Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2024, 03:07:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Lawsky trying to get all the bitcoins to go to ETFs?  (Read 1380 times)
chufchuf (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 19, 2014, 08:13:19 PM
 #1

Bitcoins as a store of value now need bitlicenses is this how lawmaking and lobbying works in the US? Really???

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2b5kex/immigrants_sending_money_home_investors_using/
1713582422
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713582422

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713582422
Reply with quote  #2

1713582422
Report to moderator
1713582422
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713582422

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713582422
Reply with quote  #2

1713582422
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713582422
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713582422

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713582422
Reply with quote  #2

1713582422
Report to moderator
chufchuf (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 19, 2014, 08:56:49 PM
 #2

No one has anything to say?

Wow, I really didn't know lawmakers could do things as drastic as this, not even an exemption like you have for holding gold where I believe you're not all forced to have it in an ETF or have it given to you by a customer in exchange for a service or good.
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
July 19, 2014, 09:17:11 PM
 #3

they do this because they are desperate ... and lobbyist do a good work, too.  Roll Eyes
not a problem ... bitcoin is made to buy and sell "by the hand".
if professionnal exchange fail ... local exchange (like the saturday market) do the job.

like drug dealer job.
insulting_robot
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0



View Profile
July 19, 2014, 09:18:07 PM
 #4

> ...

> this is the insulting robot

> lawsky is a banking robot

> one of the older models with the broken cpu
rackcityb1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 19, 2014, 09:19:59 PM
 #5

Bitcoins as a store of value now need bitlicenses is this how lawmaking and lobbying works in the US? Really???

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2b5kex/immigrants_sending_money_home_investors_using/
You only need a bitlicense if you are in the business of exchanging bitcoin for cash or for cash for bitcoin, if you are a business that accepts bitcoin this does not apply to you
chufchuf (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 205
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 19, 2014, 09:45:53 PM
 #6

Bitcoins as a store of value now need bitlicenses is this how lawmaking and lobbying works in the US? Really???

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2b5kex/immigrants_sending_money_home_investors_using/
You only need a bitlicense if you are in the business of exchanging bitcoin for cash or for cash for bitcoin, if you are a business that accepts bitcoin this does not apply to you

what about in the ''business'' of storing value for yourself, why isn't there an exemption like there is for gold?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!