[Ultracoin] [Est. Feb 2014] ~ ASIC Resistant & Ultrafast 6 Second Transactions!

[mik57]

Hello everyone,

I have not found an answer to my problem:
I just downloaded the wallet and it does not syncronise.
I did not find the node to add.
thank you in advance.
someone can give me? 

[1714031826]

1714031826

[1714031826]

1714031826

[1714031826]

1714031826

[fabietech]

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

Great job Kracko love to see you on the team!

[usukan]

Kracko

Could you check the Tumblingblock main page

"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."

I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour

It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp

It makes a huge difference.

Cheers

Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi

Cost was 0.16 BTC

Return was about 550 UTC (needed 2,000 UTC to breakeven) = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)

I lost 0.116 BTC

so I bought these little suckers for 0.00029 BTC each (while the market rate seems to be about 0.00008) - now if I could colour them it would be a GOLD for sure - and they WILL get their own special wallet.

so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day).  There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that.  As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss?  How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained? Is the pool paying out correctly - sorry but I need to ask as its a big divergence from predicted. This seems a very inefficient way of using our hashing power to boost UTC. Everyone would be better off (like 4 times better off) to sell hash on NiceHash and buy UTC with the proceeds.

Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm the results - I suggest that no one else try it.

But it was interesting to see the cogs spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

[Kracko]

Usukan,

The length of your test does not account for your work in those pools that have not hit a block.  I'm assuming you're UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp.  I'll watch your address and report back.  Was that address solely dedicated to the test?  I suppose I can filter all the inputs from the pool's address.  And I'll have to work out something so we can see shares for everyone that are on each of the pools.  

I wondered about that too the GH/hour thing.  I assumed the guy who wrote NOMP had it right.  I took his value and multiplied it by 1000 to convert it to GH:

libs/profitData.js, line 570

Code:

                coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour = 86400 / ((coinStatus.difficulty * Math.pow(2,32)) / (1 * 1000 * 1000));
                coinStatus.coinsPerMhPerHour = coinStatus.reward * coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour;

The variable should be ___PerDay as there are 86400 seconds in a day.  The value is actually per day, not per hour.


Just looking through the redis database on the pool and I saw that you have quite a lot of shares outstanding.  Here are just a few pools where you had way more than anyone else.

Anoncoin  10895360
Auroracoin 3553280
Cannabiscoin 6.6733675


Here is a shares snapshot of our highest block reward pool, URO.  It pays out around 750UTC  for the block reward at current prices:

Ubio7xbdXRkFCMJfCTnethpgddP5WYPT1q    619.79642499000001032
UQ6ouaEKao9gWdonx4mNBEAQ3kkc3obzXR    113.39435067000000067
UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp    2729.77701524000001143
UZ4kcjprXMo5BgYZf38Woa1BkZdoLxp7v1    339.25154035999999927
UMzy2N8oTFmcQ2bfZoqLnmXsWzvfA8miRy    28.82131565
UfCerLiTZa9XETvFdcdtxUMhwTRGrai6LB    129.23172063000000014
UdD3yCeEs4RQXemGB97yzVUTpNj2SLL2nE    90.23027884000000039
UebKusfEMQV2zMkXghVDUhsydeotdcoUwG    107.19990581000000027
UTWctXiCNcN4bd3p5tpUPtwz3s87Y6BaNa    107.03654302999999954

As you can see you have the lions share in there.  You'll get a nice chunk of that when it finally hits.

Some of the coins in the pool are going to take a day or more to hit- it could be weeks on some of the coins depending on how much hash the pool gets and how long they are the most profitable.   It's not going to be instant gratification.   I might have to add some logic to avoid selecting coins that will take longer than a day to hit a block at the current pool hashrate, even if they are more profitable at the time.  The only problem with that is that the shares already put into them will never be realized if the coin is not made available.

I ran on the X11 pool with nice hash, spending about .05BTC and got back .045 in UTC fairly quickly but still got more trickling back in, but the payouts aren't complete until all shares are hit.  I'm going to send .1BTC to WestHash and do my own test on the Scrypt pool.

Kracko

Could you check the Tumblingblock main page

"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."

I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour

It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp

It makes a huge difference.

Cheers

Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi

Cost was 0.16 BTC

Return was about 550 UTC = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)

I lost 0.116 BTC

so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day).  There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that.  As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss?  How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained?

Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm - suggest no one else try it.

But it was interesting to see the wheels spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

[usukan]

Hi Kracko - thanks for that explanation.  I waited till the payouts seemed to stop to that address - and assumed that was the end of the test.  Maybe more coming - that would be good.

Yes - That address was solely for the test. UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp

It would be rather excellent if it was just above breakeven - as we could really get things cranking on the pool.

I dont mean to be negative - just trying to understand the best way to support UTC.  We need to find the issues and understand to move forward.

Your attention to my questions greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Usukan,

The length of your test does not cover the amount of time it takes to hit a block in all the pools and does not account for the work in those pools that have not hit a block.  I'm assuming you're UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp.  I'll watch your address and report back.  Was that address solely dedicated to the test?  I suppose I can filter all the inputs from the pool's address.  And I'll have to work out something so we can see shares for everyone that are on each of the pools.  

I wondered about that too the GH/hour thing.  I assumed the guy who wrote NOMP had it right.  I took his value and multiplied it by 1000 to convert it to GH:

libs/profitData.js, line 570

Code:

                coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour = 86400 / ((coinStatus.difficulty * Math.pow(2,32)) / (1 * 1000 * 1000));
                coinStatus.coinsPerMhPerHour = coinStatus.reward * coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour;

The variable should be ___PerDay as there are 86400 seconds in a day.  The value is actually per day, not per hour.


Just looking through the redis database on the pool and I saw that you have quite a lot of shares outstanding.  Here are just a few pools where you had way more than anyone else.

Anoncoin  10895360
Auroracoin 3553280
Cannabiscoin 6.6733675


Here is a shares snapshot of our highest block reward pool, URO.  It pays out around 750UTC  for the block reward at current prices:

Ubio7xbdXRkFCMJfCTnethpgddP5WYPT1q    619.79642499000001032
UQ6ouaEKao9gWdonx4mNBEAQ3kkc3obzXR    113.39435067000000067
UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp    2729.77701524000001143
UZ4kcjprXMo5BgYZf38Woa1BkZdoLxp7v1    339.25154035999999927
UMzy2N8oTFmcQ2bfZoqLnmXsWzvfA8miRy    28.82131565
UfCerLiTZa9XETvFdcdtxUMhwTRGrai6LB    129.23172063000000014
UdD3yCeEs4RQXemGB97yzVUTpNj2SLL2nE    90.23027884000000039
UebKusfEMQV2zMkXghVDUhsydeotdcoUwG    107.19990581000000027
UTWctXiCNcN4bd3p5tpUPtwz3s87Y6BaNa    107.03654302999999954

As you can see you have the lions share in there.  You'll get a nice chunk of that when it finally hits.

Some of the coins in the pool are going to take a day or more to hit- it could be weeks on some of the coins depending on how much hash the pool gets and how long they are the most profitable.   It's not going to be instant gratification.   I might have to add some logic to avoid selecting coins that will take longer than a day to hit a block at the current pool hashrate, even if they are more profitable at the time.  The only problem with that is that the shares already put into them will never be realized if the coin is not made available.

I ran on the X11 pool with nice hash, spending about .05BTC and got back .045 in UTC fairly quickly but still got more trickling back in, but the payouts aren't complete until all shares are hit.  I'm going to send .1BTC to WestHash and do my own test on the Scrypt pool.

Kracko

Could you check the Tumblingblock main page

"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."

I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour

It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp

It makes a huge difference.

Cheers

Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi

Cost was 0.16 BTC

Return was about 550 UTC = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)

I lost 0.116 BTC

so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day).  There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that.  As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss?  How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained?

Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm - suggest no one else try it.

But it was interesting to see the wheels spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

[Kracko]

It's a work in progress man.   It's going to take a lot more tweaking to dial it in.  The difficulties change so fast that the profitability drops out after a few blocks- I noticed Emerald really shoots up from it's .7 diff to 2+ very quickly.  The Kimoto Gravity Well doesn't help out.  I'm going to have to add a check that polls the wallet for the current difficulty and switch it faster- as in after each found block in the current switch coin, making it more of a hit and run.  The market data will probably remain more static.  We'll just have to figure out a happy point between switches that keeps profitability up as you end up losing some work with those switches. As a temporary fix I lowered the profitability checks to every 5 minutes.  That should help keep the BTC/GH-Day rate a little higher.

I just plunked down .05BTC on WestHash.  USE8CxbiyZ3r7y2mNDNxEvjdsgfATEoEKz is the address.  Scrypt Order #103887 on WestHash if anyone wants to follow along.  I should have left it at the the original .30 price.  I'm probably going to take a beating too.  I can't wait until I get my Volcano damnit...

Hi Kracko - thanks for that explanation.  I waited till the payouts seemed to stop to that address - and assumed that was the end of the test.  Maybe more coming - that would be good.

Yes - That address was solely for the test. UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp

It would be rather excellent if it was just above breakeven - as we could really get things cranking on the pool.

I dont mean to be negative - just trying to understand the best way to support UTC.  We need to find the issues and understand to move forward.

Your attention to my questions greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Usukan,

The length of your test does not cover the amount of time it takes to hit a block in all the pools and does not account for the work in those pools that have not hit a block.  I'm assuming you're UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp.  I'll watch your address and report back.  Was that address solely dedicated to the test?  I suppose I can filter all the inputs from the pool's address.  And I'll have to work out something so we can see shares for everyone that are on each of the pools.  

I wondered about that too the GH/hour thing.  I assumed the guy who wrote NOMP had it right.  I took his value and multiplied it by 1000 to convert it to GH:

libs/profitData.js, line 570

Code:

                coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour = 86400 / ((coinStatus.difficulty * Math.pow(2,32)) / (1 * 1000 * 1000));
                coinStatus.coinsPerMhPerHour = coinStatus.reward * coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour;

The variable should be ___PerDay as there are 86400 seconds in a day.  The value is actually per day, not per hour.


Just looking through the redis database on the pool and I saw that you have quite a lot of shares outstanding.  Here are just a few pools where you had way more than anyone else.

Anoncoin  10895360
Auroracoin 3553280
Cannabiscoin 6.6733675


Here is a shares snapshot of our highest block reward pool, URO.  It pays out around 750UTC  for the block reward at current prices:

Ubio7xbdXRkFCMJfCTnethpgddP5WYPT1q    619.79642499000001032
UQ6ouaEKao9gWdonx4mNBEAQ3kkc3obzXR    113.39435067000000067
UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp    2729.77701524000001143
UZ4kcjprXMo5BgYZf38Woa1BkZdoLxp7v1    339.25154035999999927
UMzy2N8oTFmcQ2bfZoqLnmXsWzvfA8miRy    28.82131565
UfCerLiTZa9XETvFdcdtxUMhwTRGrai6LB    129.23172063000000014
UdD3yCeEs4RQXemGB97yzVUTpNj2SLL2nE    90.23027884000000039
UebKusfEMQV2zMkXghVDUhsydeotdcoUwG    107.19990581000000027
UTWctXiCNcN4bd3p5tpUPtwz3s87Y6BaNa    107.03654302999999954

As you can see you have the lions share in there.  You'll get a nice chunk of that when it finally hits.

Some of the coins in the pool are going to take a day or more to hit- it could be weeks on some of the coins depending on how much hash the pool gets and how long they are the most profitable.   It's not going to be instant gratification.   I might have to add some logic to avoid selecting coins that will take longer than a day to hit a block at the current pool hashrate, even if they are more profitable at the time.  The only problem with that is that the shares already put into them will never be realized if the coin is not made available.

I ran on the X11 pool with nice hash, spending about .05BTC and got back .045 in UTC fairly quickly but still got more trickling back in, but the payouts aren't complete until all shares are hit.  I'm going to send .1BTC to WestHash and do my own test on the Scrypt pool.

Kracko

Could you check the Tumblingblock main page

"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."

I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour

It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp

It makes a huge difference.

Cheers

Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi

Cost was 0.16 BTC

Return was about 550 UTC = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)

I lost 0.116 BTC

so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day).  There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that.  As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss?  How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained?

Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm - suggest no one else try it.

But it was interesting to see the wheels spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

[usukan]

I am following - so you are not concerned that tumblingblock is in Europe and Westhash is in US?  They say to rent closest place to the pool location? I do notice that Westhash is cheaper though.

Thanks for the entertainment - this could become an Olympic sport of sorts - I might be tempted to put 0.05 @ .30 and see what happens.

Good luck

It's a work in progress man.   It's going to take a lot more tweaking to dial it in.  The difficulties change so fast that the profitability drops out after a few blocks- I noticed Emerald really shoots up from it's .7 diff to 2+ very quickly.  The Kimoto Gravity Well doesn't help out.  I'm going to have to add a check that polls the wallet for the current difficulty and switch it faster- as in after each found block in the current switch coin, making it more of a hit and run.  The market data will probably remain more static.  We'll just have to figure out a happy point between switches that keeps profitability up as you end up losing some work with those switches. As a temporary fix I lowered the profitability checks to every 5 minutes.  That should help keep the BTC/GH-Day rate a little higher.

I just plunked down .05BTC on WestHash.  USE8CxbiyZ3r7y2mNDNxEvjdsgfATEoEKz is the address.  Scrypt Order #103887 on WestHash if anyone wants to follow along.  I should have left it at the the original .30 price.  I'm probably going to take a beating too.  I can't wait until I get my Volcano damnit...

Hi Kracko - thanks for that explanation.  I waited till the payouts seemed to stop to that address - and assumed that was the end of the test.  Maybe more coming - that would be good.

Yes - That address was solely for the test. UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp

It would be rather excellent if it was just above breakeven - as we could really get things cranking on the pool.

I dont mean to be negative - just trying to understand the best way to support UTC.  We need to find the issues and understand to move forward.

Your attention to my questions greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Usukan,

The length of your test does not cover the amount of time it takes to hit a block in all the pools and does not account for the work in those pools that have not hit a block.  I'm assuming you're UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp.  I'll watch your address and report back.  Was that address solely dedicated to the test?  I suppose I can filter all the inputs from the pool's address.  And I'll have to work out something so we can see shares for everyone that are on each of the pools.  

I wondered about that too the GH/hour thing.  I assumed the guy who wrote NOMP had it right.  I took his value and multiplied it by 1000 to convert it to GH:

libs/profitData.js, line 570

Code:

                coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour = 86400 / ((coinStatus.difficulty * Math.pow(2,32)) / (1 * 1000 * 1000));
                coinStatus.coinsPerMhPerHour = coinStatus.reward * coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour;

The variable should be ___PerDay as there are 86400 seconds in a day.  The value is actually per day, not per hour.


Just looking through the redis database on the pool and I saw that you have quite a lot of shares outstanding.  Here are just a few pools where you had way more than anyone else.

Anoncoin  10895360
Auroracoin 3553280
Cannabiscoin 6.6733675


Here is a shares snapshot of our highest block reward pool, URO.  It pays out around 750UTC  for the block reward at current prices:

Ubio7xbdXRkFCMJfCTnethpgddP5WYPT1q    619.79642499000001032
UQ6ouaEKao9gWdonx4mNBEAQ3kkc3obzXR    113.39435067000000067
UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp    2729.77701524000001143
UZ4kcjprXMo5BgYZf38Woa1BkZdoLxp7v1    339.25154035999999927
UMzy2N8oTFmcQ2bfZoqLnmXsWzvfA8miRy    28.82131565
UfCerLiTZa9XETvFdcdtxUMhwTRGrai6LB    129.23172063000000014
UdD3yCeEs4RQXemGB97yzVUTpNj2SLL2nE    90.23027884000000039
UebKusfEMQV2zMkXghVDUhsydeotdcoUwG    107.19990581000000027
UTWctXiCNcN4bd3p5tpUPtwz3s87Y6BaNa    107.03654302999999954

As you can see you have the lions share in there.  You'll get a nice chunk of that when it finally hits.

Some of the coins in the pool are going to take a day or more to hit- it could be weeks on some of the coins depending on how much hash the pool gets and how long they are the most profitable.   It's not going to be instant gratification.   I might have to add some logic to avoid selecting coins that will take longer than a day to hit a block at the current pool hashrate, even if they are more profitable at the time.  The only problem with that is that the shares already put into them will never be realized if the coin is not made available.

I ran on the X11 pool with nice hash, spending about .05BTC and got back .045 in UTC fairly quickly but still got more trickling back in, but the payouts aren't complete until all shares are hit.  I'm going to send .1BTC to WestHash and do my own test on the Scrypt pool.

Kracko

Could you check the Tumblingblock main page

"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."

I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour

It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp

It makes a huge difference.

Cheers

Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi

Cost was 0.16 BTC

Return was about 550 UTC = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)

I lost 0.116 BTC

so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day).  There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that.  As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss?  How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained?

Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm - suggest no one else try it.

But it was interesting to see the wheels spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

[Kracko]

WestHash is closer to the multipool, which is in North America.  I'd go for .28 or less.  The scrypt pool coins all hovering around .3 right now.  My problem is that I get impatient watching the order with no miners on it.

I am following - so you are not concerned that tumblingblock is in Europe and Westhash is in US?  They say to rent closest place to the pool location? I do notice that Westhash is cheaper though.

Thanks for the entertainment - this could become an Olympic sport of sorts - I might be tempted to put 0.05 @ .30 and see what happens.

Good luck

It's a work in progress man.   It's going to take a lot more tweaking to dial it in.  The difficulties change so fast that the profitability drops out after a few blocks- I noticed Emerald really shoots up from it's .7 diff to 2+ very quickly.  The Kimoto Gravity Well doesn't help out.  I'm going to have to add a check that polls the wallet for the current difficulty and switch it faster- as in after each found block in the current switch coin, making it more of a hit and run.  The market data will probably remain more static.  We'll just have to figure out a happy point between switches that keeps profitability up as you end up losing some work with those switches. As a temporary fix I lowered the profitability checks to every 5 minutes.  That should help keep the BTC/GH-Day rate a little higher.

I just plunked down .05BTC on WestHash.  USE8CxbiyZ3r7y2mNDNxEvjdsgfATEoEKz is the address.  Scrypt Order #103887 on WestHash if anyone wants to follow along.  I should have left it at the the original .30 price.  I'm probably going to take a beating too.  I can't wait until I get my Volcano damnit...

Hi Kracko - thanks for that explanation.  I waited till the payouts seemed to stop to that address - and assumed that was the end of the test.  Maybe more coming - that would be good.

Yes - That address was solely for the test. UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp

It would be rather excellent if it was just above breakeven - as we could really get things cranking on the pool.

I dont mean to be negative - just trying to understand the best way to support UTC.  We need to find the issues and understand to move forward.

Your attention to my questions greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Usukan,

The length of your test does not cover the amount of time it takes to hit a block in all the pools and does not account for the work in those pools that have not hit a block.  I'm assuming you're UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp.  I'll watch your address and report back.  Was that address solely dedicated to the test?  I suppose I can filter all the inputs from the pool's address.  And I'll have to work out something so we can see shares for everyone that are on each of the pools.  

I wondered about that too the GH/hour thing.  I assumed the guy who wrote NOMP had it right.  I took his value and multiplied it by 1000 to convert it to GH:

libs/profitData.js, line 570

Code:

                coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour = 86400 / ((coinStatus.difficulty * Math.pow(2,32)) / (1 * 1000 * 1000));
                coinStatus.coinsPerMhPerHour = coinStatus.reward * coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour;

The variable should be ___PerDay as there are 86400 seconds in a day.  The value is actually per day, not per hour.


Just looking through the redis database on the pool and I saw that you have quite a lot of shares outstanding.  Here are just a few pools where you had way more than anyone else.

Anoncoin  10895360
Auroracoin 3553280
Cannabiscoin 6.6733675


Here is a shares snapshot of our highest block reward pool, URO.  It pays out around 750UTC  for the block reward at current prices:

Ubio7xbdXRkFCMJfCTnethpgddP5WYPT1q    619.79642499000001032
UQ6ouaEKao9gWdonx4mNBEAQ3kkc3obzXR    113.39435067000000067
UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp    2729.77701524000001143
UZ4kcjprXMo5BgYZf38Woa1BkZdoLxp7v1    339.25154035999999927
UMzy2N8oTFmcQ2bfZoqLnmXsWzvfA8miRy    28.82131565
UfCerLiTZa9XETvFdcdtxUMhwTRGrai6LB    129.23172063000000014
UdD3yCeEs4RQXemGB97yzVUTpNj2SLL2nE    90.23027884000000039
UebKusfEMQV2zMkXghVDUhsydeotdcoUwG    107.19990581000000027
UTWctXiCNcN4bd3p5tpUPtwz3s87Y6BaNa    107.03654302999999954

As you can see you have the lions share in there.  You'll get a nice chunk of that when it finally hits.

Some of the coins in the pool are going to take a day or more to hit- it could be weeks on some of the coins depending on how much hash the pool gets and how long they are the most profitable.   It's not going to be instant gratification.   I might have to add some logic to avoid selecting coins that will take longer than a day to hit a block at the current pool hashrate, even if they are more profitable at the time.  The only problem with that is that the shares already put into them will never be realized if the coin is not made available.

I ran on the X11 pool with nice hash, spending about .05BTC and got back .045 in UTC fairly quickly but still got more trickling back in, but the payouts aren't complete until all shares are hit.  I'm going to send .1BTC to WestHash and do my own test on the Scrypt pool.

Kracko

Could you check the Tumblingblock main page

"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."

I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour

It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp

It makes a huge difference.

Cheers

Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi

Cost was 0.16 BTC

Return was about 550 UTC = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)

I lost 0.116 BTC

so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day).  There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that.  As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss?  How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained?

Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm - suggest no one else try it.

But it was interesting to see the wheels spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

[usukan]

Steven - the main UTC net website needs to have a link to a working block explorer on it

http://ultracoin.net/links.html

no worky this block explorer listed

http://bitgo.pw:3731/chain/Ultracoin

Needs to link from main page under "Services" tab

Bitcointalk first page needs a block explorer listed too.

Cheers - usukan

[usukan]

Hi Kracko - this is my 2nd test

WesthHash to tumblingblock multi - Scrypt

Order 0.05 @ 0.28 BTC/GH day - limit 0.3GH

#104057   Alive   0.28   0.04890200   0.00%   ∞   0.00   0.30   0   0.0000

Miner - Ug4RWovZ91wE6YTgphRJT2c5f3Ly1F144e

fingers crossed - whiskey and tacos while I wait - west pacific region so not drinking early am.

I see NiceHash is now in @ .28

Cheers

Cheer

WestHash is closer to the multipool, which is in North America.  I'd go for .28 or less.  The scrypt pool coins all hovering around .3 right now.  My problem is that I get impatient watching the order with no miners on it.

I am following - so you are not concerned that tumblingblock is in Europe and Westhash is in US?  They say to rent closest place to the pool location? I do notice that Westhash is cheaper though.

Thanks for the entertainment - this could become an Olympic sport of sorts - I might be tempted to put 0.05 @ .30 and see what happens.

Good luck

It's a work in progress man.   It's going to take a lot more tweaking to dial it in.  The difficulties change so fast that the profitability drops out after a few blocks- I noticed Emerald really shoots up from it's .7 diff to 2+ very quickly.  The Kimoto Gravity Well doesn't help out.  I'm going to have to add a check that polls the wallet for the current difficulty and switch it faster- as in after each found block in the current switch coin, making it more of a hit and run.  The market data will probably remain more static.  We'll just have to figure out a happy point between switches that keeps profitability up as you end up losing some work with those switches. As a temporary fix I lowered the profitability checks to every 5 minutes.  That should help keep the BTC/GH-Day rate a little higher.

I just plunked down .05BTC on WestHash.  USE8CxbiyZ3r7y2mNDNxEvjdsgfATEoEKz is the address.  Scrypt Order #103887 on WestHash if anyone wants to follow along.  I should have left it at the the original .30 price.  I'm probably going to take a beating too.  I can't wait until I get my Volcano damnit...

Hi Kracko - thanks for that explanation.  I waited till the payouts seemed to stop to that address - and assumed that was the end of the test.  Maybe more coming - that would be good.

Yes - That address was solely for the test. UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp

It would be rather excellent if it was just above breakeven - as we could really get things cranking on the pool.

I dont mean to be negative - just trying to understand the best way to support UTC.  We need to find the issues and understand to move forward.

Your attention to my questions greatly appreciated.

Cheers

Usukan,

The length of your test does not cover the amount of time it takes to hit a block in all the pools and does not account for the work in those pools that have not hit a block.  I'm assuming you're UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp.  I'll watch your address and report back.  Was that address solely dedicated to the test?  I suppose I can filter all the inputs from the pool's address.  And I'll have to work out something so we can see shares for everyone that are on each of the pools.  

I wondered about that too the GH/hour thing.  I assumed the guy who wrote NOMP had it right.  I took his value and multiplied it by 1000 to convert it to GH:

libs/profitData.js, line 570

Code:

                coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour = 86400 / ((coinStatus.difficulty * Math.pow(2,32)) / (1 * 1000 * 1000));
                coinStatus.coinsPerMhPerHour = coinStatus.reward * coinStatus.blocksPerMhPerHour;

The variable should be ___PerDay as there are 86400 seconds in a day.  The value is actually per day, not per hour.


Just looking through the redis database on the pool and I saw that you have quite a lot of shares outstanding.  Here are just a few pools where you had way more than anyone else.

Anoncoin  10895360
Auroracoin 3553280
Cannabiscoin 6.6733675


Here is a shares snapshot of our highest block reward pool, URO.  It pays out around 750UTC  for the block reward at current prices:

Ubio7xbdXRkFCMJfCTnethpgddP5WYPT1q    619.79642499000001032
UQ6ouaEKao9gWdonx4mNBEAQ3kkc3obzXR    113.39435067000000067
UUxcMGAt3jFK56cPtx9N6fX1iay7s3MfRp    2729.77701524000001143
UZ4kcjprXMo5BgYZf38Woa1BkZdoLxp7v1    339.25154035999999927
UMzy2N8oTFmcQ2bfZoqLnmXsWzvfA8miRy    28.82131565
UfCerLiTZa9XETvFdcdtxUMhwTRGrai6LB    129.23172063000000014
UdD3yCeEs4RQXemGB97yzVUTpNj2SLL2nE    90.23027884000000039
UebKusfEMQV2zMkXghVDUhsydeotdcoUwG    107.19990581000000027
UTWctXiCNcN4bd3p5tpUPtwz3s87Y6BaNa    107.03654302999999954

As you can see you have the lions share in there.  You'll get a nice chunk of that when it finally hits.

Some of the coins in the pool are going to take a day or more to hit- it could be weeks on some of the coins depending on how much hash the pool gets and how long they are the most profitable.   It's not going to be instant gratification.   I might have to add some logic to avoid selecting coins that will take longer than a day to hit a block at the current pool hashrate, even if they are more profitable at the time.  The only problem with that is that the shares already put into them will never be realized if the coin is not made available.

I ran on the X11 pool with nice hash, spending about .05BTC and got back .045 in UTC fairly quickly but still got more trickling back in, but the payouts aren't complete until all shares are hit.  I'm going to send .1BTC to WestHash and do my own test on the Scrypt pool.

Kracko

Could you check the Tumblingblock main page

"I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section."

I suspect that where you have - BTC/GH-Hour

It should be BTC/GH-24 Hour OR BTC/GH-Day (as NiceHash has)
https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp

It makes a huge difference.

Cheers

Incidentally - I put 2 GH of X11 (for 4 hrs) and 1 GH of Scrypt (for 6 hrs) on Tumbling block multi

Cost was 0.16 BTC

Return was about 550 UTC = 0.044 BTC (-72.5% - a loss of 72.5%)

I lost 0.116 BTC

so am I missing something basic? - "There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins".
I rented hash at less (to equal in a few short cases) than the target coins from your webpage (assuming its BTC/GH/Day).  There was some great switching going on - so tumblingblock was working well on that.  As such I would have expected a close to breakeven from my little experiment - but the mining achieved a 72% loss?  How might the huge difference from your main page rates and the actual real world results be explained?

Interesting experiment that I shall not repeat to confirm - suggest no one else try it.

But it was interesting to see the wheels spinning fast - and your pool seems solid to handle the load.
Hope it was some value for you in testing the pools out.

Ultracoin Multipool Update

I've added some new coins, and re-added others.

New

• 42 (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (sha256)
• Saffroncoin (scrypt)
• Saffroncoin (x11)

Re-added

• Fireflycoin (sha256)
• Crypt (x11)
• Darkcoin (x11)

And I am planning to add these soon:

Near future

• Digibyte(Sha256d)
• Digibyte(Scrypt)
• Earthcoin
• Franko

And we've reached 2BTC of buy/sells on the exchange since the multipool started.  Not bad for a beta-testing group.  Someone must have rented some hash because we had 5GH on the X11 pool there for awhile.  I converted the BTC earning rate to GH on the home page to align it to what is on NiceHash's order section.  There might be a few opportunities where the hash for rent is actually less than several target coins, and this would make it easier to compare.

I've pulled out Peercoin(PPC) - with only 1TH on it, it would have taken an average of 15 days to hit a block.  That's beyond the patience of most people.  I am considering pulling out Darkcoin and Uro because at the current difficulty and rate it will take an average of a day to hit each.  Although, when it does hit, it'll be a nice payout.  I'll re-add PPC if we get some more hash on the pool.

If I see other choice coins that are hitting the top of profit lists in sha256, scrypt or x11 I'll add them.  I'm taking requests too- at the moment it has to be Cryptsy.  For the next few weeks  I'm going to be focusing more on adding Bittrex support to open up even more doors.

Edit: I think I'll leave URO and DRK in.  We hit a URO block this morning and the payout was pretty nice.

[sammy007]

Anyone received UTC from mintpal scam?

[tuankiet716]

Wallet Mac does not sync every block, there must be an error 

[Official Ultracoin Team]

Dear community,

It's time for a little update from the front.

It goes very well with UTC and we are very happy to see that we are growing every day and getting stronger.
At this moment we are already three weeks in the top 10 cryptsy in volume which gives many opportunities for acceptance.

The next step is Chinese exchanges ( we have the volume ), so as a community promot also UTC in chinese exchanges because we can't do it alone.
At this moment we are very busy with some exchanges to get us accepted

We also want to know what do you think? which exchange will give us the next boost for further acceptance of UTC?

Regards,
UTC management team

[KingCole]

...

* We now have a European pool, Ultrablockparty.com, it is the only pool located in Amsterdam. This gives many users a much more efficient pool to mine on and also diversifies our pool's geographically.

Sincerely,

Steven "Rapture"
PR & Marketing Director
Steven@Ultracoin.net

I haven't been mining for a while due to drop in BTC and pools going offline. However, I reconfigured last night and pointed at Ultrablockparty.com using the config provided on the site for Yacminer. Must say it was all very easy.

My miners are feeling a bit lonely so if anyone else is in Europe please come and join the UTC party at utrablockparty.com

KC

[KingCole]

Dear community,

It's time for a little update from the front.

It goes very well with UTC and we are very happy to see that we are growing every day and getting stronger.
At this moment we are already three weeks in the top 10 cryptsy in volume which gives many opportunities for acceptance.

The next step is Chinese exchanges ( we have the volume ), so as a community promot also UTC in chinese exchanges because we can't do it alone.
At this moment we are very busy with some exchanges to get us accepted

We also want to know what do you think? which exchange will give us the next boost for further acceptance of UTC?

Regards,
UTC management team

All good news,

Lets not forget our friends at Crypto-Trade.com they are based in Hong-Kong which is often seen as the gateway to China with more tolerant rules. The upgraded site is looking pretty nice and they also offer fiat to UTC trading.

KC

[fabietech]

Dear community,

It's time for a little update from the front.

It goes very well with UTC and we are very happy to see that we are growing every day and getting stronger.
At this moment we are already three weeks in the top 10 cryptsy in volume which gives many opportunities for acceptance.

The next step is Chinese exchanges ( we have the volume ), so as a community promot also UTC in chinese exchanges because we can't do it alone.
At this moment we are very busy with some exchanges to get us accepted

We also want to know what do you think? which exchange will give us the next boost for further acceptance of UTC?

Regards,
UTC management team

All good news,

Lets not forget our friends at Crypto-Trade.com they are based in Hong-Kong which is often seen as the gateway to China with more tolerant rules. The upgraded site is looking pretty nice and they also offer fiat to UTC trading.

KC

Agree +1

[Uggle]

What are the estimated transport time of the ASICs when they are shipped? I don't mean to snoop around, I am interested in buying so thats why I am asking.  Is Zeus shipping from north america or from Asia?

[endcoin]

On bittrex UTC have 0.22 btc volume. So for what any new exchange if you have on bittrex shit vol?

[Kracko]

What are the estimated transport time of the ASICs when they are shipped? I don't mean to snoop around, I am interested in buying so thats why I am asking.   Is Zeus shipping from north america or from Asia?

On their web site they mention they ship within 3 days after payment for the non-preorder items- and it looks like just about all of those are out of stock.  They ship with UPS and DHL- I believe from China.

ZeusMiner said delivery is the end of Q4 for the Scrypt Volcano 300mh.   I haven't heard much in the way of news or updates, except for one disturbing newsletter (https://zeusminer.com/2014/10/15/progress-update-15102014/, towards the bottom) that mentioned that they might focus on ZuesHash and delay shipping; and then they posted on Facebook saying that they will meet the deadline.  At any rate, I plunked down $1700 on a Volcano.  I'm not advocating or suggesting that anyone should do the same.  It's a risky investment that I'm still not sure I'm going to ROI on.

[funsponge]

Dear community,

It's time for a little update from the front.

It goes very well with UTC and we are very happy to see that we are growing every day and getting stronger.
At this moment we are already three weeks in the top 10 cryptsy in volume which gives many opportunities for acceptance.

The next step is Chinese exchanges ( we have the volume ), so as a community promot also UTC in chinese exchanges because we can't do it alone.
At this moment we are very busy with some exchanges to get us accepted

We also want to know what do you think? which exchange will give us the next boost for further acceptance of UTC?

Regards,
UTC management team

BTER.com or btc38 are the main two with huge volumes. If one of these exchanges add UTC & it takes off we could be as strong as blackcoin & stellarcoin! Forget crypto-trade they have no volume & almost killed UTC in the early stages.