cypherdoc
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
 |
March 11, 2012, 10:55:59 AM |
|
Most dollars in circulation are just digits in a computer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
niko (OP)
|
|
March 11, 2012, 04:24:12 PM |
|
Most dollars in circulation are just digits in a computer.
True, but there are no Bitcoins in circulation. Only signed transactions in the ledger (blockchain). You cannot show me digits in a computer and say "See, this is one bitcoin." |
They're there, in their room.
Your mining rig is on fire, yet you're very calm.
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 11, 2012, 05:25:40 PM |
|
Most dollars in circulation are just digits in a computer.
True, but there are no Bitcoins in circulation. Only signed transactions in the ledger (blockchain). You cannot show me digits in a computer and say "See, this is one bitcoin." Sure I can. I could open my Satoshi wallet and show you my balance. The average user wouldn't argue. |
|
|
|
|
notme
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1002
|
|
March 11, 2012, 06:22:07 PM |
|
Most dollars in circulation are just digits in a computer.
True, but there are no Bitcoins in circulation. Only signed transactions in the ledger (blockchain). You cannot show me digits in a computer and say "See, this is one bitcoin." The same could be said for dollars in a DB. |
|
|
|
|
niko (OP)
|
|
March 11, 2012, 06:25:32 PM |
|
Most dollars in circulation are just digits in a computer.
True, but there are no Bitcoins in circulation. Only signed transactions in the ledger (blockchain). You cannot show me digits in a computer and say "See, this is one bitcoin." Sure I can. I could open my Satoshi wallet and show you my balance. The average user wouldn't argue. If that average user doesn't care how stuff works, they can certainly keep using it, and assume that bitcoins themselves exist, and are represented digitally - with a serial number or something similar. This is simply not so in reality. The question then is whether this distinction has important legal and practical implications. I'd say it does, and ignorance cannot be good in the long run. Try talking to "average" people about dollars or euros - where they come from, for example. Most of folks will tell you that government prints/issues them, which is simply not true (not the whole truth, anyway), and this ignorance leads to real problems. I wouldn't want Bitcoin to start suffering from same obscurity, as this would open the door to abuse and manipulation. The mechanics of Bitcoin are not that hard for an average person to grasp, and we should all work diligently to help them get it right. |
They're there, in their room.
Your mining rig is on fire, yet you're very calm.
|
|
|
FreeMoney
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014
Strength in numbers
|
|
March 11, 2012, 08:26:04 PM |
|
Can you show the code/file/db that is a dollar? I think that makes even less sense than showing a bitcoin.
If you count Wells Fargo database as being a dollar then you need to count MtGox bitcoin balance database as BEING a bitcoin in the same way, which is absurd imo.
|
Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone. |
|
|
benjamindees
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 12, 2012, 02:10:44 AM |
|
You keep pushing this point, but it's wrong imho. There are actually bits that represent Bitcoins. They reside in the blockchain. Access to them is secured by the miner network and by your private address keys in your wallet.
Is it really necessary to explain to people that Bitcoins are just a convention that can disappear given the right circumstances? Well, it depends. Do you normally feel it necessary to go around explaining that all property rights are just a convention that can be taken away as well?
|
Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1007
|
|
March 12, 2012, 03:04:18 AM |
|
You keep pushing this point, but it's wrong imho. There are actually bits that represent Bitcoins. They reside in the blockchain.
No, they don't. Only the transactions reside in the blockchain. |
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
benjamindees
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 12, 2012, 03:14:48 AM |
|
Every transaction is traced back to bits that represent newly generated coins. They reside in the blockchain as well.
|
Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
|
|
|
MoonShadow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1007
|
|
March 12, 2012, 04:59:49 AM |
|
Every transaction is traced back to bits that represent newly generated coins. They reside in the blockchain as well.
Again, no. Even the block reward is just another special transaction. There are no bits that represent a bitcoin, or fifty. |
"The powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominate its government by its ability to control Treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence cooperative politicians by subsequent economic rewards in the business world."
- Carroll Quigley, CFR member, mentor to Bill Clinton, from 'Tragedy And Hope'
|
|
|
txcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
March 19, 2012, 05:37:17 PM |
|
Every transaction is traced back to bits that represent newly generated coins. They reside in the blockchain as well.
Again, no. Even the block reward is just another special transaction. There are no bits that represent a bitcoin, or fifty. And the "value" entries in a transaction? E.g., the "50.04750000" in tx "fd207092f921894229388b6b7a0bd5b1f3e30a50629ad2001f09a0e5657faaa4" inside block 171903 as found here: http://blockexplorer.com/rawblock/00000000000002901eeaa9c60f32ba02de5089cb44db71bacccbb850ec0c4bfdDon't those numbers somehow represent the amount of Bitcoins being transferred? Although they do not address any individual/unique Bitcoin, I do not see that this would cause a problem as with other fungible things I shouldn't / wouldn't care either?! Cheers txcoin |
|
|
|
|
|
nybble41
|
|
March 19, 2012, 09:56:20 PM |
|
Every transaction is traced back to bits that represent newly generated coins. They reside in the blockchain as well. Again, no. Even the block reward is just another special transaction. There are no bits that represent a bitcoin, or fifty. And the "value" entries in a transaction? E.g., the "50.04750000" in tx "fd207092f921894229388b6b7a0bd5b1f3e30a50629ad2001f09a0e5657faaa4" inside block 171903 as found here: http://blockexplorer.com/rawblock/00000000000002901eeaa9c60f32ba02de5089cb44db71bacccbb850ec0c4bfdDon't those numbers somehow represent the amount of Bitcoins being transferred? Exactly so. They represent an amount of bitcoins, which is not the same as representing actual bitcoins, in the same way that the number written on a check represents an amount of dollars, not a specific set of dollar bills. Although they do not address any individual/unique Bitcoin, I do not see that this would cause a problem as with other fungible things I shouldn't / wouldn't care either?! It certainly isn't an obstacle so far as the bitcoin system is concerned. The bitcoins are just placeholders; it doesn't matter what they are, or even if they really exist. It does make a difference when trying to determine what we're actually trading--if anything--for legal purposes, however: commodities, currency, information, etc. Currency is particularly slippery. Outside of the bitcoin system, even fiat currencies which exist almost entirely in the form of digital records represent physical objects. We're expected to believe those computer records are equivalent to actual Federal Reserve Notes, even though there aren't really enough FRNs in existence to balance the accounts. It seems likely to me that if bitcoins can't be considered commodities, then they can't be treated as currency either, even if the bitcoin system as a whole amounts to a currency system. The closest non-digital analogy for the bitcoin system seems to me to be a multiplayer game, where the bitcoins are the points. So far the legal system does not attempt to regulate gameplay, intervene in disputes over the rules, or tax people on their scores; hopefully this will remain the case in the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
