Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2017, 08:55:44 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.1  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: CFD trading issue  (Read 855 times)
slothbag
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 09:46:32 AM
 #1

I have been thinking about how to set up a CFD trading project but have a problem someone might know a solution to.

Lets say trader A wants to go long on AAPL shares for 1000 shares @ $500usd, and trader B agrees to go short AAPL for 400 shares @ $500usd.  A position is matched and created for both traders for 400 shares @ $500.

AAPL goes up in price to $600usd a share.

If trader B wants to liquidate his loss there shouldn't be a problem because trader A will happily take the profit.  However what if trader A wants to liquidate which forces trader B to "realize" the loss.  In a market with high liquidity a potential buyer of trader A's long position could be found to take its position. However in a low liquidity market there probably wont be anyone to assume trader A's long position and after trader B "realizing" the loss there may be no one to take up a new matching position with trader B for him to recoup his losses on any downward swing.

What about if the profiting trader wants to liquidate he only gets 50% of the profit, so that the loosing trader only realizes half the loss? Still pretty shitty for the loosing trader.

Or is it a known risk in a low liquidity market that you may not be able to liquidate easily?

Thoughts?
1493326544
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493326544

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493326544
Reply with quote  #2

1493326544
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1493326544
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493326544

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493326544
Reply with quote  #2

1493326544
Report to moderator
1493326544
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493326544

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1493326544
Reply with quote  #2

1493326544
Report to moderator
slothbag
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 369



View Profile
March 07, 2012, 11:54:05 AM
 #2

The only solution I can see is if trader A wants to force liquidate, he has to cancel the order and both trader A and trader B walk away with no money made or lost except for maybe a small fee/penalty.
copumpkin
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 266


I'm actually a pineapple


View Profile
March 07, 2012, 03:29:48 PM
 #3

I have been thinking about how to set up a CFD trading project but have a problem someone might know a solution to.

Lets say trader A wants to go long on AAPL shares for 1000 shares @ $500usd, and trader B agrees to go short AAPL for 400 shares @ $500usd.  A position is matched and created for both traders for 400 shares @ $500.

AAPL goes up in price to $600usd a share.

If trader B wants to liquidate his loss there shouldn't be a problem because trader A will happily take the profit.  However what if trader A wants to liquidate which forces trader B to "realize" the loss.  In a market with high liquidity a potential buyer of trader A's long position could be found to take its position. However in a low liquidity market there probably wont be anyone to assume trader A's long position and after trader B "realizing" the loss there may be no one to take up a new matching position with trader B for him to recoup his losses on any downward swing.

What about if the profiting trader wants to liquidate he only gets 50% of the profit, so that the loosing trader only realizes half the loss? Still pretty shitty for the loosing trader.

Or is it a known risk in a low liquidity market that you may not be able to liquidate easily?

Thoughts?

It is a known risk Smiley but either way, if you implement something like daily settlement with a margin account, the potential losses from one of the counterparties getting cold feet are much more limited.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!