#1 RATINGS of BITCOIN SPORTSBOOKS since 2014 : KYC Rankings, Bonuses, Scam Accus

[jessraely]

which bet king you talking about? betking.com? .eu? or .io?

[1713556084]

1713556084

[1713556084]

1713556084

[1713556084]

1713556084

[1713556084]

1713556084

[jeremypwr]

Any problems or reviews?

Yes, I've got a problem that I'd like to report:

a)  You have Jetwin listed as a "B" sportsbook when they have, literally, the worst odds out of any book you have listed.  It's not even close.

b)  On top of that, you falsely state that they offer 2FA security, when in reality they don't.   Or if they do, I can't find it on the site.

c)  Also, they have no Live chat and per their site, it takes up to 3 hours for an email response:  "We aim to respond within three hours. More technical inquiries can take additional time."  
3 hours to reply?  That's longer than Nitrogen  

In conclusion:

Peeps ratings are money motivated and nothing else.  They are dishonest and misleading to the Bitcoin community.  

Anyone who takes his ratings seriously needs to do their own "research" (as Peeps likes to call it) because his ratings are meaningless.

Reference:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448302.msg6512771#msg6512771

[patt0]

I do find strange seeing Betcoin.ag rated as A, with all the accusations on them, that we keep finding in the forum. Also, although sportsbet.io also had some problems in the past, I keep seeing users rating them better on other threads, so it's hard to accept them as being "inferior" to betcoin.ag.

Also, when will betking.io will have a rate? I'm finding them pretty good as well so I think they deserve a rate.

Anyway, on my perspective I would rate nitrogen with A+, sportsbet.io and betking.io with A, and I can't really see batcoin.ag with more than a B.

[jeremypwr]

Bumping to the top

[SyGambler]

I do find strange seeing Betcoin.ag rated as A, with all the accusations on them, that we keep finding in the forum. Also, although sportsbet.io also had some problems in the past, I keep seeing users rating them better on other threads, so it's hard to accept them as being "inferior" to betcoin.ag.

Also, when will betking.io will have a rate? I'm finding them pretty good as well so I think they deserve a rate.

Anyway, on my perspective I would rate nitrogen with A+, sportsbet.io and betking.io with A, and I can't really see batcoin.ag with more than a B.

most of Betcoin negative trust here came from not paying a jackpot that was won but after that they also decided to not pay the BBJ from poker which resulted more negative feedbacks
but when it comes to sportsbook both sites are ok since both sites are making fair amount of money

I still totally don't agree with the rating in this thread , it needs a lot of changes

[jeremypwr]

What are "action points" exactly, and why do you have a row when none of your participating books have them?

Same goes for:

a) pessapallo
b) exchange
c) horse racing
d) pleasers


You might as well add:

a) alpine skiing
b) bandy
c) beach soccer
d) beach volleyball
e) curling
f)  biathlon
g) field hockey
h) squash
i) water polo

Why not fluff up your rankings a bit more; I just helped you out substantially.

[Peeps Place]

I do find strange seeing Betcoin.ag rated as A, with all the accusations on them, that we keep finding in the forum. Also, although sportsbet.io also had some problems in the past, I keep seeing users rating them better on other threads, so it's hard to accept them as being "inferior" to betcoin.ag.

Also, when will betking.io will have a rate? I'm finding them pretty good as well so I think they deserve a rate.

Anyway, on my perspective I would rate nitrogen with A+, sportsbet.io and betking.io with A, and I can't really see batcoin.ag with more than a B.

most of Betcoin negative trust here came from not paying a jackpot that was won but after that they also decided to not pay the BBJ from poker which resulted more negative feedbacks
but when it comes to sportsbook both sites are ok since both sites are making fair amount of money

I still totally don't agree with the rating in this thread , it needs a lot of changes

Sorry I was out of town this weekend. Betking's rating will go up in approximately one week.

The ratings only include the sportsbook. Betcoin has been a great sportsbook with no known problems. Feel free to post changes that you would make in the ratings.

[Peeps Place]

What are "action points" exactly, and why do you have a row when none of your participating books have them?

Same goes for:

a) pessapallo
b) exchange
c) horse racing
d) pleasers


You might as well add:

a) alpine skiing
b) bandy
c) beach soccer
d) beach volleyball
e) curling
f)  biathlon
g) field hockey
h) squash
i) water polo

Why not fluff up your rankings a bit more; I just helped you out substantially.

Action points are added wins or losses compared to how many points that was covered by the spread. If you play a team -7 action points, if the team wins by 10, then you add 3 points to the win. If the team wins by 2 points, then you lose 5 action points. Normally you lose -110 on each action point.

If you want anymore sports added, then post them. It will take about a week to make all the changes requested in the last few days.

[jeremypwr]

What are "action points" exactly, and why do you have a row when none of your participating books have them?

Same goes for:

a) pessapallo
b) exchange
c) horse racing
d) pleasers


You might as well add:

a) alpine skiing
b) bandy
c) beach soccer
d) beach volleyball
e) curling
f)  biathlon
g) field hockey
h) squash
i) water polo

Why not fluff up your rankings a bit more; I just helped you out substantially.

Action points are added wins or losses compared to how many points that was covered by the spread. If you play a team -7 action points, if the team wins by 10, then you add 3 points to the win. If the team wins by 2 points, then you lose 5 action points. Normally you lose -110 on each action point.

If you want anymore sports added, then post them. It will take about a week to make all the changes requested in the last few days.

Thanks for explaining what "action points" are!   

However, you totally ignored the most important part of the posts 

You didn't answer my question, though, as to why you have a row for "action points" when none of your rated books have said "action points."

Same goes for the other sports; why even include them?

[Peeps Place]

What are "action points" exactly, and why do you have a row when none of your participating books have them?

Same goes for:

a) pessapallo
b) exchange
c) horse racing
d) pleasers


You might as well add:

a) alpine skiing
b) bandy
c) beach soccer
d) beach volleyball
e) curling
f)  biathlon
g) field hockey
h) squash
i) water polo

Why not fluff up your rankings a bit more; I just helped you out substantially.

Action points are added wins or losses compared to how many points that was covered by the spread. If you play a team -7 action points, if the team wins by 10, then you add 3 points to the win. If the team wins by 2 points, then you lose 5 action points. Normally you lose -110 on each action point.

If you want anymore sports added, then post them. It will take about a week to make all the changes requested in the last few days.

Thanks for explaining what "action points" are!   

However, you totally ignored the most important part of the posts 

You didn't answer my question, though, as to why you have a row for "action points" when none of your rated books have said "action points."

Same goes for the other sports; why even include them?

I'll delete all the sports where no books have a market, thanks. Everything that you and others post in this thread is considered.

[jeremypwr]

Thank you so, so much for "deleting all the sports where no books have a market."
I'm sure you are aware, but there is a sportsbook that does offer all of those sports....

Speaking of sportsbooks, you must of not seen my post about Jetwin, that you have listed as a "B" rated book.




Yes, I've got a problem that I'd like to report:

a)  You have Jetwin listed as a "B" sportsbook when they have, literally, the worst odds out of any book you have listed.  It's not even close.

b)  On top of that, you falsely state that they offer 2FA security, when in reality they don't.   Or if they do, I can't find it on the site.

c)  Also, they have no Live chat and per their site, it takes up to 3 hours for an email response:  "We aim to respond within three hours. More technical inquiries can take additional time."  
3 hours to reply?  That's longer than Nitrogen  

In conclusion:

Peeps ratings are money motivated and nothing else.  They are dishonest and misleading to the Bitcoin community.  

Anyone who takes his ratings seriously needs to do their own "research" (as Peeps likes to call it) because his ratings are meaningless.

Reference:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448302.msg6512771#msg6512771

[Peeps Place]

Thank you so, so much for "deleting all the sports where no books have a market."
I'm sure you are aware, but there is a sportsbook that does offer all of those sports....

Speaking of sportsbooks, you must of not seen my post about Jetwin, that you have listed as a "B" rated book.




Yes, I've got a problem that I'd like to report:

a)  You have Jetwin listed as a "B" sportsbook when they have, literally, the worst odds out of any book you have listed.  It's not even close.

b)  On top of that, you falsely state that they offer 2FA security, when in reality they don't.   Or if they do, I can't find it on the site.

c)  Also, they have no Live chat and per their site, it takes up to 3 hours for an email response:  "We aim to respond within three hours. More technical inquiries can take additional time."  
3 hours to reply?  That's longer than Nitrogen  

In conclusion:

Peeps ratings are money motivated and nothing else.  They are dishonest and misleading to the Bitcoin community.  

Anyone who takes his ratings seriously needs to do their own "research" (as Peeps likes to call it) because his ratings are meaningless.

Reference:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448302.msg6512771#msg6512771

I read the whole post. Jetwin will be changed. As far as the accusations, I can't prove a negative. Although everyone has different ratings that correspond to their needs, the ratings in this thread are similar to other rating threads at Bitcointalk as well as to other sites with ratings guides.

[jeremypwr]

Thank you so, so much for "deleting all the sports where no books have a market."
I'm sure you are aware, but there is a sportsbook that does offer all of those sports....

Speaking of sportsbooks, you must of not seen my post about Jetwin, that you have listed as a "B" rated book.




Yes, I've got a problem that I'd like to report:

a)  You have Jetwin listed as a "B" sportsbook when they have, literally, the worst odds out of any book you have listed.  It's not even close.

b)  On top of that, you falsely state that they offer 2FA security, when in reality they don't.   Or if they do, I can't find it on the site.

c)  Also, they have no Live chat and per their site, it takes up to 3 hours for an email response:  "We aim to respond within three hours. More technical inquiries can take additional time."  
3 hours to reply?  That's longer than Nitrogen  

In conclusion:

Peeps ratings are money motivated and nothing else.  They are dishonest and misleading to the Bitcoin community.  

Anyone who takes his ratings seriously needs to do their own "research" (as Peeps likes to call it) because his ratings are meaningless.

Reference:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448302.msg6512771#msg6512771

I read the whole post. Jetwin will be changed. As far as the accusations, I can't prove a negative. Although everyone has different ratings that correspond to their needs, the ratings in this thread are similar to other rating threads at Bitcointalk as well as to other sites with ratings guides.

You didn't acknowledge the fact that you read it; so thanks for finally admitting you aren't blind.

Just curious, since you do so much "research," why did you lie and say Jetwin offers 2FA?   

If you did any research you would know they don't.

Anyone who plays at a sportsbook that doesn't offer extra security is:
1) Stupid
2) Gullible and believes what liars like Peeps say, even though he's strictly money motivated and could care less about anyone but his pockets
3) Stupid

I'm sure Peeps will go back on vacation or be in an airport for another week (at least) before he takes his blatant lies down and stops doing a negative service to the community.

[Peeps Place]

Thank you so, so much for "deleting all the sports where no books have a market."
I'm sure you are aware, but there is a sportsbook that does offer all of those sports....

Speaking of sportsbooks, you must of not seen my post about Jetwin, that you have listed as a "B" rated book.




Yes, I've got a problem that I'd like to report:

a)  You have Jetwin listed as a "B" sportsbook when they have, literally, the worst odds out of any book you have listed.  It's not even close.

b)  On top of that, you falsely state that they offer 2FA security, when in reality they don't.   Or if they do, I can't find it on the site.

c)  Also, they have no Live chat and per their site, it takes up to 3 hours for an email response:  "We aim to respond within three hours. More technical inquiries can take additional time."  
3 hours to reply?  That's longer than Nitrogen  

In conclusion:

Peeps ratings are money motivated and nothing else.  They are dishonest and misleading to the Bitcoin community.  

Anyone who takes his ratings seriously needs to do their own "research" (as Peeps likes to call it) because his ratings are meaningless.

Reference:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=448302.msg6512771#msg6512771

I read the whole post. Jetwin will be changed. As far as the accusations, I can't prove a negative. Although everyone has different ratings that correspond to their needs, the ratings in this thread are similar to other rating threads at Bitcointalk as well as to other sites with ratings guides.

You didn't acknowledge the fact that you read it; so thanks for finally admitting you aren't blind.

Just curious, since you do so much "research," why did you lie and say Jetwin offers 2FA?   

If you did any research you would know they don't.

Anyone who plays at a sportsbook that doesn't offer extra security is:
1) Stupid
2) Gullible and believes what liars like Peeps say, even though he's strictly money motivated and could care less about anyone but his pockets
3) Stupid

I'm sure Peeps will go back on vacation or be in an airport for another week (at least) before he takes his blatant lies down and stops doing a negative service to the community.

The 2FA was a mistake. Jetwin is going to be downgraded. Although not perfect, I'm very confident in the ratings. There were warnings given prior to some books going under. Up until this point, "A" books have been solid on the sportsbook side.

[jeremypwr]

Seems like you've made a lot of "mistakes."

Regardless, anyone knew here should ignore your rankings.

[Peeps Place]

[Peeps Place]

"A" rated books
nitrogensports.eu A+ (2012)
betcoin.ag A (2013)
bitcoinrush.io A- (2013)

"B"rated books
jetwin.ps B- (2013)

"C" rated books
betking.io C (2017)
sportsbet.io C (2016)
anonibet.com  C- (2011)

"D" rated books
cloudbet.com D+ (2013)
coinbet24.com D+ (2015)
1xbit.com D (2016)
lunarbets.eu D (2016)
mBet.io D- (2017)

"F" rated books
Anybet.eu
Ball2Win F
BetCas F
BTCBonusBook (2015)
Casinoco (2015)
Coindrafts F (2014)
Webetcoins F (2014
Bitbm F.
Bitcoinsport F
Bitcoinlivebets F
Coinbet F
Ghostbook (TOR)
Gobetgo F (2013)
Sportbet.im F
StakeBTC F
Blockbet F
Bitbook F
Powerbet F (2016)

[game-protect]

You didn't acknowledge the fact that you read it; so thanks for finally admitting you aren't blind.

Just curious, since you do so much "research," why did you lie and say Jetwin offers 2FA?  

If you did any research you would know they don't.

Anyone who plays at a sportsbook that doesn't offer extra security is:
1) Stupid
2) Gullible and believes what liars like Peeps say, even though he's strictly money motivated and could care less about anyone but his pockets
3) Stupid

I'm sure Peeps will go back on vacation or be in an airport for another week (at least) before he takes his blatant lies down and stops doing a negative service to the community.

1) Anyone playing at the publicly proven Sportsbet scam is stupid!

2) Anyone promoting the publicly proven sportsbet scam is a criminal

3) 2FA does not help you if the operator runs away with the account balances or gets shut down by authorities

[Peeps Place]

Books and players- Please post or PM any mistakes in the spreadsheet. Thanks

[Sukut]

Please post comments, reviews, praises and complaints here.

Although this is a player's thread, books are encouraged to post. The only rule for books is to keep their conversation on their own book and not that of another book.

"A" rated books
nitrogensports.eu A+ (2012)
betcoin.ag A (2013)
bitcoinrush.io A- (2013)

"B"rated books
jetwin.ps B- (2013)

"C" rated books
betking.io C (2017)
sportsbet.io C (2016)
anonibet.com  C- (2011)

"D" rated books
cloudbet.com D+ (2013)
coinbet24.com D+ (2015)
1xbit.com D (2016)
lunarbets.eu D (2016)
mBet.io D- (2017)

"F" rated books
Anybet.eu ..........................accepting deposits will unpaid players
Ball2Win F ..........................accepting deposits with unpaid players. They are under the same license as "F" book gobetgo
BetCas F ............................accepting deposit with unpaid players.
BTCBonusBook (2015).......... accepting deposits with unpaid players
Casinoco (2015)...................accepting deposits with unpaid players
Coindrafts F (2014)
Webetcoins F (2014
Bitbm F .............................accepting deposits with unpaid players.
Bitcoinsport F
Bitcoinlivebets F
Coinbet F
Ghostbook (TOR)
Gobetgo F (2013)
Sportbet.im F
StakeBTC F
Blockbet F
Bitbook F
Powerbet F (2016) ............................accepting deposits with unpaid players.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exchanges
betbtc.co (2014)
fairlay.com (2014)
betmatch.is (2016

Prediction Markets
betmoose.com (2014)
predictious.com  (2013)

Mutual Betting
Onehash.com


BetVIP - closed 6/12/15
DirectBet closed 5/21/17
bitsport.bet closed 4/11/18 still owing players.


NR
betopen.co
bitgame.online
mBitcasino
trinkbahis.com
webet7.com
zombiewager.com


Maximum grade based upon time in business:

A - 2 years
B - 1 year
C - 3 months
D - 1 month

Coinbase Warning:  Court Allows IRS John Doe Summons For Bitcoin, Other Virtual Currencies http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertwood/2016/11/30/court-allows-irs-john-doe-summons-for-users-of-virtual-currency/#4c6e64db5e47

thanks for the list. is it continuously updated?