Bitcoin Forum
March 06, 2021, 05:37:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.21.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 514 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Scientific proof that God exists?  (Read 840522 times)
ytlover
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 03:29:35 AM
 #1701

No one can prove or not. Life is faith
1615009060
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1615009060

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1615009060
Reply with quote  #2

1615009060
Report to moderator
1615009060
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1615009060

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1615009060
Reply with quote  #2

1615009060
Report to moderator
1615009060
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1615009060

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1615009060
Reply with quote  #2

1615009060
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
username18333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Knowledge could but approximate existence.


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2014, 03:34:07 AM
 #1702

No one can prove or not. Life is faith
As "they" say, "Cool story, bro."

Since it could not, prior limakasidian entropism, be conclusively demonstrated that anything existed beyond one's own mind, scientific evidence was accepted by faith and, therefore, was not proof.

However, as revealed below, one may now proceed beyond solipsism unto a belief in a literal everything without yielding unto faith.


These are interesting perspectives; however, it would seem His entropism has not been heard.

Entropism, dervied from solipsism, starts at the belief that nothing exists beyond one's own mind. From their, it then proceeds to assert that the sentience of that mind deomonstrates the existence of that required for it - some tendancy or tendancy to become less orderly, the consciousness occupied another state. From there, it is then postulated that this/these tendencies, begetting entropy, could, in having propagated a state of a mind out of nothing, are sufficient for some form of ex nihilo generation.

From this, entropism proceeds unto an absolute tendancy to become less orderly. In considering this, and the capabilities of those tendancies previously mentioned, it is determined that absolute entropy of this tendancy would prove sufficient for ex nihilo generation of everything, including its own self.

From that, it is determined, within entropism, that, by an absolute tendancy to become less orderly, the sum of existence is absolute entropy.

Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
Und3rd0g
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 231
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 03:36:37 AM
 #1703

No one can prove this thread valid or not.  Relax folks.  Ether way, it's all good. 
username18333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Knowledge could but approximate existence.


View Profile WWW
October 13, 2014, 03:38:15 AM
 #1704

No one can prove this thread valid or not.  Relax folks.  Ether way, it's all good.  
As "they" say, "Cool story, bro."

Since it could not, prior limakasidian entropism, be conclusively demonstrated that anything existed beyond one's own mind, scientific evidence was accepted by faith and, therefore, was not proof.

However, as revealed below, one may now proceed beyond solipsism unto a belief in a literal everything without yielding unto faith.


These are interesting perspectives; however, it would seem His entropism has not been heard.

Entropism, dervied from solipsism, starts at the belief that nothing exists beyond one's own mind. From their, it then proceeds to assert that the sentience of that mind deomonstrates the existence of that required for it - some tendancy or tendancy to become less orderly, the consciousness occupied another state. From there, it is then postulated that this/these tendencies, begetting entropy, could, in having propagated a state of a mind out of nothing, are sufficient for some form of ex nihilo generation.

From this, entropism proceeds unto an absolute tendancy to become less orderly. In considering this, and the capabilities of those tendancies previously mentioned, it is determined that absolute entropy of this tendancy would prove sufficient for ex nihilo generation of everything, including its own self.

From that, it is determined, within entropism, that, by an absolute tendancy to become less orderly, the sum of existence is absolute entropy.

Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 2909


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 08:38:56 AM
 #1705

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
    If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
. Σ A Ω A .
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬




▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
.The Unofficial Bitcointalk Discord Server.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬




▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
.NastyScams - Crypto Contradictions.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Bitcoin Magazine
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 02:29:52 PM
 #1706

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


naturally someone you want to have sex with is someone you love right?

so why would you want to separate the 2 by putting one in jail and making them marry someone else when they're released in 34 years

wounds can heal.  but effectively separating them so you can't resolve the problem just makes it worse

i am here.
BitChick
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 03:22:04 PM
 #1707

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


naturally someone you want to have sex with is someone you love right?

so why would you want to separate the 2 by putting one in jail and making them marry someone else when they're released in 34 years

wounds can heal.  but effectively separating them so you can't resolve the problem just makes it worse

I just want to add that much of the Old Testament is a historical book/documents.  Much of what happens in the books is not what God desires but it is an account of the culture and the choices that were made during that time.  It was never God's intentions for people to rape, or have multiple wives and so on.  The laws for rape at this time were made for the protection of women.  Women were treated as property, much like some societies even today where dowries are paid.  If a women was raped she would be perceived as not desirable to marry her so it was better for the women to be married if raped, as weird as it seems to us in our society.  Not ideal of course, but that is the way it was.

1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
Bitcoin Magazine
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 04:22:46 PM
 #1708

i guess fucking is important, but God is more important

i am here.
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1250


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 06:24:03 PM
 #1709

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


The idea is protection of the child and the parents at the same time. Some other opetions:
1. You could execute all three;
2. You could execute the mother and fetus and punish the guy;
3. You could let the state or the parents raise the child, and execute the guy.

There isn't any happy solution. The idea is that the kid gets as normal of a life as possible. That's with two parents. Besides, these things were somewhat the way things were done in those days, all over the place, not simply at God's command.

However, these days, when Stockholm Syndrome sets in, some rape victims marry their attacker voluntarily.

Vod, you're kinda talking nonsense.

Smiley

BUDESONIDE essentially cures Covid in one day to one week >>> https://budesonideworks.com/.
Hydroxychloroquine is being used against Covid with great success >>> https://altcensored.com/watch?v=otRN0X6F81c.
Masks are stupid. Watch the first 5 minutes >>> https://www.bitchute.com/video/rlWESmrijl8Q/.
Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin. Thank you. >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz
BADecker
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1250


View Profile
October 13, 2014, 06:26:59 PM
 #1710

people are full of flaws).
So are the God(s) described on known religions, making them nothing but human imagination.
Of course, maybe none of the God(s) are flawed, and the only flaws lie in the people who think They are flawed.

 Cheesy
So you're saying that there are flaws in people like Hawking, in comparison to the average believer?  Roll Eyes

Everyone is a little bit flawed, at least. No disrespect meant but, most average believers can walk. That wasn't the point, however.

Smiley

BUDESONIDE essentially cures Covid in one day to one week >>> https://budesonideworks.com/.
Hydroxychloroquine is being used against Covid with great success >>> https://altcensored.com/watch?v=otRN0X6F81c.
Masks are stupid. Watch the first 5 minutes >>> https://www.bitchute.com/video/rlWESmrijl8Q/.
Don't be afraid to donate Bitcoin. Thank you. >>> 1JDJotyxZLFF8akGCxHeqMkD4YrrTmEAwz
username18333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Knowledge could but approximate existence.


View Profile WWW
October 14, 2014, 12:42:00 AM
 #1711

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


The idea is protection of the child and the parents at the same time. Some other opetions:
1. You could execute all three;
2. You could execute the mother and fetus and punish the guy;
3. You could let the state or the parents raise the child, and execute the guy.

There isn't any happy solution. The idea is that the kid gets as normal of a life as possible. That's with two parents. Besides, these things were somewhat the way things were done in those days, all over the place, not simply at God's command.

However, these days, when Stockholm Syndrome sets in, some rape victims marry their attacker voluntarily.

Vod, you're kinda talking nonsense.

Smiley
4. "God" could also have felled the fellow upon his resolution to transgress Their will. Shocked

Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
the joint
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1820
Merit: 1010



View Profile
October 14, 2014, 12:49:58 AM
Merited by Foxpup (3)
 #1712

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


The idea is protection of the child and the parents at the same time. Some other opetions:
1. You could execute all three;
2. You could execute the mother and fetus and punish the guy;
3. You could let the state or the parents raise the child, and execute the guy.

There isn't any happy solution. The idea is that the kid gets as normal of a life as possible. That's with two parents. Besides, these things were somewhat the way things were done in those days, all over the place, not simply at God's command.

However, these days, when Stockholm Syndrome sets in, some rape victims marry their attacker voluntarily.

Vod, you're kinda talking nonsense.

Smiley

I'm sorry, I must not be reading clearly.  I could have sworn that you imagined three alternative means of justice that all involved execution, and also that you believe a silver payment and forced, terminal marriage to her sexual abuser is a good way to protect a rape victim.

Surely you must have meant something else, right?
nsimmons
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 12:51:27 AM
 #1713

(Deuteronomy 22:28-29 NLT)
 
Quote
   If a man is caught in the act of raping a young woman who is not engaged, he must pay fifty pieces of silver to her father.  Then he must marry the young woman because he violated her, and he will never be allowed to divorce her.

What kind of lunatic would make a rape victim marry her attacker?  Answer: God.


The idea is protection of the child and the parents at the same time. Some other opetions:
1. You could execute all three;
2. You could execute the mother and fetus and punish the guy;
3. You could let the state or the parents raise the child, and execute the guy.



How about not executing anyone? How about executing religious fanatics?

Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 2909


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 01:25:12 AM
 #1714

It's fairly clear I'm not talking nonsense.  It's written in the bible.

 Roll Eyes

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
. Σ A Ω A .
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬




▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
.The Unofficial Bitcointalk Discord Server.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬




▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
.NastyScams - Crypto Contradictions.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
My Name Was Taken
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 01:30:56 AM
 #1715


How about not executing anyone? How about executing religious fanatics?

These two statements are not consistent. How about we stick with just not executing anyone?
username18333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Knowledge could but approximate existence.


View Profile WWW
October 14, 2014, 01:35:49 AM
 #1716


How about not executing anyone? How about executing religious fanatics?

These two statements are not consistent. How about we stick with just not executing anyone?
If you leave executors alive, they may execute. Should you spare all but those others that do not so spare, all (and, then, yourself) shall spare.

(That dilemma is comparable to that between pure and authoritarian anarchism.)

Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
My Name Was Taken
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 01:57:21 AM
 #1717


How about not executing anyone? How about executing religious fanatics?

These two statements are not consistent. How about we stick with just not executing anyone?
If you leave executors alive, they may execute. Should you spare all but those others that do not so spare, all (and, then, yourself) shall spare.

(That dilemma is comparable to that between pure and authoritarian anarchism.)

I emphasized the key word in your statement. You don't punish someone based on what they might do. Preemptive punishment is not legitimate.
Vod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3402
Merit: 2909


Licking my boob since 1970


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 02:10:10 AM
 #1718

Why are you guys arguing this?  It is the word of God - it cannot be questioned or used out of context!!


▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
. Σ A Ω A .
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬




▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
.The Unofficial Bitcointalk Discord Server.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬




▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
.NastyScams - Crypto Contradictions.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
username18333
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


Knowledge could but approximate existence.


View Profile WWW
October 14, 2014, 02:10:27 AM
Last edit: October 14, 2014, 02:20:39 AM by username18333
 #1719


How about not executing anyone? How about executing religious fanatics?

These two statements are not consistent. How about we stick with just not executing anyone?
If you leave executors alive, they may execute. Should you spare all but those others that do not so spare, all (and, then, yourself) shall spare.

(That dilemma is comparable to that between pure and authoritarian anarchism.)

I emphasized the key word in your statement. You don't punish someone based on what they might do. Preemptive punishment is not legitimate.
(I emphasized an actual operative word, "executors.")

They are made to depart for their dispositions—nothing more, nothing less.

Escape the plutocrats’ zanpakutō, Flower in the Mirror, Moon on the Water: brave “the ascent which is rough and steep” (Plato).
My Name Was Taken
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
October 14, 2014, 04:28:46 AM
 #1720


How about not executing anyone? How about executing religious fanatics?

These two statements are not consistent. How about we stick with just not executing anyone?
If you leave executors alive, they may execute. Should you spare all but those others that do not so spare, all (and, then, yourself) shall spare.

(That dilemma is comparable to that between pure and authoritarian anarchism.)

I emphasized the key word in your statement. You don't punish someone based on what they might do. Preemptive punishment is not legitimate.
(I emphasized an actual operative word, "executors.")

They are made to depart for their dispositions—nothing more, nothing less.

Or you could imprison them, that would stop them from killing again. I'd rather leave all the primitive ideas on 'justice killing' in the eras that made the world such a terrible place to live.
Pages: « 1 ... 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 [86] 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 ... 514 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!