|
shimlbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:05:42 PM |
|
wts 2600coins pm me
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:19:41 PM Last edit: August 09, 2014, 04:52:38 PM by ocminer |
|
There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476. i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this: int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN; if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400) { nSubsidy = 0 * COIN; } to this: int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN; if(pindexBest->nHeight == 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight > 1 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } Which should fix the issue. Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it. EDIT: Works as expected https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.png
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
najzenmajsen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:25:06 PM |
|
There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476. i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this: int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN; if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400) { nSubsidy = 0 * COIN; } to this: if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } Which should fix the issue. Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it. EDIT: Works as expected https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.pngso , is it safe to mine now ?
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:29:18 PM |
|
There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476. i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this: int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN; if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400) { nSubsidy = 0 * COIN; } to this: if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } Which should fix the issue. Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it. EDIT: Works as expected https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.pngso , is it safe to mine now ? The issue is fixed, but the dev's have not commited the fix to their source now.. If you look at the Specs for the coin, it SHOULD be safe now, as I've simply corrected their error in the code but maybe they have something different on their mind.. I cannot say for 100% as I'm not the dev :-(
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
cryptoangel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:36:57 PM |
|
Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.
I am questioning the developer skills now.
|
|
|
|
najzenmajsen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:41:33 PM |
|
Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.
I am questioning the developer skills now.
this dev , seems strange the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but 1. the 0 reward as you mentioned 2. they didnt even register the IRC *-*
|
|
|
|
cryptoangel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:45:45 PM |
|
Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.
I am questioning the developer skills now.
this dev , seems strange the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but 1. the 0 reward as you mentioned 2. they didnt even register the IRC *-* Nice hashrate on Novapool ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif)
|
|
|
|
najzenmajsen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:46:45 PM |
|
Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.
I am questioning the developer skills now.
this dev , seems strange the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but 1. the 0 reward as you mentioned 2. they didnt even register the IRC *-* Nice hashrate on Novapool ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Thanks , im doing a gamble i guess ^^
|
|
|
|
martibg
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:49:21 PM |
|
HOW DO I SOLO MINE THIS ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif)
|
|
|
|
cryptoangel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:50:26 PM |
|
Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.
I am questioning the developer skills now.
this dev , seems strange the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but 1. the 0 reward as you mentioned 2. they didnt even register the IRC *-* Nice hashrate on Novapool ![Roll Eyes](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/rolleyes.gif) Thanks , im doing a gamble i guess ^^ Yeah 50/50 on this one, They can accept the changes + the mistake or change it completely. This is the best time to be in it with all the other pools mining 0 block rewards.
|
|
|
|
najzenmajsen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 03:54:51 PM |
|
dev should be online in 2-5 hours
|
|
|
|
najzenmajsen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:03:40 PM |
|
There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476. i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this: int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN; if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400) { nSubsidy = 0 * COIN; } to this: if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } Which should fix the issue. Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it. EDIT: Works as expected https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.pngso , is it safe to mine now ? The issue is fixed, but the dev's have not commited the fix to their source now.. If you look at the Specs for the coin, it SHOULD be safe now, as I've simply corrected their error in the code but maybe they have something different on their mind.. I cannot say for 100% as I'm not the dev :-( When it says FINDER : unknown what does it mean ? and why does it do that ? ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif)
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:17:35 PM |
|
There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476. i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this: int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN; if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400) { nSubsidy = 0 * COIN; } to this: if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } Which should fix the issue. Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it. EDIT: Works as expected https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.pngso , is it safe to mine now ? The issue is fixed, but the dev's have not commited the fix to their source now.. If you look at the Specs for the coin, it SHOULD be safe now, as I've simply corrected their error in the code but maybe they have something different on their mind.. I cannot say for 100% as I'm not the dev :-( When it says FINDER : unknown what does it mean ? and why does it do that ? ![Sad](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/sad.gif) Database has to catch up.. Give it a few mins
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
najzenmajsen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:31:33 PM |
|
Where is the other 4g's comming from , i thought supernova was on own fork ^_^
|
|
|
|
uray
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:40:12 PM |
|
confirmed working and synced on osx 10.9.4
|
|
|
|
uray
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:42:39 PM |
|
guys why suprnova is 20 blocks longer than current block on wallet ?
|
|
|
|
cryptoangel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:45:58 PM |
|
guys why suprnova is 20 blocks longer than current block on wallet ?
The source code has block rewards set at 0, OCminer (Suprnova) noticed this and changed it to the correct block reward. Look at the pools, only suprnova is mining correct block sizes but the other are mining blocks at zero 0 reward. I am not sure on the end outcome, just need to wait for the plebs.
|
|
|
|
uray
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:47:14 PM |
|
guys why suprnova is 20 blocks longer than current block on wallet ?
The source code has block rewards set at 0, OCminer (Suprnova) noticed this and changed it to the correct block reward. Look at the pools, only suprnova is mining correct block sizes but the other are mining blocks at zero 0 reward. I am not sure on the end outcome, just need to wait for the plebs. so the other pools are stupid? and we are on the wrong chain ?
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
August 09, 2014, 04:53:22 PM |
|
I made a small mistake with the code, the correct new code is: if(pindexBest->nHeight == 1) { nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN; } else if(pindexBest->nHeight > 1 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400) { nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN; } (Notice the == instead of <)
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
|