|
sdersdf2
|
 |
August 21, 2014, 03:43:32 AM |
|
POD means nothing Boomcoin dev is tied to Carsen Klock and i'm quite sure he just got a 5 star rating, those types of ratings mean nothing. Welcome to crypto where you need to dyor on everything and try to draw a conclusion, and you will be wrong more than right.
Looking at the list http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2014, 03:46:59 AM |
|
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output. As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids. Regards, syntaks |
|
|
|
|
Altcoin4life
|
|
August 21, 2014, 03:50:10 AM |
|
POD means nothing Boomcoin dev is tied to Carsen Klock and i'm quite sure he just got a 5 star rating, those types of ratings mean nothing. Welcome to crypto where you need to dyor on everything and try to draw a conclusion, and you will be wrong more than right.
Looking at the list http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD. You do realize cryptoasian is just some guy off twitter that happens to mine a lot of coins and has been around awhile right? It's not like we are dealing with the judge of cryptoland, hes just some random dude, I could do the same thing... |
|
|
|
|
socket
|
|
August 21, 2014, 03:51:14 AM |
|
Looking at the list http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD. POD isn't magic pixie dust. In theory it could be manipulated to some degree. There is no guarantee there isn't another person(s) hiding behind a real life sock puppet dev(s). That could be on their N'th shitcoin. It's nice to see someone trying to do some verification. But, at some point bad eggs will make it through the process. |
|
|
|
|
|
socket
|
|
August 21, 2014, 03:59:20 AM |
|
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output. As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids. Regards, syntaks I think that would help. Also, if you want to get fancy, I would consider further obfuscation. Like random amounts of uneven divisions sent at slightly differing times from different exit nodes if possible. |
|
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:04:23 AM |
|
Looking at the list http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD. POD isn't magic pixie dust. In theory it could be manipulated to some degree. There is no guarantee there isn't another person(s) hiding behind a real life sock puppet dev(s). That could be on their N'th shitcoin. It's nice to see someone trying to do some verification. But, at some point bad eggs will make it through the process. He's exactly right and CryptoAsian actually acknowledged that today when we had a video call. I had told him when I first was prompted to do this, I thought "Who deemed him the source?". However the same goes with that as with anything - once you have a known trusted party you can refer to them for validation. Regards, syntaks |
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:05:13 AM |
|
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output. As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids. Regards, syntaks I think that would help. Also, if you want to get fancy, I would consider further obfuscation. Like random amounts of uneven divisions sent at slightly differing times from different exit nodes if possible. That's exactly what came to mind when I was reading. It's literally now in my to-do. Thanks for the input Regards, syntaks |
|
|
|
|
ereborltc
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:08:35 AM |
|
Looking at the list http://cryptoasian.com/coin-list/POD has generally helped the coins that seem to have the most to offer. In other words, it seems to do the most good for the coins that seem to bring the most to the table from the start, before the POD. POD isn't magic pixie dust. In theory it could be manipulated to some degree. There is no guarantee there isn't another person(s) hiding behind a real life sock puppet dev(s). That could be on their N'th shitcoin. It's nice to see someone trying to do some verification. But, at some point bad eggs will make it through the process. He's exactly right and CryptoAsian actually acknowledged that today when we had a video call. I had told him when I first was prompted to do this, I thought "Who deemed him the source?". However the same goes with that as with anything - once you have a known trusted party you can refer to them for validation. Regards, syntaks yeap cryptoasian is a good guy who does intensive research... if you don't follow him on twitter ..do so  Turtle your just the man ! lol A+ |
|
|
|
|
ereborltc
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:09:59 AM |
|
Yessir that's correct.
Are any steps taken to help obfuscate the final TX? Example: Bob sends Alice 166.32 NEOS via Arbitrush. Given timing and the unique amount sent. It would be trivial to discover Bob was the origin of the transaction if Alice receives 166.32 NEOS in a single output. As of right now the only obfuscation would be the timestamp as it purposely doesn't send it right away through to prevent matching up a certain send time/amount with another masked tx's. With PoT enabled it returns the one tx, but what I can do is modify it so that the amount sent is split up into fragments and just return an array of txids. Regards, syntaks I think that would help. Also, if you want to get fancy, I would consider further obfuscation. Like random amounts of uneven divisions sent at slightly differing times from different exit nodes if possible. That's exactly what came to mind when I was reading. It's literally now in my to-do. Thanks for the input Regards, syntaks everyone should hashtag #2turtles !! this wallets gonna make you famous!! |
|
|
|
|
EdvinZ
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:12:18 AM |
|
Keep your coins, do not sell cheap or you Balls weigh nothing?  |
|
|
|
|
InitialDat
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:20:09 AM |
|
Any plans doing a mobile wallet in the future?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gpools
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:21:11 AM |
|
other coin ICO fail?  |
|
|
|
|
twoturtles (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:27:12 AM |
|
Any plans doing a mobile wallet in the future?
Absolutely would be something great. |
|
|
|
|
ereborltc
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:35:08 AM |
|
Any plans doing a mobile wallet in the future?
Absolutely would be something great. ya that would be great |
|
|
|
|
ereborltc
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:37:00 AM |
|
also people if u want to create demand you have to lower the supply! TAKE DOWN YOUR SELL ORDERS!! keep the sell side very thin...
|
|
|
|
|
InitialDat
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:38:41 AM |
|
also people if u want to create demand you have to lower the supply! TAKE DOWN YOUR SELL ORDERS!! keep the sell side very thin...
Kind of hard when some people don't even read the thread  The price will reflect the product. No need to rush it. |
|
|
|
|
|
AbiusGMIU
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:39:18 AM |
|
Can't beat buying in below IPO  |
|
|
|
|
|
ereborltc
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:58:35 AM |
|
also people if u want to create demand you have to lower the supply! TAKE DOWN YOUR SELL ORDERS!! keep the sell side very thin...
Kind of hard when some people don't even read the thread The price will reflect the product. No need to rush it. your right |
|
|
|
|
ereborltc
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:58:48 AM |
|
Can't beat buying in below IPO and your right lol |
|
|
|
|
Cesare1985
|
|
August 21, 2014, 04:59:40 AM |
|
100K soon! Hold this coin, I think it will be great in a few time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
