support current clients again.
Please let me know if your problem is resolved.
Thanks  The incidences seem to have diminished, possibly stopped. I'll post again if it pops back up. Rich list was removed
Good one. I do suggest verify however, in case I was somehow mistaken. |
|
|
|
|
Timmy95
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 53
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2014, 08:35:49 PM |
|
Client with new features has been successfully tested, we will update it after some time
Good news!  Wait for news? |
|
|
|
|
fnordian
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
December 11, 2014, 04:48:28 PM |
|
So, how its going? Should we expect something this year?
|
|
|
|
|
xtrembash
|
|
December 11, 2014, 05:48:09 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2014, 04:12:20 AM by xtrembash |
|
With stealth adress and max supply "only" 99M, the price should logically rise
Maybe we need hybrid POS/POW to increase security and stabilize value..
& some market adoption..
|
|
|
|
|
majoh
|
|
December 11, 2014, 06:47:17 PM
Last edit: December 13, 2014, 07:15:47 PM by majoh |
|
With stealth adress and max supply with "only" 111M, the price could just rise up.
Maybe we need hybrid POS/POW to increase security and stabilize value..
& some market adoption..
Maximum coins: 99,000,000. Edit: And again - Bittrex This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on December 19th unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC. Anybody able to compile new-sx-0.8.7 branch on github(for windows)? |
|
|
|
|
|
kozmos
|
|
December 17, 2014, 06:05:38 AM |
|
My last comment at this thread was at 13 November 2014 and I was checking this thread today again.
I see nothing has changed, plus Deepcoinbiz's Last Active: 12 December 2014, 23:46:45.
lol why I'm not surprised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mrben77
|
|
December 17, 2014, 06:23:26 AM |
|
a good news from dev , hope price is better , i still keep more coins and cannot sell |
|
|
|
|
SeymourSkinner
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
December 17, 2014, 08:16:38 AM |
|
Bittrex will delist Deepcoin the 19th.
Deepcoin community would be smart to start buying. Would be a shame to see DCN dropped because of lack of interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
