[ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New 1.2.3 Fork block 92000

[italianMiner72]

The Burst Team are putting together a new collaboration site where we can centralize access to Burst Tools, News, Blogs, Press Releases etc.

To access goto: http://burst-team.us

Currently all content is available as read-only to anonymous users. To comment you need to register for an account. To get authorship rights, drop me an email at: haitch@burst-team.us

We also have spare capacity on our servers to host additional VMs. If you're working on a Burst related project that you need a publicly available host to run it on, again drop me an email at: haitch@burst-team.us

H.

Thank you very much Haitch!



Also, wanted to let everyone know, I have made a blog post about the new GUI, and we've also updated it already to fix a few minor bugs, and solidify it!

http://burstcoin.info/blog/

good job crowetic!!!
i can see multilanguage too!!!

good!!!

[italianMiner72]

Is there any BURST exchange?

"ANY"?

polo, c-cex and bittrex !!!

have fun!!!

[equipoise]

Is there any BURST exchange?

"ANY"?

polo, c-cex and bittrex !!!

have fun!!!

Thank you. I wasn't around more then a month. When I searched in polo few hours ago I didn't found it with the filter. It's there now.

[Karl Perkin]

Hello,

Regarding the Twitter campaign showing BURST's undervaluation, the 10 first tweets have been posted along with some tweets explaining what I'm doing.

Please re-tweet if you have a Twitter account and spread the word. If few do it, I might start with some kind of award for re-tweets.

Tweets are found here (and starting with 0.):
https://twitter.com/karl_perkin

The first one is https://twitter.com/karl_perkin/status/635564915789578240

It is a little too much work to post all the direct links. I will continue tomorrow with new tweets.

Warm regards,
Karl

[crowetic]

updated PR doc so I can hopefully submit to coindesk, if anyone has anything to say, please comment...

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nwHUjHcNc4sdzLa5F1MIGGcKgUdf6ArfeInWOvnl5mE/edit?usp=sharing

Hey haven't visited burst in a while, reading through this, nice to see you still active in here crowetic

I'm not going anywhere bro, this coin and its mining style deserve more recognition, and I will work tirelessly until I successfully achieve it!

Nice to see you back here too!

[Razerglass]

updated PR doc so I can hopefully submit to coindesk, if anyone has anything to say, please comment...

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nwHUjHcNc4sdzLa5F1MIGGcKgUdf6ArfeInWOvnl5mE/edit?usp=sharing

Hey haven't visited burst in a while, reading through this, nice to see you still active in here crowetic

I'm not going anywhere bro, this coin and its mining style deserve more recognition, and I will work tirelessly until I successfully achieve it!

Nice to see you back here too!

Agreed, whats the tl;dr on the dev?

[laurelled]

So, you want more recognition for Burstcoin?

Let's recapitulate what I wrote 2 months ago.

• More miners? The rewards will distributed over more pockets, so that's a good thing for decentralization. However, it doesn't necessarily mean that more money flows into the coin. You need more investors for that, not more miners.
  
• More paid PR? We all know that PR is shallow buzz that may attract some initial attention from people who have never heard of you. But serious investors who do their due diligence, want the PR backed up by real, hard information. A thousand pages of forum posts, a few hundred tweets and a web site with tutorials are not hard information. A white paper explaining the underlying mechanisms of the coin is hard information.
  
• Two months ago, I wrote here that only a white paper can save this coin. I also wrote that there existed a few blog posts by mczarnek that could form a good foundation on which a white paper could be based: http://burstcoin.info/blog/ (2 blogposts by mczarnek, the rest is PR buzz).
  
• tl;dr: If this coin can't produce a decent white paper after one year, it's doomed.
  
• Oh, and don't blame it on the silence of the founder-developer.  The coin exists, the basic functionalities and a lot more exists, the technical platform is stable and mature. But an altcoin without a white paper will not be taken seriously.
  

[yeponlyone]

So, you want more recognition for Burstcoin?

Let's recapitulate what I wrote 2 months ago.

• More miners? The rewards will distributed over more pockets, so that's a good thing for decentralization. However, it doesn't necessarily mean that more money flows into the coin. You need more investors for that, not more miners.
  
• More paid PR? We all know that PR is shallow buzz that may attract some initial attention from people who have never heard of you. But serious investors who do their due diligence, want the PR backed up by real, hard information. A thousand pages of forum posts, a few hundred tweets and a web site with tutorials are not hard information. A white paper explaining the underlying mechanisms of the coin is hard information.
  
• Two months ago, I wrote here that only a white paper can save this coin. I also wrote that there existed a few blog posts by mczarnek that could form a good foundation on which a white paper could be based: http://burstcoin.info/blog/ (2 blogposts by mczarnek, the rest is PR buzz).
  
• tl;dr: If this coin can't produce a decent white paper after one year, it's doomed.
  
• Oh, and don't blame it on the silence of the founder-developer.  The coin exists, the basic functionalities and a lot more exists, the technical platform is stable and mature. But an altcoin without a white paper will not be taken seriously.
  

So, why do you care so much about BURST...?

[Shunak]

i have 4,5 Tb on a win pc, could i mine?

[okae]

i have 4,5 Tb on a win pc, could i mine?

of course that you can mine, just check the OP thread and you will notice how to do that.

Also the PR team release a new and usefull tool ALL in ONE from where you should be able to start to mine this coin in a few easy steps, you can check it here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=731923.msg12174611#msg12174611

Welcome to the BURST world

[Elmit]

So, why do you care so much about BURST...?

We all do, that's why we are here! 

[yeponlyone]

So, why do you care so much about BURST...?

We all do, that's why we are here! 

I'm just getting sick on all the lazy bastards, who 1) think they have all the solutions, 2) do not understand that their ideas are everything but novel, and 3) just expect that a handful of people are supposed to work night and day to make them money while they don't contribute themselves.

If just everyone contributed with something little at least, BURST would be totally different.

[lorylore]

i have 4,5 Tb on a win pc, could i mine?

of course that you can mine, just check the OP thread and you will notice how to do that.

Also the PR team release a new and usefull tool ALL in ONE from where you should be able to start to mine this coin in a few easy steps, you can check it here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=731923.msg12174611#msg12174611

Welcome to the BURST world

I watched the video, after ploting which use CPU and HDD write/read at the maximum speed. After this will it use only the cpu or only the hdd or both? I have 500gb free.

[crowetic]

i have 4,5 Tb on a win pc, could i mine?

of course that you can mine, just check the OP thread and you will notice how to do that.

Also the PR team release a new and usefull tool ALL in ONE from where you should be able to start to mine this coin in a few easy steps, you can check it here -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=731923.msg12174611#msg12174611

Welcome to the BURST world

I watched the video, after ploting which use CPU and HDD write/read at the maximum speed. After this will it use only the cpu or only the hdd or both? I have 500gb free.

it will use CPU and HDD slightly, for about 1 min or so per block. But that's it. it is about 25% less efficient than just leaving your computer on I mine on my main rig all day long and notice no decrease in performance or any issues whatsoever.

[Karl Perkin]

Hello,

15-20 tweets on BURST's undervaluation have now been posted, following the first batch. Twitter account:

https://twitter.com/karl_perkin/

First tweet of the new ones:
https://twitter.com/karl_perkin/status/636610597208068097

Please help to spread this by retweeting some or all of the numbered tweets (these are directed at BURST, while I tweet on other subjects too.

Thank you for doing promotional work! The next tweet will probably come tomorrow.

Warm regards,
Karl

[Irontiga]

I am quitting Burst until the dev returns, shows us a whitepaper, and proves that PoC is NOT flawed. Byte Ent continues, and I still support it fully. I am just not doing anything core related until I see some evidence for PoC being 100% secure.

[yeponlyone]

I am quitting Burst until the dev returns, shows us a whitepaper, and proves that PoC is NOT flawed. Byte Ent continues, and I still support it fully. I am just not doing anything core related until I see some evidence for PoC being 100% secure.

What do you mean not flawed and not secure? You can't leave your reasoning out of a statement like that.


Edit, someone just dumped 3-4mil on polo, down to 38sat.

[m3ta]

I am quitting Burst until the dev returns, shows us a whitepaper, and proves that PoC is NOT flawed. Byte Ent continues, and I still support it fully. I am just not doing anything core related until I see some evidence for PoC being 100% secure.

What do you mean not flawed and not secure? You can't leave your reasoning out of a statement like that.

You're wrong. It's the other way around:
If it can't be proven that it is not flawed and secure, there doesn't need to be a reasoning to argument that it might be flawed and insecure.

[yeponlyone]

I am quitting Burst until the dev returns, shows us a whitepaper, and proves that PoC is NOT flawed. Byte Ent continues, and I still support it fully. I am just not doing anything core related until I see some evidence for PoC being 100% secure.

What do you mean not flawed and not secure? You can't leave your reasoning out of a statement like that.

You're wrong. It's the other way around:
If it can't be proven that it is not flawed and secure, there doesn't need to be a reasoning to argument that it might be flawed and insecure.

Yes, of course. But to me it sounds like Irontiga as a dev sits on inside information. More correctly would be to ask if that is the case and if he can share the content of that information. However, I'm pretty sure Irontiga understood what I meant. The price is down -15%


By the way, you do know that it is "et cetera" and "etc.", and not what you state in your sig, right...?

[saamxx]

I am quitting Burst until the dev returns, shows us a whitepaper, and proves that PoC is NOT flawed. Byte Ent continues, and I still support it fully. I am just not doing anything core related until I see some evidence for PoC being 100% secure.