Here is a record of my posts that were deleted.
You can decide for yourself whether deletion is warranted:
The XC dev's post, which you deleted, is a clarification, not an attack.
The XC dev clarified that trustless mixing, which is multisig, was implemented a while ago in XC - long before you came along.
In contrast you attacked him by saying he is "cheating his community" and that he is an "amateur".
That's why you're not letting the truth about him, hence the clarification.
Here it is again, to back up my case:
[/quote]
@synechist show me the diagram how it works other wise its just a crab like old schemes
By "crab" do you mean one of these?
@PowderMonkey i have not got any plan to attract xc community at all. they can enjoy their dev i have no words to say there, but whn the issue comes to decentralised trustless system with multisig we are the first one
and my name is not the matter here i will check again when your dan fix the whitepaper
fix the whitepaper?
just check the block chain
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htmSEE how he try to FUD this is the XC dev i told he is a crab, because he has something to hide he has to attack and make mammothcoin system bad looking. boy i like you really, you make my day.
Mammothcoin a transaction ON A BLOCKCHAIN is not FUD. It's recorded by third parties.
Come on. Who's gonna take you seriously now?
attack more so we can more understand true face of XC dev
I'm not the XC dev.
And I'm not attacking you.
Just requesting that you engage with
this instead of deleting posts.
Remember this is the Mammothcoin thread, not XC. An 'attack' on XC here isn't really an attack....However, if what Mammoth dev says is true, I can see why he would want to keep deleting distracting information off of here. Assume for a minute that he's right and XC is unreliable/trickery, just that its beyond most people's comprehension. IF thats true. He's acting in a way anyone would expect.
It is not "distracting" to discuss the veracity of the Mammoth dev's claims about XC. It is on-topic.
It is not FUD to dispute the veracity of his claims, it is important to Mammothcoin's reputability.
Lastly it is not an attack to post a record of a transaction on this thread.
Yet comments keep getting deleted...
Remember this is the Mammothcoin thread, not XC. An 'attack' on XC here isn't really an attack....However, if what Mammoth dev says is true, I can see why he would want to keep deleting distracting information off of here. Assume for a minute that he's right and XC is unreliable/trickery, just that its beyond most people's comprehension. IF thats true. He's acting in a way anyone would expect.
Dude, we don't have anything to hide. Hence why we aren't anonymous developers and posted an anon tx that you can compare yourself.
We aren't attacking anyone, just defending ourselves from claims that have no merit or reputation behind them.
http://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?229177.htm+1
Delete and bring disrepute upon yourself.
You're even deleting posts like this?
There's nothing wrong with that post. Come on!
@synechist if you want from me an answer you need to have respect my job, join my tests and make it public in your thread that our system really works
You only accept correspondence that is in your favour.
You censor everything else.
This makes you either a coward or a totalitarian.
Get lost.
I must agree. No sense deleting things here. The truth will out soon enough either way when phase 2 is out and everyone can go over it.
Hou many posts have the dev deleted?30?
Why do this?
That´s clear not a good signal for the community...nothing transparent, I will report this thread.
+1
You probably think XC uses the trusted mixer that it made open source a while ago.
XC is completely decentralised. There are no centralised nodes at all. Every single wallet processes transactions.
Mammothcoin, can you substantiate any of your claims about XC?
