Scientific proof that God exists?

[Vod]

Cause and effect is possibly the most basic reality science. You should study it a little, so that you can see that it is programming.

Science is king, yes.  It proves fairy tales do not exist.

Science proves God exists. God is greater than the king.   

Science is incompatible with your fairy tale.

[1714068963]

1714068963

[BADecker]

Cause and effect is possibly the most basic reality science. You should study it a little, so that you can see that it is programming.

Science is king, yes.  It proves fairy tales do not exist.

Science proves God exists. God is greater than the king.   

Science is incompatible with your fairy tale.

But science proves God exists.   

[Vod]

But science proves God exists.   

In your fairy tale, yes.  In reality, no.

[BADecker]

But science proves God exists.   

In your fairy tale, yes.  In reality, no.

In your science fiction no. In reality, yes.   

[Vod]

In your science fiction no. In reality, yes.   

Before you can talk of reality, you need to pull your head out of the sand.

[BADecker]

In your science fiction no. In reality, yes.    

Before you can talk of reality, you need to pull your head out of the sand.

Did that decades ago. Now you should do it so that you can realize that God exists, and be saved.

[Vod]

Did that decades ago. Now you should do it so that you can realize that God exists, and be saved.

If you pulled your head out of the sand, why don't you have a clear mind?

Your fairy tale cannot save anything.

[BADecker]

Did that decades ago. Now you should do it so that you can realize that God exists, and be saved.

If you pulled your head out of the sand, why don't you have a clear mind?

Your fairy tale cannot save anything.

God saves. Science merely proves that He exists. What's the matter? You don't seem to have anything that contradicts cause and effect, complexity, and entropy combined.These three couldn't exist together without God bringing them into being together.

[Vod]

God saves. Science merely proves that He exists. What's the matter? You don't seem to have anything that contradicts cause and effect, complexity, and entropy combined.These three couldn't exist together without God bringing them into being together.

Cool story.

This thread is about proof.  Have any?

[BADecker]

God saves. Science merely proves that He exists. What's the matter? You don't seem to have anything that contradicts cause and effect, complexity, and entropy combined.These three couldn't exist together without God bringing them into being together.

Cool story.

This thread is about proof.  Have any?

Showed it to you. Obviously you don't have to acknowledge anything. Your loss.

[Vod]

Showed it to you. Obviously you don't have to acknowledge anything. Your loss.

Do you have any proof your god exists?

[BADecker]

Showed it to you. Obviously you don't have to acknowledge anything. Your loss.

Do you have any proof your god exists?

You quoted the answer.   

[Vod]

You quoted the answer.   

I did?  For the first time ever in history , >>I<< provided proof your fairy tale is real?

Cool story.

[Astargath]

Like fuck it is..Evolution is a THEORY..and one of the most UNPROVEN easily Disproven EVER..
Evolution is a JOKE and crime against reason and science...A WEAPON of propaganda.

Cool story!

Do you have any evidence to prove to an open minded person it's a joke?

It's scientifically proven evolution is fact.

But, as I said before, even if evolution, big bang, hell even if all science is wrong it still doesn't prove their god is right or true.

But cause and effect almost proves the existence of God all by itself.

There may indeed always be a cause for anything and everything that has or ever will come into existence however we don't know that for sure, is just assumptions, the same assumptions you said were not valid for evolution. Our Universe could be one of many. There could be parallel universes or even a postulated Multiverse

[qwik2learn]

The main myth is to believe any one thing "too much", that means you should look at multiple sources. If you can claim that GOD wrote the Bible then I can claim that there is better evidence that GOD wrote the Phoenix Journals, as evidence for this I cite how the clarity and content of the two texts are starkly different, but you obviously have not made this type of reasoned comparison for yourself.

The skeptics at Quora.com seem to agree that the Christian god is impossible. They concluded this after examining the cause/effect argument set forth by BADecker.
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-deal-with-the-something-cannot-come-from-nothing-argument-that-theists-may-use-to-justify-existence-of-their-gods

[Vod]

The main myth is to believe any one thing "too much", that means you should look at multiple sources. If you can claim that GOD wrote the Bible then I can claim that there is better evidence that GOD wrote the Phoenix Journals, as evidence for this I cite how the clarity and content of the two texts are starkly different, but you obviously have not made this type of reasoned comparison for yourself.

The skeptics at Quora.com seem to agree that the Christian god is impossible. They concluded this after examining the cause/effect argument set forth by BADecker.
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-deal-with-the-something-cannot-come-from-nothing-argument-that-theists-may-use-to-justify-existence-of-their-gods

Common sense.

[Jolyquinzel]

bunkum
how it can be proved for sure?

[Przemax]

The main myth is to believe any one thing "too much", that means you should look at multiple sources. If you can claim that GOD wrote the Bible then I can claim that there is better evidence that GOD wrote the Phoenix Journals, as evidence for this I cite how the clarity and content of the two texts are starkly different, but you obviously have not made this type of reasoned comparison for yourself.

The skeptics at Quora.com seem to agree that the Christian god is impossible. They concluded this after examining the cause/effect argument set forth by BADecker.
https://www.quora.com/How-do-you-deal-with-the-something-cannot-come-from-nothing-argument-that-theists-may-use-to-justify-existence-of-their-gods

Im not sure if those "scientists" are serious. There is a saying that even Salomon could not fill something out of nothing. I guess "science" is so "advanced" it can.

And some proponent of this "science" says its common sense? Are you people mad? Or can you go even madder.

Its like extreme opposite to common sense. Are you all just pathological liars or what?

Let's quote those:

So nothing and everything are just two sides of the same coin.

eeeeee. WTF is this shit? Its pure insanity there. If I have everything I have nothing? Based on their absolutely crappy idea of dark matter that noone had ever seen and noone will? And its not even true because dark shit is 95% of the universe(as they say). So 5% minus 95% is clearly not 0=nothing.

If thats not crazy I do not know what is.....

[Vod]

Im not sure if those "scientists" are serious. There is saying that even Salomon could not fill something out of nothing. I guess "science" is so "advanced" it can.

Yes, the scientists are serious.  You can't understand what they say until you pull your head out of the sand.

[Przemax]

Im not sure if those "scientists" are serious. There is saying that even Salomon could not fill something out of nothing. I guess "science" is so "advanced" it can.

Yes, the scientists are serious.  You can't understand what they say until you pull your head out of the sand.

I guess you can "understand" them because you are as mad as they are.