Scientific proof that God exists?

[Astargath]

You are the retard who is using semantics to prove god's existence. As I previously said, your argument DOES NOT rule out the possibility of different gods or creators creating the universe, you keep claiming it's 1 god only but how do you know this?

Poor little fella. Having trouble, aren't you. Can't even remember what we are talking about, right? Okay. I'll say it again, just for you, because I feel sorry for you:

As I said, because of the complexity of the physics of the universe, even if there were multiple entities who together created the universe, they still would need to work as One, or the universe wouldn't work. The entities would not be the God of the universe. They might be gods or lords in the sense of having some strength or control, but they would not and could not be the God of the universe, simply because of the complexity we see in all things. God is One.

''As I said, because of the complexity of the physics of the universe, even if there were multiple entities who together created the universe, they still would need to work as One'' Working as one =/= being 1 entity. Constructors work as one, inventors can work as one, they are still different people, these bullshit semantics you are trying to use are worthless.

[1714035910]

1714035910

[1714035910]

1714035910

[BADecker]

You are the retard who is using semantics to prove god's existence. As I previously said, your argument DOES NOT rule out the possibility of different gods or creators creating the universe, you keep claiming it's 1 god only but how do you know this?

Poor little fella. Having trouble, aren't you. Can't even remember what we are talking about, right? Okay. I'll say it again, just for you, because I feel sorry for you:

As I said, because of the complexity of the physics of the universe, even if there were multiple entities who together created the universe, they still would need to work as One, or the universe wouldn't work. The entities would not be the God of the universe. They might be gods or lords in the sense of having some strength or control, but they would not and could not be the God of the universe, simply because of the complexity we see in all things. God is One.

''As I said, because of the complexity of the physics of the universe, even if there were multiple entities who together created the universe, they still would need to work as One'' Working as one =/= being 1 entity. Constructors work as one, inventors can work as one, they are still different people, these bullshit semantics you are trying to use are worthless.

I know you are having trouble. Let me show you from a different angle.

Look around the universe. What do we see? One universe. All the parts and physics work together as one. Do we see God? That is, do we see Him directly? Maybe, but not that we recognize. So, all we see is the oneness of the universe which shows that He exists.

Can we look outside the universe? Of course not. Why not? Because, if we thought we were looking outside the universe, what we saw would really be part of the universe. Something outside would not be recognizeable, because it would not be made up of anything that we were familiar with.

So, all we see is the oneness of the universe. What if God, in some super abstract way - an abstract of abstract - was neither one nor many nor an entity nor a super entity, but something else that possessed all these qualities, and yet none of them? The thing we see is one universe.

As far as we are concerned, God is one. And we can understand this from our standpoint of corporation, and of nothingness. All nothingness is one, even though it contains waves that are electromagnetic subatomic particles. Nothing is all connected. Yet, it is within the universe. And...

Our understanding of corporate oneness, though it is made up of many parts, is still one regarding the corporation.

Your lack of understanding of this is simply your desire for something else than what we see exists.

If God is other than One, we have no understanding of Him in any other way than One. Why don't we understand? He is outside the universe where we don't understand. For us  He is One, no matter what He is out there.

[shittypro]

Only you can answer that question if GOD exists maybe you don't have bible or spirit of a good person be good be nice and you will feel GOD . GOD will never show for the sin people.
But people believe is always feel the LOVE of GOD

[shittypro]

I don't think this topic is good to discuss here cos people are judge mental we receive a bad comment for this thread but we understand that each people got own opinion

[Stervyatnik]

People who want it to be true find evidence and give them out as facts, that's all!

[janecrypto03]

Why do you think there should be a scientific proof? God is already something that can't be explained. IMHO, everyone has his own explanations and "proofs".

[Astargath]

You are the retard who is using semantics to prove god's existence. As I previously said, your argument DOES NOT rule out the possibility of different gods or creators creating the universe, you keep claiming it's 1 god only but how do you know this?

Poor little fella. Having trouble, aren't you. Can't even remember what we are talking about, right? Okay. I'll say it again, just for you, because I feel sorry for you:

As I said, because of the complexity of the physics of the universe, even if there were multiple entities who together created the universe, they still would need to work as One, or the universe wouldn't work. The entities would not be the God of the universe. They might be gods or lords in the sense of having some strength or control, but they would not and could not be the God of the universe, simply because of the complexity we see in all things. God is One.

''As I said, because of the complexity of the physics of the universe, even if there were multiple entities who together created the universe, they still would need to work as One'' Working as one =/= being 1 entity. Constructors work as one, inventors can work as one, they are still different people, these bullshit semantics you are trying to use are worthless.

I know you are having trouble. Let me show you from a different angle.

Look around the universe. What do we see? One universe. All the parts and physics work together as one. Do we see God? That is, do we see Him directly? Maybe, but not that we recognize. So, all we see is the oneness of the universe which shows that He exists.

Can we look outside the universe? Of course not. Why not? Because, if we thought we were looking outside the universe, what we saw would really be part of the universe. Something outside would not be recognizeable, because it would not be made up of anything that we were familiar with.

So, all we see is the oneness of the universe. What if God, in some super abstract way - an abstract of abstract - was neither one nor many nor an entity nor a super entity, but something else that possessed all these qualities, and yet none of them? The thing we see is one universe.

As far as we are concerned, God is one. And we can understand this from our standpoint of corporation, and of nothingness. All nothingness is one, even though it contains waves that are electromagnetic subatomic particles. Nothing is all connected. Yet, it is within the universe. And...

Our understanding of corporate oneness, though it is made up of many parts, is still one regarding the corporation.

Your lack of understanding of this is simply your desire for something else than what we see exists.

If God is other than One, we have no understanding of Him in any other way than One. Why don't we understand? He is outside the universe where we don't understand. For us  He is One, no matter what He is out there.

Making more meaningless arguments eh? ''So, all we see is the oneness of the universe.'' What is this even supposed to mean?

You can't show in your argument that the universe has to be created by 1 single entity or god, period, you lost.

[BADecker]

Making more meaningless arguments eh? ''So, all we see is the oneness of the universe.'' What is this even supposed to mean?

You can't show in your argument that the universe has to be created by 1 single entity or god, period, you lost.

Poor, little fella. Too mentally weak to understand the scientific proof for God.

 

[Astargath]

Making more meaningless arguments eh? ''So, all we see is the oneness of the universe.'' What is this even supposed to mean?

You can't show in your argument that the universe has to be created by 1 single entity or god, period, you lost.

Poor, little fella. Too mentally weak to understand the scientific proof for God.

 

Still no argument, though. You got destroyed several times, you have to resort to using retarded language to try and make a point. Simply your argument does not show why the universe had to be created by 1 single entity and not a few and also why it has to be a god. If we don't know what's outside the universe then how can you say the universe was created by god ( and by god you mean Yahweh because you don't believe in Zeus) and not many gods or an alien race or simply, the big bang?

[BADecker]

Making more meaningless arguments eh? ''So, all we see is the oneness of the universe.'' What is this even supposed to mean?

You can't show in your argument that the universe has to be created by 1 single entity or god, period, you lost.

Poor, little fella. Too mentally weak to understand the scientific proof for God.

 

Still no argument, though. You got destroyed several times, you have to resort to using retarded language to try and make a point. Simply your argument does not show why the universe had to be created by 1 single entity and not a few and also why it has to be a god. If we don't know what's outside the universe then how can you say the universe was created by god ( and by god you mean Yahweh because you don't believe in Zeus) and not many gods or an alien race or simply, the big bang?

Simply because one is all we can see from within the universe. Prove it was more than one by going out there and coming back with the proof.

[Astargath]

Making more meaningless arguments eh? ''So, all we see is the oneness of the universe.'' What is this even supposed to mean?

You can't show in your argument that the universe has to be created by 1 single entity or god, period, you lost.

Poor, little fella. Too mentally weak to understand the scientific proof for God.

 

Still no argument, though. You got destroyed several times, you have to resort to using retarded language to try and make a point. Simply your argument does not show why the universe had to be created by 1 single entity and not a few and also why it has to be a god. If we don't know what's outside the universe then how can you say the universe was created by god ( and by god you mean Yahweh because you don't believe in Zeus) and not many gods or an alien race or simply, the big bang?

Simply because one is all we can see from within the universe. Prove it was more than one by going out there and coming back with the proof.

Prove it's one by going there and coming back with the proof you fool. ''one is all we can see from within the universe.'' I see multiple planets and particles and everything is multiple, what do you mean one is all we can see lmao, you are going insane.

[BADecker]

Prove it's one by going there and coming back with the proof you fool. ''one is all we can see from within the universe.'' I see multiple planets and particles and everything is multiple, what do you mean one is all we can see lmao, you are going insane.

Good job! You see parts of the one universe that we know about.

The complexity of the one universe we know about, is the proof that, for us, God is One. Even if His nature is something totally different regarding existing where He is, He is One for us, because we can't see Him where He is.

But more than likely, He is One like the God Particle.

[Rowenza]

The universe and the human being and all thw living creatures.

[Astargath]

Prove it's one by going there and coming back with the proof you fool. ''one is all we can see from within the universe.'' I see multiple planets and particles and everything is multiple, what do you mean one is all we can see lmao, you are going insane.

Good job! You see parts of the one universe that we know about.

The complexity of the one universe we know about, is the proof that, for us, God is One. Even if His nature is something totally different regarding existing where He is, He is One for us, because we can't see Him where He is.

But more than likely, He is One like the God Particle.

If you are just going to make insane and logic-less arguments like ''He is One for us, because we can't see Him where He is.'' which literally means nothing, I might as well make them too. The universe as we know is made out of multiple things therefore we know whatever created had to be many things too, they are many for us because we can't see them.

[Belmyl]

This discussion keeps rolling but there is actually no proof, the only person you can prove that god exists is yourself. That is the answer.

[BADecker]

How well does any average person understand E=mc²? Who understands the math of Big Bang Theory? Many scientific theories, including the two listed, are gobbledygook to average people. But people can see intelligent design in everything - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsHkfWr5TEo - even if they don't want to recognize the Designer.

To suggest that God doesn't have scientific proof, is to suggest that one had found out just about everything about everything.

[JoBoo]

What do you mean 101 proofs of God?

Only 1 definitive proof of the existence of God would be necessary and this will never happen.

You can not prove non existence of something that doesn't exist.

Read some Richard Dawkins books and try prove to me that there isn't a spaghetti monster somewhere far out in deep space which of course is my God.

[PSYCHE0317]

Science can never prove or disprove the existence of God, but if we use our beliefs as an excuse to draw conclusions that scientifically, we’re not ready for, we run the grave risk of depriving ourselves of what we might have come to truly learn.

[Susucu]

He still believed in a god, just not a personified textbook man in the sky.

[sirazimuth]

How well does any average person understand E=mc²? Who understands the math of Big Bang Theory? Many scientific theories, including the two listed, are gobbledygook to average people. But people can see intelligent design in everything - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsHkfWr5TEo - even if they don't want to recognize the Designer.

To suggest that God doesn't have scientific proof, is to suggest that one had found out just about everything about everything.

oh jeezus ...seriously dude?
intelligent design?
a youtube link to some clown interview... very convincing ...  SMFH
... "it's not so much about hunches... its about growing up, running around in the woods...blah blah miraculous blah blah"..  oh ffs ...I had to shut off the nonsense after that.

hey your fellow nutter notbatshitcrazyman posts youtube links on a 500+ page btctalk  thread too..so they must be true.
(Yeah ok, so you're not quite at 500 pages ....I rounded up)