marlboro.gold (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
¶v¶€ - €xchange - Ønline instantly!
|
|
July 01, 2014, 05:11:45 AM |
|
how have Signature link image ? pls member tell me here . thanks for watching !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
ProudMiner
|
|
July 01, 2014, 05:18:21 AM |
|
You cannot have an image in your signature, it is not allowed.
|
|
|
|
marlboro.gold (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
¶v¶€ - €xchange - Ønline instantly!
|
|
July 01, 2014, 05:27:00 AM |
|
oh . thanks for you comment
|
|
|
|
kuusj98
|
|
July 01, 2014, 04:08:47 PM |
|
For the record, not allowed on any rank, not Sr. member, not Hero member.
You can have coloured text at some point I beleve (well I have it in my sig and i'm a SR. member... Hmm)
|
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5152
Merit: 12580
|
|
July 02, 2014, 04:00:00 AM |
|
Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it... There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble.
I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
|
July 02, 2014, 06:39:31 AM |
|
Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it... There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble.
I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all. /joke on So you can do your own stuffing /joke off
|
|
|
|
coinbroker
|
|
July 04, 2014, 08:17:47 AM |
|
- Newbie: No styling (including links) allowed. Max 40 characters. - Jr. Member: Links allowed. Max 100 characters. - Member: Unlimited length. - Full: Color allowed. - Sr. Member: Size allowed - Hero: Background color allowed
hope this helps.
|
|
|
|
jambola2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1038
|
|
July 05, 2014, 06:19:33 AM |
|
Wow, I forgot how bad the user response was after that. Now hardly anyone even remembers it... There are also security problems: Images can be used to execute cookie stuffing and cross-site request forgery attacks; they use a lot of bandwidth; and they prevent bitcointalk.org's HTTPS from appearing totally "kosher" to browsers. These issues could be solved by hosting all images at bitcointalk.org, but this isn't worth the trouble.
I guess I decided that it was worth the trouble after all. Wouldn't it be possible to use the forum image proxy like we do for posted images , for signatures and avatars ? I guess there would be more images posted than avatars or signatures, so it wouldn't put too much additional strain on the servers.
|
No longer active on bitcointalk, however, you can still reach me via PMs if needed.
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5152
Merit: 12580
|
|
July 05, 2014, 04:08:58 PM |
|
Wouldn't it be possible to use the forum image proxy like we do for posted images , for signatures and avatars ? I guess there would be more images posted than avatars or signatures, so it wouldn't put too much additional strain on the servers.
Signature images would still be way too distracting/messy, and the problems with paid signatures would become much worse.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
|