Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2024, 09:07:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: With e-currency based on cryptographic proof, without the need to trust a third party middleman, money can be secure and transactions effortless.
True
False

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][WSX][WeAreSatoshi]X11|PoS/PoW|EST 2014|Low Cap|Active Development MN  (Read 83290 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
MrData
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


CoinPayments


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2014, 03:13:41 PM
 #61

MrData, would you mind weighing in on hybrid PoW / PoS vs just PoS?  It's a highly technical question / decision involving network security and stability, and I don't know that I fully understand the pro's & con's on both sides.

Is one method more secure than the other?  If switched to 100% PoS, in your opinion would that pose a risk or potential problems?

I like keeping both active just because it makes coins more reliable; you don't have to have wallets open all the time and there are no periods of slowness when there are periods of less weight on the network.

CoinPayments - The original multi-cryptocurrency payment processor.
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1713906476
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713906476

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713906476
Reply with quote  #2

1713906476
Report to moderator
1713906476
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713906476

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713906476
Reply with quote  #2

1713906476
Report to moderator
1713906476
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713906476

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1713906476
Reply with quote  #2

1713906476
Report to moderator
brian_nguyen (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 03:21:20 PM
 #62

MrData, would you mind weighing in on hybrid PoW / PoS vs just PoS?  It's a highly technical question / decision involving network security and stability, and I don't know that I fully understand the pro's & con's on both sides.

Is one method more secure than the other?  If switched to 100% PoS, in your opinion would that pose a risk or potential problems?

I like keeping both active just because it makes coins more reliable; you don't have to have wallets open all the time and there are no periods of slowness when there are periods of less weight on the network.

When we reach 1 coin per block, how many coin will be mined in a year? Do I need addnodes for the latest wallet? It doesn't sync on a new PC.
MrData
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


CoinPayments


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2014, 03:30:15 PM
 #63

MrData, would you mind weighing in on hybrid PoW / PoS vs just PoS?  It's a highly technical question / decision involving network security and stability, and I don't know that I fully understand the pro's & con's on both sides.

Is one method more secure than the other?  If switched to 100% PoS, in your opinion would that pose a risk or potential problems?

I like keeping both active just because it makes coins more reliable; you don't have to have wallets open all the time and there are no periods of slowness when there are periods of less weight on the network.

When we reach 1 coin per block, how many coin will be mined in a year? Do I need addnodes in the latest wallet? It doesn't sync on a new PC.

If you keep the current 30 second block time 1,051,200 WSX would be minted per year.
No addnodes are needed, it has the seednodes built-in. From a blank install it will connect to them within about 30-45 seconds.

CoinPayments - The original multi-cryptocurrency payment processor.
TaijiBagua
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 03:38:43 PM
 #64

add my seletion on the poll.
brian_nguyen (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 03:43:47 PM
 #65

MrData, would you mind weighing in on hybrid PoW / PoS vs just PoS?  It's a highly technical question / decision involving network security and stability, and I don't know that I fully understand the pro's & con's on both sides.

Is one method more secure than the other?  If switched to 100% PoS, in your opinion would that pose a risk or potential problems?

I like keeping both active just because it makes coins more reliable; you don't have to have wallets open all the time and there are no periods of slowness when there are periods of less weight on the network.

When we reach 1 coin per block, how many coin will be mined in a year? Do I need addnodes in the latest wallet? It doesn't sync on a new PC.

If you keep the current 30 second block time 1,051,200 WSX would be minted per year.
No addnodes are needed, it has the seednodes built-in. From a blank install it will connect to them within about 30-45 seconds.

ACN mentioned earlier that it will help fixing forks if we go up to to 60 or 90 second block. What do you think about that and that means the total coin minted per year will reduce to 525600 or 350400 per year?
AmericanComputerNerd
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100

"Change is the only constant." -Heraclitus


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2014, 03:56:58 PM
 #66

You could double or triple the block reward to keep the distribution plans unchanged.  Or accept that your timeline will be expanded by 2 or 3 times, in terms of distribution schedule...

I also think that the PoS only option should be taken down as a vote item.  Our lead developer recommends keeping it, and it doesn't sound like there is anything to gain by eliminating the maintenance reward for PoW at the end of the distribution schedule.  Unless I'm missing something.
garmin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 550
Merit: 501


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 04:01:34 PM
Last edit: August 07, 2014, 04:59:56 PM by garmin
 #67

MrData, would you mind weighing in on hybrid PoW / PoS vs just PoS?  It's a highly technical question / decision involving network security and stability, and I don't know that I fully understand the pro's & con's on both sides.

Is one method more secure than the other?  If switched to 100% PoS, in your opinion would that pose a risk or potential problems?

I like keeping both active just because it makes coins more reliable; you don't have to have wallets open all the time and there are no periods of slowness when there are periods of less weight on the network.

When we reach 1 coin per block, how many coin will be mined in a year? Do I need addnodes in the latest wallet? It doesn't sync on a new PC.

If you keep the current 30 second block time 1,051,200 WSX would be minted per year.
No addnodes are needed, it has the seednodes built-in. From a blank install it will connect to them within about 30-45 seconds.

ACN mentioned earlier that it will help fixing forks if we go up to to 60 or 90 second block. What do you think about that and that means the total coin minted per year will reduce to 525600 or 350400 per year?

Real world or street use should be considered when considering block time. I think all serious alt's should strive to have an android wallet in the portfolio of features at some point. with that said 2.5 min like DRK seems to long, 60 sec is acceptable for street use. If 30 seconds causing issues for longevity or sync or forking then 60 would still keep it fast, 90 is kinda long for street use but still much better than BTC... Tapping toe waiting for BTC to confirm.... LOL What about number of confirmations to maturity?
MrData
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


CoinPayments


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2014, 05:15:29 PM
 #68

MrData, would you mind weighing in on hybrid PoW / PoS vs just PoS?  It's a highly technical question / decision involving network security and stability, and I don't know that I fully understand the pro's & con's on both sides.

Is one method more secure than the other?  If switched to 100% PoS, in your opinion would that pose a risk or potential problems?

I like keeping both active just because it makes coins more reliable; you don't have to have wallets open all the time and there are no periods of slowness when there are periods of less weight on the network.

When we reach 1 coin per block, how many coin will be mined in a year? Do I need addnodes in the latest wallet? It doesn't sync on a new PC.

If you keep the current 30 second block time 1,051,200 WSX would be minted per year.
No addnodes are needed, it has the seednodes built-in. From a blank install it will connect to them within about 30-45 seconds.

ACN mentioned earlier that it will help fixing forks if we go up to to 60 or 90 second block. What do you think about that and that means the total coin minted per year will reduce to 525600 or 350400 per year?

It's a good idea and should definitely help the pools, etc. Yep, it would reduce to 525600/350400 per year.

CoinPayments - The original multi-cryptocurrency payment processor.
brian_nguyen (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 05:23:42 PM
 #69

MrData, would you mind weighing in on hybrid PoW / PoS vs just PoS?  It's a highly technical question / decision involving network security and stability, and I don't know that I fully understand the pro's & con's on both sides.

Is one method more secure than the other?  If switched to 100% PoS, in your opinion would that pose a risk or potential problems?

I like keeping both active just because it makes coins more reliable; you don't have to have wallets open all the time and there are no periods of slowness when there are periods of less weight on the network.

When we reach 1 coin per block, how many coin will be mined in a year? Do I need addnodes in the latest wallet? It doesn't sync on a new PC.

If you keep the current 30 second block time 1,051,200 WSX would be minted per year.
No addnodes are needed, it has the seednodes built-in. From a blank install it will connect to them within about 30-45 seconds.

ACN mentioned earlier that it will help fixing forks if we go up to to 60 or 90 second block. What do you think about that and that means the total coin minted per year will reduce to 525600 or 350400 per year?

It's a good idea and should definitely help the pools, etc. Yep, it would reduce to 525600/350400 per year.

So as I've learned so far, we need to keep the mix POW/POS to keep the network moving per MrData. I'm taking down the poll, sorry for the extra vote guys. I have a couple suggestions:

1. Change WSX to 60 second block
2. Rename the data directory to WeAreSatoshiX (can that be incorporated into the executable as a rename while upgrading the wallet?)

I don't think that will require a fork but MrData should let us know soon. Thanks,
MrData
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


CoinPayments


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2014, 05:41:24 PM
 #70

So as I've learned so far, we need to keep the mix POW/POS to keep the network moving per MrData. I'm taking down the poll, sorry for the extra vote guys. I have a couple suggestions:

1. Change WSX to 60 second block
2. Rename the data directory to WeAreSatoshiX (can that be incorporated into the executable as a rename while upgrading the wallet?)

I don't think that will require a fork but MrData should let us know soon. Thanks,

Changing the block time will fork. I can rename the data folder if people are worried about it, I don't know if anyone would care about that though???

CoinPayments - The original multi-cryptocurrency payment processor.
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


quarkchain.io


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 06:01:33 PM
 #71

I didnt get which exact version of WeAreSatoshi is tradind on C-Cex ?
MrData
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 290
Merit: 250


CoinPayments


View Profile WWW
August 07, 2014, 06:03:58 PM
 #72

I didnt get which exact version of WeAreSatoshi is tradind on C-Cex ?

It is the version in this thread, WeAreSatoshi v2.

CoinPayments - The original multi-cryptocurrency payment processor.
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


quarkchain.io


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 06:10:27 PM
 #73

I didnt get which exact version of WeAreSatoshi is tradind on C-Cex ?

It is the version in this thread, WeAreSatoshi v2.

Then they have to change its index there. It is very confusing...
brian_nguyen (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 06:13:43 PM
 #74

I didnt get which exact version of WeAreSatoshi is tradind on C-Cex ?

It is the version in this thread, WeAreSatoshi v2.

Then they have to change its index there. It is very confusing...
We just changed the ticker this morning. We will contact all the exchanges to update their ticker. Thanks,
go6ooo1212
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000


quarkchain.io


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 06:50:00 PM
 #75

C-Cex already did it Smiley
I like this coin, wathing for price risings...
brian_nguyen (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 06:55:54 PM
 #76

C-Cex already did it Smiley
I like this coin, wathing for price risings...

That's the first one I got to. Love their support. Resolved in less than a minute.
brian_nguyen (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 07:07:01 PM
 #77

C-Cex already did it Smiley
I like this coin, wathing for price risings...

That's the first one I got to. Love their support. Resolved in less than a minute.

Sent requests asking to change from WAS to WSX to both AllCrypt and RockyTrade
craazzzzzy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 09:36:27 PM
 #78

I have in rockytrade  634265.65051714 WeAreSatoshi and what now??
I want windraw. ! I want exhange ..! help
brian_nguyen (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1404
Merit: 1001


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 10:03:17 PM
 #79

I have in rockytrade  634265.65051714 WeAreSatoshi and what now??
I want windraw. ! I want exhange ..! help
You should be able to withdraw. Is there an issue?
craazzzzzy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 07, 2014, 10:07:54 PM
 #80

yes.
new wallet use to windraw right?
WeAreSatoshi v2 Client
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!