Byter88
|
|
May 01, 2015, 05:31:36 PM |
|
Big updates should be around 6 months if any, so maybe by June there will be something. Looks like most of it is speculation.
|
|
|
|
ElTomeko27
|
|
May 01, 2015, 06:55:36 PM |
|
who is accumulating via? any rumors?
Bagholders... Only one direction for VIA-----> DOWN
|
|
|
|
appbox
|
|
May 02, 2015, 05:36:20 PM |
|
0.10.6 version: 0.10.7 version: Good job~ thanks.
|
|
|
|
GooseNL
|
|
May 03, 2015, 10:33:15 AM Last edit: May 03, 2015, 09:43:06 PM by GooseNL |
|
http://www.coindesk.com/research/cryptocurrency-2-0-report/VIA is mentioned in the new Coindesk report about 2.0 technology and industry. Cost report is 99$. "Next-generation cryptographic applications (NGDAs), commonly grouped under the term 'cryptocurrency 2.0', are a class of emerging projects seeking to expand blockchain technology beyond the storage and transfer of money. At a time when many definitions of '2.0' companies remain vague, here potential investors can glean detailed information about what constitutes an NGDA, alongside the future business models these projects might facilitate. Highlights include: - An explanation of what can be considered a next-generation decentralised app (NGDA). - A brief history of NGDAs and how bitcoin technology made these projects possible. - An overview of some of the most prominent cryptocurrency 2.0 projects, from smart contract platforms to prediction markets. - An overview of some of the key challenges many of these NGDAs face." Spread the news! Let companies and investors know!
|
|
|
|
derrend
|
|
May 06, 2015, 01:10:54 PM |
|
VIA is mentioned in the new Coindesk report about 2.0 technology and industry.
How do you know that? Cost report is 99$.
Torrent link?
|
|
|
|
btcdrak (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 06, 2015, 02:20:20 PM Last edit: May 06, 2015, 03:41:05 PM by btcdrak |
|
VIA is mentioned in the new Coindesk report about 2.0 technology and industry.
How do you know that? Cost report is 99$.
Torrent link? I was sent a copy of that section complimentary so I can confirm there is a nice section on Viacoin. Obviously I cannot share it which is a shame, but there you go.
|
|
|
|
|
rick321
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
May 09, 2015, 07:57:15 PM |
|
help me, all my via coins are gone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! my wallet wouldnt sync so i was told to update my downloading the newer version, but then i couldnt open my wallet at all...i got an error, i decided to uninstall my wallet, and i was told to save the wallet.dat, so i uninstalled and re-installed and replaced back my wallet.dat and now my coins are all gone now!!! WTF!!!
|
|
|
|
kingscrown
|
|
May 10, 2015, 04:32:21 AM |
|
help me, all my via coins are gone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! my wallet wouldnt sync so i was told to update my downloading the newer version, but then i couldnt open my wallet at all...i got an error, i decided to uninstall my wallet, and i was told to save the wallet.dat, so i uninstalled and re-installed and replaced back my wallet.dat and now my coins are all gone now!!! WTF!!!
if u lose wallet.dat then its gone
|
|
|
|
crazytrain
|
|
May 10, 2015, 05:01:33 AM |
|
I'm holding a loss on this coin.
|
|
|
|
mistercashking
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1044
Merit: 1050
|
|
May 10, 2015, 05:20:53 AM |
|
I'm holding a loss on this coin. welcome to the bagholders club.
|
|
|
|
creuz
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
May 12, 2015, 06:11:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
derrend
|
|
May 13, 2015, 10:14:56 AM Last edit: May 16, 2015, 11:53:37 PM by derrend |
|
Not sure how interested any of you will be about this but I'm developing a web app that uses cryptocurrency keys to cryptographically identify the origin of a product using BIP32 complient public keys. The library I'm using supports Viacoin out of the box so implimentation further down the line should be trivial. Here is a link to the dev site in case anyone would like to test it out - cryptoproof.infoI have a whole synopsis written out but I dare not post it here and incur the wrath of Drak so I will only post the opening paragraph Cryptographic Proof Of Production is a method of identification by which users who submit their cryptocurrency extended master public keys which comply to the BIP32 standard can have their identity inferred by checking if a subsequent cryptocurrency address is a product (subkey) of the submitted master public key.
Head over to the 'Project development' section of bitcointalk if you would like to learn more Cheers and go Viacoin!
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc
|
|
May 15, 2015, 01:38:50 AM |
|
Any plans to add Masternodes to this? It would open up a stream of possible cooperation with other projects like BCR and SPR, in fact every coin that is using my adaptation (i.e every coin cloned from CRAVE).
DS and IX are not necessary, just the MN implementation.
|
|
|
|
spartak_t
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1176
@FAILCommunity
|
|
May 15, 2015, 04:02:45 AM |
|
Any plans to add Masternodes to this? It would open up a stream of possible cooperation with other projects like BCR and SPR, in fact every coin that is using my adaptation (i.e every coin cloned from CRAVE).
DS and IX are not necessary, just the MN implementation.
Masternodes are useless gimmicks imho. We all saw how they worked for Crave.
|
|
|
|
kingscrown
|
|
May 15, 2015, 04:04:21 AM |
|
I'm holding a loss on this coin. welcome to the bagholders club. propably the 'fun' has ended. i do hold VIA but no on loss. i made cash, those coins i have now are "free", even 1 satoshi sell would be profit
|
|
|
|
bitcreditscc
|
|
May 15, 2015, 12:45:50 PM |
|
Any plans to add Masternodes to this? It would open up a stream of possible cooperation with other projects like BCR and SPR, in fact every coin that is using my adaptation (i.e every coin cloned from CRAVE).
DS and IX are not necessary, just the MN implementation.
Masternodes are useless gimmicks imho. We all saw how they worked for Crave. I have a different idea in mind. I have a working idea that wee can have certain types of nodes enabled for cross-network communication. Once we can communicate safely and securely, we can now have these nodes (bridges ) relaying messages (no action taken). After that we move to make them relay each other's transactions and get paid for it by whichever chain's tx they relayed. This does not in anyway affect the base client, but allows networks to assist each other and get paid for it. For the user this means a possible new revenue stream from running a node, and for developers it opens up the possiblity of cooperation in a cross-chain decentralized exchange with masternodes being the order-book servers. Most of all that is futuristic, but the most immediately achievable goals are Masternodes on one chain comunicating with Masternodes on another chain. This is really up the dev and the community whether you wish to attempt this, we @ BCR are ready to cooperate with any group that wishes to. Just a note....this is infinitely scalable. the increase in overheads is well within the landscape of Masternodes that are being run on VPS. For example, the combined data of Via and BCR is <500MB. It's just something to think about, i think communities will always stand to win if there is more cooperation.
|
|
|
|
btcdrak (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 15, 2015, 12:50:40 PM |
|
Not sure how interested any of you will be about this but I'm developing a web app that uses cryptocurrency keys to cryptographically identify the origin of a product using BIP32 complient public keys. The library I'm using supports Viacoin out of the box so implimentation further down the line should be trivial. Here is a link to the dev site in case anyone would like to test it out - cryptoproof.infoI have a whole synopsis written out but I dare not post it here and incur the wrath of Drak so I will only post the opening paragraph Cryptographic Proof Of Production is a method of identification by which users who submit their cryptocurrency extended master public keys which comply to the BIP32 standard can have their identity inferred by checking if a subsequent cryptocurrency address is a product (subkey) of the submitted master public key.
Head over to the 'Project development section of bitcointalk if you would like to learn more Cheers and go Viacoin! Looks interesting. Which library are you using? The only thing I don't like about BIP32 is if a the public master key is published and any private key of any subkey is leaked, all private keys for all possible key in the HD chain can be derived. Makes me very wary of publishing the master public key.
|
|
|
|
compmaster
|
|
May 15, 2015, 07:24:05 PM |
|
Any plans to add Masternodes to this? It would open up a stream of possible cooperation with other projects like BCR and SPR, in fact every coin that is using my adaptation (i.e every coin cloned from CRAVE).
DS and IX are not necessary, just the MN implementation.
Whats up with this darkcrave? its just a sad knock off right?
|
|
|
|
derrend
|
|
May 16, 2015, 11:50:45 PM Last edit: May 17, 2015, 02:37:13 AM by derrend |
|
Looks interesting. Which library are you using?
pycoinThe only thing I don't like about BIP32 is if a the public master key is published and any private key of any subkey is leaked, all private keys for all possible key in the HD chain can be derived. Makes me very wary of publishing the master public key.
I know, I suppose the trick here is... not to publish your private keys . One of bitcoins biggest appeals to me is that it forces us to take responsibility for ourselves, and if you intend to use the address purely for ID then you wouldn't care any way.
|
|
|
|
|