[ANN] [XMG] MAGI | CPU mining | mPoW | mPoS | [MagiPay]

[lionheart78]

....

ur proof?

Its better not responding to this kind of reaction.
It's unfortunate but in the crypto world  competitors go sometimes fight each other in another thread. It is not the first, and may also not be the last.
Sometimes people do not  take the time to read the originel thread. Quote # 1
This communitty is too strong for this. The unique Magicoin certainly.
 

i agree but im kinda qrious so i wanted him to spell out what he is saying so he will give time to read about this thread ^^, from someone stating __ is the next bitcoin  

XC is next bitcoin...it is lightyears ahead of any other coin with tech..and when I say this is shitcoin I really mean it. What would you called coin that 80% of people don't know how to mine it ? ...so it will be instamined to the balls by a few individuals.

go back on XC thread if you want to promote XC, we have nothing against that coin; and we dont like to have any misunderstanding with other coin as well pls don't step this low promoting a nice coin; and besides read the thread again, am sure ull realize ur assumption bout instamine is a mistake...

[Digithusiast]

A rich list (if possible at this time) would be a great tool for information how the XMG are currently being distributed among miners/wallets.
I am beginning to feel like I am mining XMG against better judgment, as mining for 14 hours with 2 machines only results in afew coins.
If some smart ass is collecting all the coins, that would more easily become visible with a rich list.

[dida]

....

ur proof?

Its better not responding to this kind of reaction.
It's unfortunate but in the crypto world  competitors go sometimes fight each other in another thread. It is not the first, and may also not be the last.
Sometimes people do not  take the time to read the originel thread. Quote # 1
This communitty is too strong for this. The unique Magicoin certainly.
 

i agree but im kinda qrious so i wanted him to spell out what he is saying so he will give time to read about this thread ^^, from someone stating __ is the next bitcoin  

XC is next bitcoin...it is lightyears ahead of any other coin with tech..and when I say this is shitcoin I really mean it. What would you called coin that 80% of people don't know how to mine it ? ...so it will be instamined to the balls by a few individuals.

go back on XC thread if you want to promote XC, we have nothing against that coin; and we dont like to have any misunderstanding with other coin as well pls don't step this low promoting a nice coin; and besides read the thread again, am sure ull realize ur assumption bout instamine is a mistake...

I don't promote anything...you are reading my posts and made stupid assumptions, so I am answering you.
No hard feelings buddy

[ocminer]

Can someone help me modding this CPU Miner:

https://github.com/magi-project/magi-cpuminer/

and incooperate the new algo from this:

https://github.com/magi-project/magi-minerd

?

I've got the stratum running but need a stratum miner

thx a lot

[lionheart78]

....

ur proof?

Its better not responding to this kind of reaction.
It's unfortunate but in the crypto world  competitors go sometimes fight each other in another thread. It is not the first, and may also not be the last.
Sometimes people do not  take the time to read the originel thread. Quote # 1
This communitty is too strong for this. The unique Magicoin certainly.
 

i agree but im kinda qrious so i wanted him to spell out what he is saying so he will give time to read about this thread ^^, from someone stating __ is the next bitcoin  

XC is next bitcoin...it is lightyears ahead of any other coin with tech..and when I say this is .... I really mean it. What would you called coin that 80% of people don't know how to mine it ? ...so it will be instamined to the balls by a few individuals.

go back on XC thread if you want to promote XC, we have nothing against that coin; and we dont like to have any misunderstanding with other coin as well pls don't step this low promoting a nice coin; and besides read the thread again, am sure ull realize ur assumption bout instamine is a mistake...

I don't promote anything...you are reading my posts and made stupid assumptions, so I am answering you.
No hard feelings buddy

lol read what you typed anyway; let's move on

[OrientA]

A rich list (if possible at this time) would be a great tool for information how the XMG are currently being distributed among miners/wallets.

That would require a blockchain explorer.

[restless]

The launch went well, but there are improvements on the way.
When you first start using something new, it's always a little harder.
Soon there will be more information about the goals that XMG wants to achieve.

Good launch? - algo changed only to make coin cpu-only, so botnet friendly.
No pools - again botnet friendly

I know few coins that started this way and usually some inside people were mining with pre-configured HW or botnets.
A month of testing and no pools at launch - that is suspicious.

[lionheart78]

Can someone help me modding this CPU Miner:

https://github.com/magi-project/magi-cpuminer/

and incooperate the new algo from this:

https://github.com/magi-project/magi-minerd

?

I've got the stratum running but need a stratum miner

thx a lot

will qoute this for the dev to take notice

A rich list (if possible at this time) would be a great tool for information how the XMG are currently being distributed among miners/wallets.

That would require a blockchain explorer.

i think dev will work on that soon

[lionheart78]

The launch went well, but there are improvements on the way.
When you first start using something new, it's always a little harder.
Soon there will be more information about the goals that XMG wants to achieve.

Good launch? - algo changed only to make coin cpu-only, so botnet friendly.
No pools - again botnet friendly

I know few coins that started this way and usually some inside people were mining with pre-configured HW or botnets.
A month of testing and no pools at launch - that is suspicious.

we all can be suspicious but as far as i knwn the dev he is pretty transparent over things ^^, ever since with the old magicoin

edit: hopefully problem with the pool will be fixed soon

[ocminer]

The launch went well, but there are improvements on the way.
When you first start using something new, it's always a little harder.
Soon there will be more information about the goals that XMG wants to achieve.

Good launch? - algo changed only to make coin cpu-only, so botnet friendly.
No pools - again botnet friendly

I know few coins that started this way and usually some inside people were mining with pre-configured HW or botnets.
A month of testing and no pools at launch - that is suspicious.

pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet

[lama82]

A rich list (if possible at this time) would be a great tool for information how the XMG are currently being distributed among miners/wallets.
I am beginning to feel like I am mining XMG against better judgment, as mining for 14 hours with 2 machines only results in afew coins.
If some smart ass is collecting all the coins, that would more easily become visible with a rich list.

+1 i like the idea

That's a good idea.
As the developer and the community have been transparent this fits in perfectly in.

[bbr]

The launch went well, but there are improvements on the way.
When you first start using something new, it's always a little harder.
Soon there will be more information about the goals that XMG wants to achieve.

Good launch? - algo changed only to make coin cpu-only, so botnet friendly.
No pools - again botnet friendly

I know few coins that started this way and usually some inside people were mining with pre-configured HW or botnets.
A month of testing and no pools at launch - that is suspicious.

pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet

Managed to get 1 accepted and 1 rejected on your pool!

 

[Bojcha]

Can someone explain me, what's the point?
I am mining with i7 since launch and no single block found.

[lama82]

Managed to get 1 accepted and 1 rejected on your pool!


----------------------------------------------------------

So the pool is working??

 
 

[ocminer]

The launch went well, but there are improvements on the way.
When you first start using something new, it's always a little harder.
Soon there will be more information about the goals that XMG wants to achieve.

Good launch? - algo changed only to make coin cpu-only, so botnet friendly.
No pools - again botnet friendly

I know few coins that started this way and usually some inside people were mining with pre-configured HW or botnets.
A month of testing and no pools at launch - that is suspicious.

pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet

Managed to get 1 accepted and 1 rejected on your pool!

 

lol.. with which miner ?

[MrUnzO]

64bit win minerd
https://mega.co.nz/#!4sExQTIb!2qnIHVaylsmUAsL7NDhvnSimgqSq-Xg0CVNQSpoBTQM
i7 and e3 work fine

e3 1230V3 use https://mega.co.nz/#!Mk1jHCaT!oSiR5sUXWv8i-OHS8PEeM3oMkcz-hfduaA1keLZNpjM

if your pc have 8threads,use 4 threads or open 2 bat use 4 threads

my i7 4930K can't run these minerds it open and close immediately ... any idea?

[bbr]

The launch went well, but there are improvements on the way.
When you first start using something new, it's always a little harder.
Soon there will be more information about the goals that XMG wants to achieve.

Good launch? - algo changed only to make coin cpu-only, so botnet friendly.
No pools - again botnet friendly

I know few coins that started this way and usually some inside people were mining with pre-configured HW or botnets.
A month of testing and no pools at launch - that is suspicious.

pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet

Managed to get 1 accepted and 1 rejected on your pool!

 

lol.. with which miner ?

With the standard miner released at launch. It seems that for nearly every accepted share the next is rejected with "share above target".

I'm using a stratum proxy but I don't think that it is designed for this algo. I believe this algo is similar to cryptonight? If so, the stratum protocol for that algo is different from normal. I found this statement:

The rpc2_* functions does not just use JSON-RPC 2.0 instead of 1.0, they also uses different method names with different parameters from the "real" stratum protocol.

For example, exchanges between the proxy and a "real" stratum pool (sha-256, scrypt, x11, x13...) are:

Proxy                             Pool
mining.subscribe ------->
                      <-------- mining.subscribe response
mining.authorize ------->
                      <-------- mining.authorize response
                      <-------- set_difficulty notification
                      <-------- mining.notify notification
mining.submit    -------->
                      <-------- mining.submit response
mining.submit    -------->
                      <-------- mining.submit response
                      <-------- mining.notify notification
mining.submit    -------->
                      <-------- mining.submit response
mining.submit    -------->
                      <-------- mining.submit response
                      <-------- set_difficulty notification
                      <-------- mining.notify notification


With a cryptonight pool, it should be like that (If you could provide me a protocol dump of a real mining session to confirm):

Proxy                             Pool
login                 ------->
                      <-------- login response
getjob              ------->
                      <-------- getjob response
submit              -------->
                      <-------- submit response
submit              -------->
                     <-------- submit response
getjob              ------->
                      <-------- getjob response
submit              -------->
                      <-------- submit response

You can see that methods are not the same (and parameters are not the same at all). Even the flow control is not the same at all, thus I cannot integrate this properly in the proxy.


Don't know if this is correct or not as i don't know anything about programming!

[sleepdog]

64bit win minerd
https://mega.co.nz/#!4sExQTIb!2qnIHVaylsmUAsL7NDhvnSimgqSq-Xg0CVNQSpoBTQM
i7 and e3 work fine

e3 1230V3 use https://mega.co.nz/#!Mk1jHCaT!oSiR5sUXWv8i-OHS8PEeM3oMkcz-hfduaA1keLZNpjM

if your pc have 8threads,use 4 threads or open 2 bat use 4 threads

my i7 4930K can't run these minerds it open and close immediately ... any idea?

Same here with E5620's.

[Nixss]

64bit win minerd
https://mega.co.nz/#!4sExQTIb!2qnIHVaylsmUAsL7NDhvnSimgqSq-Xg0CVNQSpoBTQM
i7 and e3 work fine

e3 1230V3 use https://mega.co.nz/#!Mk1jHCaT!oSiR5sUXWv8i-OHS8PEeM3oMkcz-hfduaA1keLZNpjM

if your pc have 8threads,use 4 threads or open 2 bat use 4 threads

my i7 4930K can't run these minerds it open and close immediately ... any idea?

What are your settings in the .bat file?

[Bojcha]

pool and stratum is ready - but no (stratum) miner yet

what's that pool?